Is there anyone hillary clinton doesn’t make top secret information available to?
barack obama, loretta lynch and hillary clinton have created a disastrous situation for the country. There is now proof that hillary violated the Espionage Act that the Department of Justice is totally corrupt. It is why there will be no indictment of hillary and why we will be facing a Constitutional crisis.
hillary clinton is a criminal. Of that there is absolutely no doubt. Many others have suffered greatly for actions far less offensive. In order to conduct her clandestine self-enrichment schemes clinton made certain there was no Inspector General– no watchdog- around while she was SoS.
Even today the her offenses continue to pile up. She failed to report a $1 million gift from Qatar to the Clinton Foundation despite signing a pledge to do so. clinton apparently sent her daughter Chelsea classified information on a routine basis. Astonishingly, she had her maid print out classified documents on a daily basis.
As secretary of state, Hillary Clinton routinely asked her maid to print out sensitive government e-mails and documents — including ones containing classified information — from her house in Washington, DC, e-mails and FBI memos show. But the housekeeper lacked the security clearance to handle such material.
In fact, Marina Santos was called on so frequently to receive e-mails that she may hold the secrets to E-mailgate — if only the FBI and Congress would subpoena her and the equipment she used.
Clinton entrusted far more than the care of her DC residence, known as Whitehaven, to Santos. She expected the Filipino immigrant to handle state secrets, further opening the Democratic presidential nominee to criticism that she played fast and loose with national security.
clinton even gave Santos access to her SCIF:
Santos also had access to a highly secure room called an SCIF (sensitive compartmented information facility) that diplomatic security agents set up at Whitehaven, according to FBI notes from an interview with Abedin.
From within the SCIF, Santos — who had no clearance — “collected documents from the secure facsimile machine for Clinton,” the FBI notes revealed.
This is a clearcut violation of the Espionage Act:
In fact, the espionage act—which regulates the handling of intelligence by government officials — does not refer to classified information; it refers to information relating to the national defense. Moreover, it does not prohibit solely the transmission of such information; it criminalizes the communication, delivery, or transmission of that information; causing communication, delivery, or transmission of that information; permitting the removal of that information from its proper place of custody through gross negligence; permitting that information to be lost, stolen, abstracted, or destroyed through gross negligence; or, failing to make a prompt report to superiors in the government when an official knows that the information has been removed from its proper place of custody, communicated to someone not authorized to have it, lost, stolen, abstracted, or destroyed. See also Title 18 United States Code Section 2071(prohibiting destruction of records).
It is also a textbook definition of mishandling classified information:
(a)Whoever knowingly and willfully communicates, furnishes, transmits, or otherwise makes available to an unauthorized person, or publishes, or uses in any manner prejudicial to the safety or interest of the United States or for the benefit of any foreign government to the detriment of the United States any classified information—
(1)concerning the nature, preparation, or use of any code, cipher, or cryptographic system of the United States or any foreign government; or
(2)concerning the design, construction, use, maintenance, or repair of any device, apparatus, or appliance used or prepared or planned for use by the United States or any foreign government for cryptographic or communication intelligence purposes; or
(3)concerning the communication intelligence activities of the United States or any foreign government; or
(4)obtained by the processes of communication intelligence from the communications of any foreign government, knowing the same to have been obtained by such processes—Shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both
Some key notes from the Post article:
It also appears the FBI did not formally interview Santos as a key witness in its investigation.
Most likely because the DOJ would not allow it. And this:
In addition to Abedin, Santos worked closely with Hanley at Whitehaven and could shed light on the mystery — if only she were asked about it.
Again- the DOJ likely forbade it. Prediction: If Congress subpoenas Santos, DOJ will immunize her ahead of time and she will plead the 5th.
The crisis arrives when the DOJ refuses to convene Grand Juries and immunizes all the witnesses and the FBI leaks its proof directly to the public. This is worse than Watergate.
UPDATE- I revised the title.