The election may not be rigged but the process certainly is

By 44 Comments 1,368 views

pravda

 

Pravda is all upset that Donald Trump is suggesting that the coming Presidential election might be rigged.

Wait- did I say Pravda? I meant the US media- which has effectively morphed into the official state run media. Donald Trump is running not only against Hillary Clinton, but against nearly all the media. They are pounding him for it:

The nation’s largest newspapers said Donald Trump has “contempt” for and is “trashing” American democracy by refusing to say in Wednesday’s debate that he would concede the race to Hillary Clinton should she win.

Trump refused to say categorically that he would concede the race, which alarmed Clinton and many others, especially since he’s been saying the election is “rigged” in favor of Clinton. It was a remark Trump’s team quickly worked to rein back in as soon as the debate was over.

But for many major papers, the damage was done. The New York Times said Trump showed “contempt” for American democracy, and said Clinton was rightly shocked by his statement.

There is no shortage to the evidence of the complete one sided nature of what used to be journalism. Pat Caddell points out that the press has a short memory when it comes to the refusal to accept voter outcomes:

“All he said was, ‘I’ll wait and see what the results are,’ which is a reasonable position, I suppose,” said Caddell, also pointing out that Democrats challenged the results of the presidential elections in 2000 and 2004.

Hillary Clinton and Al Gore were still claiming Al Gore won the 2000 election as recently as last week in Florida on the stump together:

As the crowd chanted and Hillary smiled and nodded approvingly, Gore continued his thought process by suggesting that he actually won the 2000 election by warning the young voters to not be in a position “years from now” welcoming Hillary Clinton and saying to her “actually you did win, it just wasn’t close enough to make sure that the votes were counted.”

Through this entire sequence, Mrs. Clinton continued to smile and nod in agreement.

Additionally, Democrats, including current Secretary of State John Kerry, accused George Bush of stealing the 2004 election: “A profile of Secretary of State John Kerry published Sunday in The New Yorker reveals that, 11 years after his election loss to George W. Bush in 2004, Kerry still believes he was robbed via systematic fraud.”

At The Federalist Bre Payton recalls 8 times that democrats complained about elections being stolen.

The problem is, Trump’s concerns are well founded and he’s not alone. 72% of Americans have concerns about voting security. democrats want votes counted even before the validity of the registration can be verified.

democrat operatives boast about conducting fraud for fifty years:

“It’s a very easy thing for Republicans to say they’re bussing people in,” Foval says in the video. “Well you know what? We’ve been bussing people in to deal with you fuckin’ assholes for fifty years and we’re not going to stop now. We’re just going to find a different way to do it.”

And the worst of it? clinton’s campaign manager asserting that it was entirely acceptable for an illegal alien to vote as long as he/she had a driver’s license. I have no doubt that that is hillary clinton’s ambition as well.

And this is only what we’ve learned.

Not unexpectedly, hillary clinton asserted that Trump was talking down our democracy.

As far as I can see, Trump right now is the only one defending it. The media is so biased that has no interest in the clinton emails or anything wrong that clinton has done. They’ve stooped so low as to assert that looking at them was illegal. I never thought I’d see the day the US media would be reduced to the level of the Russian media, but it has come to that.

DrJohn has been a health care professional for more than 30 years. In addition to clinical practice he has done extensive research and has published widely with over 70 original articles and abstracts in the peer-reviewed literature. DrJohn is well known in his field and has lectured on every continent except for Antarctica. He has been married to the same wonderful lady for over 30 years and has three kids- two sons, both of whom are attorneys and one daughter on her way into the field of education. DrJohn was brought up with the concept that one can do well if one is prepared to work hard but nothing in life is guaranteed. Except for liberals being foolish.

44 Responses to “The election may not be rigged but the process certainly is”

  1. 26

    Richard Wheeler

    @Nanny G: Again do you understand the E.C A third Party win in RED Utah simply means 4 less “assured” votes for Trump–nothing more.

