Hillary’s new sunglasses? Yes, they are used for suppressing seizures, but there might be more to it- UPDATED

By 68 Comments 5,115 views

zeiss-z1-on-hillary

 

Skook took note of Hillary’s new shades the other day. I thought it a bit odd at first but then I came across Jim Hoft’s post:

Hillary has been sick for some time and the major media will not report on it. But on the internet the news is much more accurate and up to date. One post on Twitter pointed out that Hillary was the only one wearing sunglasses at the 9-11 event and suggested that the glasses are not regular sun glasses.  That is why she was wearing them. The glasses worn by Hillary are recommended for seizure patients.

I don’t jump on rumors and I do like to see data so I did some digging and yes, those lenses (Zeiss Z1 lenses) are indeed used to suppress seizures. Let’s put some flesh on the bones. First the research:

Usefulness of blue sunglasses in photosensitive epilepsy

These results suggest that the suppressive effect of the three sunglasses on FDP stimulation is mainly due to a luminance diminution, whereas that of blue sunglasses on RF stimulation is produced by an inhibitory effect of short wavelengths and possibly by a luminance diminution. Thus, blue sunglasses are thought to be useful in the treatment of patients with photosensitive epilepsy

Suppressive Efficacy by a Commercially Available Blue Lens on PPR in 610 Photosensitive Epilepsy Patients

Conclusions: The Z1 lens is highly effective in controlling PPR in a very large number of photosensitive epilepsy patients irrespective of their epilepsy or antiepileptic drug treatment. The lens might become a valid resource in the daily activity of any clinician who cares for patients with epilepsy

A novel nonpharmacologic treatment for photosensitive epilepsy: a report of three patients tested with blue cross-polarized glasses

CONCLUSIONS: These preliminary data suggest that blue cross-polarized lenses may be useful in the treatment of photosensitive epilepsies and that their efficacy can be predicted in the EEG laboratory.

Suppressive efficacy by a commercially available blue lens on PPR in 610 photosensitive epilepsy patients.

CONCLUSIONS:The Z1 lens is highly effective in controlling PPR in a very large number of photosensitive epilepsy patients irrespective of their epilepsy or antiepileptic drug treatment. The lens might become a valid resource in the daily activity of any clinician who cares for patients with epilepsy.

And some anecdote:

Life with Zeiss Z1 F133 protective lenses

I promised to share information about my daughter’s experience with the blue Zeiss Z1 F133 lenses that I’ve written about previously. In the past we got prescription glasses made with these lenses. But her prescription has changed every year and that meant ordering them all over again. So this last time we got her a new pair, we went with clip-ons. Here’s what I can tell you:

They absolutely do prevent seizures while Alice watches TV! They also prevent the seizures that happen when she reads uninterrupted for very long periods. And they’re handy for unexpected events out in the community—emergency lights, flash photography, and flickering fluorescent bulbs.

Photosensitivity as a Seizure Trigger

Some non-moving patterns with high contrast may trigger seizures in some people with photosensitive epilepsy. Examples of high contrast patterns are black and white stripes, some patterned materials and wallpapers, and sunlight through slatted blinds.
Polarized, blue lens sunglasses may help with photosensitivity. Ask your optician to find the deepest blue tint possible. The Z1 lens , listed in a study below, is available only in Italy. Polarized, blue lens are useful in preventing photosensitive seizures in many epilepsy patients.

And there’s this little nugget:

 

“Squeeze my fingers” is indeed part of a neurological evaluation for a motor deficit.

And I saw this from the NY Times:

.

It shows Hillary getting off her jet last week. What I noticed is how close Clinton walks behind Palmieri, suggesting to me that Palmieri is there to break a possible fall. I don’t think Clinton can see well at all which explain why her handler was lighting the way for her a while back- even in a well-lit corridor..

 

She’s still wearing powerful glasses, even if they’re not the Fresnel type lenses:

 

This doesn’t prove anything but it begs a volume of questions- questions that demand answers before someone is elected to the highest office in the land. I am not going to accept anything about Clinton from the campaign that gave us “allergies” and “overheating.” Their first instinct always is to lie.

I am highly amused by the NY Times’ reportage on Clinton. There is a video at the link titled “Clinton loses her balance at 9/11 memorial” and wrote that Clinton “briefly appeared unsteady.”

You can stick that one in the “gross understatement” file.

There is monstrous collective lack of intellectual curiosity affecting the press who haven’t asked why Clinton was taken to Chelsea’s apartment instead of a medical facility. Of course they didn’t want an evidentiary trail but more than that, they didn’t want anyone to know what was being administered. A blast of dexmethazone would be appropriate and effective treatment for, say, an acute episode of Multiple Sclerosis. BTW, seizures are more common in those with MS than those without. Seizures- the kind that blue glasses help suppress.

Common MS Symptoms?

Blurred or double vision.
Thinking problems.
Clumsiness or a lack of coordination.
Loss of balance.
Numbness.
Tingling.
Weakness in an arm or leg

 

 

Or maybe not. Just sayin’

 

PS
Watch this video

At ten seconds in, Clinton takes one step with her right foot and that’s it. She then collapses totally and loses her right shoe. She had to be literally dumped into the van.

 

UPDATE

It is claimed that Clinton released her medical records. She has not. Only a letter- a narrative- was released. Further, her physician is simply wrong:

Bardack, Clinton’s personal doctor, said she found a “mild, non-contagious bacterial pneumonia.”

There is no such thing.

 

DrJohn has been a health care professional for more than 30 years. In addition to clinical practice he has done extensive research and has published widely with over 70 original articles and abstracts in the peer-reviewed literature. DrJohn is well known in his field and has lectured on every continent except for Antarctica. He has been married to the same wonderful lady for over 30 years and has three kids- two sons, both of whom are attorneys and one daughter on her way into the field of education. DrJohn was brought up with the concept that one can do well if one is prepared to work hard but nothing in life is guaranteed. Except for liberals being foolish.

68 Responses to “Hillary’s new sunglasses? Yes, they are used for suppressing seizures, but there might be more to it- UPDATED”

  1. 51

    Common Sense

    @Greg: Greggie, show me where it is a requirement to show tax returns to be President. I’m waiting Greggie but I know you won’t produce anything. Election hasn’t been conducted yet so tax returns can still be produced. Your really stuck on stupid. Hilldabeast insults working Americans by calling then deplorable and numerous phones, passes out and lies about her health, and no real health records produced by her. Without also recognizing the fact that she left soldiers on the field of battle to die, lied over their dead bodies, and then tried to hide the reality. It’s called treason Greggie!!

  2. 52

    Enchanted

    @Greg: greg my brother has stage 2 parkinsons, so I know a bit about the disease. hillary has parkinsons and it appears she is going into stage 3. At this stage she has trouble walking or standing. The metal thing that came put of her pant leg was probably from a leg brace. Many people with the disease wears a brace to aid with walking. The disease has some strange effects too like having seizures because of flash bulbs or sunlight. Those glasses she wears are to aid in the prevention of seizures. Her disease may not progress over stage 3, but if so she will be pretty much useless and will require 24/7 care. This disease not only attacks the body but the mind.

    There has been more then one picture showing an outline of a foley bag and also an apparatus that will kick start her heart in case of heart attack. She doesn’t wear those big tent jackets for nothing. They are hiding medical equipment.

    Then there is her ever present handler with his epi pen. Also when she was near the van, the nurse, doctor or whoever the woman was told her to squeeze her fingers. This is a neurological test.

    Then of course her double. Only a blind idiot would not be able to spot the differences.

    The woman is ill, very ill. However her greed for power is pushing her forward. People that will support her to the end would believe she was alive and well if she were wheeled around on a dolly and worms were turning out.

    Our country deserves better.

  3. 53

    Oblamobinlyen

    @Common Sense: The BEST thing Trump can do at the first debate is to ask HilLIARe if she’d like a seat, just to be polite. Might want to include a seat belt. If she freezes then she’s toast, except to Greg, he’d vote for her if she was stone cold, like her heart.

  4. 54

    Nanny G

    The Clinton Foundation spent a hair under $91.3 million in 2014, the organization’s IRS filings show.

    But less than $5.2 million of that went to charitable grants.

    That number pales in comparison to the $34.8 million the foundation spent on salaries, compensation and employee benefits.

    Another $50.4 million was marked as “other expenses.”

    http://dailycaller.com/2016/09/16/just-5-7-percent-of-clinton-foundation-budget-actually-went-to-charity/

    So, when we learn that Hillary ”gave” a certain percent to ”charity,” remember, she gave it to her own Foundation which then paid her, her husband and her daughter VERY NICELY.

    Tax returns don’t tell the whole story.

  5. 55

    Greg

    @Nanny G, #54:

    The Clinton Foundation spent a hair under $91.3 million in 2014, the organization’s IRS filings show.

    But less than $5.2 million of that went to charitable grants.

    That’s because the Clinton Foundation runs it’s own programs all over the world, rather than just collecting money and writing out checks to third parties.

    That information has been posted here before, and more than once. This particular distortion—otherwise known as a lie—was originally rolled out by Carly Fiorina. It has been thoroughly debunked, but people just keep right on repeating it.

  6. 56

    Greg

    Trump is a liar, a fraud, and a totally irresponsible man. He’s setting a extremely low standard for the people who are following him. Consider this latest comment:

    Donald Trump Says Hillary Clinton’s Bodyguards Should Disarm to ‘See What Happens to Her’

    People should start listening closely and start thinking about what they’re hearing. This idiot has no business whatsoever on a presidential election ballot. He’s more suited to the position of lynch mob leader. If we’re not careful, he’ll not only destroy the GOP, but the nation as well.

