Those times obama obstructed justice and shared classified information with Russia

Loading

 

democrats have clutched a new straw in their mission to take down Donald Trump. It has been reported that Trump tried to persuade James Comey to end the investigation into Michael Flynn.

The White House grappled late Tuesday with the political ghost of James Comey, as an explosive new report said a memo written by the ousted FBI chief claimed President Trump once asked him to end the probe into former national security adviser Michael Flynn.

The White House sharply disputed the report, as Democrats seized on it as potential proof of “obstruction” of justice.

According to The New York Times the memo quoted Trump as saying he hoped Comey could “let this go” with regard to Flynn.

The Times said Comey wrote the memo shortly after an Oval Office meeting on Feb. 14, the day after Flynn resigned from the Trump administration. The paper acknowledged it had not seen a copy of the memo, but said a Comey associate read parts of it to a reporter over the phone.

The memo was presented as the clearest evidence yet that Trump tried to influence the Justice Department and FBI probe into Russian meddling in the 2016 campaign and alleged links to Trump’s associates.

The White House disputes it.

democrats are now more freely using the word “impeachment.” 

It might be a little early for that, especially based on precedent. barack obama has more than a little experience with obstruction of justice and sharing classified information.

obama himself handed out classified intelligence to Russia. Juan Zarate  on Friday’s Today show:

Back in the summer of 2016, the Obama administration provided some information to the Russians about some of the things happening on the ground. Guess what happened? The Russians then attacked some of those sites of our allies, our proxies that we were working with. And that’s a problem.

Jeffrey Lord on CNN:

The only thing I would say here, Chris is perspective. Perspective is all. I’m holding two headlines from the Washington Post, one of May 25th, 2014, “White House mistakenly identifies CIA chief in Afghanistan.” The Obama administration put the name of the CIA on the press release, exposed him and endangered his life. The second one, June 30, 2016, “U.S. Offers to share Syrian intelligence on terrorist with Russia,” which is to say the Obama administration wanted to give their intelligence to the Russians. All I’m saying here is there’s perspective. We need to find out the facts and let’s have perspective.

Why, here’s the article:

The Obama administration has offered to help Russia improve its targeting of terrorist groups in Syria if Moscow will stop bombing civilians and opposition fighters who have signed on to a cease-fire and use its influence to force Syrian President Bashar al-Assad to do the same.

The offer early this week of what one administration official called “enhanced information sharing” does not include joint military planning, targeting or coordination with U.S. airstrikes or other operations in Syria.

But it would expand cooperation beyond the “deconfliction” talks the U.S. and Russian militaries began last year to ensure their planes do not run into each other in Syria’s increasingly crowded airspace.

Defense Secretary Ashton B. Carter, who has long opposed any additional cooperation, said Thursday that if Russia would “do the right thing in Syria — that’s an important condition — as in all cases with Russia, we’re willing to work with them.”

Which democrat was screaming impeachment?

Then obama ordered the sharing of intelligence with Cuba:

The Obama administration has offered to help Russia improve its targeting of terrorist groups in Syria if Moscow will stop bombing civilians and opposition fighters who have signed on to a cease-fire and use its influence to force Syrian President Bashar al-Assad to do the same.

The offer early this week of what one administration official called “enhanced information sharing” does not include joint military planning, targeting or coordination with U.S. airstrikes or other operations in Syria.

But it would expand cooperation beyond the “deconfliction” talks the U.S. and Russian militaries began last year to ensure their planes do not run into each other in Syria’s increasingly crowded airspace.

Defense Secretary Ashton B. Carter, who has long opposed any additional cooperation, said Thursday that if Russia would “do the right thing in Syria — that’s an important condition — as in all cases with Russia, we’re willing to work with them.”

obama also has obstructed at least two investigations. He declared hillary clinton innocent in 2015 before the investigation was anywhere near finished.

WASHINGTON — Federal agents were still cataloging the classified information from Hillary Rodham Clinton’s personal email server last week when President Obama went on television and played down the matter.

“I don’t think it posed a national security problem,” Mr. Obama said Sunday on CBS’s “60 Minutes.” He said it had been a mistake for Mrs. Clinton to use a private email account when she was secretary of state, but his conclusion was unmistakable: “This is not a situation in which America’s national security was endangered.”

Those statements angered F.B.I. agents who have been working for months to determine whether Mrs. Clinton’s email setup did in fact put any of the nation’s secrets at risk, according to current and former law enforcement officials.

Investigators have not reached any conclusions about whether the information on the server was compromised or whether to recommend charges, according to the law enforcement officials. But to investigators, it sounded as if Mr. Obama had already decided the answers to their questions and cleared anyone involved of wrongdoing.

obama also screwed the IRS investigation

President Obama in a pre-Super Bowl interview with Fox News said that there was “not even a smidgen of corruption” behind the Internal Revenue Service’s targeting of conservative groups.

“There were some boneheaded decisions,” he said. “Not even mass corruption. Not even a smidgen of corruption.”

Obama said that people are questioning whether the IRS actions were politically motivated attempts to help Democrats because Fox News is promoting the idea.

obama clearly signaled the outcome he sought in these investigations. It’s obstruction. obama both obstructed justice and shared classified information with Russia.

Which democrats called for his impeachment? None- so they’re going to have an uphill slog explaining why this is different.

And this is before we recall obama promising to be more flexible for Vlad.

0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
11 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

SQUIRREL!!!!!!!!!!

Medical Malpractice misfires again!

If it want Clinton selling out to the Chicoms now its Obama the Fink who sold out to the Russians these liberal demac-RATS are the worst form of lower lifeforms on earth lower then a snake in a wagon rut so low a worm would have to look down to see them

the whore dog billy sold classified computer, missile and satellite intell to China. why wasn’t the traitor punished with impeachment

Both Comey and Trump can’t be telling the truth. Comey’s handling of Hillary’s email case proves he is a liar and probably guilty of obstruction of justice. Trump is an undisciplined loudmouth. I would not be surprised either way as to who is lying. Both need to testify under oath about what is alleged in the memo. In addition, Comey needs to testify as to whether or not what Trump allegedly said amounted to obstruction of justice. One of the two will have to either perjure himself or change his story ahead of time. If Comey perjures himself, he goes to jail. If Trump perjures himself, he gets impeached and Comey goes to jail for failing to report Trump’s obstruction of justice as required by 38 USC.

I wouldn’t place Trump’s odds as being very good if there are impeachment hearings. The dems, being the power hungry Marxist collectivists they are, will vote in lockstep to impeach regardless of the evidence or if the bar for obstruction is not met. They would have voted in lockstep to impeach him the minute he was sworn in if given the chance. But the dems don’t have enough votes to impeach him, however there are enough establishment Republicans out there who want him gone just as bad as the dems and therein lies Trump’s problem. They can provide the remaining votes. It may cost them Congress in 2018 and the WH in 2020, but they don’t care. That is second to getting control of the Party back. Besides they know they’ll eventually get Congress back (probably in 2022 after the dem POTUS screws things up). Then they can go back to being doing nothings, screaming while they get bitched slapped around by the dems just like they did under Obama.

Just to show how cowardly they are and how they probably secretly yearn for impeachment regardless of the evidence, there are two parallel sets of scandals running here- Trump’s and the dems’. Trump’s have been for the most part based on hysteria. The WAPO one from yesterday has already been shown to be all hype and no substance other than the leakers needing to be prosecuted for their leaks. The dems’ scandals on the other hand have some known substance/evidence to them or least far more indication of wrongdoing. Hillary’s email scandal; Obama’s spying; the IRS scandal, and now Rich’s murder given that he has been all but identified as the DNC leaker thus putting a gaping hole in the “Russians hacked the election” meme which was the initial impetus for the Russia-Trump collusion conspiracy theory. Yet the Republican majority shies away from launching investigations, pushing for independent prosecutors, or even going public in a loud way to point out dem wrongdoing.

The moral of the story is- don’t ever expect a dem to be held to the same standards as everybody else.

Two things this election brought out, the anti-Americans and the communists.

First, doc, you can remove your shocked face; these are amoral hypocritical liars you are talking about.

Second, don’t forget Obama, while “negotiating” another deal at all costs, the arms limitation with his Russian buddies, they told him they wanted to know how many nukes Great Britain had… and he told them.

But, again… massive hypocrisy.

What about Obama ignoring & circumventing a Federal Judge’s decision on his BS amnesty EO forcing states to take illegals. Is that not obstructing justice? Not only that but he had Holder sue Arizona for not complying with his unconstitutional EO. Thank God for Texas. That Judge didn’t back down & even called out the Obama Administration for being in contempt of court.

The actual source for the NYTimes story, w/ its “memo” has outed himself.
Benjamin Wittes, editor and writer for Lawfare blog, admits he was the primary source for the New York Times Comey Memo article (Michael Schmidt).
He seems upset that Comey has been accused of “leaking.”
Yet he seems blind to the fact that Comey leaked to him!
You’d think a “Lawfare” blogger would realize this.

@Nanny G: The ends always justifies the means. When leftists break laws, it doesn’t count.