image courtesy of hardnoxandfriends
We’ve said it before. The Clinton’s do not believe rules are for them. They think they’re better and smarter than everyone else. They’re insatiably avaricious. They’re dishonest. Let’s review her email lies:
Hillary Clinton, March 2015
“I did not e-mail any classified material to anyone on my e-mail. There is no classified material.”
“I’m certainly well aware of the classification requirements and did not send classified material.”
July 25, 2015:
“I am confident that I never sent nor received any information that was classified at the time it was sent and received.”
Clinton had more than 1300 emails containing classified intelligence on her private unsecured server. Now another shoe drops. Hillary Clinton had emails on her private server that are not just classified, but are considered above top secret.
EXCLUSIVE: Hillary Clinton’s emails on her unsecured, homebrew server contained intelligence from the U.S. government’s most secretive and highly classified programs, according to an unclassified letter from a top inspector general to senior lawmakers.
Fox News exclusively obtained the unclassified letter, sent Jan. 14 from Intelligence Community Inspector General I. Charles McCullough III. It laid out the findings of a recent comprehensive review by intelligence agencies that identified “several dozen” additional classified emails — including specific intelligence known as “special access programs” (SAP).
That indicates a level of classification beyond even “top secret,” the label previously given to two emails found on her server, and brings even more scrutiny to the presidential candidate’s handling of the government’s closely held secrets.
Not one or two- “several dozen” were on the server, including “SAP’s:
Intelligence from a “special access program,” or SAP, is even more sensitive than that designated as “top secret” – as were two emails identified last summer in a random sample pulled from Clinton’s private server she used as secretary of state. Access to a SAP is restricted to those with a “need-to-know” because exposure of the intelligence would likely reveal the source, putting a method of intelligence collection — or a human asset — at risk. Currently, some 1,340 emails designated “classified” have been found on Clinton’s server, though the Democratic presidential candidate insists the information was not classified at the time.
I can’t wait for her to explain how an SAP could not be “classified.” That begs the question- how did this kind of sensitive material get onto her server? We know,though, don’t we? She had someone strip the classified markings and then send them to her from a nonsecure server. They could not have come directly from State, because the State Department is not connected to the outside world. Clinton herself told us in an email how she wanted things:
“If they can’t, turn into nonpaper [with] no identifying heading and send nonsecure.”
Someone had to take the SAP information, digitally copy it in house and then send to Clinton’s nonsecure server via nonsecure portals. The person who did that has committed a serious crime. As for Hillary, what she did is worse than what David Petraeus did.
According to court documents, former CIA Director David Petraeus was prosecuted for sharing intelligence from special access programs with his biographer and mistress Paula Broadwell. At the heart of his prosecution was a non-disclosure agreement where Petraeus agreed to protect these closely held government programs, with the understanding “unauthorized disclosure, unauthorized retention or negligent handling … could cause irreparable injury to the United States or be used to advantage by a foreign nation.” Clinton signed an identical non-disclosure agreement Jan. 22, 2009.
Paula Broadwell had the security clearance to see the information she was given. Clinton’s personal IT guy did not. I doubt Clinton’s pals Mills and Abedin had top secret clearance either.
This makes Hillary’s recent words very poignant:
“There should be no bank too big to fail and no individual too big to jail.”
Indeed. Hilary’s smugness was met with some particularly sharp responses:
@HillaryClinton That includes you, Hillary.
— Alyssa Birchfield (@alyssambirch) January 18, 2016
— Zachary Blevins (@ZDBlev) January 18, 2016
@HillaryClinton "No individual too big to jail" – I can't believe she just tweeted that with a straight face
— Alxandro (@Alxandro) January 18, 2016
This comes on the heels of the revelation that in 2011 Hillary aides resisted the suggestion from the State Department that Hillary use a government email system instead of her shaky set-up.
About Hillary having above Top secret information on her private server the Obama administration had……nothing to say.
“[The report] makes an allegation that concerns a former secretary, and therefore I think it’s a reasonable thing to ask you about. Are you in a position to say anything about whether you believe there may have been information classified at that level, which I gather is beyond top secret on her home email server, or deny it, you know?” Mohammed asked.
Kirby again declined to say whether Clinton sent SAP information on her server.
“I’m not in a position to comment any more than what I’ve already done here. I’m afraid I’m going to have to leave it at how I left it,” Kirby said.
Kirby is a complete and total embarrassment to the military.
I am looking forward to our liberal friends attempt to dismiss this as nothing. It ain’t nothing. No one is too big to jail. Hillary might yet prove to be impressively prescient. I think I asked this once before- will Mills or Abedin fall on the sword for Clinton? Stay tuned.