An indictment is likely

This is a snapshot of what a Hillary administration would look like. Unleash the IRS (again) while the DOJ runs interference for the administration. They can do whatever they like and have the media whitewash it.

Add to that loading the Supreme Court with liberal judges and all you have to do is get an issue before them and new law is made.

This nation did not grow strong and powerful on corruption and oppression; it succeeded due to free capitalism, freedom and justice. Count on that being gone under Hillary.

@kitt:

We are now learning the level of corruption and betrayal by mrs clinton and the clinton crime syndicate. It is now known those who previously were granted immunity have had that immunity revoked. Interviews are being conducted as we speak to those who lied(lying when having been granted immunity is a felony) are being told they can make their plight softer by now revealing what they had previously refrained from confirming. The rats are jumping ship, this is the titanic and it is sinking once more….

Wikileaks has Obama’s ”pseudonyms.”
One of them is ”bobama.”
Gee, real deep cover.
I’d have never guessed.
I’m waiting for Melania on the new Trump Tube.
http://trumptube.tv/donald-trump-rally-speech-video/video/trump-berwyn-pa-rally-live-11-3-16/
So many people have been messed with by You Tube that it is LONG overdue to have an alternative.
Louder With Crowder is only on You Tube for adults, not on colleges or in libraries.
And Right Side Broadcasting has had its feeds frozen a few times.
Has ANY Hillary news outlet covered the riots in Paris, the police resigning en masse in Sweden or the 78 crimes a day committed by Germany’s new guests?
Hillary wants to do away with Fox News, Brietbart, and every TEA Party activist.
Her ”box of deplorables,” grew from that to, “negative, dark, divisive, dangerous people who support Trump.”
Sounds real conciliatory, huh?

The FBI’s impetus for a Clinton Foundation investigation turns out to have been inspired by Peter Schweizer’s anti-Clinton book CLINTON CASH, which is little more than an author’s exercise in speculative slander for profit, and by secret recordings of comments about the Clinton Foundation made by someone who has no inside connection with the Clinton Foundation.

An anti-Clinton faction in the FBI has done very serious damage. They have affixed an official FBI seal to an accusation supported by nothing more than hearsay and rumor days before a presidential election, with the specific intention of influencing the outcome of that election. The lasting damage they’ve done is to the reputation of the FBI. They’ve cast serious doubt on the impartiality of the nation’s highest and most respected investigative body.

I think Comey has been doing everything he can to prevent this, but he’s been put in a position by forces internal and external to the FBI that have made maintaining any appearance of balance and impartiality almost impossible.

People are running around looking for a rope because they heard something about an FBI investigation—the details of which are virtually nonexistent. The assumption seems to be that this verifies whatever manure has been shoveled by the right’s full-time army of manure shovelers.

This, hopefully, will lead to the installation of a man into the Oval Office whose list of qualifications could be written on the back of a postage stamp, with enough room left over for a short grocery list. Were you to make a list of his characteristics and traits that should be considered instantly disqualifying, you’d require a blue essay test booklet, a couple of sharpened No.4 pencils, and half-an-hour or so to think things through, which is more time than anyone on the right seems to have given to the matter at this point.

Trump has already done serious lasting damage just running a campaign. What sort of damage to you think will follow if he suddenly finds himself made the most powerful individual on the planet? Do you think this fractious egomaniac is going to usher in some new era of peace, prosperity, national harmony, and domestic tranquility? If so, I’m curious about the medications you’re taking.

Hillary Clinton is still the lesser evil. By far.

DrJ, although this is a serious slam on the unethical Clinton machine, there’s a strong likelihood that between the FBI and WikiLeaks, the degree of corruption of the Obama/Jarrett duo will be revealed after this election. These two may be making a big mistake slandering the FBI. It will come back to haunt them.

The FBI will be left with no choice but reveal what they find. We’re in for some really ugly months ahead as we witness the disintegration of an Administration AFTER it leaves office.

Not the first time Clinton crime mob attempted to destroy evidence Bill Clinton’s National Security Advisor Sandy Berger stole and destroyed classified documents in October 2003 from a National Archives reading room prior to testifying before the 9/11 Commission.

In April 2005, Berger pleaded guilty to a misdemeanor charge of unauthorized removal and retention of classified material from the National Archives in Washington.
Patterns patterns patterns everywhere

So, you believe Hillary Clinton is about to be indicted for some unspecified crime because five days before the presidential election FOX News claims an unnamed source inside the FBI told them so?

Maybe you need to loosen up the adjustment a bit on that one-size-fits-all Trump hat.

@Greg: Every 4 years Hannity tries to push the Repub to victory with fawning adoration and bashes the Dem. opponent with over the top negative commentary.
Looks to me like 0 and 3 for pretty boy Sean

@Greg: Actually, the reports state an indictment is likely.

Looky here.

http://www.cbsnews.com/news/fbi-finds-emails-related-to-hillary-clintons-state-department-tenure/

State Department emails that Hillary did NOT turn over are found on Weiner’s computer. Oops. Another lie revealed.

Oh… remember you stating repeatedly that Hillary’s secret, private, unsecured server was never hacked? The FBI says it is 99% certain that it was hacked by 5 separate entities. Uh-oh. Perhaps Hillary was Wikileaks’ primary source!

Why wouldn’t the DOJ want a full investigation of the Clinton Foundation’s suspicious activities long before the campaign in order to try and clear the Clinton’s of all the suspicions? Instead, they tamped it down. Why? What were they afraid of seeing exposed?

Bad news, Greg. Bad news.

@Bill… Deplorable Me, #19:

Oddly, when I read that article the only thing I take away from it is that additional emails have turned up, that it isn’t known how many if any are relevant, and that it isn’t known if any that are relevant will have any actual significance. That, after all, is what the article actually says.

Nor does this necessarily suggest Clinton withheld relevant emails. It’s been known from the start that she was under no regulatory obligation to retain personal emails, and that emails that were considered personal had been deleted from her server. It’s entirely possible that the newly discovered emails on Wiener’s laptop are copies of that deleted personal material. After all, when you delete emails from your own computer or server, you aren’t deleting the copies on the computer or server that the emails were originally sent to or received from.

Why wouldn’t the DOJ want a full investigation of the Clinton Foundation’s suspicious activities long before the campaign in order to try and clear the Clinton’s of all the suspicions?

What they didn’t want was the sort of partisan politicization of their investigative processes that the “unnamed sources” in the FBI have now taken it upon themselves to create—in violation of the Hatch Act. Those sources have damaged the credibility of the FBI as an impartial law enforcement and investigative institution to pick up a few polling points or votes for their political candidate. There’s a story of totally improper behavior, if you really want one.

Is it true that the Federal prison at Lewisburg, PA is ordering orange pants suits?

@Greg:

ITEM…..when Huma exited the State Dept, she was required to signoff on form OF-109….a separation agreement that states she understands when leaving the US government that she is maintaining no classified information. That she understands her legal obligation to protect further classified information and safeguard any potential disclosures……
==========================================

ITEM—Two special agents of the FBI interviewed Abedin on April 5 noted the details in the summary of their interview, which took place at the FBI’s Washington field office and, notably, was attended by the chief of the FBI’s counterespionage section.

ITEM—–On page 3 of the FBI’s 11-page report, federal agents detail how a classified paper on Pakistan, sent from a State Department source, that Abedin inexplicably forwarded to her personal Yahoo email account….. an obviously unclassified, unencrypted, unsecured and unauthorized system. Not an isolated event, but a common practice with Abedin. “She routinely forwarded emails from her state.gov account to either her clintonemail.com or her yahoo.com account,” the agents wrote. Why? “So she could print them” at home and not at her State Department office.

========================================

ITEM—– The cover story the Hillary team concocted…..Huma was only forwarding the emails home so she could print them, b/c Hillary wanted it that way, even though it’s illegal.

ITEM—-Tens of thousands of classified emails are housed, not only on Hillary’s secret basement server, but at Huma’s home as well….. on devices held by Huma’s unemployed husband.

ITEM—-Investigating his sexting, the FBI found thousands of classified emails on Anthony’s devices. Abedin’s sex-obsessed husband, Anthony Weiner, liked to brag of how easy it is to earn big money in private-sector consulting. Yeah sure……if you’re selling US ntl security secrets.

===========================================

This underlines Judiciary Chair Sen Grassley’s point that Huma Abedin may have been collecting political intelligence gleaned from unsuspecting State Dept officials that was then sold….. for a price.

Recall that Huma was a govt employee at the State Dept. Then Hillary facilitated Huma having several other jobs simultaneously. (a) Huma working for Teneo….the powerhouse company that is purported to be the vehicle foreign entities use to get access to the Clintons. (b) Clinton Foundation employee. (c) State Dept employee.

Sen Grassley wrote in a June 13, 2015 letter: It appears that one of Abedin’s clients, the Clinton-connected Teneo Strategies, may have been compensating Ms. Abedin for gathering information from US government sources for the purpose of informing investment decisions of her consulting clients – or in other words, political intelligence.

This raises important questions about whether Abedin’s dual role was adequately disclosed to government officials who may have provided her information without realizing that she was being paid by private investors to gather information.

Grassley’s letter recounted in detail:

Abedin allegedly sent or received more than 7,000 emails on her US government account that involved her employer, Teneo’s head Doug Band, a close confidante and travel companion of the globe-trotting Bill Clinton;

one email exchange involved Teneo’s Doug Band pressuring Abedin to encourage her State Department boss, Hillary Clinton, to facilitate a White House appointment for one of his clients. Judith Rodin, then-president of the Rockefeller Foundation, “donated hundreds of millions of dollars to the Clinton Foundation,” Mr. Band allegedly noted in his email to Ms. Abedin.

email evidence allegedly suggests that Ms. Abedin and another Hillary aide, Cheryl Mills, colluded to find a way to ensure the US govt paid for Ms. Abedin’s travel to and from New York.

multiple allegations received by Sen Grassley’s Judiciary Committee indicated Abedin had actually taken leave during her time as a govt employee, casting doubt on whether Abedin should have been paid $33,000 in taxpayer money while on leave. Huma later said her husband handled the couple’s finances, so she did not know she had been paid the $33,000.

Perhaps I lack your imagination.

@Greg:

Oddly, when I read that article the only thing I take away from it is that additional emails have turned up, that it isn’t known how many if any are relevant, and that it isn’t known if any that are relevant will have any actual significance. That, after all, is what the article actually says.

No wonder you still whole-heartedly support the most corrupt, incompetent and dishonest candidate ever to run for office. What the story says is that State Department emails were found on the Weiner’s computer. What it further says is that, because the FBI is eliminating duplicates of the emails they already have with their search software, they are finding State Department emails not previously turned over to the State Department. So, this verifies yet ANOTHER lie of Hillary’s… that she turned over all State Department emails.

Now, there’s the question of WHAT was Huma doing with them and WHAT was security clearance-free Weiner doing with them on his computer?

With the hacked emails and the FBI investigations we see the widespread culture of corruption and disregard for laws and the Constitution and, in addition to exposing yet another lie of Hillary’s, this revelation shows Huma learned her disregard for the law well from her master.

What this shows us is that all the suspicions are not only justified, but they are substantiated. Hillary REALLY tried to avoid FOIA requests into her dirty dealings and illegally deleted (she thought) thousands of emails. We also know the Obama DOJ colluded with the Clinton campaign to try and quash the investigations… for some reason.

Dirty business, through and through.

Charles Krauthammer—he can’t bring himself to come right out and say you should vote for Clinton. He just points out that you’d be crazy to vote for Donald Trump:

Final days, awful choice

In a normal election, the FBI and WikiLeaks factors might be disqualifying for a presidential candidate. As final evidence of how bad are our choices in 2016, Trump’s liabilities, especially on foreign policy, outweigh hers.

We are entering a period of unprecedented threat to the international order that has prevailed under American leadership since 1945. After eight years of President Obama’s retreat, the three major revisionist powers — Russia, China and Iran — see their chance to achieve regional dominance and diminish, if not expel, U.S. influence.

At a time of such tectonic instability, even the most experienced head of state requires wisdom and delicacy to maintain equilibrium. Trump has neither. His joining of supreme ignorance to supreme arrogance, combined with a pathological sensitivity to any perceived slight, is a standing invitation to calamitous miscalculation.

Two generations of Americans have grown up feeling that international stability is as natural as the air we breathe. It’s not. It depends on continual, calibrated tending. It depends on the delicate balancing of alliances and the careful signaling of enemies. It depends on avoiding self-inflicted trade wars and on recognizing the value of allies like Germany, Japan and South Korea as cornerstones of our own security rather than satrapies who are here to dispatch tribute to their imperial master in Washington.

It took seven decades to build this open, free international order. It could be brought down in a single presidential term. That would be a high price to pay for the catharsis of kicking over a table.

That, from a guy no one is going to mistake for a liberal, or even for a moderate republican. That from a guy who clearly doesn’t even like Clinton. If you’re missing the point, read that last paragraph again.

@Greg:

So, greg, why did mrs clinton put a home brew server in her private residence to conduct government business? Answer that one……

People Googling Hillary Clinton Really Want To Know When She’ll Be Indicted

The top questions potential voters are asking Google about Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton are how old she is, how much money she has, and when she’ll be indicted by federal law enforcement authorities.

Data compiled by Google Trends reveals many people are concerned about what will happen if Hillary Clinton runs into trouble with the law for keeping a private, unsecured e-mail server during her tenure as secretary of State.

@Greg: More likely you lack intelligence to analyze facts.

@Greg: ,#22

So the emails that are on wieners laptop are not duplicates of those on the private home brew server. Did not that woman, mrs clinton tell everyone she had turned over all emails? If she did, what praytell are these?

And, if some many of the emails were destroyed following the subpoena request by congress, does that constitute obstruction of justice?

Also, if the lawyers involved had not been read into security interests, having access to classified info is a felony.

Finally, we know that huma advised the White House each and every time that woman, mrs clinton changed her devices, of which she had no fewer than 13 as SOS. We know now the boner in chief communicated with that woman, mrs clinton on her private home brew server and likely communicated information of a classified nature. So the boner in chief himself may be guilty like that woman, mrs clinton of espionage.

Did not that woman, mrs clinton tell everyone she had turned over all emails? If she did, what praytell are these?

No, she did not say that. It was stated from the beginning that her intention had been to retain official State Department correspondence, as was required by the Federal Records Act. She was under no legal or regulatory obligation at the time to retain personal correspondence to turn over to anyone. That was the law during her entire term of office. Her personal correspondence was deleted. She was under no legal obligation to turn that material over to her political enemies, whose entire focus has been upon figuring out some way to destroy her, by fair means or foul.

The reason she decided to use a personal server in the first place was to keep these frickin’ idiots from gaining access to her private communications. She has succeeded in doing so in large part, despite their repeatedly having the assistance of Putin’s Russian hackers, Julian Assange’s corrupted Wikileaks, and the illegal actions of Rudy Giuliani’s contacts inside the FBI.

@Greg:

The reason she decided to use a personal server in the first place was to keep these frickin’ idiots from gaining access to her private communications. She has succeeded in doing so in large part, despite their repeatedly having the assistance of Putin’s Russian hackers, Julian Assange’s corrupted Wikileaks, and the illegal actions of Rudy Giuliani’s contacts inside the FBI.

Really, 33k emails personal. You are a poor used care salesman, hope you are on government assistance, guffaw…..

@Greg:

Did she conduct official state department business on her private unsecured server?

By the way, the two criminal investigations are still underway.

@Greg:

Hillary Deleted Email Showing She Forwarded Classified Information To Her Daughter

Just a personal email, nothing to see here…

@Bill… Deplorable Me, #48:

Apparently what she has been reaping are multiple death threats that have forced her back into hiding.

I didn’t say I believed her accusations. What I said is that the Clinton campaign has refrained from making any of Trump’s pending lawsuits the subject of her campaign speeches.

In contrast, unproven accusations of criminal conduct have been all that Trump has been yammering about for weeks—even when prolonged, multiple investigations have been conducted and no evidence has been found allowing charges to be filed. He just stands there in front of his crowds in his goofy hat fizzing like a rabid raccoon, mindlessly repeating the same propaganda memes over and over, like it was some sort of Hillary Clinton hate fest. You don’t hear a damn thing in the way of detailed policy intentions.

@Greg:

Apparently what she has been reaping are multiple death threats that have forced her back into hiding.

You mean to say the reason she never brought this up since 1994 is because she has been in hiding? I wonder why, when you will not buy that Hillary has illegally put national security at risk when the evidence is clear and available, you believe THIS? You liberals have a history of fomenting court cases to affect elections.

In contrast, unproven accusations of criminal conduct have been all that Trump has been yammering about for weeks

Greg.

Greg, Greg, Greg.

It is PROVEN Hillary had a secret, private, unsecured server on which she conducted ALL State Department business. It is PROVEN she lied about not having, sending, receiving classified information… sometimes HIGHLY classified… using that unsecured server. It has been PROVEN she lied before Congress about her emails. It is PROVEN she lied about Benghazi and LIED to the bereaved. Damn, Greg. This is all in the can. Done. Definite. No one even questions it anymore.

Hacked emails now show a subterranean link between the DOJ and the Clinton campaign. Why is this necessary when there is no guilt? What are the Clinton’s worried about when they’ve done nothing wrong? Emails show the scrambling within the campaign to dump emails and develop stories to answer the questions they are being informed are coming their way? What’s wrong with the truth? Oh… that’s right. In this case, the truth is INCRIMINATING.

Then, there are the very disturbing things that look almost definitely true. Her pay-for-play activities. Her peddling government influence. The illegal activities of the Clinton Foundation. The suspicions there are well founded and the reasons are clear. It all warrants a more thorough investigation (which the DOJ for some reason blocks) and anyone considering voting for Hillary for reasons other than the moth-drawn-to-light reasons of she’s a woman and a liberal should WANT to know the facts.