Hillary: Big banks paid me zillions of dollars to hear about my role in the Bin Laden raid

By 31 Comments 2,820 views

hrc-politico

 

Did you know that Hillary Clinton was the one who shot Osama Bin Laden? Neither did I until the other day.

From 2013 to 2015 Hillary Clinton sucked in nearly $3 million dollars from Wall St banks. In just 12 speeches.

Clinton’s most lucrative year was 2013, right after stepping down as secretary of state. That year, she made $2.3 million for three speeches to Goldman Sachs and individual speeches to Deutsche Bank, Morgan Stanley, Fidelity Investments, Apollo Management Holdings, UBS, Bank of America, and Golden Tree Asset Managers.

The following year, she picked up $485,000 for a speech to Deutsche Bank and an address to Ameriprise. Last year, she made $150,000 from a lecture before the Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce.

To put these numbers into perspective, compare them to lifetime earnings of the median American worker. In 2011, the Census Bureau estimated that, across all majors, a “bachelor’s degree holder can expect to earn about $2.4 million over his or her work life.” A Pew Research analysis published the same year estimated that a “typical high school graduate” can expect to make just $770,000 over the course of his or her lifetime.

During the time Hillary served as Secretary of State, Bill and Hillary raked in “$17 million in talks to banks, insurance companies, hedge funds, real estate businesses, and other financial firms.”

Yes THEY made $17 million while SHE was Secretary of State. They file taxes jointly, they earn jointly. She was handing out the favors while Bill was collecting for them.

Asked if she would release the transcripts of her speeches to Goldman Sachs, Clinton laughed and turned away. There’s good reason for that. In 2013 Clinton gave a speech to Goldman Sachs in which she is reported to have said “banker-bashing so popular within both political parties was unproductive and indeed foolish.” 

And now she’s going to reform them? LOL we’ve heard this story before- in 2008, from Barack Obama. He also promised to prosecute those in Wall St who ripped this country apart in the financial crisis. He lied, and there is absolutely no reason to believe her now. She is owned by Wall St, despite her protestations.

A former Goldman Sachs banker knows this as well. He suggests Wall St  is pouring money into Hillary’s and Bill’s pockets as insurance:

 Banks lent trillions of dollars to home buyers on too loose of terms knowing that they could turn the resulting junk mortgages into AAA securities through the alchemy of CDOs and securitization and thus generate hundreds of billions of profit and leave the resulting mortgage mess to their investing clients.

But the financial crisis is behind us, right? Why would Wall Street shower Hillary Clinton with millions of dollars in speaking fees and tens of millions in campaign contributions?

I think it is an insurance policy. Wall Street wants a friend in the White House to protect the status quo, and if they can’t get a Republican elected, Hillary is the next best thing. I think they need a friend in government because the industry could not survive an investigation into how they actually make their profits.

There are all sorts of excuses for Hillary hoovering up Wall St cash. First Clinton tries to draw you away from her owing Wall St. Hillary would have you believing that Wall St is paying her millions because, well, first because health groups and auto dealers were interested in a complicated world:

“Why do you think one of these big banks paid you over $200,000 for a speech?” Todd asked.

“Look, I gave speeches to a wide array of groups from health care groups to auto dealers and many, many more, and I think what they were interested in, because what we talked about was the world coming off of four years as secretary of state in a complicated world, people were interested in what I saw, what I thought,” Clinton said. “You know, I think Americans who are doing business in every aspect of the economy want to know more about the world. I actually think it’s a good conversation for people to be having.”

“You don’t think they expect anything in return?” Todd asked.

“Absolutely not,” Clinton said.

Unless she was taking millions from Wall St because of 9-11 and like, she’s a girl.

Oh, wait a minute, senator. You know, not only do I have hundreds of thousands of donors, most of them small, and I’m very proud that for the first time a majority of my donors are women, 60%. [Cheers and applause.] So I— I represented New York, and I represented New York on 9/11 when we were attacked. Where were we attacked? We were attacked in downtown Manhattan where Wall Street is. I did spend a whole lot of time and effort helping them rebuild. That was good for New York. It was good for the economy, and it was a way to rebuke the terrorists who had attacked our country.

But now we learn that Hillary Clinton is taking millions from Wall St because big bankers want to hear about her participation in the Bin Laden raid:

TODD: “As you know, your opponent Senator Sanders has been hitting you on Wall Street contributions and including paid speeches you did for Goldman Sachs among other banks. Let me ask you this — why do you think one of these big banks paid you over $200,000 for a speech.”

CLINTON: “Look, I gave speeches to a wide array of groups from health care groups to auto dealers and many, many more and I think what they were interested in — because what we talked about was the world coming off of four years as secretary of state in a complicated world, people were interested in what I saw, what I thought, they asked questions about matters that were on their minds. A lot of interest in the bin Laden raid, how such a tough decision was made and what I advised the president. You know, I think Americans who are doing business in every aspect of the economy want to know more about the world. I actually think it’s a good conversation for people to be having.”

Make no mistake. Wall St loves Hillary:

According to a wide assortment of bankers and hedge-fund managers I spoke to for this article, Clinton’s rock-solid support on Wall Street is not anything that can be dislodged based on a few seemingly off-the-cuff comments in Boston calculated to protect her left flank. (For the record, she quickly walked them back, saying she had “short-handed” her comments about the failures of trickle-down economics by suggesting, absurdly, that corporations don’t create jobs.) “I think people are very excited about Hillary,” says one Wall Street investment professional with close ties to Washington. “Most people in New York on the finance side view her as being very pragmatic. I think they have confidence that she understands how things work and that she’s not a populist.”

A Wall St money manager said:

“The money is already behind her. “I don’t think it’s starting to line up behind her: It’s there for her if she wants it.”

She’s already been collecting and she owes them big. Hillary Clinton is irrevocably inter meshed with Goldman Sachs:

That will change if Clinton decides to run. For starters, as the former U.S. senator from New York, she is well known to many of Goldman’s leaders. They have seen her at numerous Goldman events over the years or at fundraisers in the Hamptons. Blankfein ran into the Clintons in August at a party in the Hamptons at Hollywood mogul Harvey Weinstein’s house, and there are the many pictures of Blankfein smiling broadly at her side during September’s Clinton Global Initiative in New York. A few weeks later, they spent time together at a dinner celebrating the Goldman Sachs “10,000 Women Initiative,” a Goldman-funded training and education program for female entrepreneurs.

Bill Clinton was led by the nose by Robert Rubin, the Goldman Sachs alum who convinced Clinton not to regulate derivatives, which was the linchpin of the financial crisis. When it came time for real Wall St. reforms, Clilnton stayed mostly mum:

She’s been fairly cagey about this issue, eager to assuage both sides. Where Obama blamed Wall Street—not inaccurately—for behavior that caused the 2008 financial crisis and championed new Wall Street regulations like the Volcker Rule and the 2010 Dodd-Frank law that really stick in the craw of money men—all while presiding over a veritable profit boon for the financial industry—Clinton said hardly a word on the topic of Wall Street shenanigans.

I will be really interested in seeing whether Sen. Elizabeth Warren sells out.

Above all else, sources close to Warren argue that Rubin and his followers put the interests of financial markets first and downplay the challenges facing the middle class.

In a debate with Sanders, Clinton admitted:

“I know how much money influences the political decision-making.” 

Yes, she does. She is living proof of it.

When Bill Clinton admitted in 2010 that he allowed Wall St. to screw up the economy, he also said something about himself and his wife:

Their argument was that derivatives didn’t need transparency because they were “expensive and sophisticated and only a handful of people will buy them and they don’t need any extra protection,” Clinton said. “The flaw in that argument was that first of all, sometimes people with a lot of money make stupid decisions and make it without transparency.”

That could not describe the Clinton’s any more accurately.

 

 

 

 

DrJohn has been a health care professional for more than 30 years. In addition to clinical practice he has done extensive research and has published widely with over 70 original articles and abstracts in the peer-reviewed literature. DrJohn is well known in his field and has lectured on every continent except for Antarctica. He has been married to the same wonderful lady for over 30 years and has three kids- two sons, both of whom are attorneys and one daughter on her way into the field of education. DrJohn was brought up with the concept that one can do well if one is prepared to work hard but nothing in life is guaranteed. Except for liberals being foolish.

31 Responses to “Hillary: Big banks paid me zillions of dollars to hear about my role in the Bin Laden raid”

  1. 1

    John

    Unlike George Bush who does usually pocket his speaking fees, the Clinton’s fees go to their foundation
    Neither Clinton seems to lead a super lux lifestyle. They own 2 houses one they bought for 1.5 million and the other for a bit more than 2 million

    Neither seem interested in jewelry or yachts or owning jets
    Material possessions are not a primary concern of them

  2. 7

    kitt

    @DrJohn: When she isn’t dodging sniper fire she is clipping coupons from the red plum flyer, putting up the window film behind her Kmart curtains and only goes to the bathroom at debates to save on the water bill at home.

  3. 8

    Bill

    You can’t completely write off that Hillary would not reform banking just because she talks like it is unproductive; remember, she will say ANYTHING for a buck. Like Obama did with gay marriage, opposing it until he had screwed everything up so badly that he needed a diversion and some extra support, so would Hillary gladly throw her Wall Street buddies under the bus to save her own leathery, sagging skin. After all, what are THEY going to do about it?

    @John:

    Unlike George Bush who does usually pocket his speaking fees, the Clinton’s fees go to their foundation

    Which goes back to the Clinton’s. Only 10% of the Clinton Foundation goes to any outside enterprise.

  4. 11

    James Raider

    author

    Wall St is pouring money into Hillary’s and Bill’s pockets as insurance:

    DrJ, . . . . and even some Dems who know this are evidently joining the support for Trump. The left knows, but will not vocalize confirmation, that Obama was bought by the banks and that is why he and Holder NEVER went after a single senior banker. They wasted time “grifting” billions from their banks through blackmail, but they DID NOT nail any of them — it was a pathetic theatre of the absurd filled with hypocrite thespians. Then Holder retired Chicago to collect on his multi-million dollar quid-pro-quod from the banks.

    These grifting puppets sold out America and the Clintons just represent more of the same charade.

  5. 12

    JSW

    Hillary Clinton’s net worth is $34 million

    She’s just a regular sort, scrapin’ by.

    What, exactly, was so wrong about Mitt Romney (who gives millions more to charity that Gore, Kerry, the Clintons)?

    What, exactly, is so wrong with the Koch Brothers, who give away millions more to charity than the Clinton Money Laundering Trust?

    Liberals have no scruples, while lecturing everyone else on their supposed lack of such.

    http://www.reviewjournal.com/news/las-vegas/high-fashion-expense-hillary-travel

    illary Rodham Clinton likes to travel in style.

    She insists on staying in the “presidential suite” of luxury hotels that she chooses anywhere in the world, including Las Vegas.

    She usually requires those who pay her six-figure fees for speeches to also provide a private jet for transportation — only a $39 million, 16-passenger Gulfstream G450 or larger will do.

    And she doesn’t travel alone, relying on an entourage of a couple of “travel aides,” and a couple of advance staffers who check out her speech site in the days leading up to her appearance, much like a White House trip, according to her contract and supporting documents concerning her Oct. 13 speech at a University of Nevada, Las Vegas Foundation fundraiser. The documents were obtained by the Las Vegas Review-Journal through the state public records law.

    CENTER OF ATTENTION

    Clinton, a former first lady, U.S. senator from New York and U.S. secretary of state, is expected to run for president in 2016. Her lifestyles of the rich and famous ways and comments that she made about her wealth during a recent book tour have fueled criticism that she’s out of touch with average Americans.

    The Democratic contender said she pays taxes, unlike some people who are “truly well off.” She also said she and her husband, former President Bill Clinton, were “dead broke” when they left the White House in 2001. In the past eight years alone, the couple has earned more than $100 million, much of it from speaking fees, according to Politico.

    In fact, the former president spoke at the 2012 UNLV Foundation dinner, taking home a $250,000 fee. His spouse will get $225,000 to speak at the annual dinner. The size of Hillary Clinton’s fee has come under fire from critics who question the large expense in an era when students are hard-pressed to cover tuition and leave school saddled with massive debt.

    But Clinton’s $225,000 is something of a cut-rate. Documents obtained by the newspaper show that she initially asked for $300,000 and reveal that she insists on controlling every detail of the private event, large and small, to ensure that she will be the center of attention.

    “It is agreed that Speaker will be the only person on the stage during her remarks,” according to the May 13 contract the Harry Walker Agency signed for Clinton’s keynote address at the Bellagio.

    According to her standard speaking contract, Clinton will remain at the event no longer than 90 minutes; will pose for no more than 50 photos with no more than 100 people; and won’t allow any press coverage or video- or audio-taping of her speech.

    The only record allowed will be made by a stenographer whose transcription will be given only to Clinton. The stenographer’s $1,250 bill, however, will go to the UNLV Foundation.

    The foundation, meanwhile, is prohibited from advertising the event on radio, TV or billboards. Mail and website ads are allowed, although Clinton staffers must approve in writing any promotional material. One unhappy UNLV Foundation official in an email complained of “meddling” after Clinton’s agency edited a description of the annual dinner to “dumb it down.”

    And Clinton’s demand for approval of all website material before it hits the Internet prompted a UNLV Web designer to grouse in an email that it seems “assbackwards in my mind.”

    The foundation complied with Clinton’s wishes, however.

    POLITICS IN PLAY

    While big-name speakers such as the Clintons have been proven moneymakers, the foundation took a pass on a Hillary appearance in 2013 because Bill had appeared the previous year and the organization didn’t want to come off as favoring Democrats.

    “We need to be careful not to appear partisan,” said a Feb. 18, 2013, email from the UNLV Foundation to the Harry Walker Agency.

    Later, in a Jan. 31, 2014, email, UNLV suggested that Hillary Clinton might want to be interviewed by former TV broadcaster Tom Brokaw, who was supposed to speak in 2013 but fell ill and had to be replaced by talk show host Charlie Rose.

    “It would temper any criticism by uber conservative donors that we’re giving her a campaign stop, particularly in light of the fact the BC was here 2 years prior,” reads an email from Tori Klein of the UNLV Foundation to Beth Gargano, a Harry Walker Agency representative.

    But Clinton, who has had a rocky relationship with the press, had already vetoed media interviews.

    Ironically, uber-conservative donor Sheldon Adelson, the chairman and chief executive officer of the Las Vegas Sands Corp. who donated an estimated $150 million to GOP campaigns and causes in 2012, will be honored at the UNLV Foundation dinner. His company helped UNLV raise millions of dollars this year and committed $7 million toward construction of a hotel college building and a proposed Center for Professional and Leadership Studies, the foundation said.

    BIG NAMES

    The annual dinner, one of Las Vegas’ biggest fundraising events, attracts powerful donors. The top givers this year, who purchased the most expensive $20,000 tables, are a who’s who of Nevada business and politics. They include:

    Bank of America; Barnes & Noble College; Barrick Gold; the Bennett Family Foundation; Cashman Equipment Co.; the Engelstad Family; Kell and Nancy Houssels; Konami Gaming Inc.; Dana and Gregory Lee; Mr. and Mrs. Hae Un Lee of Lee’s Discount Liquor; Joyce Mack; The Mendenhall Family; MGM Resorts International; NV Energy; PR Partners; the Wells Fargo Foundation; and Michael and Renee Yackira.

    Clinton’s contract allows her to invite up to 20 guests, including her staff, and have them sit together to be able to join the photo line.

    None of the photos can be made public.

    “The Sponsor is also required to communicate to the photo line attendees that the photo is for private, personal use only and that the photo cannot be used in any way to imply any kind of endorsement of an entity, individual, product or service,” the contract says.

    “Any use of the photo that suggests or implies any such endorsement is forbidden.”

    UNLV did win one major concession in contract talks that stretched more than a year: The Harry Walker Agency Inc. agreed to a $225,000 fee, down from Clinton’s standard $300,000.

    Clinton’s fee usually includes expenses such as travel by private jet, other transportation, hotel rooms, phone charges, a TelePrompter, if needed, and all meals and “incidentals” for her and her staff.

    “We can bring the fee down (because of the fact that a major portion of the $300K is for the jet),” an agency representative wrote in a May 23, 2013, email to a UNLV Foundation official.

    “I believe the $225,000 ALL INCLUSIVE plus stenographer fee should do it,” the agency said in a follow-up May 31, 2013, email after the university negotiated the discount and asked for confirmation.

    Presumably, Clinton will have to pay for her own jet to Las Vegas, presidential suite and other costs she normally charges to events, unless some private donor picks up the tab.

    According to a May 31, 2013 email, Clinton’s standard contract usually includes:

    ■ Round-trip transportation on a chartered private jet “e.g., a Gulfstream 450 or larger jet,” plus round-trip business class travel for two advance staffers who will arrive up to three days in advance.

    ■ Hotel accommodations selected by Clinton’s staff and including “a presidential suite for Secretary Clinton and up to three (3) adjoining or contiguous single rooms for her travel aides and up to two (2) additional single rooms for the advance staff.”

    ■ A $500 travel stipend to cover out-of-pocket costs for Clinton’s lead travel aide.

    ■ Meals and incidentals for Clinton, her travel aides and advance staff, as well as all phone charges.

    ■ Final approval of all moderators or introducers.

    BIG MONEYMAKER

    The UNLV Foundation expects up to 1,000 people for the dinner, which is expected to turn a healthy profit. By early July, the organization had already sold out its top $20,000 tables with the $10,000, $5,000 and $3,000 tables going fast.

    Individual tickets also are on sale for $200 each.

    UNLV student leaders have sent a letter to the Bill, Hillary & Chelsea Clinton Foundation, which collects the $225,000 fee, asking that Hillary Clinton donate all or part of the money back to the university. They’ve received no reply.

    UNLV Foundation leaders have defended paying such a high fee to Clinton, arguing that the dinner will make a profit and that her presence is both a big draw and an honor.

    The foundation has raised more than $1 billion for the university over the years.

  6. 14

    KITT

    @JSW: Speaking of high fashion the clothing hanging off her carcass by designer Nina McLemore are about 1400 bucks a pop for an unappealing boxy jacket and shapeless slacks, but they do hide the support hose. The shoes are most likely as much per pair. Her taste in clothes has not evolved through the years, 1993 forever!

  7. 15

    John

    @DrJohn:
    Dr j
    They have 2 houses
    One was valued at 1.5 million when they bought it in 2001
    Is that too decadent a lifestyle for you to accept?
    After 40 years as a “Doctor” in MA I would assume your own house to be worth that
    Do you see Hillary as taking a pay cut to become POTUS?
    Certainly she is not doing that to enrich herself
    She could make as much money as she could possibly want by simply keeping all the money she could make giving speeches
    Certainly Hillary is an imperfect person
    But to suggest that a primary motivation is money is stupid

  8. 16

    KITT

    @John: What did she do with her other two mansions one estimated 11 million, another at 13 million? she just keep the New York 1.7 million and the DC at 5.7 million to look like she is a nice normal low income lady?
    She wants the office for the awesome unlimited power she would wield, she got a little taste of it as 1st lady.

  9. 17

    Bill

    @John: I don’t care if they have 10 houses at $10 million apiece. The problem is when she vilifies anyone that actually WORKED for their money spending it as THEY please. Seems you and she are just fine with her lavish lifestyle (financed through corruption and graft) but people like the Koch bros. who provide 10’s of thousands of jobs, charities, foundations and tax revenue are evil because they stand up for the principles that make all that feasible.

    You know, when you have a “Foundation” that pays for all the travel, meals, lodging, clothes and accoutrements, she doesn’t really NEED an income. She is a greedy dictator wanna-be and should not be allowed withing visual distance of the White House. Her or her skirt-chasing husband.

    THAT’s the problem, but I understand how it sails right over your pointed head.

  10. 18

    KITT

    Good news there is going to be another Democrap debate moderator… ready…sit down..none other than Rachel Madcow from MSNBC. Will this be a debate or a massage in one of “those, are you current on your shots” kinda places?

  11. 19

    Anonymous

    There is a True Saying which says that, he or she who Pays the Piper calls the Tune, and this is what has been happening with Bill Secret Harem Clinton and Hillary Clinton.

    These ‘Lectures’ are a front for a Bribe, and it is Disguised Money Laundering, so that the Wealth of the Clintons can be made to look clean, and these ‘Lectures’ are written for the Clintons by those who Pay to Listen to those ‘Lectures’.

    It is Interesting how Barack Obama’s earnings as a Politician amount to that of a Senator’s salary of 175,000 Dollars a year for 4 years, and then on the President’s salary of 400,000 Dollars a year for 7 years, which over 3 million Dollars before Tax and Expenses, but Somehow, Hillary Clinton’s Puppet Barack Obama, was able to buy a 35 Million Dollar Mansion in Hawaii at http://hillbuzz.org/why-arent-the-occupy-wall-street-kids-angry-about-the-obamas-getting-a-35-million-beachfront-mansion-in-hawaii-24333 .

    The thoughts of a Government Paid Public Servant, which is a Euphemism for a Self Server like Hillary Clinton, should have been given Free of Charge, and the Public have a Right to know what Government Policy is, because Hillary Clinton was and remains the Real President of America during her Puppet Obama Administration.

    It should Not be a surprise if Hillary Clinton Schemed and Shamed the Osama bin Laden killing, and whose alleged body was said to have been buried at sea so that no one could examine it, and there are People who think that a cover up was needed of the Navy Seals known as Team 6 who are alleged to have killed Osama bin Laden, and those Navy Seals Definitely Knew the Facts, and they were killed in a helicopter crash in Afghanistan under Highly Suspicious circumstances, and they Knew what Really happened at http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2013/oct/20/families-suspect-seal-team-6-crash-was-inside-job-/?page=all , and at http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2015/aug/5/obama-stonewalls-seal-team-6-extortion-17-helicopt/?page=all , and at http://humansarefree.com/2011/05/proof-that-osama-bin-laden-was-cia-and.html .

    After having read that, we can see why there are People who think Hillary Clinton Deliberately Reduced Security at the American Embassy in Benghazi, even though those Americans in Benghazi asked on several Occasions for Security to be Increased at that American Embassy.

    If Navy Seal Team 6 had Evidence that the Osama bin Laden raid was a Hoax, then Hillary Clinton would have allowed for Proper Security at the Benghazi Embassy.

    It is Hillary Clinton who Controls the Democrats, and Barack Obama did Not invent these Schemes, because he is Hillary Clinton’s Puppet.

    According to some People, the Benghazi Scheme involved using Bribed Libyans to Fake the kidnap of American Citizens, and where Obama would have rescued them to increase his popularity for the 2012 Election.

    Hillary Clinton was looking for a way to also gain Control of the Congress and the Senate, along with having Barack Obama reelected, so that she could have Dictatorial Power in America.

    That Theory suggests that certain Real Terrorists in Libya learned of the incident, and they used it for their own purposes.

    There was either a Secret Double Agent among the Fake Terrorists, who told the Real Terrorists of the Scheme, or it was unintentionally and carelessly told to someone in confidence, and the information was told to the Real Terrorists in Libya.

    Hillary Clinton is a Lawyer, and they say that Lawyers are Trained on How to Lie, Cover Up, and Misrepresent, and Hillary Clinton’s Proven Scandals, which do Not include her other Activities are at http://www.wnd.com/2015/05/here-they-are-hillarys-22-biggest-scandals-ever/ .

    Hillary Clinton calculated that there would be No Honest Investigation of these things, because any Honest Investigation would be Labeled as Racist, and Hillary Clinton was able to use the Race Card to Manipulate the Benghazi Hearings to be a Cover Up of the Benghazi matter.

    The Republicans were wary of being Wrongly Labeled as Racists or as being against women, and some Democrats including African American Democrats Know that Bill Secret Harem Clinton could Secretly Photograph People in his Secret Harem, and Hillary Clinton Controls the Democrats, and she Manipulates the Republicans.

    These People say that Hillary Clinton had All of the Lying Excuses thought of in Advance in case something went wrong, and that incident was used to help to reelect Barack Obama in the 2012 Election.

    Hillary Clinton’s Secret Email was Needed so that as a Paid Public Servant, she could be Above Scrutiny, and it made it easier to Cover Up, and this made it more difficult to Impeach or Prosecute her, and it was how she sent her Dictatorial Decrees to her House Servant, Vice President Barack Obama.

    We have seen how Barack Obama is Hillary Clinton’s House Servant, and there are People wondering if Senator Sanders is Hillary Clinton’s House Caucasian, and whether he was chosen to make it look like Clinton had some competition in the Primaries.

    This will be Evident by there being at least a certain degree of Enthusiasm by Senator Sanders on Building a get out the Vote operation and sharing Campaign Information in States across America by means of Volunteers, who will direct Voters to the Official Campaign Website of Senator Sanders, because Banking and Corporation Funded Hillary Clinton may have her own Paid Misinformation and Propaganda Agents Slandering Senator Sanders, but Hillary Clinton’s Lies and Corruption are Proven Facts.

    The Clinton Campaign has Much Money Available, and these Secretly Paid Clinton Misinformation and Propaganda Agents, would use Cunning Methods Invented by Hillary Clinton, and they would Pretend to be Undecided Voters or People who will not vote in the Primaries, and they would Slander Senator Sanders as a communist; even though he is a Social Democrat, and in this way, Hillary Clinton can Conduct her Dirty Campaign, while appearing to be conducting an honest campaign.

    We have seen how the former Major of New York Michael Bloomberg, wants Hillary Clinton to be the Democrat nomination, but Many Voters want Honest Government, and if Senator Sanders is seen to be a House Servant to the Corrupt Hillary Clinton, then they may Vote for the Republicans, and this is why there are Many Democrat Voters who think that the Democrats have better chances with Senator Sanders, because he has No Corruption Scandals; whereas Hillary Clinton is a Real Liability for the Democrats and for America.

    Hillary Clinton is the wrong type of woman to be President of America, because the Abundant Evidence Proves what Hillary Clinton is, and this is why there are Many Democrat Voters who think that it is Proper for Americans Voters to Vote for Anyone But Clinton, because Americans should Respect America.

  12. 20

    JSW

    I’m getting this horrible feeling that Trump will implode, Cruz comes off as ulikable and oily, and Hillary will win. I just don’t see the Republicans winning without Trump, who I can’t stand but will eagerly vote for over this horrible woman. I really hope I’m wrong.

  13. 22

    kitt

    @JSW: No one gave Trump a snowballs chance when he announced, his my way or the highway attitude with the debate was way too much, did he really think Fox was going to cater to him only to have him brag about it later? I can think of the amount of time on the CNN debate where he demanded it be cut by an hour, then made sure to announce it at the debate. If he wants to make it he needs to be a tiny bit more classy take the high road on occasion. He says they made up and were all good then insists Megan not be a moderator. tsk tsk tsk when piled with the Pro-life women saying they cannot back him. I will again say I will not sit home in November.
    All of MSM behind the dem ticket, he may have made a boo boo alienating Fox so early in the primaries.
    Just because Don says Ted is unlikable doesn’t make it so. If his conservative credentials make him oily then grease me up he is a fighter and Rinos dont like that wah wah wah.

  14. 25

    Anonymous

    There are Many Democrat Voters who Know that Hillary Clinton should never have been a Democrat Presidential Candidate, and that she Should have retired from Politics after she retired as Secretary of State.

    They Know that if Hillary Clinton ever became President, then it would be 4 long and unhappy years filled with Scandal and Corruption, and years of Divisiveness, and of using the Race Card, and of Slandering People by Wrongly saying that they are against women, and this would Harm America’s Image and Interests in America and in the World, and so America Cannot afford someone Arrogant and Corrupt like Hillary Clinton as President of America.

    This is why they want Anyone But Clinton to be the Democrat’s nomination for Presidential Candidate, and they would even Prefer a Republican President to Hillary Clinton.

    There are People who say that Senator Sanders cannot become President as a Democrat or as a third Party Candidate, and that may remain to be seen, and there are Many People who think that unlike Hillary Clinton, that Senator Sanders has a Real Chance of becoming America’s President.

    Many Democrats do Not think that Hillary Clinton could be elected as President, and so they Know they have a Real Chance with Senator Sanders as their Presidential Candidate.

    If these People Respected America, then they would say that Hillary should Not become the President of America for the Reasons that are stated in this comment.

    We have seen from my other comment how Hillary Clinton Schemed and Shammed the Fake Osama bin Laden raid, and how Navy Seals Team 6 who performed the Sham raid were later killed in a helicopter crash, and they cannot now say what Really happened on that occasion.

    However, the Hardened and Compulsive Liar, Bill Secret Harem Clinton, says that Hillary Clinton represents honesty and accountability in Government.

    We All Know that Bill Secret Harem Clinton is Lying Again, and the Clintons have been the Most Corrupt Politicians in America’s History.

    Hillary Clinton is an Establishment Politician and she is Funded by Banks and Corporations, and so she has the Money to Bribe for endorsements, and Bill Secret Harem Clinton may have placed miniature cameras in his Secret Harem, and some Democrats including some African American Democrats that he invited to his Secret Harem are now Hillary Clinton’s Puppets.

    Hillary Clinton admitted to being the Real President of America by saying: “I’m not going to have some reporters pawing through our papers. We (Bill Clinton and Hillary Clinton) are the president.”

    Hillary Clinton who is a Lawyer, Knew that she could Not say that she is the President, because that would be Treason under the Constitution by both Bill Secret Harem Clinton and Hillary Clinton, and so she had to say We are the President, but People with Sufficient Discernment Know that Hillary Clinton is the More Dominant one, and that Hillary Clinton was the Real President of America during the Vice Presidency of Bill Clinton, and that Hillary Clinton is the Real President of America during the Vice Presidency of Barack Obama.

