FBI Agent: I’m Getting Out My Guns If Clinton Doesn’t Win the Election

Loading

No bias in the FBI:



The OIG report also flags messages exchanged between two agents referred to as “Agent 1” and “Agent 5.” Both worked on the Clinton investigation but not on the Trump-Russia probe.
Agent 1 was one of the agents who, along with Strzok, interviewed Hillary Clinton in July 2016.

“I’m done interviewing the President,” the agent wrote, referring jokingly to then-candidate Clinton.

The agents also suggested in text messages on Election Day that there would be riots if Trump defeated Clinton.

“You think HRC is gonna win right? You think we should get nails and some boards in case she doesnt,” Agent 1 wrote.

“She better win… otherwise i’m gonna be walking around with both of my guns,” Agent 5 responded.

It gets better:

“aint noone gonna do shit” against President Clinton.

https://twitter.com/erichartmane/status/1007324211763965952

These agents were assigned to the Clinton email investigation.

But again…not bias.

0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
8 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

They were obviously delusional possibly Ambien victims, maybe CIA mind control experiments. Does sound like an attempt of humor with the election day texts, the convo about the witness lying well they knew she was given a skate.

“She better win… otherwise i’m gonna be walking around with both of my guns,” Agent 5 responded.

LOOK! I identified Agent 5!

From IG report: Agent discusses interview with a witness who assisted the Clintons at their Chappaqua residence:

Combetta?

If you read the brief the IG was under, then his entire report, you learn that the IG had NO AUTHORITY to follow-up once he got an official response from an agent.
So, if the agent claimed it was “X,” or “Y,” or “Z,” Not Bias, that led him to (whatever) action, the IG was obligated to report that, not to cross examine or give the agent the 2nd degree.
This is why many had been calling for a new “Special Prosecutor,” instead of relying on an IG.
There are things a SP can do in follow-up that an IG is prohibited from doing.
(Someone needs to do a mash-up of Dems who once LOVED James Comey -the days after he was fired – but now want him to be as far as the blame goes.)

@Nanny G: The IGs recommendations are much of nothing, hey kids follow the rules already established.
The destruction of evidence should be enough for an obstruction of justice charge, add destruction of public property, destruction of public records 18 U.S.C. § 2071. Section 2071(a)

We saw the behavior of Sore Losers in Nov 2016 at stink holes like U.C. Berkeley and the ANTIFA scum suckers bottom dwellers and the Democ-Rats and the Hollywood idiots especialy talking sewers like Robert DeNiro

Invasion of the body snachers? On the outside, they look and sound like normal Americans. On the inside, they are hostile alien agents (known as “Lefties”) who want to transform the country into an environment where only their species can survive the political atmosphere. Be afraid. Be very afraid.

@kitt: It’s a start. Only a start.