  7. 57

    July 4th American

    @Greg:

    Just 5.7 Percent Of Clinton Foundation Budget Actually Went To Charitable Grants

    Exclusive: $216 Million From Clinton Foundation Donors Bought 205 Invitations to White House State Dinners

    The Clinton global initiative aka(the cash grab initiative) was set up to be a money laundering operation, nothing more…..

  8. 58

    Common Sense

    @Greg: Greggie, nice rant with nothing to say. All I heard was blah blah blah, wah wah wah, and baby baby baby. PTSD took whoever brains you may have had and made you a moronic robot without a clue. Has Trump committed treason like hilldabeast?? Has true put American lives at risk by sending and receiving classified documents on a private server and then lie about it??

  9. 59

    Greg

    @July 4th American, #57:

    Just 5.7 Percent Of Clinton Foundation Budget Actually Went To Charitable Grants

    The Clinton Foundation makes few grants to third parties charitable organizations because it operates its own charitable programs directly, all over the world. That’s how it manages to spend 88 percent of all fund raised directly on its charitable programs while spending only 12 percent on operating costs, including fund raising costs. That’s how it gets an A rating from Charity Watch. Most well-known charitable programs don’t do anywhere near that well.

  10. 61

    Greg

    @July 4th American, #60:

    Unlike Donald Trump, the Clinton tax returns are available for public inspection.

    So are the Annual Reports, Financials & Tax-Exempt Materials of the Clinton Foundation. That includes yearly Audited Financial Statements & IRS Form 990s from 1998 forward.

    The Clinton’s financial dealings have been put under a microscope. Donald Trump’s financial dealings have been hidden from public view. For all you know, the Russian oligarchy own this guy. They may have invested to get him under their thumb just as cleverly as Putin’s intelligence service has used computer hacks and Wikileaks in an effort to install him in the White House. All the dots are there. You should get a pencil and see what happens when you connect them.

  11. 62

    July 4th American

    @Greg:

    Why do we not know the complete list of charitable contributions? Are they not a 501c(3)?

    How about you list the charitable orgs where they donated 88% of their foundation revenue?

    The Clinton Foundation: A cauldron of conflicts and cronyism

    By Barbara Joanna Lucas, Foundation Watch, May 2015 (PDF here)

    Summary: The former first family’s philanthropy has always been a vehicle to promote the careers of the Clintons. It does some good things that help people but in recent years it has functioned more like an unofficial campaign headquarters for Hillary Clinton’s 2016 presidential bid. And if there is one thing the Clintons are good at, it’s getting paid. The Clintons said the charity would not accept donations from foreign governments while Mrs. Clinton served as Secretary of State. They must have been crossing their fingers behind their backs because it was recently revealed that the Clinton Foundation accepted millions of dollars from foreign governments during Mrs. Clinton’s tenure at the State Department. Making matters worse, Hillary Clinton’s cavalier approach to U.S. national security has also spilled over into her family’s foundation – and a new book called “the most anticipated and feared book of a presidential cycle still in its infancy” is to be published this month. The Clinton Foundation may soon dominate news cycles, but not the way the Clintons wanted.

    Another subgroup is the Clinton Health Access Initiative, which is in the center of the foreign donations controversy. The CHAI was established in 2002 to help fight HIV/AIDS, malaria, tuberculosis, and other diseases in the developing world. The health initiative was started by Clinton inner-circle member Ira C. Magaziner, who was the chief strategist behind the failed HillaryCare initiative (New York Times, Aug. 13, 2013).

    Reuters first reported in mid-March that CHAI confirmed that it had not released a complete list of donors since 2010. Mrs. Clinton had pledged to the Obama administration that the State Department would be able to review all proposed new or increased contributions to the CHAI by foreign governments, but while she served in the Obama administration, CHAI received millions in new or increased payments from seven separate foreign governments with no review. Five of the governments began donating to the foundation after Hillary became Secretary of State, while two more at least doubled their contributions. CHAI admitted only that it should have informed the State Department of a $340,000 contribution from Switzerland (Reuters, March 19, 2015).

    The other donor-governments were Great Britain, Australia, Swaziland, Papua New Guinea, Sweden, and Rwanda.

    Allegations Of Fraud Surface Over “One Time” Donations To Hillary That Occur Repeatedly

    Haitian President EXPOSES the Clinton Foundation: “Hillary Clinton tried to bribe me!

    Clinton Foundation Spent Millions More On Travel Than Charitable Grants, IRS Filings Show

    Clinton Bundler Faced No Punishment for Failing to Register Foreign Government Work

  12. 63

    Common Sense

    @Greg: Greggie, Trump is audited by the IRS yearly. He said he would release his returns if hilldabeast released the transcripts of her speeches where she got paid millions. You OK with that Greggie??

  13. 67

    JR

    Interesting that you mention MS. After her 9/11 episode I mentioned this exact thing to my husband. I had someone close to me suffer from MS and her actions remind me very much of an MS patient.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *