Driving Miss Crazy

Loading

driving miss crazy

 

In the worst surprise of 2015, Hillary Clinton declared herself a candidate for President in the 2016 election and it could scarcely have gone worse. Her office released a statement claiming that Hillary has

‘fought children and families all her career.’

Her campaign sent website visitors to a broken YouTube channel. Her campaign logo screams “Hospital this way.”

Hillary is kicking off her campaign in a van on a “listening” tour through Iowa. She has a Secret Service agent for a chauffeur. Hillary sent out a Tweet that said

“Every­day Americans need a champion, and I want to be that champion.”

Hillary has been chauffeured around for nearly twenty years. She hasn’t driven a car since 1996. You know, just like everyday Americans.

She gives speeches to Goldman Sachs for $200,000 each. Just like everyday Americans.

Hillary has remade herself more times than Joan Rivers, plastic surgery and all. We’re up to Hillary v.67. She has to continually remake herself because America doesn’t like any of her past versions. Swing state voters don’t find her to be honest or trustworthy.

Form the Washington Post:

“Americans have fought their way back from tough economic times. But the deck is still stacked in favor of those at the top,” Clinton says. “I’m hitting the road to earn your vote, because it’s your time. And I hope you’ll join me on this journey.”

The studied understatement was intentional, an attempt to answer critics who wrote off her 2008 campaign as a nervy juggernaut of ambition and guile. This time, Clinton seems to be saying, the campaign is about voters and not about her.

Crazy talk. I don’t know who is stupid enough to believe that. Of course it’s all about her. Everything she does is about her and nothing else.

There are a slew of questions for her to answer, and that’ll be the next post.

In the meanwhile, be thankful you’re not her chauffeur. you know, one of the “pigs” that used to guard her life in the White House. Personally, I think she’s driving through Iowa looking for a good place to bury the hard drive.

UPDATE

Hillary says she’s driving in a “Scooby Doo” van. That’s so late 60’s. Just like Hillary.

0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
25 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

Shouldn’t the arrow be pointing due left? I guess like anything else Clinton, it can be rotated to point whichever direction is suitable at the time.

If not a “Hospital this way” sign, it certainly could be an updated label for Prep H. 🙂

another pig in the wipe house. she will finish the job the fool started-the killing and total destruction of America.

The message is always a bit conflicted when the person who is running a dysfunctional campaign is waaaaaay ahead in the polls of your champions

After Bill Clinton lost his first bid for elective office, on election night in 1974, “You f***ing Jew bastard!” Bill’s fiance Hillary yelled at Paul, even though Paul Fray is not Jewish.
Paul Fray is a Baptist but his heritage is Jewish; his paternal grandmother was Jewish, and Bill and Hillary knew of his heritage.

Clinton campaign aide Neill McDonald, who has always been a Clinton supporter [Jewish World Review, 19 July 2000], confirmed the story, according to the New York Daily News. [Reuters, 17 July 2000] He heard the obscenity as he stood outside the room. [FOXNews.com, AP, New York Post, 18 July 2000]

NBC-TV’s Andrea Mitchell admitted that Fray recounted the incident, complete with Hillary’s anti-Semitic slur, during an interview for the network’s “Dateline NBC” program in 1999. But NBC News editors decided to kill the report.

Nice to have such a loving media covering up for you.
Later, when she ran for Senate she actually had the nerve to deny it ever happened:
“I have never used ethnic, racial, anti-Semitic, bigoted, discriminatory, prejudiced accusations against anybody. I’ve never done it. I’ve never thought it. So why people are accusing me of this is certainly beyond my understanding.” [Daily News, 17 July 2000]

Rewriting History was one of Hillary’s books, right?

So what’s she going to offer, more food stamps? Hell lets try for getting 70 million people on them. After all according to leading democrats, such as Nancy Pelosi, food stamps are a great economic boost. She can just follow Obama’s lead. Who knew gov’t dependency was the ticket to nirvana.

Maybe on that van tour they can stop someplace a buy a clue. It’s a sure bet a lot of her potential voters won’t have one.

According to CNN she’s met her first member of the general public.
Chris Learn, a Penn State student ran into her at a gas station.
I wonder how far into the Left’s bag he is?

So, what ”accomplishments” will she be touting?
Any of these…..

She gave Russia a big red button that said “Overcharge” on it; also the Crimea.
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2009/03/06/clinton-goofs-russian-translation-tells-diplomat-wants-overcharge-ties/

She managed to lose $6 Billion of taxpayer money while Secretary of State. It’s just gone.
http://freebeacon.com/national-security/state-department-misplaced-6b-under-hillary-clinton/

She kept a man who raped a 12 year old girl out of prison by smearing his accuser and using a legal technicality; then she laughed about it.
http://dailycaller.com/2014/07/08/hillary-clinton-refuses-to-apologize-for-laughing-about-12-year-old-rape-victim-she-maligned-in-court/

She illegally used a private, non-secure email server while Secretary of State, then destroyed it to prevent Congress from having access to her email.

She accepted millions in foreign donations and then lobbied for policy changes on behalf of foreign donors.
http://hotair.com/archives/2015/04/09/quid-pro-uh-oh-hillary-changed-stance-on-trade-deal-after-foreign-donations/

She invented the technique of responding to questions with a dismissive cackle.

After Iran turns Manhattan into a smoking hole, Hillary’s standard response will be..

“What difference at this point does it make?”

@Thirteen: She’s already lost. I don’t believe she’ll be the Dim Nom.

@john: Well, let’s see… of all the candidates from both sides, which ones have, through negligence and ineptitude, gotten 4 Americans, including an ambassador, killed and a consulate sacked and then lied about it? Hmmmm…. which ones…. which ones……

Seems only one, john, and that would be Hillary. Good luck scrubbing THAT stain off the old hag.

@john:

Actually, until yesterday she wasn’t running anything other than her mouth.

I watch with melancholy the blank expressions from supporters of Hillary when I ask them to list the accomplishments that justify Hillary being President.

Some can say, “She was Secretary of State”, but cannot come.up.with anything she actually accomplished other than occupying the office.

Some even relate she was the junior senator from New York, but upon questioning cannot name a.single thing she accomplished beyond carpet-bagging that position.

When I ask these uninformed Clinton supporters if they think she can be trusted after her email server fiasco, they don’t know what I am talking about, and typically respond with something vapid like, “It is time for a woman to be president.” When I ask them why gender makes a difference, over political positions and experience, in choosing a president, the response is as equally stupid as the idiotic “it is time for a black president” crap far too many ill-informed, trend-addicted, emotion-over-reason voters used in their rush to elect the worst president in the history of our nation.

Don’t like Hillary? Maybe the GOP should consider finding a candidate that consistently offers sensible solutions to obvious problems. That could work.

Don’t hold your breath. Most of the questions on their 2016 Republican Platform Survey are worded to elicit responses that will endorse what they’ve been doing for the past 6 years. Foremost among their delusions, Republican strategists seem to believe that the 2016 election will be a referendum concerning the presidency of Barack Obama, with Hillary Clinton as the surrogate to be defeated.

@Greg:

Maybe the GOP should consider finding a candidate that consistently offers sensible solutions to obvious problems. That could work.

Well, it hasn’t hurt the Dimocrats doing the exact opposite of that. We’ve had a total imbecile in office for over 6 years doing all he can to destroy the country and the Dims still love him.

will be a referendum concerning the presidency of Barack Obama

that’s a joke right? No one will ever hold obozo responsible for anything. He even gets a pass for being Muslim. If another Dimocrat accidentally gets elected it’ll still be Bush’s fault.

@Pete: Some Dimocrats want Karl Marx elected president with Hillary as VP.

@Greg:

You are beyond tiresomely stupid, with such stereotypically idiotic posts.

Name a single accomplishment or position from Hillary that justifies her being president. She is a corrupt, worthless, lying hag whose only accomplishments are being married to a dishonest, corrupt, adulterous democrat ex-president, and carpet bagging into a NY senatorial seat after her corrupt, IMPEACHED and disbarred husband left the Ocal Office.

To support such a conniving, dishonest, worthless, shrieking harpy to be President demonstrates a contemptible lack of intelleigence, integrity, and morality.

@Redteam:

I have noticed that, when the dimwitted, lazy, pothead 20-30 year olds regurgitate the lame stupidity of their moronic college professors’ claims of “marxism just hasn’t been done right..”

Madam Secretary Clinton can simply win by default. Which Republican candidate will be able to win 1) the female vote, 2) the youth vote or 3) the minority vote?

@bill #10
People (and I use the word loosley ) like Hillary really do not have any shame…or conscience….it’s just “business as usual” for them…

I do hope when she is on her ‘tour’ a few people really ask her some really biting questions and they get captured on video to boot….

@Greg:

Don’t like Hillary? Maybe the GOP should consider finding a candidate that consistently offers sensible solutions to obvious problems. That could work.

And what would Hillary’s bold, fresh new ideas be? Secret servers for staff emails, with destruct buttons? Defenseless embassies and consulates? Cutting the deficit (uh, HER personal deficit) with money from foreign contributors?

Transparency? (sorry, I laughed, choked and snorted coffee out my nose on that one)

@Gary Miller:

Madam Secretary Clinton can simply win by default. Which Republican candidate will be able to win 1) the female vote, 2) the youth vote or 3) the minority vote?

The one and only thing Hillary has in her favor is that she has a far better chance of having the media blocking for her throughout the campaign than any Republican. Otherwise, she is corruption incarnate.

@Gary Miller:

The same tone deaf establishmentarians who insisted Reagan was too conservative to be electable…the ones who gave us Dole, McCain and Romney…are pushing the same tiresome drivel about Cruz and Rubio while they push Jeb and Christie. Cruz raised $35 million in a week, and I cannot wait to see him debate whatever leftist doofus the socialist party puts forth. The country has suffered from 6 and a half years of Obama’s incompetency and criminal behavior. A bright, articulate conservative should be able to capitalize on the desultory economic condition and the foreign policy disaster of the current ultra-leftist administration to win election.

@Gary Miller: Madam Secretary Clinton can simply win by default. Which Republican candidate will be able to win 1) the female vote, 2) the youth vote or 3) the minority vote?

Iowa students preparing for Hillary’s first ‘listening’ session think she’s a ‘control freak’ who will be ‘talking s**t’ and only wants immigration reform because the Democratic party needs voters.
One female student said ‘I hope people don’t vote for her just because she’s a woman.’
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3037460/Iowa-students-preparing-Hillary-s-listening-session-think-s-control-freak-talking-s-t-wants-immigration-reform-Democratic-party-needs-voters.html
Depending on his role in the upcoming campaign, Marco Rubio could help Republicans siphon off plenty of minority voters.
So, could Rand Paul siphon off plenty of Independent voters, if he makes himself useful.
Most voters, polled on the question say Hillary is NOT honest or trustworthy.
And we’ve had 6.5 years of that with 18 months to go before the election.

All that said, any Dem gets nearly 45% of the raw vote simply by showing up.
That’s just the way it is.
Hillary will have to fight for a 6% additional.
What promises can she make that jaded and entitled voters will buy?

@Pete: I agree with everything you said about Cruz, but I won’t vote for him for the simple reason that he’s not a natural born citizen. I don’t agree with bending the requirements for Obama and I don’t agree with bending them for Cruz or Rubio

Hillary’s so out of touch that she doesn’t know that the “Scooby Doo van” belongs to Fred and is called “The Mystery Machine.” It’s even painted on the side!

I guess that Greg doesn’t think “It’s Time for a Latino/Chicano/Hispanic American President.” Too bad, because the GOP is fielding two, this time around!