Our President, Chief Lobbyist and Apologist for ISIL

Loading

Lord Haw Haw Prototypes no longer operate behind enemy linesThe Obama Administration has taken lobbying for Islamic Extremism and the Islamic State to the point of absurdity and the FBI has joined the IRS in the role of an official political bureaucracy of the Democrat party.

Attorney General Loretta Lynch revealed to Democrat mouthpiece Chuck Todd of NBC, the FBI will release edited transcripts of the Islamic extremist’s 911 calls.

Lynch is willing to openly admit she is using propaganda to keep the public from forming negative opinions of ISIS or as our president prefers ISIL. It becomes a win-win situation for the administration: first, the radical extremists, otherwise known as terrorists, the president and Hillary Clinton funded and armed during the Arab Spring don’t receive negative press, and two, the president and Hillary Clinton lessen the inevitable charges of incompetence and complicity.

Lynch: “What we’re not going to do is further proclaim this man’s pledges of allegiance to terrorist groups, and further his propaganda. We are not going to hear him make his assertions of allegiance.” (Presumably, to this administration’s bastard child, ISIL)

FBI Director and Obama stooge James Comey (Whose investigation of Hillary is approaching marathon qualification, no doubt his findings will be released as insufficient to recommend prosecution, just before the election) has stated that the shooter’s comments from the past were inflammatory and contradictory; therefore, the public will be denied the truth. Unfortunately, under Comey’s direction, the FBI refused to take action against the Orlando extremist on several occasions and he was allowed to proceed with his act of terror, presumably to avoid problems with political correctness.

LORETTA LYNCH: What we’re announcing tomorrow is that the FBI is releasing a partial transcript of the killer’s calls with law enforcement, from inside the club. These are the calls with the Orlando PD negotiating team, who he was, where he was… that will be coming out tomorrow and I’ll be headed to Orlando on Tuesday.

CHUCK TODD: Including the hostage negotiation part of this?

LYNCH: Yes, it will be primarily a partial transcript of his calls with the hostage negotiators.

CHUCK TODD: You say partial, what’s being left out?

LYNCH: What we’re not going to do is further proclaim this man’s pledges of allegiance to terrorist groups, and further his propaganda.

CHUCK TODD: We’re not going to hear him talk about those things?

LYNCH: We will hear him talk about some of those things, but we are not going to hear him make his assertions of allegiance and that. It will not be audio, it will be a printed transcript. But it will begin to capture the back and forth between him and the negotiators, we’re trying to get as much information about this investigation out as possible. As you know, because the killer is dead, we have a bit more leeway there and we will be producing that information tomorrow.

While our president and Hillary Clinton struggle to hide their mistakes of the past and the treachery of the Islamic State, their efforts become an inverse equation; it’s true, their emotional efforts as apologists and lobbyists for ISIL may help contain the malignancy that exists within the Islamic religion, from the American public, it is these obvious overtures that expose their own complicity and instill doubts in Americans as to the administration’s true loyalties.

Lord Haw Haw was a propagandist for the National Socialists during WW II. An American, he became involved with fascism and broadcast his propaganda behind enemy lines. In our current age, our leaders engage in propaganda and openly admit that they will not release the truth. Lord  Haw Haw is pictured at the top of the article.

0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
60 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

Transcripts are only ”transcripts” when they are complete.
Otherwise these should be renamed something else.
“Narratives” is both accurate and aligns with the Left’s common use of narratives over facts.
The families of the victims are being victimized again – this time by our government.
Telling this man’s story, without his MOTIVE, leaves a huge gap in the factual timeline.
Obama and Lynch might as well have stood over their coffins and promised their families that they will get the guy who made that video.
Wait for it, something of this sort is coming.
If they can hide the truth long enough they can make up any story they want about why it happened.

Obama who releases crinimal’s and thugs wants the public disarmed and opens the borders bring in so called refugees proves he is a traitor and surrounds himself with fellow traitors

And you think that Ovama should give ISIS free advertising ?
When other mass killings occurred many people posting here believed that the shooters name be withheld so as to not give him the recognition that he desperately wanted. But now apparently those people want the terrorists to grave their name splashed everywhere even as we discover that he had no previous contact and said he also supported Hezbolkah the mortal enemy of ISIS Clearly he didn’t know much about either
Of course those same people were also saying “don’t politicize this tragedy”

@John: Do you not think ISIS already HAS all the information they need to claim responsibility and a glorious victory showing Allah smiles upon them? The ship to deny them a massive propaganda and recruitment bonanza has sailed, Mr. Oblivious, just as claiming Benghazi was about a video didn’t fool al Qaeda.

All this is is an effort not to cloud the gun-control debate with information showing how far removed from gun control the facts are.

@Bill:no
I don’t think they have that
Marten sure seemed to be a slacker in his religion drinking alcohol going to the GHEY and doing drugs
So at best a must recent enlisted and of course there is also that pesky allegiance to Hezbollah the sworn enemy of Sunni ISIS
I don’t think you are allowed to claim allegiance to both, do you?

the only terrorist is a dead terrorist-lynch / holter and the terrorist pres have emasculated this country. the spineless congress should be impeached/recalled. paul ryan rolled over has become pelosi’s bitch.

Skook, I note that you’ve now taken this whole claim of Obama Muslim apologetics to a new level. Now the administration isn’t simply “pro-Muslim,” it’s now explicitly pro-ISIL.

That’s nuts. In the first place, you can’t claim to know the facts about the motives of the Orlando killer, based on what’s come out to date. We certainly know that there have been many mass killers with ostensibly high intelligence, who are disaffected for a long list of reasons, having nothing to do with religion, and then decide to simply go out guns blazing. There have been scores of these people.

In the second place, there’s the whole closet homosexual thing. Gay Catholics have gone into the priesthood to hide and otherwise deal with a form of sexual orientation which has been traditionally condemned by the society in which they live. This has resulted in problems, as a fraction of these men were also pedophiles and traditional relationships between priests and boys gave them opportunity. But the point is that entering the priesthood gave them “cover.”

Now, the Orlando shooter was a Muslim. But he could have also been a disaffected misfit and he could have even also been a closet homosexual. So he figured out a way to go out in a blaze of Islamic glory. There’s no evidence that he ever had anything at all to do with ISIL, before the shooting.

Remember that Colorado shooter in the Planned Parenthood clinics? What did conservatives say about that? They said that this wasn’t a person from the anti-abortion movement. It was just a crazy guy who wanted to kill people and decided to gain a little glory for himself by turning his killing spree into some sort of “contribution” to the anti-abortion movement.

It’s human nature, when one does something bad, to try and put a positive spin on it, to excuse the badness.

And the Obama administration is correct. They correctly understand that there is absolutely nothing to be gained by, in effect, establishing a state of war between Western Culture and Islam — a religion with a world membership approaching 2 billion people. Do we really gain by earning the enmity of so many people? As opposed to trying to draw a clear distinction (as did the George W Bush administration) between extremist terrorism on one hand and Islam the religion on the other hand?

There is simply no advantage at all in using language which has the effect of provoking a conflict of civilizations, when this language can be avoided.

With respect to the “censorship” of the transcripts, it is still very early in the investigation. I’m sure that, down the road, when all the facts have been determined, the full transcripts will come out. But releasing the full transcripts right now just plays into the hands of the dead killer. He wanted the world to think that he did it all for ISIL. He wanted to die as a martyr for a cause, as opposed to dying as a deranged misfit.

Until law enforcement and intelligence has determined exactly what it was which was behind this horrible event, the responsible thing to do is not to allow the killer to control the narrative, as the killer so obviously wished to do (in calling the media and posting to social networks during his killing spree).

– Larry Weisenthal/Huntington Beach CA

@John: I can’t read your jumbled post, but I think my response is, I don’t really care if he ate BLT’s every day; if he was a “good”Muslim is immaterial. Personally, I don’t regard a Muslim that murders in the name of their religion as “good”.

But, the indisputable truth is, he committed his crime in the name of Muhammad and Islam.

@Larry Weisenthal: In the first place, you can’t claim to know the facts about the motives of the Orlando killer, based on what’s come out to date.

What, may I ask, is still in doubt?

Soooo you joining of all Muslims both good and bad entitles all being equally blamed for whatever is done by anyone claiming to do it in the name of their religion?
The mass shooting of 12 people at the Planned Parenthood clinic was done by a Christian doing that in the name of his religion, should all Christians both “good” and “bad” be blamed equally ?
Dylan Roof mass murder ee of Blacks in the church stated that he did so for his race. Should all whites thusly deserve blame ?
Matteen also said he belonged to the sworn enemy of Sunni ISIS, Shia Hezbollah . Do you actually think he supported both?

@JohnSoooo you caressing all Muslims both good and bad are to be equally blamed for whatever is done by anyone claiming to do it in the name of their religion?

Soooo… you read about as well as you write. I suggest you check again, Road Warrior.

@Skook: Now they are released.
We have a self proclaimed “radical Islamist terrorist.”
Why did he chose a gay night club on Latin Night? Disco music?? Put me in there for 3 hours I’d wish I had a gun.
Is it possible he was a self loathing gay who just wanted to go out in an “heroic” manner?

Skook,

Right on as always. Propaganda or tell the lie enough until it becomes the truth in people’s eyes. Basic dictatorial tactic.

Whether one wants to admit the obvious or not, the Radical Muslims want to destroy Western Civilization as we know it. That is a fact. Radical Muslims hate and murder Gays. That is a fact. The Orlando shooter professed allegiance to ISIS . That is a fact.

And the amazing thing is people wonder why the Government and MSM aren’t trusted.

The public needs facts, not pansy ass garbage from this American hating, Muslim leaning President and his moronic minions. Hell, even Bill Maher gets it on this one!

I just read that DOJ has changed it’s mind and released the unredacted transcripts. All fine and dandy, but the FBI is still looking for a motive! You can’t make this stuff up.

“We’re actually looking into any potential motive,” Hopper said. “We’re not limiting ourselves to coming up with just one motive. We’re looking at a myriad of things right now and that actually is ongoing as we speak, both through social media, friend contacts, people that have only met the individual for one time. That’s why we’re asking for anybody and everybody that’s had any contact with this individual to come forward so we can piece that information together for potential other motives as well.”

Hi Skook, No one is ignoring the problem, but statements like “the Islamic world is not overly concerned with earning the enmity of the West” is precisely the language which, in my opinion, should be avoided.

How on earth does it help anyone or anything, including prevention of terrorist attacks against the West, to portray all of this as an Islamic societal problem?

Here’s a quote by Ronald Reagan (true quote; passed the Snopes test): “We must reject the idea that every time a law’s broken, society is guilty rather than the lawbreaker. It is time to restore the American precept that each individual is accountable for his actions.”

What you all are trying to do is to present this as an Islamic societal problem and responsibility, rather than an individual problem and responsibility.

I see no advantage at all in so doing and a lot of disadvantages. How does it help us to convey to the 2 billion Muslims in the world (and the 6 million Muslims living in America) that we consider ourselves to be at war with their religion? Will this increase or decrease the probability of any given individual being radicalized?

@Nanny G, #1:

I think law enforcement and the Obama administration are very much mindful of the fact that transcripts and tapes could very likely become ISIS internet recruiting tools.

A more responsible media would be devoting more time and effort to exposing Omar Mateen as a pathetic, mentally disturbed loser, instead of giving him some sort of celebrity status in the eyes of other pathetic, mentally disturbed losers. I doubt they’d handle transcripts or tapes any more responsibly.

@Skook:
Yes just as radical pastors in the USA who keep talking about Planned Parenthood should also be held responsible for further twisting the sick mind of that killer who shot 12 people
Of course not AlL Christians were held responsible for the acts of that deranged killer

@Skook:
Fortunately they are a very small minority, let’s make sure we do nothing to increase their numbers or power
Of course it was giving the mist radical Islamists billions to fight the Russians that jump started this problem
And following that by getting rid of Saddam who was strongly secular and wouldn’t tolerate radical Islamists
Now our Sunni allies the Saudis and the Gulf sheiks are continuing the financing of the most radical
Anyone see a problem with that ??????

Here is the full transcript of everything the shooter said:

PDF

Addendum: I didn’t read the transcript carefully to the end. Apparently, there was a subsequent call from the shooter to 911 reportedly related to hostage negotiations (reference occurs near the end of the transcript).

Skook, Do you seriously contend that this is all Barack Obama making command decisions to micromanage and censor the FBI and CIA? I’ve been listening to all manner of security experts discus this whole matter. I’ve yet to hear any non-political person try to make the case that the language being carefully used is in any way detrimental to what should be the goal: to minimize the threat to US and Western interests — in our homelands and in the world. Quite the contrary.

Your own writings on this are not framed to be a serious debate on the strategy of the avoidance of the turning of jihadism into a modern day clash between Western and Muslim civilization as a strategy in reducing terrorist attacks and threats, but come across exclusively as a personal attack on Obama — who is by no means a fool and who is advised by a whole lot of smart people, with many smart people publicly supporting his approach.

I’d really like to see a reasoned explanation of how the “war on terror” would in any way be advantaged through having it be a US government position to frame the issue as an Islamic problem, rather than as a factional problem.

And whatever the “merits” there may be in describing this as “Islamic terrorism,” I truly think it is wrong to label this one particular attack as being “Islamic terrorism,” in the absence of an investigation to determine if this is not simply a garden variety societal loser attack or an attack by someone plagued by self loathing over sexual orientation, who simply used radical jihadism as a cover to glorify his own personal sickness.

@Larry Weisenthal:

I truly think it is wrong to label this one particular attack as being “Islamic terrorism,”

I truly think you liberals will make any excuse for terrorist attacks including labeling the Fort Hood shooting as nothing more than “workplace violence.” Are you that far removed from reality?

I think, if he said ”god,” the ”transcript” ought to read, ”god.’
BUT he SAID, ”allah.”
And allah was already being worshipped at the Ka’ba in Mecca by Arab pagans years before Muhammad was even born!
Allah is a name not a title.
God is a title, not a name.

The name of the god of the Bible is a variation of 4 Hebrew letters: YHWH that occurs thousands of times, but is replaced by ”god” most of the time.
Yet even the King James Bible has God’s actual name left intact in it in four places. (Exodus 6:3, Psalm 83:18, Isa 12:2 and Isa 26:4)
The confusion of replacing the name of the pagan ”allah” with the generic title ”god” was avoidable.

@Richard Wheeler: What is a “self loathing gay? Moreover, if you mean “heroic ” manner as a directive of Islam ,ergo you have a direct motive,everything else is propaganda.

Hi retire: I’m happy to discuss these matters with you, but can we please avoid the personal vitriol this time around?

In answer to your question, I’d like to remind you that we are allegedly fighting a war against terror. What is the goal of this war? To reduce the number and severity of terrorist attacks.

Fact: There are close to 2 billion Muslims in the world. There are close to 6 million Muslims in the USA. The Fort Hood shooter wasn’t the only Muslim in the military. There are currently close to 6,000 Muslims in the US military who are willing to self-identify as such. Doubtless thousands more who would prefer not to be identified as such who are descended from Islamic families.

What on earth is the objective, in insisting on using the descriptors “Islamic,” “Muslim, and “Islam” every time the term could be applied? Is the objective to make it appear to Muslims, in the US and around the world, that there is, in fact, a clash of religions and civilizations going on? That’s what ISIL and Al Qaeda want.

It was originally the policy of the Bush administration to draw a clear distinction between terrorist sects and terrorists on one hand, and the religion of Islam on the other hand. Bush was just as careful as Obama to avoid the descriptor “Islamic terrorism.” And he was right about this.

Yes, we could use the term “Islamic terrorism.” Yes, it would be accurate to do so. But it would serve no strategic purpose in the war on terrorism. Quite the contrary.

We are not waging a war against the Republic of Islam, in which we have the opportunity to wage war against a piece of real estate, capture the flag, and raise our own flag. That’s what we thought we were doing in Iraq.

The Bush/Obama strategy is to isolate the problem of terrorism from the religion of Islam. The purpose in so doing is to reduce the number of Muslim people who view this as a clash of religions and civilizations. We want to make it clear that our enemy is not Islam, but our enemy are terrorists who would seek to hurt our people.

The language we choose to use is a tactic in the war on terror. Again, the objective is not to try and fool anyone that we don’t think this has anything to do with Islam, but to avoid creating the impression among ignorant Americans and ignorant Muslims that the war on terror is, at its heart, a conflict with the Muslim religion.

I’d like someone to make a cogent case for how it would be a smarter tactic in the war on terror to continually be introducing the descriptors “Islam,” “Islamic,” and “Muslim” at every opportunity. I’d like someone to make a cogent case for why it is not a smart tactic in the war on terror to avoid doing this.

What I think is going on is that a whole lot of people don’t like the religion of Islam for a lot of reasons, including the infliction of terrorism on Western society by a minuscule portion of its adherents. So these people want to convince everyone else to share their views that the whole religion is rotten. So the fact that the avoidance of the “Islamic” descriptors may be helpful in the war on terror (because it shows Muslims as a whole that we are not at war with their religion) is at cross purposes with the objective of convincing everyone that Islam is bad.

But is it more important to convince people that Islam is bad or to actually reduce the total amount of terrorism?

Rather than making this a discussion about Obama’s perceived deficiencies, let’s make it a rational discussion about the use of language in counterterrorism.

– Larry Weisenthal/Huntington Beach CA

@Richard Wheeler, #13:

Is it possible he was a self loathing gay who just wanted to go out in an “heroic” manner?

Given that Mateen was a regular at the Pulse club and a known user of online gay dating apps, that’s likely an accurate assessment. Homophobia is one of the most seriously dysfunctional bits of programming in fundamentalist Islam, right up there with an irrational terror of unsuccessfully dominated women. A repressed gay Muslim male keeping up a macho heterosexual front is probably a likely candidate for the ISIS martyrdom sales pitch. He can solve all his problems through a homicidal act of self destruction, and imagine it as the ultimate act of purification.

@Greg: A repressed gay Muslim male keeping up a macho heterosexual front is probably a likely candidate for the ISIS martyrdom sales pitch.

Pitch?
More like emotional blackmail, guys.
Here’s the options open to a muslim homosexual male whose family is strict and found out:
1. he can be ”honor killed,” so as to go to islamic hell for sure.
OR,
2. he can try to curry favor with allah by taking out as many infidels as possible while dying, so as to have a chance of getting into islamic paradise (where young boys are plentiful as sexual partners.)
We see it over and over again.
We even have seen men take wives, have their own friends rape them, then threaten the women with honor killing or suicide vest.

@Larry Weisenthal:

Hi Skook, No one is ignoring the problem, but statements like “the Islamic world is not overly concerned with earning the enmity of the West” is precisely the language which, in my opinion, should be avoided.

Well, actually, anyone that is not asking why this administration is wasting time on “gun control” and not working on how to identify the terrorists here and keep more terrorists from coming here is, indeed, “ignoring the problem”… and to an extreme degree. If the radical Islamists comprise only a small percentage of all Muslims, why is it so difficult to root them out, persecute all those who preach and teach a hateful message and issue thousands of their “fatwas” declaring anyone killing in the name of their religion will go to hell stuffed with pig guts and reduce the amount of radicals greatly? My feeling is, those that are not prone to violence are waiting to see who looks like they are winning (the “strong horse”) and will hop on the bandwagon. The cowardly exercise of denying the facts so you don’t have to do your job shows even moderates who side they should be leaning toward.

An Israeli told me that we have no idea what a sacrifice Israel made during Desert Storm when Hussein was showering Scuds on Israel. In the culture over there, if you do not strike back, you are weak and a coward. You don’t look like a considerate and restrained civilized person, you look like a pu$$y. And these people do not respect pu$$ies. And respect is everything.

@Richard Wheeler: @Greg: OR (as I have already speculated) he could not reconcile being gay AND being Muslim (who has been taught that gays should be killed) and was afraid the 72 virgins he was due would NOT be 72 young boys, in a row, all bent over. So, he tried to redeem himself to Allah by killing 100 gay guys.

No matter how you look at it, the radical teachings of his vile Imam drove him to consider ISIS as someone he would like to impress.

Hi Bill,

You raise straw men. The fact that Obama wants to ban the sales of guns to people on terrorist watch lists has nothing at all to do with preventing jihadists from entering the US and rooting out the jihadists who are already here. Of course, that’s being done. How many Americans have been killed under Obama’s watch by jihadists who have slipped across our borders? Compared to the number of Americans who have been killed by skate boards, for example. Pretty darn good job, whether or not you ask me.

As for raining down scuds, tell that to the hundreds of jihadists who have had missiles from Obama’s drones (each missile personally approved by Obama) rained down on their heads.

@Larry Weisenthal:

The fact that Obama wants to ban the sales of guns to people on terrorist watch lists has nothing at all to do with preventing jihadists from entering the US and rooting out the jihadists who are already here.

Having a list with terrorists on it and banning them from buying weapons is a great idea. I wish we had one. Instead, we have a list that contains many people that don’t belong on it. So, once investigators have checked all the names and purged it of anyone that has no reason to be on it and then you can resolve how you can deny ANYONE a Constitutional right without being convicted or even ACCUSED of anything, we have a deal.

The Mateen case is a glaring example of what is wrong with this system. Because references to Islam has to be purged and ignored, he, an associate of a suicide bomber, ranter of anti-American rhetoric, son of an outspoken Taliban supporter, wife-beater, traveler to Saudi Arabia, was “cleared”. The answer (at least according to this administration)… punish everyone BUT the terrorist sympathizers.

This is no straw man… this is the crux of it.

Why on earth would it seem wise to redact everything that actually pertained to the motive for the murders when releasing information to show the motive of the murders? Does that actually make sense to you? This is like the administration trying to revive the worn out video excuse for Benghazi after so much proof that it was a coordinated, planned terror attack… everyone already KNOWS the truth, you idiots!!!.

I am NOT one of the people this administration thinks is dumb enough to swallow their weak lies.

@Skook:We shouldn’t generalize or jump to conclusions even if the facts support them unless of course the shooter is a conservative or someone who has a “Confederate” flag. Then it’s perfectly acceptable to label all conservatives or people who own a “Confederate” flag a bunch of evil racist, pigs. If we banned guns, conservatives, and “Confederate” flags we’d be much better off. All terrorist attacks would cease and the radical Islamists would love everybody. Think about it, the left and radical Islamists working together to make the U.S. a much better place! Remember, the shooter was a registered Democrat.

Remember that jihadists are from the right wing politically anti gay anti abortion anti big government
They may vote Dem but they are very socially consetvative
Oh yeah the jihadists also hate those Commies something fierce

Haha the confederate flag !! Yeah you guys are still upset over losing that one
The Southern Bapyidts just got around to agree to stop showing that in their churches
NASCAR. Says it’s a no-no too
Next thing will be those monuments to the generals who fought against their own country for the right to keep other humans as slaves

@Larry Weisenthal: Compared to the number of Americans who have been killed by skate boards, for example.

I thought you were smarter than this, Larry W.
An actuarial viewpoint of terror deaths to “X,” “Y” or “Z” deaths is immaterial.
XY&Z deaths do’t TERRORIZE the population the way terror deaths are designed to.
When a person dies because he miscalculates his bungee cord length at the Arches National Park (which is all too often) people still jump off the arches in the parks. The jumpers in the public are simply more careful (for a while).
When a terrorist uses airplanes to knock down buildings, the entire country’s flying public is forced into all sorts of changes imposed on us by the gov’t.
When a terrorist blows through a guarded gate at a military base, the gov’t changes the way guarded gates are designed.
When terrorists try to kill cartoonists for drawing Mohammad, the government tries to convince everyone to curtail their freedom of expression.
Note the major difference between what happens when an accident occurs with what happens when a terror attack occurs:
the difference is personal responsibility VS government imposition.
It is a difference in KIND, not DEGREE.
And you don’t get that?
I really thought you would.

@John: If he didn’t identify with your intolerant, left wing, hate-in-place-of-reason, racist mindset, why would he BE a Democrat today?

@Bill:
My guess is that he may have decided to vote Dem because he blamed the GOP for invading and occupying Afghanistan
It woukd seem to me that most of his values would have made him a natural GOP
Anti gay anti abortion anti woman gun lover someone who chose as his victims those who would also probably voted Dem

@Nanny G: Larry still believes that CO2 levels that are lower than what we exhale are harmful to our respiratory system.

@John: Actually he did mention the civilians Obama was killing with his drone strikes.

I see you disapprove of going after terrorists where they operate and plan. Even Obama (when useful) proclaimed Afghanistan the just war.

No, attacking people over being different is a classic liberal trait. The Bernie/Hillary thugs paid by Soros reemphasizes that.

Liberals and terrorists (excuse the redundancy) with guns are the threat; conservatives with guns is the defense.

@Greg: The real evidence versus the speculation supports that this evil animal was a radical islamic terrorists!!

@Common Sense: @Common Sense: the FBI has yet to be able to find any solid past links from Mateen to ISIS
If you know of any please tell the FBI

Only slightly off topic:
Trump has finally inspired me to leave Islamcomment image

This is a powerful read from a 19 year old female.
I was especially hit by what she wrote about how it is inside American mosques after islamic attacks.
Maybe we really need to have polite observers inside them so we can see for ourselves.

@Nanny G:
Most mosques welcome visitors of all faiths perhaps you might consider a personal visit ?

@John: Well, how about the fact that he called and claimed such allegiance to ISIS?? Would that be an indication maybe??

@John:
You have to be fluent in Arabic to get what is going on inside mosques, john.
But also you can’t just come by.
You have to move in, so to speak, before the guard comes down.
The BBC special called Undercover Mosque was astounding.
http://www.channel4.com/news/articles/dispatches/undercover+mosque+the+return/2436087.html
People became regulars and then wore hidden microphones.
Beating children was advocated for ”Westernizing.”(in Arabic)
Beating teenage daughters who refuse to arranged marriages to foreign men. (again, in Arabic)
Looking for susceptible men to radicalize then assigning handlers to each of them was common. (also in Arabic)

But what happens in a foreign language, like English?
Taqiyya and kitman, curried chicken and raisins.
PR.