I have officially had enough of this sh*t. Deport the bastards. All of them.
It’s one thing to disagree with candidates. It’s another to protest. Rioting is over the top. Hurting people is beyond the pale.
Police clashed with hundreds of protesters outside Donald Trump’s rally in Southern California on Thursday night.
At least one police car was smashed up as hundreds of demonstrators – many of them waving Mexican flags – took to the streets outside the Pacific Amphitheater in Costa Mesa, Orange County where Trump was speaking.
The protesters flooded the street outside the amphitheater with some stomping on cars, hurling rocks at motorists and forcefully declaring their opposition to Trump – bringing traffic to a halt and creating a tense standoff with authorities.
One Trump supporter was pictured with a bloody face after clashing with the anti-Trump activists, many of whom appeared to be young Hispanic people.
The violence in Southern California where Latinos make up a large segment of the population suggests Trump may face more of this in the days to come, as he campaigns ahead of the state’s June 7 primary. Trump currently leads Kasich and Cruz in the California polls, with an estimated 45.7 per cent of voters, according to Real Clear Politics.
The goddam mainstream media is downplaying the violence, dismissing it as “protests.”
Just imagine for a moment the shrieking outrage if Trump supporters had tried to flip a car outside a Hillary Clinton rally. Imagine the fury at the sight of a bloody man wearing a Hillary shirt. So how did the mainstream media cover the anti-Trump riot? Hot Air’s Larry O’Connor has the details:
Check out the LA Times headline: Protests rage outside Trump rally in Orange County; 17 arrested, police car smashed. Maybe it’s me, but if your headline includes the phrase: “police car smashed,” perhaps you should go ahead and call it a riot and not the benign and righteous sounding “protest.” The Times write-up of the ugly violence begins with more apologetic language: “Hundreds of demonstrators filled the street outside the Orange County amphitheater where Donald Trump held a rally Thursday night…” “Demonstrators”??? This is a very deliberate use of language. When you have a righteous cause, you’re a “demonstrator.” The Times is using language equating these thugs with someone marching in Selma. “Demonstrators” sounds heroic.
The Washington Post used the morally-neutral term “clashed.” Trump protesters clashed with police officers here after a campaign rally Thursday hosted by the Republican presidential candidate.
This is not a damn “protest.” It’s a riot:
[youtube]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cdpmJsPhJck[/youtube]
Trump supporters are being injured:
As if that’s not enough, these dirtbags are making clear where their loyalties lie:
images courtesy of the LA Times and the Daily Mail
These events are going to make campaign fodder for Trump. They validate everything he says. How dare these illegal alien nematodes attempt to deny Trump and other their right to free speech? What the freaking hell is wrong with the left? How would it be received and reported were attendees to a Hillary rally attacked and injured? How would it be reported if Hillary was rushed and denied entry to a campaign event?
And those flags? They’re going to suck up the benefits and privileges offered by this country and then shove this in our faces?
I don’t think so. ¡Fuera de mi país!
Trump is a jerk, but damn it, this makes clear he’s right. This garbage is going to make Trump the next President. It’s not the left being denied their rights. It’s not Hillary being jeopardized. The left is behind all of the violence, illegal and legal. If they think violence and intimidation is going to succeed, they’re yugely mistaken.
It has to stop. Trump is the guy to do it.
Felicitanos, culos. You’ve made another Trump convert.
UPDATE
Get. Out.
UPDATE II
https://twitter.com/_R1ghtW1ng9O2IO/status/726152925534248960?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw
Protestors take over hotel parking lot while #DonaldTrump speaks inside at #CAGOPConvention pic.twitter.com/UaGuFjEAFA
— Bob Redell (@BobNBC) April 29, 2016
via Breitbart
And hey, let’s watch those peaceful anti-Trumpers rough up a supporter
DrJohn has been a health care professional for more than 30 years. In addition to clinical practice he has done extensive research and has published widely with over 70 original articles and abstracts in the peer-reviewed literature. DrJohn is well known in his field and has lectured on every continent except for Antarctica. He has been married to the same wonderful lady for over 30 years and has three kids- two sons, both of whom are attorneys and one daughter on her way into the field of education.
DrJohn was brought up with the concept that one can do well if one is prepared to work hard but nothing in life is guaranteed.
Except for liberals being foolish.
@Redteam:
OK, so quote the U.S. Constitution precisely and show where the word two is.
So, now according to you, not only was the judge derelict in his duty, he was incompetent, as well.
@DrJohn:
Well, yeah, I suppose it’s a reasonable assumption to deduce that “several Trump supporters have been bloodied and beaten by illegals and the left”. I guess you got me there, or, something. And it’s also reasonable to say “those weren’t Trump supporters rioting outside a Hillary rally” and that “those weren’t Trump supporters smashing a police car”.
But no one (at least openly or documented) is exonerating them or hinting at paying their legal fees whereas Trump has promoted it in speech after speech. No one is spurring them on or exploiting their anger with direct and coded language as Trump has made that his hallmark. No one that I’m aware of other than Trump has openly stated that his hecklers “should be roughed up” by his supporters, actually advocating to bypass due process and just “beat the hell out of them”- deliver a quick and fast beating sentence for throwing a proverbial tomato or flipping a bird. Or how about “not blaming” the supporters for rioting?
And even if you can equate Hillary or the left or even if you cherry pick selective incidents, it doesn’t compare to the level Trump has taken it nor does it rationalize your rather asinine argument that he’s the man to end it.
@Ditto:
Well, there you have it.
Ted Cruz’ mother a) never applied for Canadian citizenship and b) had not yet met the statutory residency requirements that would have allowed her to do so, all according to the Canadian government.
And I am tired of these “birthers” who refuse to admit they are wrong simply because they are too dishonest to admit they support the carnival barker known as Donald Trump.
some difference here Hillary has not and probably will not be indicted
Let alone be convicted
@Ajay42302:
You continue to miss the point. I want them out. They’re not here to assimilate and become Americans. They’re here to turn this country into another Mexico and those flags and the violence prove it.
@retire05 #103:
BITE him, 05!
BITE HIM WHERE IT HURTS!
Not, mind you, that I am inciting violence…
Don’t you think that, when someone repeatedly AGREES with you, that it’s OK to call them as your “SWEETHEART”?
Because…
@Ajay42302:
Speaking of “roughed up”
@DrJohn #105:
Or just maybe they’re here to take back the part of Mexico that WE took from them and turned into an insane asylum we call “TEXAS”?
@Ajay42302:
Stop the bullshit. All of this was a response to the initial attacks from the left. And those attacks and harassment continue.
@George Wells:
You mean Mexifornia?
We TOOK from them? How so? What of the land they TOOK from the Aztecs when they slaughtered them?
@John:
You are up on your definitions about the same as you are on solar power. Pedophilia is defined as with pre-pubescent children. That means before puberty. in girls that’s usually in the 9-10-11 range and boys about 10. Very few high school girls or boys are pre-pubescent.
@DrJohn #110:
Oops! Are you arguing that two wrongs make a right?
Besides, I think that you can pin the slaughter of the Aztecs on the Spaniards, not the Mexicans.
As for Texas and California (and New Mexico, Arizona, Utah, Nevada and Oregon), Mexicans were there first. Like much of the Indian lands we took by SUPERIOR FORCE, we overwhelmed Mexico and took what we wanted. The Mexican-American War wasn’t fought over a couple of Taco Bell franchises. From our perspective, Polk did us a great favor, but surely you can appreciate that Mexicans might see it differently…
@DrJohn: @DrJohn: It’s hard to capture your point when you’re all over the place. You hate illegal immigrants from Mexico. Got it. And Hillary. Got that too. And the left. Understood.
And you think Trump, who has utilized illegal immigrants to make him fortunes will now get rid of them, or, uh, something. And because you hate the left and Hillary and Mexicans, well, that means that all the violence is a product of them and Trump is the diplomat that’s here to put a halt to that. Or again, something.
As mentioned earlier, Trump supporters are illogical people to try to have an intelligent conversation with.
@DrJohn:
You’re correct. They are here because people like Trump has enjoyed their cheap labor and that they can hide them from the regulations associated with Americans citizens.
@George Wells:From 78 you said:
And then in 95 you said:
I said it wasn’t pedophilia, that it was homosexuality. You said it was homosexuality. now you’re trying to say it wasn’t homosexuality. Did they help you out when 911 responded?
If I were to want to make a point, it would be that what Hastert did is what homosexuals do. If they get an opportunity to seduce young boys just into puberty, they are delighted. There are ‘far’ too many cases of that happening for it to be an anomaly. If you did not have sex, when you were younger, with a boy in his early teens, I’d say you were the exception for homosexuals. As my neighborhood queer, affectionately known as Quesy, used to say, the younger the better.
@Redteam: in common American English he would be called a pedophile
I suppose for most having him described as a hebephile would at best be confusing
But if course if you did wantbtobdefend him you woukd seek to confuse
But in any case RedTeam you and the GOP own him and put him 2 heart beats away from the POTUS
Wouldn’t that have been great the first POTUS arrested for taping underage boys while he was a wrestling coach
At least one of his victims later committed suicide in his early 20s
But hey !! Your right not technically a pedophile so ……… I guess you are a-ok with him
@retire05:
I’ll assume you missed this:
@George Wells:
You mean the Spaniards who are now Mexicans?
@John:
For goodness sakes John, you’re actually going to try to change the definition of pedophile?
You have no problem saying that with Obozo in the White House? And he’s not even two steps away from the white house.
Oh my God, he was ‘taping’ some boys… is that a new description of sexual crimes?
@Ajay42302:
This, as Dr. John pointed out and as I accurately tried to explain to you (you, who deems others “illogical”) was in response to the violent disruptions of his events. Don’t like violence? Don’t provoke it.
Speaking of provoking and promoting violence, why are you not directing your phony rage at your liberal media, Bernie, Hillary and the rest of the mindless liberal mouthpieces? After all, it is they that have completely mischaracterized Trump’s totally legitimate and correct stance on illegal immigrants as being directed at ALL immigrants and Mexicans? Why are you not upset about the left wing lies that is fueling the violent demonstrations?
Because the ends justifies the means, don’t they, AJ? Lies and violence are but tools in the liberal kit to gain and maintain power and you are totally down with it.
I applaud Trump encouraging anyone that is able and willing to fight back, tooth and nail, against your leftist fascism. As Obama said, if they bring a knife, his folks will bring a gun. So, if they bring a gun, we’ll have a cannon.
Let’s play.
Oh, and now how about substantiating your stupid-ass claim that Trump used illegal immigrants to amass his fortune. And don’t give more of your, “well, if you don’t know, I can’t tell you” crap, either.
@Ajay42302:
I am willing to give him the chance. Hillary and obama will do nothing other than continue to cheapen the value of being an American citizen.
@George Wells: Oh, you mean after Mexico attacked the US and provoked a war and then we PAID them for the territory we captured?
@retire05:
If I run across any of those people I’ll be sure to pass on your comments and let them know it is causing you to be sick. So far I don’t know any birthers that don’t support Hillary.
Now someone is trying to change the discussion back to whether or not he is a US citizen, not a ‘natural born’ US citizen.
It has not been proven that the necessary paperwork to ensure that Cruz is an American citizen was ever filed in the US. No birth is ‘official’ until the proper documentation has been concluded. No proof any was ever filed for Cruz, just to make him a naturalized US citizen. We do know that Cruz was both with Canadian citizenship and Canada does not recognize dual citizenship. He was also born as a Cuban citizen, even tho I haven’t heard of any proof that they filed the necessary paperwork for that either.
I never heard that Trump worked as a carnival barker. Was that back in his younger days? Do you know which midway shows he was with and which acts he barked for? That might be some good trivia information.
Heidi Cruz was a member of the CFR for 5 years, it’s surprising that she was only able to contribute one paragraph in that time.
@John:
You’re right John, the Obama admin does not agree with enforcing laws against Dimocrat criminals
If you think Trump will deport anyone you’ve drank the kool aid.
@George Wells:
I think you should review your history, George.
@Ajay42302: You are one confused feller.
So much talk of hate and anger the words have lost meaning. No we dont hate the illegal aliens we just cannot afford them, no we dont hate the left we are tired of the non solutions, tried them they do not work in fact they made things worse. Angry at the GOP nope disappointed that they made promises they had no intention of keeping.
Trump made a huge mistake by agreeing with those that stated it was anger that fueled his rise, it wasn’t anger it was who has a simple easy to understand solution. So now they describe his following as grumpy old white men of low information.
Everybody and his cousin has tried to analyze the rise of Trump, whos fault is it, where does his message resonate. So far its just Blah Blah Blah. The news agencies chase him for ratings, not because they believe he would make a great statesman, a smaller government ect.
@Redteam:
No paperwork required. Cruz was (as determined by a judge) a NBC by the virtue of his mother’s U.S. citizenship when he was born, just as Mitt Romney’s father was although born in Mexico.
What? Are you drunk? Canada most certainly allows dual citizenship.
“Since there can be several ways to acquire a given country’s citizenship, it is possible for someone to be considered a citizen under the laws of two (or more) countries at the same time. This is what is meant by “dual” (or “multiple”) citizenship.
For example, my son has been a dual citizen of both the US and Canada from the day he was born. He is a citizen of the US, because his parents are both US citizens who fulfilled the US’s legal requirement of residency in the US prior to his birth. And he is also a citizen of Canada, because he was born in Canada and neither my wife nor myself were in the country as foreign diplomats. I, too, am a dual citizen of both the US and Canada — a citizen of the US because I was born in the US, and a citizen of Canada because I went through the Canadian naturalization process.”
https://www.uscitizenship.info/dual_citizen.htm
Stop showing how ill informed you are, Redteam, I am embarrassed for you. I think you have been sipping way too much Trump vodka.
@Redteam:
So now you’re going to slam Heidy Cruz who is at least respectable enough to keep her clothes on?
How about a link to prove your claim about her being a member “Fellow” of the CFR for years?
@DrJohn #118:
“You mean the Spaniards who are now Mexicans?”
No. I mean the Spaniards who conquered Mexico – a name that came from the indigenous people in the region, not from Spain. The Spaniards were looking for gold – follow the history for yourself. But if you follow it all the way to the present, you’ll find that there is precious little love lost between the native Mexican people who represent the lion’s share of the current Mexican population and the “Spanish-Mexican” or “Castilian-Mexican” people who remain in the country as remnants of Spanish colonialism. You confuse the two at the peril of appearing ignorant. The incredible disarray in Mexico that enabled the United States to more or less walk away with half of the land Mexico had a prior claim to was Spain’s fault, not Mexico’s, Spain having thrown the population into civil war with its exploitive mis-management of the country..
@Redteam:please note that none of the FBI agents nor anyone else who has investigated get has quit in protest over tha lack of prosecution
The GOP owns Trump
And he will lose and take thecsenate with him
@DrJohn: I’m no Hillary fan by any stretch. I’m as disappointed of this race as anyone.
We could pound sand all day but that doesn’t change the cold hard reality that we are either going to vote for Trump or Hillary or not at all (or write in our own which is akin to not voting at all).
Trump is an egotistical, racist, sexist, lying, misogynist, self-centered, xenophobe who mismanaged his inheritance while profiteering of the backs of the people he’s exploited, having Chinese factories make the shirts and ties he sells rather than having Americans do it, having foreign labor run his motels rather than pay Americans, living a life a scam after scam. How about a Trump University diploma to go with those Trump steaks?
There’s just no way on God’s green earth that I’ll cast a vote for this spoiled thug to have the keys to our nuclear arsenal or nominate a supreme court justice.
@kitt:
Trump has no solutions, only blatant lies. He’s not going to build a wall which wouldn’t do any good anyway. To paraphrase DR. John, let’s stop the bullshit. Mexico IS NOT going to pay for a wall. They are not going to do it. We ARE NOT going to deport some 13 or however many Mexicans. We’re not. We don’t have the resources or the capability so it’s just flat bullshit. And even if we did, the economy would collapses. And if we did, who or where is this arbitrary panel that’s going to decide to let them back in? And what friggin sense does that make anyway.
Trump cannot ban a religion? He cannot scrap the Geneva convention and torture at will.. He cannot end Obamacare with a swoop of a pen and he has no plan in place for a replacement. He’s a lying thug that’s out for no one other than himself and has no concern of how many people he steps on.
If you live in one of the 12 battleground states maybe you do have to vote D or R
But in any o the other states by all means write in your real choice
@John: Latest poll out today Trump 41 Clinton 39
@Ajay42302: I know that, Trump as a statesman is as close as this being Rod Stewart, https://youtu.be/YUD_aeVi_bY now force yourself to watch the whole thing!
Carson is us, witnessing the bizzaro Trump
@John:
John is English your 2nd language?
@kitt: I’ll pass but thanks for the offer.
Sorry about the English being sub par
I am not home I work for a living I am doing this sometimes driving sometimes tendons a mason
That poll showing Trump ahead??? Who did that pill? How accurate have they been in the past ?
Which way do their results tilt ?left/right?
Has ANY other pollster had similar ?
How did that pollster do in the 2012 or 2008 elections?
Also please note that Rasmussen has 20% as “undecided” no other pollster has even half that many as undecided between Trump and Clinton
Any idea how that 20% will break??
English is first language
Unlike many who are posting here I actually have a job and am trying to post when/where/how I can
That is also why you will see me posting well before 7 am
@Ajay42302: lol coward honest the longer you watch the more bizzaro it gets
@kitt:
“Dismissed”, “Tossed out”, mean pretty much the same as far as rulings go.
I agree it shouldn’t, but that is generally how nation of origin citizenship was awarded when Cruz was born and up to the 1970’s.
@retire05:
Again, Ted Cruz has a legal argument to claim he is a citizen of the US or Cuba or Canada none of which recognizes dual citizenship. The problem is he decided to run for President (while leaving which nation he was going to decide he was going to be from up in the air). The entire purpose of requiring a presidential candidate be a ‘Natural Born Citizen” is specifically to ensure that that person can not hold dual citizenship (and thus a double allegiance,) that might create conflict of interests over which nation they will represent in their decisions.
Because Cruz could make claim to citizenship of either of these three nations, this “clear as mud” situation creates a huge problem for him in the general election.
More Scholars Say Ted Cruz Can’t Be President
Which clearly indicates as I have stated, that the Supreme Court only can rule on whether Ted Cruz meets the qualification.
The Universal Declaration of Human Rights lists both the right to leave any country, including one’s own (Article 13(2)) and the right to change one’s nationality (Article 15(2)), which implicitly recognizes the right to renounce citizenship.
Ted Cruz could have easily removed the question of his eligibility by filing the paperwork to legally renounce his claims to Cuban or Canadian citizenship. Why he (a constitutional lawyer,) didn’t do this very simple process is beyond me, but it could be possible that he wants to retain his triple-citizenship.
I put it out there for discussion:
Why do you think it is that Ted Cruz insists on retaining his triple-citizenship and with that his triple-allegiances, when he could have easily renounced his claims to Cuban and Canadian citizenship?
@retire05:
LOL, Romney had a mother and father that were US citizens, not the same situation.
When a US citizen is born in a foreign country, they are required to file for a US birth certificate.
travel.state.gov > Passports & International Travel > While Abroad > Life Events & Vital Records > Birth Abroad
Print Email
Drunk? you do realize we’re talking about 1970 when Teddy was born. Canada started allowing dual citizenship in 1977. But let’s go with your point and assume he was, in fact, born as a citizen of 3 countries at birth. Can it be said he is a ‘natural born’ citizen of all 3 of those countries? If you didn’t come up with a ‘NO’ then your answer is incorrect, whether drunk is an excuse, I’ll leave to you.
Don’t believe I’ve been wrong on any points yet. Kinda strange you arguing someone is a dual citizen and natural born for two of them. Kinda voids the meaning of ‘natural born’ doesn’t it.? I don’t drink Vodka. Trump or other.
Are you implying that being a model is not an honorable profession?
Don’t have time to look up that link right now, but she joined in 2007 as a term member and resigned in 2011 when ted decided to run for Senator. There are several links that discuss her membership.
@Ditto: He has renounced his Canadian citizenship.
Allegiance a 4 year old, the only allegiance they have is to a favorite blanket or teddy bear. Something that happens when you are a toddler may seem to be important or even come to mind.
A professor of Cruz says he is very qualified to be president.
http://dailycaller.com/2013/05/09/dershowitz-tex-cruz-one-of-harvard-laws-s
@kitt:
Correction: Ted “renounced his Canadian citizanship” on television. You certainly are not naive enough to think that video statement has any legal standing. I’ll also note that he did not “renounce” his Cuban citizenship.
FYI your link doesn’t work. Nor does an opinion of one of Cruz’ professors hold any legal standing.
Sorry but no dice. Only the Supreme Court can rule whether Cruz meets the required criteria.
@Ditto: No the supreme court can not rule it must be congress, if a law is unclear then Congress must put forth an amendment to the Constitution.
http://www.whitehousedossier.com/2015/03/23/liberal-prof-dershowitz-cruz-char
UPDATE UPDATE UPDATE
http://www.cnn.com/2014/06/11/politics/ted-cruz-canada-citizenship/index.html
Cuba DOES NOT recognize DUAL CITIZENSHIP of any kind.
@kitt:
Not true at all. Only the supreme court has the power to give a ruling on a law. If congress does not like the ruling, then they can amend the law. If it is a constitutional issue, Congress must pass an amendment and forward it to the states for approval, or not.
@Redteam: As long as they are not creating a Law only interpreting the meaning thereof.