    Looks now like HRC 322 DT 216 with Utah — Popular HRC 48 DT 44 GJ 6 JS 2
    Idaho DT Nev HRC

    Faith #14 Craziest poll to date lol You are dreaming HRC wins PA. BY 8

  2. 27

    Common Sense

    @mathman: I live in California but working in Florida on that night. I was with my friend at a Martini Bar in Orlando when they called it and we looked at each other and said what?? Turns out the Republican election headquarters was at the Marriott and tis was our hotel. Imagine how things changed by morning. Certainly the slimy MSM and the demoncraps tried to cheat on this one!!

  3. 28

    George Wells

    Y’all who are so convinced that Hillary has been PROVEN GUILTY are forgetting that, in this nation that you love so much, we are ALL innocent UNTIL PROVEN GUILTY IN A COURT OF LAW, and that includes HRC.
    You may BELIEVE that she is a criminal, and you may BELIEVE that the courts are all rigged so that she will CONTINUE to escape prosecution, but that’s a wild hair of a conspiracy theory growing up your collective arses, considering all of the REPUBLICAN prosecuting attorneys and REPUBLICAN judges who evidently DON’T see it your way. NOBODY has made a case against her, HAVE THEY???

    Justice is made up of processes that we all ACCEPT, no matter that the system is imperfect, and all of your WILD speculations regarding Hillary’s GUILT are just that – wild speculations, UNTIL PROVEN OTHERWISE IN A COURT OF LAW.

    Never mind your absurd confusion concerning what constitutes guilt – this clown YOU nominated to lead YOUR Republican Party will be happily on his merry commercial, media empire-building way the day after the election in two weeks, and where will that leave you for the next four years? Crying over your spilled beer? Depressed that you FAILED to beat the weakest presidential nominee the Democrats have come up with since Walter Mondale?

    It’s the media’s fault, it’s a rigged system, Hillary’s a crook. LOL!
    It’s YOUR fault for nominating a Class A JERK who never DID want the job in the first place. So who’s stupid????

  4. 29

    Bill- Deplorable Me

    @George Wells: She ON TAPE, under oath lying before Congress. Comey provided the evidence she lied. If only the Obama DOJ wasn’t corrupt, she WOULD have been found guilty.

    And that’s just the perjury. If a legitimate investigation into WHY she was lying before Congress, there would be more corruption.

    Oh, would this be an inconvenient time to point out how you hypocritical liberals convict Trump of every accusation you can dream up? How about how you liberals convict every cop in the court of leftist opinion and sentence them to death?

    Liberals; the masters of hypocrisy. Hillary is a lying, corrupt, incompetent skank.

  5. 30

    George Wells

    @Bill #29:

    “Hillary is a lying, corrupt, incompetent skank.”

    She is also innocent until proven guilty in a court of law.
    Your OTHER complaint about liberals attacking Trump does not mitigate Hillary’s innocence.
    Trump has done far more damage to himself than Hillary or any other Democrat could EVER dream of doing to him. All the Democrats have to do is keep running tapes of Trump SPEAKING. He’s done HIMSELF in, and IT IS ON PURPOSE!
    You just can’t wrap your silly little deluded mind around that fact, can you?
    You keep TRYING to make a case against Hillary, all the while YOUR candidate does everything in his power to NOT GET ELECTED!
    How can you STILL be TRYING to beat the ONLY candidate that actually WANTS THE JOB????
    What, exactly, IS your best-case scenario, anyway?
    That Trump miraculously DOES win, and then he just up and quits Sara Palin-style, claiming that he’s done all that he set out to do, which was to build the foundation of his fledgling media empire? Is THAT what you want? Because if it is, I’m guessing that you’ve chased quite a few rainbows in your time, and you STILL haven’t figured out that there ISN’T a pot of gold at the end of them.

    BILL!!!
    WAKE UP!!!
    IT’S OVER!!!
    YOU CAN GO HOME NOW!!!

  6. 31

    Bill… Deplorable Me

    @George Wells: Nothing changes the fact that Hillary lied, under oath, before Congress, lied to the FBI, proved herself completely incompetent as Secretary of State, lost $6 billion, collected payments for US influence.

    Leaked emails now also implicate her in campaign fraud, inciting fascist violence, racism and selling influence. Sheesh, George, how big a criminal are you willing to tolerate just for the sake of having a liberal rule you?

  7. 32

    Richard Wheeler

    @Bill- Deplorable Me: You’re a one trick pony Bill As in anything Liberal is bad.
    .
    Ride out the defeat with your sidekick Hannity–where’s RT?
    Accept the fact you’re gonna lose–AGAIN–because YOU nominated an unacceptable and unelectable standard bearer.
    Republicans are obviously much stupider than Libs. Or maybe they’re masochists and enjoy the pain that comes EVERY 4 years..

  8. 33

    George Wells

    @Bill #31:

    If Hillary DID what you CLAIM she did, WHY haven’t REPUBLICANS taken their case through the courts? You get yourselves all puffed up, and then you fizzle. It would seem that you need a hefty dose of Viagra, as without artificial enhancement, you lack sufficient conviction to get done the job that you insist you deserve.

    Hillary ISN’T a criminal until she’s been proven GUILTY.
    She HASN’T been proven guilty.
    End of story.

    YOU nominated Trump.
    You’re getting what you deserve.

  9. 34

    Bill- Deplorable Me

    @George Wells:

    If Hillary DID what you CLAIM she did, WHY haven’t REPUBLICANS taken their case through the courts?

    Oh, I don’t know… because that is the DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE’S JOB?!?

    And, as we have clearly seen, the DOJ is now as corrupt as the rest of the Obama administration.

    Answer this: did Hillary state, under oath, before Congress, that she neither sent, received or stored any emails with classification markings on them? Next, answer this: did Comey state that the FBI found 110 email chains that were, indeed, marked with varying levels of classification, up to and including TOP SECRET?

    OK, one more: do you know what perjury is? You might also google Kathleen Kane.

    You think yourself through those three questions successfully and you will be a lot smarter.

  10. 35

    George Wells

    @Bill #34:

    I’m seeing that while you press ahead with your Clinton character-assassination spiel, you DON”T bother to defend Trump.
    Good for you!
    You will vote for YOUR clown in two weeks, doubtless hoping that his BEST FRIEND Putin will somehow save the campaign that Trump has consistently sabotaged, and I will vote for my miserably flawed candidate because I want a liberal Supreme Court for the rest of my life. I will get what I want and you will not. Once again. When will you begin to wonder if this doesn’t point to a fundamental flaw in WHAT YOU WANT?

    Don’t you get this?
    The PEOPLE don’t want Trump!
    They don’t really want Hillary either, but they’d MUCH prefer her to Trump, and that’s the bottom line.
    Nothing comes after it.
    America has had YEARS of GOP muckraking over Benghazi and email servers and Bill Clinton’s naughty behavior, and in short order Trump counterfeited the value of those scandals with his own outrageous crap. The Clinton stuff was old news, the Trump nonsense all fresh and exciting. It’s no wonder America has been following all of the sensational Trump news… it’s NEWs! Benghazi isn’t. It’s as simple as that.

    And AFTER president Hillary is inaugurated, you’ll KEEP on about what a crook she is, won’t you? Because obsessive-compulsive nut-cases like you can’t ever move on.
    Just remember who will be celebrating!
    ME!

  11. 36

    Bill… Deplorable Me

    @George Wells: I see you tippy-toed around the questions I asked. That mans you KNOW Hillary lied, is a criminal and is a terrible candidate. However, being a liberal, you LIKE liars, you EXPECT to be lied to and all you care about is liberalism. Forget that liberalism has failed at every turn, you and those like you just care about liberalism… because you get something out of it.

    Let’s be clear; NO ONE votes for Hillary for the good of the country. No one that is reasonably informed, anyway. Anyone voting for Hillary does so for a specific self interest, not the good of the country. I find it impossible to believe that the majority of those supporters are unaware of the blatant lies and gross negligence she committed by having her unsecured server, just to name a little of her disqualification.

    No, make no mistake; no one actually believes Hillary is good for the nation. They believe Hillary is good for THEM.

    Trump is good for the nation in that he is not Hillary. He is all that stands in the way of Hillary and, as such, he is tonic for the nation. Hillary is dishonest, corrupt and incompetent. The incompetence and corruption are a dangerous combination and it was on display prominently when she was Secretary of State. Only Trump can block this combination from infecting the White House and across all levels of government power.