    The Bush and Clinton Dictatorships over America began with the first President Bush in 1989, and has continued with Vice President Bill Clinton and President Hillary Clinton from 1993 to 2001, and then the second President Bush from 2001 to 2009, and it continues today with President Hillary Clinton’s Puppet Obama Administration, and Clinton wants to extend that by another 4 years.

    The first President George Bush was the Director of the CIA, and the son of the Wall Street Banker and American Senator Prescott Bush, and so anyone with Sufficient Discernment Knows that Vice President Ronald Reagan was a Puppet of the first President George Bush.

    This is because the first President Bush was the Director of the CIA, and he Knew Ronald Reagan’s Secrets, and he made a Puppet of Actor Reagan to win Elections for him and to Pretend to be the President, while the first President Bush in the Guise of Vice President was the Real Secret President, and so the Bush and Clinton Dictatorship of America began in 1981 and continues to this day, and there are Many Democrats who want to Reclaim their Democracy, along with Honest and Accountable Government, and so they Know that can Only happen if Anyone But Clinton is the Democrat’s nomination for Presidential Candidate.

    America has seen the Bush and Hillary Clinton Dictatorships, which began in 1981 with the Puppet Reagan Administration, where the Actor Roland Reagan’s Only function was to be a Good Actor and to Read the Scripts that were given to him, and to win Elections for the first George Bush, and then came the second President George Bush, after Vice President Bill Clinton and President Hillary Clinton.

    Vice President Bill Clinton’s and Vice President Barack Obama’s Only functions are those of Good Actors who Read the Scripts that were Prepared by President Hillary Clinton, and to win Elections for Hillary Clinton who has been the Real and Unofficial President of America for 15 years, and Hillary Clinton has the Dirt on Barack Obama, and on Bill Clinton’s Secret Harem.

    We know that Hillary Clinton is said to have a certain health problem, which involves prolonged coughing episodes, and so there are Caring Democrat Voters who Will Vote for Senator Sanders, because Politics is adversely affecting the health of Hillary Clinton.

    There are Democrats who think that if Senator Sanders is perceived to be too Socialist for Americans, that a Moderate Democrat may join the Primaries, if Hillary Clinton does not receive a high enough percentage of the Democrat Votes in the first few States in the Primary Election.

    There are Democrats who think that the Multi Billionaire and former Mayor of New York Michael Bloomberg is an Establishment Candidate who could be viewed as a Plutocrat, and that if he were to become a Presidential Candidate, then this Could ensure that Senator Sanders becomes President, because Most Americans would have More in Common with Senator Sanders, than with an Establishment Plutocrat who is an Ally of the Bank and Corporation Funded Hillary Clinton.

    There are Social Democrats who think that if Senator Sanders were to create a third Party of Only Social Democrats with no Bloomberg type Overly Capitalistic Democrats, then the result would be close, and would cause Republicans to have some more Socialistic Economic Policies, and this would Achieve More for Ordinary Americans than a Bloomberg type of Clinton Presidency.

    Hillary Clinton is the wrong type of woman to be President of America, because the Abundant Evidence Proves what Hillary Clinton is, and this is why there are Many Democrat Voters who think that it is Proper for Americans Voters to Vote for Anyone But Clinton, because Americans should Respect America.

  15. 26

    Nanny G

    Now that the Clintons are all out of power they are not pulling the same as before.
    Chelsea tried to do a fundraiser for Hillary.
    She refused to even take part in the event which involved (gasp!) exercise.
    Her event tried to sell seats for over $2,000 each but ended up trying to give those same seats away at $50.
    OOPS!
    Bill couldn’t draw even a thousand people to a Hillary event.
    I think he drew about 250.

  16. 28

    Anonymous

    There are Many People who define Capitalism as Regulated Free Enterprise with Free and Fair Completion, but that was how Capitalism used to be in America, and Hillary Clinton has said that she is a Capitalist, but the correct understanding of Capitalism is Crony Capitalism.

    This is the Only type of Capitalism that Wall Street wants, because if they wanted Regulated Free Enterprise with Free and Fair Competition, then they would Not need to Bribe anyone in America, because that is the Economic System that made America Prosperous.

    There has long been some level of Socialism in America, and one example is the Military, where Taxpayers Money is used to Defend the American People, and most Americans agree that they want that, even though they might not know that this is an example of Socialism.

    There are Americans who identify themselves as Social Democrats, who think that if Socialism can be used to Defend Americans, then Socialism can be used to Defend the Health of Americans, and even to Defend against Illiteracy, and this is there is the Public School System, even though there is also the Private Education System.

    Social Democrats do Not want the Government to control and run every aspect of the Economy, because Most of the Economy has to be Regulated Free Enterprise with Free and Fair Completion or Proper Business Practice, because this Creates the Wealth of a Country, even though some level of Socialism is both good and vital, and how much Socialism and what type of Socialism America needs is up to Public Debate.

    If we look back at the Banking Crisis and the Sub Prime Mortgage Crisis, then it is Obvious that it would have been Much Better and Cheaper if there had been a Federal Housing Commission that purchased or built houses and rented them to low income earners, then there would Not have been a Sub Prime Mortgage Crisis that created a large Recession in America and that created much homelessness, and Much Public Debt.

    However, the Clintons were being Bribed by the Banks, and the Banks Knew that Sub Prime Mortgages was risky and even insane, but their Bribed Clinton Puppets would give the Banks Massive amounts Money if they lost Money, and which was worse than what could be Described as Socialism for the Plutocrats, which is the Only Socialism Plutocrats want, even though Plutocrats do Not need any type of Socialism, because Socialism is for either for the minority poor such as Welfare and Unemployment Benefits, or for the majority such as Public Education, or for everyone such as Defense.

    The Clintons are Responsible for this, and Especially Hillary Clinton, because she is the Greediest, and Most Ambitious, and Most Corrupt and Dominant of the Clintons.

    America would have had been in a Much Stronger Economic Position if it had some Level of Public Housing.

    The Rent from that Public Housing would have been a Source of Government Revenue, but it is important that the Economy be Regulated.

    Another vital feature would be that if a Company or Bank goes Bankrupt, then it is Not propped up with Taxpayers’ Money, which is a feature of Capitalism.

    Americans Need to be Realistic and Know the Plutocrats have been able to make Puppets of certain Democrats like the Clintons, and they have done this with certain Journalists.

    Democrat Voters need to Vote wisely, and they should Not Reward Corruption and Incompetence, because Corruption and Incompetence will Not reward them, and has Not rewarded them, and Cannot reward them, and this is why there are Many Democrats who will Not vote for Hillary Clinton.

    The Corrupt Media will say that Senator Sanders is Idealistic, and that Hillary Clinton is Pragmatic, but these Journalists are Bribed Manipulators are Deceiving Americans, and they Know that Senator Sanders is More Correct than Many other Democrat Politicians, and Hillary Clinton is Pragmatic anywhere between Mainly and Only for herself and for her own Bank Account.

    The limited degree of Socialism in America can only succeed, if there are Not too many lazy, incompetent, or corrupt Public Servants, and even America at it Most Capitalistic Had to Have Public Servants.

    I have given some Known examples of Socialism and it is up to Public Debate and Unbiased Accountants to calculate which forms of Socialism are Profitable to the Economy.

    We Need to Know that the Plutocrats have their Agents who have their miniature cameras and listening devices, and that they can Compromise and Puppetize certain Politicians and Journalists.

    We should realize that Hillary Clinton has the ability to Pretend to be an opponent of Barack Obama, and some American Politicians and Journalists are Very Good Actors for the Public, and Very Good Deceivers of the Public, and Hillary Clinton Pretended to be Barack Obama’s opponent in the 2008 Primary Election, whereas she was to be the Secret President of America, and this is why President Hillary Clinton was able to have a Private Server for her Email while she was in her Guise as Secretary of State, and Vice President Barack Obama and other Public Servants did Not Questioned her on this, because they All Know that Hillary Clinton is the Secret President of America who Issues her Dictatorial Decrees by means of Secret Emails.

    This is Why Most Americans Know that Hillary Clinton will Not be Charged for sending and receiving Top Secret Classified Information by means of her Private Server.

    We have heard Hillary Clinton say that it was bad judgment by her to use a Private Email Server, but she Lies Again as Usual, because for her it was good judgment, because she had the Ulterior Motive of being above Public Scrutiny for a Public Servant, and this is Not an Example of America being a Nation of Laws, except that there is one Law for the Ordinary People and one for Hillary Clinton.

    Hillary Clinton has shown herself to be Unqualified and Untrustworthy to be President, and there are Many Democrat Voters who Know that a Hardened and Compulsive Liar and a Security Risk should Not be President of America.

    There are Criminals who brag of their Crimes, and there are People who think that it is Obvious why Hillary Clinton had the Private Server, and that was for Hillary Clinton to let Americans Know that she is Above the Law, because Barack Obama is the Vice President, and Hillary Clinton is the Real President of America.

  17. 29

    Anonymous

    There are Democrats Voters who Know that Hillary Clinton could Not win against the Republican Candidate in the Election, and some of them think that Senator Sanders is far too Socialist, because they have heard some People saying these things.

    There are Many Reason that Hillary Clinton Cannot win in a Presidential Election, and another one is that it has been confirmed that she sent and received Top Secret Government Information over an Unsecured Private Server.

    This is why there are Democrat Voters who wanted Hillary Clinton to contest the Presidential Election, who now think that they should Vote for Senator Sanders, but Not because Senator Sanders is their preferred Presidential Candidate for the Democrats, but because they think that the Democratic Party will send another Candidate that could win the Democrat’s nomination for President.

    We Know that the Democrat Party Members will Unite behind whichever Candidate is nominated for Presidential Candidate, and the same will happen with the Republicans, but how the Voters Vote will up to the Voters themselves.

    We Know that there are Democrats who want Crony Capitalism, and this is why the former Mayor of New York said that he will become a Presidential Candidate if Senator Sanders receives the nomination for Presidential Candidate.

    Hillary Clinton is the Dominate of the Clintons, and the Clintons Deregulated the Banking System, and the Clintons Guaranteed Taxpayers’ Money to Banks if they lent Money to Homebuyers who would Never qualify for a home loan under Principles of Proper Business Practice.

    The Greedy Banks made as many Subprime home loans as they could, and this caused a Global Financial Crisis, and a Global Recession, and a Large in America with Huge Debts and homelessness for America.

    This was made to look like Socialism by the Crony Capitalists, but this was Not Socialism, because it was Crony Capitalism.

    This is because Socialists would have purchased existing homes to rent to the poor, and this would have increased the Value of Houses overall, and they would have built new Housing, and this would have Stimulated the Economy and Employment in the construction of those Houses, and with Companies selling Building Materials, and other household goods.

    Even if the Country could Not make a profit on this, it would Not lose Money on the scale that America lost because of Crony Capitalism, because the Government would have owned those Properties which they could sell some of them if they wanted to, and they would charge rent, and this would be a Source of Government Revenue.

    This is why Crony Capitalism has been Proven to create Poverty and Recessions, and the remedy is to return to Regulated Free Enterprise which has Free and Fair Competition, and where Inefficient Private Businesses are Not Subsidized by the Taxpayers.

    There has been suggestions by some People that they want to have Free Tertiary Education in America, where the Government pays the Tuition Fees for Trade Apprenticeships, Universities, and for Colleges.

    Those who wish to make this an Campaign promise, should look at a Countries very similar to America where this was tried, and which was very popular, but it was discovered decades later by the same Democratic Socialist Party which introduced that scheme after they were back again in Government, that there were problems with it, because Students were gaining their Degrees and going overseas, and the Country had to pay for the cost of that Education, and they then had to seek Migrants to take the positions of those Graduating Students who could make more Money working overseas.

    What the same Democratic Socialist Party did was to give Interest Free Loans to the Students, who would make Interest Free payments of a certain rate to the Government for their Tuition Fees, but Only after their wages were higher than 65 % of the Country’s average wages.

    If they became unemployed or changed jobs and their income become less than 65 % of the Country’s average wages, then they would temporarily cease making Interest Free payments to pay off their Student Loan, until their Income become higher than 65 % of the Country’s Average wages, and then they would recommence to make Interest Free payments on their Student Loan.

    Social Democrats of America should look at where Socialist Programs have been implemented, and where they were modified, and this Socialist Program has had been Beneficial to both the Students and to that Country and its Economy.

    American Socialists should be modest in their Socialist Economic Policies, and the purpose is to help People and the Economy.

    If Hillary Clinton becomes the Democrat’s nomination for Presidential Candidate, then the Republicans may have this or another Socialist Policy as their Policy, because something similar to this is what Senator Sanders is advocating.

    This will cause Many Democrat Voters to Vote Republican, because they think that Senator Sanders should be the Democrat nomination for Presidential Candidate, and because the Clintons Totally Control the American Democrats, which is supposed to be a Democratic Political Party, and because they think that it should be easier for poorer Americans to gain a higher Education or a Trade in America.

  18. 30

    Anonymous

    The Student Loans that I mentioned in my other comment, are Interest Free Loans, and the Tuition Fee is Not free, and it is affordable.

    It would be paid by those who Graduate and those who do not graduate, depending on how long they were at the Institution of Higher Education, and on what Degree was Studied, because some are more costly than others.

    There is a way that a Person could receive a Free College Education, and that would be that they never made more than 65 % of the Country’s average income after Graduating or not graduating from an Institution of Higher Education.

    That would be only a minority with regards to Graduates, and if 65 % of the Country’s average income is considered to be too high a percentage, then perhaps the Scheme could begin at 50 % of the Country’s average income, then it could be reviewed and adjusted if that was necessary to improve it.

    These Graduating Students will be earning Good Salaries, and Paying Taxes and Purchasing Goods and Services from Companies who will Need to then Employ More Workers, and so this Government Student Loan Scheme for what is a concessional Higher Education, because of the Interest Free component to it, is in Fact an Investment for the Economy, and Benefits the Economy much More than what it costs to implement.

    This Scheme requires less Government expenditure, and it discourages those who do not want to Study and Graduate from taking on the Government Funded Student loan, and while it is Not Free for the vast majority of Students, it is affordable and gives Opportunities to all People, whose grades are sufficiently good to be granted to Study at a College.

    We have seen in America that there is Bad Crony Capitalism, and there is Regulated Free Enterprise with Free and Fair Competition which is Good Capitalism, and there is also Bad Socialism and there is Good Socialism which Benefits a Country.

    It should be keep in mind that Regulated Free Enterprise will be the Preferred Method for the Economy, because it is the Best Economic System, and Social Democrats Know this.

    There is a role for Government, and one main role is to help the Economy, so that the Economy will Recover, and a Strong Economy will Increase Government Revenue.

    A Proper Economy where more People are working will allow the Government to both Reduce Taxes and to Provide Better Services for the Citizens.

    If the Big Banks which caused the Economic Recession were only given half of the Money that they received, and the other half of that Money had been used by the Federal Government to purchase houses whose owners could not pay the Bank Loan, then that Money would have gone to Banks, and they would have been Recapitalized, and People who been paying a modest rent to the Government, but then the Greedy Insatiable Banks, could Not keep making as much Money on Interest on those Home Loans.

    This would have Significantly Reduced Homelessness and Poverty, and it would have been a Source of Government Revenue, but the Banks Callously Pursued their Anti Social Policies against Fellow Americans, as their way of saying thank you to the Naive Taxpayers, even though in Capitalism Banks would Not have pursued risky policies, and if they did, then they would go Bankrupt.

    We have seen how Hillary Clinton has Lied and Covered Up regarding Benghazigate along with Emailgate with Clinton’s Secret Private Email Server.

    We All Know that if Clinton becomes President, then America will Not have Honest Government, but America will have Scandal after Scandal, and Corruption after Corruption if Clinton becomes President.

    This is why some People think that the Republicans will provide more Honest Government than Hillary Clinton, and Democrats Voters may Vote for the Republicans if Clinton becomes the Democrat’s nomination for Presidential Candidate.

    There are Democrat Voters who want a female Candidate other than Hillary Clinton to become the Democrat’s nomination for Presidential Candidate.

    They Will Vote for Senator Sanders, and then write to the Democrat Leaders to send a Honest woman Candidate this time.

    However, Hillary Clinton and Bill Secret Harem Clinton who Deregulated the Banking System and who Invented the Sub Prime Loans that caused Great Financial and Economic Damage to America’s Economy, and who Control the American Democrats, would Not want another Democrat woman to become President of America.

    There are People who think that on Voting Day for the Primaries and at the Voting locations, at other locations, or on Talkback Radio that some Democrat Voters will say they are Voting for Senator Sanders, because they Know that the Highly Dishonest, Untrustworthy, and Corrupt Hillary Clinton Cannot win against a Republican Candidate, because of her Criminality and Corruption, and so they want Hillary Clinton to retire from the campaign, and they want Democrats to Write Anonymously to Democrat Leaders to send an Honest woman to campaign in the Primaries, because they are Honest Americans who want a Better America.

    There are Democrats who Know Hillary Clinton and Bill Secret Harem Clinton have and will Harm America’s Economy, and they will Harm America’s Image and Interests in the World, and they Know that Hillary Clinton is Unfit to be America’s President, because Despite her Lying promises, she is 0 % American and 100 % Hillary Clinton, and so they want someone Honest to be President of America.

    It is Interesting but Not surprising that a former Inspector General The State Department is not telling the truth when it claims it did not know about former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton’s use of a private email server to conduct official business.

    He said that the entire purpose was to Disregard the Rules on Federal Records Management, and that there was no Inspector General for the State Department for the entire time of Clinton’s tenure at http://www.newsmax.com/Newsfront/clinton-email-server-krongard/2016/01/31/id/712042/ .

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *