Did you ever notice that pretty much everything is a recruitment tool for ISIS? Ever notice that disagreeing with Obama on anything helps ISIS? Ever notice that pretty much anything can radicalize some people?
Gitmo is a recruiting tool for ISIS
Barack Obama says Republicans rejecting Syrians are ‘potent’ ISIS recruiting tool
GOP rhetoric is a potent recruiting tool for ISIS
Hillary Clinton can’t resist the demagoguery:
Republican “Clash Of Civilizations” Rhetoric Is A Recruiting Tool For ISIS
Clinton goes so far as to blatantly lie:
ISIS is “going to people showing videos of Donald Trump insulting Islam and Muslims in order to recruit more radical jihadists.”
Yet when it comes to those who own guns, these rules no longer apply. Oddly, neither Obama nor the left shows the same trepidation about insulting gun owners.
Wayne LaPierre is a terrorist, says the NY Daily News.
“The lobby he represents is a form of terrorism” says the NYDN Editor.
“Which enemy are you most proud of?”
O’Malley, who has taken a radical stance on gun rights, stated simply, “The National Rifle Association.”
Virginia democrat Mike Dickinson:
Gun shops and gun owners are responsible for hundreds of shootings each year. @NRA is a terrorist group
Following any domestic shooting incident, the first thing Obama and the left want to do is take guns from everyone who didn’t commit a crime. They show no respect for those er,…”bitter clingers.” The question is why? Why aren’t they afraid of inciting more violence with this anti-gun owner rhetoric? Why aren’t they afraid of radicalizing gun owners? Say something derisive about Muslims and they’ll apparently all join ISIS or become radicalized in a heartbeat and wage jihad on America but the NRA and gun owners don’t seem to lock and load when left wing invective assaults the ears. They just roll with it and others buy more guns.
So which group is more reasonable?
And, of course, how dare you suggest Obama is a Muslim but Trump is Hitler.