    Only Trump. Please, no more years of liberal disaster.

    You support Hillary even though it is PROVEN she is a perjuring liar. You support her even though she has already had a job interview for the Presidency and FAILED totally and miserably. You support her even though her OWN EMAILS reveal she is supporting violence, supporting voter fraud, supporting corruption. You support her because you are a pliant, blind, subservient liberal.

    I would have voted for Trump today, but did not get to the polls in time. So, I will take off early tomorrow and my wife and I will vote… FOR TRUMP. Trump is no saint, but he has not committed perjury, has not let our adversaries have as much of our classified information as they can carry, he has not ignored dire warnings of terror attacks, allowed a consulate to be sacked, an ambassador to be killed and then did NOTHING to try and rescue the brave defenders stranded by his incompetence. Trump has never sold US strategic assets to an enemy of peddled US government influence. Trump never supports those who want to (and sometimes DO) kill police.

    How despicable to call other people deplorable when she is just about the most deplorable person in the nation, with the exception of her puppet master, Soros (and guesses why Soros went into the voting machine business?). Trump never gave a homophobic father of a homophobic radical Islamic mass murderer a featured seat at any of his rallies. There is so much about Trump that is not like the trashy Hillary.

    The fact you are unable to honestly answer my questions reveals a lot. Go ahead and vote for your criminal. I will vote for the United States of America.

  12. 37

    George Wells

    @Bill #36:
    Answer your question?
    Sorry, but I didn’t SEE an honest question.
    I’m no more interested in exchanging spit with you than I’m interested in BOTHERING to justify my vote. You don’t deserve that.

    You keep describing Hillary as “criminal,” and you ignore my perfectly valid observation that in America, a citizen is presumed innocent until PROVEN GUILTY in a court of law. Whatever happened to your conservative’s love affair with tradition? As soon as it swings against you, you’re ready to take up torches and pitchforks and the rule of law be damned. Some conservative YOU are!

    FYI: I couldn’t care less about Hillary’s emails, and guess what? America doesn’t either. Back in the day, people had their raunchy conversations just like they do today, but there weren’t permanent records of every last shred of communication like there is today. Thus Trump has WRONGLY been crucified over his so-called “locker-room banter.” And wait a minute… are we talking about what? 33 THOUSAND emails? REALLY???? THIRTY THREE THOUSAND???? And those are the DELEATED ONES???
    How many personal letters from George Washington are in the National Archives? Personally, I can’t manage MY email as it is, and there certainly aren’t tens of thousands of them… So I’m not at all convinced that WHATEVER went through HRC’s server is a reflection of her qualifications to be president. Aren’t we fussing over about a hundred emails? Out of what, a hundred-THOUSAND? So you’re saying that she handled 99.9% of them CORRECTLY? Sounds good to me!

    Yeah, I vote for what’s good for me. I’m willing to extrapolate that to make the point that what’s good for me is good for America. The majority of Americans will do the same thing in two weeks. Whatever YOU BELIEVE is good for America is evidently NOT what the majority of Americans want, and that’s the nature of self-governance. Ultimately, WE THE PEOPLE get what we deserve.

    You will vote for the loser, and I will vote for the winner, and NEITHER of our votes will make a difference, save demonstrating that at least SOME Americans bother to vote. I’ll be celebrating, but I won’t waste my time reading your hate-speeches on Flopping Aces. So I’ll tell you right now, in advance:
    I TOLD YOU SO!

  13. 38

    Bill… Deplorable Me

    @George Wells:

    Answer your question?
    Sorry, but I didn’t SEE an honest question.

    How disgustingly cowardly and dishonest. You are supporting a corrupt liar. Does that feel good?

    FYI: I couldn’t care less about Hillary’s emails,

    Again, how typically liberal. You don’t care about an act that jeopardized national security because a lying, incompetent, corrupt, criminal liberal committed it. That says all that needs to be said.

    are we talking about what? 33 THOUSAND emails? REALLY???? THIRTY THREE THOUSAND???? And those are the DELEATED ONES???

    33,000 ILLEGALLY deleted emails. Emails deleted after they were subpoenaed as evidence. Oh, I forgot; a liberal doesn’t care about the rule of law, national security, honesty or integrity. All of that interferes with the spread of liberalism. They are incompatible.

  14. 40

    Greg

    33,000 ILLEGALLY deleted emails.

    There was nothing illegal about deleting her personal emails, which comprised the vast majority of the deleted material. 30 some emails were subsequently determined include discussion regarding Benghazi, but they could easily have been deleted inadvertently. That would be 1 out of 1,100—a few needles in a very large haystack.

    The right wants to make something out of this. Feel free, but don’t expect everyone to draw the same conclusions. Not everyone is predisposed to seeing a nefarious intention behind everything she says or does.

  15. 41

    Bill- Deplorable Me

    @election-may-not-be-rigged-but-the-process-certainly-is/#comment-511130″>George Wells: I’ll bet you are. Celebrating corruption and fascism. Enjoy.

    @Greg:

    There was nothing illegal about deleting her personal emails, which comprised the vast majority of the deleted material.

    How astute of you to now include the caveat, “vast majority” to modify Hillary’s bold-face lie. Not only were some of the emails that were deleted, AFTER the Senate Benghazi committee demanded they be preserved by the way, contain some that were not wedding plans or yoga reservations (yeah… Hillary does yoga. Right), but there were some that contained classified information… MARKED classified. Of course, Hillary, the candidate for the President of the United States, says she did not know what the classified markings meant. Yeah, OK.

    Did she “inadvertently” lie, under oath, to Congress? Georgie pretty much confirms he believes she did (of course, liberalism trumps integrity every time). How about you, Greg? Willing to support someone that is on tape committing perjury, the same thing Kathleen Kane just went to jail for? Aside from what she was lying about to cover up, her perjury is just ONE of her violations, but it is recorded and undeniable. This is what you support.

    Crime. Corruption. Incompetence. Fascism.

  16. 42

    George Wells

    @Bill #41:

    “Crime. Corruption. Incompetence. Fascism.”

    “Crime.”
    Hillary is innocent of any crime until proven guilty in a court of law.

    “Corruption and Incompetence.”
    You have failed to make the case that Hillary is any more corrupt or incompetent than The Donald.
    He has lied at least as often as HRC, has cheated his contractors, shipped jobs to China, repeatedly taken obscene advantage of bankruptcy laws to avoid paying any taxes for the past two decades, lost a BILLION dollars in one year, has no governing experience and has done absolutely nothing to demonstrate a talent for it. He admits to being a serial molester of women (a crime) and you see virtue and potential in this monster. I don’t.

    “Fascism.”
    Because I was uncertain of what you were SUGGESTING with this label, I looked up the word. What I found seemed to parallel the bullying character that Trump has exhibited repeatedly throughout his campaign, and I certainly can’t accept your suggestion that HRC is any more inclined to Fascism than Trump. What I take comfort from in EITHER case is that the House and Senate stand between the President and any lawful OR unlawful exercise of presidential power, and this reduces your fear of Fascism to a question of whatever discomfort one or the other president might cause as he or she rants from the bully pulpit that the voters provide them with.

    As you continue to assassinate the character of ONE candidate while granting carte blanch to the other, I am reminded that the majority of voters disagree with you, right or wrong, and your clown will ultimately get the defeat that he so intensely desires. That’s a sweet reward in and of itself, don’t you think?

  17. 43

    July 4th American

    @George Wells:

    “Crime.”

    Hillary is innocent of any crime until proven guilty in a court of law.

    One can commit a crime with or without the conviction by a court of law. But you choose to embarrass yourself for our comedic pleasure.

  18. 44

    George Wells

    @July 4th American:

    When YOU commit a crime, YOU are a party to the fact and, if you BELIEVE in GOD, then HE is also a party to it and, presumably, your appropriate punishment and atonement will be justly served when upon your death you stand before HIM in Judgement.

    In the secular Law, you ARE presumed innocent UNTIL you have been found guilty in a court of law. That is because the rest of us law-abiding citizens are NOT parties to YOUR crime. Yes, you may COMMIT a crime, but even if you DO, you are innocent of it in the eyes of the law UNTIL you are found guilty IN A COURT OF LAW.

    The comedy here is that you don’t know the difference.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *