‘Peace In Our Time!’…Obama Announces ‘Historic’ Consensus On Broad Parameters To Guide Future Conversations With Iran

By 11 Comments 2,166 views

obama-chamberlain

Proof that this is Obama’s Chamberlain moment?

Obama calls his capitulation to Iran ‘historic’ and in the same breath says ‘IF it leads to final comprehensive deal we’ll all be safer’

Well then….guess Israel and the world has nothing to worry about then.

The U.S. and international negotiators announced the hard-fought framework for an Iranian nuclear deal Thursday, capping days of exhaustive and tense talks that blew past their original deadline.

The preliminary agreement allows all sides — the U.S., Iran and five other world powers — to continue working toward a final deal by a June 30 deadline.

Speaking in the Rose Garden shortly after negotiators unveiled the plan in Switzerland, President Obama called the agreement a “historic understanding.”

“It is a good deal,” Obama said.

Peace in our time indeed…

Allah:

More from the NYT: “[I]t was unclear how and whether Iran would be compelled to answer the International Atomic Energy Agency’s outstanding quesitons about ‘possible military dimensions’ of Iran’s program in the past.” That’s another key western demand — UN inspectors won’t know if Iran is conducting new research into a military enrichment program if they don’t know how much research has already been conducted. It sounds to me increasingly like all that was really agreed to here was the number of centrifuges, no enrichment at Fordo, and the promise of sanctions being lifted very soon, assuming Iran complies with what’s asked of it initially.

What a mess Obama has wrought and it sounds like Israel recognizes this fact:

Even before the parameters were presented, Steinitz joined senior Israeli officials who in recent days began speaking about the possibility of Israeli military action, after months in which the idea had not been spoken about publicly.

Asked on Israel Radio whether Jerusalem would consider a military operation even against US opposition, Steinitz said “if we have no choice, we have no choice.”

Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has hinted in recent days that Israel would not feel bound by any agreement eventually signed, but Steinitz’s words were the most explicit in a while that Israel had definitely not taken the military option “off the table.”

iran israel

Curt served in the Marine Corps for four years and has been a law enforcement officer in Los Angeles for the last 24 years.

11 Responses to “‘Peace In Our Time!’…Obama Announces ‘Historic’ Consensus On Broad Parameters To Guide Future Conversations With Iran”

  1. 1

    Nanny G

    France announced it was quitting these talks unless and until something substantive was going to come out of them.
    I guess this didn’t count with them.

  2. 5

    randall

    Only traitors on the right would cast aspersions on the deal Obama made with Iran today. Well, the GOP acted as traitors during the entire process so I guess it fits. Dimwits.

  3. 6

    Pete

    The really questionable aspect of this is the “oppositional” media narrative that Obama is pushing this insane agreement because he wants to polish his legacy. He would have to be the dumbest, most naive moron to believe Iran will actually abide by any terms that prevent it from developing a nuclear bomb. That means Obama WANTS the terrorist regime to get the bomb, since this cosmically stupid agreement will never do anything to prevent such a development.

    After all, what peaceful nuclear program needs to protect enrichment centrifuges in a secret underground bunker? Moreover, what peaceful nuclear power project needs to have weapons grade uranium enrichment centrifuges in the first place?

  4. 7

    Redteam

    @randall:

    Only traitors on the right would cast aspersions on the deal Obama made with Iran today. Well, the GOP acted as traitors during the entire process so I guess it fits. Dimwits.

    Absolutely hilarious, randall considering that Iran has now notified the people of America that basically everything Obama has told them about the agreement is a lie. Oh wait, he must be a traitor to Iran, he’s communicating with the enemy(America) using your logic.
    So, now do you understand why Obama wanted it all kept a secret? He was busy selling out the country and wanted to get away with it. As a result, I’m pretty sure there are not gonna be any sanctions lifted by the US until ALL the details are known. They can do that, regardless of what you think, because those sanctions are part of an agreement that is in place because of Senate approval.

  5. 8

    Redteam

    @Pete:

    He would have to be the dumbest, most naive moron to believe Iran will actually abide by any terms

    Unfortunately Pete, you may be giving him too much credit.

  6. 10

    Nanny G

    The NYTimes is noting that Tikrit was taken back from ISIS.
    Among the things they say, though is that the USA’s ”help” was more hindrance than real help.
    http://www.nytimes.com/2015/04/03/world/middleeast/isis-forces-pushed-out-of-tikrit.html?_r=0

    [M]any of the Shiite militiamen involved in the fight say the international coalition’s air campaign actually impeded their victory….

    Hmmm….
    We KEEP coming up to the line of reasoning that Obama is NOT on OUR side, but then we pull back in apparent disbelief.
    Maybe its time to pull all of these lines together and successfully reach for that elusive conclusion.

    Oh, and Curt, the comments link on the top of each article does NOT go to the comments yet.
    After the redo it broke and only goes to the top of the article.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *