The Trump-Russian thing is a fictional plot to destroy Trump- and it all points to Ben Rhodes

We now know that Susan Rice is the person who asked that Trump, his family and campaign aides be unmasked. Despite the pleadings to the contrary, she knows she’s done something very wrong. If not, she wouldn’t have lied straight out about it.

On “PBS NewsHour” on March 22, Judy Woodruff asked Rice about Nunes’ claims.

“I know nothing about this,” Rice responded at the time. “I was surprised to see reports from Chairman Nunes on that count today.”

“So, today, I really don’t know to what Chairman Nunes was referring, but he said that whatever he was referring to was a legal, lawful surveillance, and that it was potentially incidental collection on American citizens,” added Rice, who went on to criticize Trump for his accusation that Obama wiretapped him during the presidential campaign.

Rice has a well established reputation for being a liar.

Predictably, the media has leaped to her defense. Then again, while the media has been fixated on Trump (and we will soon see why) it has largely ignored that leaking of the Flynn transcript is a violation of the Espionage Act. Intelligence officials have said that Flynn is not guilty of any criminal wrongdoing.

A current U.S. intelligence official tells NPR’s Mary Louise Kelly that there is no evidence of criminal wrongdoing in the transcripts of former national security adviser Michael Flynn’s conversations with Russian Ambassador Sergey Kislyak, although the official noted that doesn’t rule out the possibility of illegal actions.

The official also says that there are recordings as well as transcripts of the calls, and that the transcripts don’t suggest Flynn was acting under orders in his conversations.

If he did nothing wrong, why was he unmasked and then why was the transcript leaked?

Rice’s interest in Trump seems to have begun in July and then peaked after the election.

Without any question it is an orchestrated plan to destroy the Trump Presidency. Rice not only ordered unmasking, but she also demanded “detailed spread sheets” on Trump phone calls.

Former President Barack Obama’s national security adviser Susan Rice ordered U.S. spy agencies to produce “detailed spreadsheets” of legal phone calls involving Donald Trump and his aides when he was running for president, according to former U.S. Attorney Joseph diGenova.

“What was produced by the intelligence community at the request of Ms. Rice were detailed spreadsheets of intercepted phone calls with unmasked Trump associates in perfectly legal conversations with individuals,” diGenova told The Daily Caller News Foundation Investigative Group Monday.

“The overheard conversations involved no illegal activity by anybody of the Trump associates, or anyone they were speaking with,” diGenova said. “In short, the only apparent illegal activity was the unmasking of the people in the calls.”

But it’s a little farther down in the story that the nugget emerges:

Also on Monday, Fox News and Bloomberg News, citing multiple sources reported that Rice had requested the intelligence information that was produced in a highly organized operation. Fox said the unmasked names of Trump aides were given to officials at the National Security Council (NSC), the Department of Defense, James Clapper, President Obama’s Director of National Intelligence, and John Brennan, Obama’s CIA Director.

Joining Rice in the alleged White House operations was her deputy Ben Rhodes, according to Fox.

There it is. Ben Rhodes.

To refresh your memory, Ben Rhodes is the fiction writer  with “no real-world experience” who somehow became a Deputy National Security Adviser. Ben Rhodes is also the brother of CBS News President David Rhodes, which explains a lot of the media coverage. I’ve written about Rhodes before. Rhodes is also the mastermind of the misleading  “It was the video” Benghazi talking points.

But there’s more.

Let’s hark back to a familiar MO of the obama administration- they depend on the stupidity of democrat voters. According to the NY Times, Rhodes is a ventriloquist who has the ability to shape the news.

Watching Rhodes work, I remember that he is still, chiefly, a writer, who is using a new set of tools — along with the traditional arts of narrative and spin — to create stories of great consequence on the biggest page imaginable. The narratives he frames, the voices of senior officials, the columnists and reporters whose work he skillfully shapes and ventriloquizes, and even the president’s own speeches and talking points, are the only dots of color in a much larger vision about who Americans are and where we are going that Rhodes and the president have been formulating together over the past seven years.

Rhodes has the ability to control a compliant media. A fiction writer is the ventriloquist for the mainstream media.

Think about that for a second. It’s important.

Let us revisit the Iran deal and how it can to be. David Reaboi at The Federalist:

How would the American people react to knowing that an administration, then still stinging from Republican critiques of its anti-Americanism and weakness on the world stage, was holding secret negotiations in Oman with the most powerful still-standing member of George W. Bush’s “Axis of Evil”?

Under these conditions, Obama—with the help of an equally arrogant 38-year-old national security fabulist, Ben Rhodes (with whom he’s said to “mind-meld”)—succeeded in remaking the Middle East to empower America’s most hated enemy, the only United Nations member state committed to the annihilation of another state: the theocratic Islamic Republic of Iran.

Rhodes and Obama knew that, for anyone but the hard-left to accept a deal with America’s bitter enemy in Tehran, a new narrative needed to emerge, even if it was relatively transparent nonsense. As Rhodes explained to his bemused interviewer, David Samuels, in a New York Times Magazine profile this weekend, it was first necessary to lie to a corrupted and inexperienced American media about all sorts of things, beginning with the nature and intentions of the enemy Iranian regime. Subsequent lies were caked on, as the White House took advantage of a dangerous mix of journalists’ ignorance, their ideological and partisan commitment to the administration, and, finally, their career aspirations.

Rhodes said, “The average reporter we talk to is 27 years old, and their only reporting experience consists of being around political campaigns… They literally know nothing.” Thus they will believe what he tells them. He also tells friendly non-governmental organizations and think tanks what he is telling the journalists. Those outlets produce “experts” whose expert opinion is just what Rhodes wants it to be. These ignorant young journalists thus have quotes that look like independent confirmation of the White House’s lies.

And here Reaboi quotes the NY Times:

In the spring of last year, legions of arms-control experts began popping up at think tanks and on social media, and then became key sources for hundreds of often-clueless reporters. ‘We created an echo chamber,’ [Rhodes] admitted, when I asked him to explain the onslaught of freshly minted experts cheerleading for the deal. ‘They were saying things that validated what we had given them to say.’ (emphasis added)

The obama administration not only depended on the stupidity of the American voter but on the stupidity and gullibility of the American press.

Useful idiots all.

There is absolutely no doubt in my mind as to what has transpired here. This Russia-Trump story is a plot to discredit the Trump Presidency and it was IMO conceived by a fiction writer with the ability to be the ventriloquist for and  to shape the media. As I said previously, had there been anything to it, it would have leaked by now by someone in the myriad of agencies to whom obama suddenly allowed access to highly sensitive and personal information.

Let’s recap.

Trump captured the nomination for President in July- exactly when Susan Rice began collecting data on him. The obama administration had been scooping up data on Trump since 2015. Rice’s data collection spikes when Trump is elected. Now the obama anti-Trump machine kicks into gear. A torrent of Trump-Russia articles suddenly appear in the media many of which impugn the integrity of Trump and his aides. democrats suddenly begin screaming about the alleged ties to Russia. It dominates the reports. Innuendo rules while facts are absent. Then in December the Flynn-Kisylak conversation transcript is leaked. Flynn did nothing illegal and yet he was still unmasked and the transcript was leaked. We know that efforts to research into the unmasking were shut down by the President’s lawyer. Then on his way out, obama relaxes NSA rules so pretty much anyone in government can have access to all of the personal communications of Trump, his family and his aides, virtually guaranteeing someone will leak them to the compliant ventriloquist’s dummies in the media.

And there’s still nothing they can stick to Trump.

Remember what I said about a compliant media?

CNN GOES ON RAMPAGE AGAINST SUSAN RICE BOMBSHELL, INSTRUCTS VIEWERS TO IGNORE STORY

Rhodes is the ventriloquist and here’s one of his dummies:

On top of that, we learn that several outlets, including the NY Times, have been stifling this story.

Is obama involved as well? Let’s let Rhodes speak on that:

“I don’t know anymore where I begin and Obama ends.”

Who better to orchestrate all this than obama and his chief ventriloquist? After all, the press is only  ‘saying things that validated what we had given them to say.’

DrJohn

DrJohn has been a health care professional for more than 30 years. In addition to clinical practice he has done extensive research and has published widely with over 70 original articles and abstracts in the peer-reviewed literature. DrJohn is well known in his field and has lectured on every continent except for Antarctica. He has been married to the same wonderful lady for over 30 years and has three kids- two sons, both of whom are attorneys and one daughter on her way into the field of education.

DrJohn was brought up with the concept that one can do well if one is prepared to work hard but nothing in life is guaranteed.

Except for liberals being foolish.