Muslim Activists Demand Overhaul of All U.S. Law

By 16 Comments 1,342 views

BRITAIN G20 PALACE

The real title of the linked article is

Muslim Activists Demand Overhaul of All U.S. Law Enforcement Training

but my title tells you where this is headed.

Islamic activists that strong-armed the FBI to purge anti-terrorism training material considered “offensive” to Muslims have made their next wave of demands, which include an overhaul in the way all law enforcement officers are trained in the United States.

The coalition of influential and politically-connected Muslim rights groups is demanding that the Obama administration implement a mandatory retraining program for all federal, state and local law enforcement officials who may have been subjected to materials they deem “biased and discriminatory” against Muslims. There must also be an audit of all federal law enforcement and intelligence gathering training and educational materials to identify and remove information that could exhibit bias against any race, ethnicity, religion or national origin, the groups demand.

Additionally, the administration must pursue disciplinary action against agents and officials who engage in discriminatory conduct as well as those responsible for the anti-Muslim training materials. Finally, the coalition insists that all federal funding to local and state law enforcement agencies be withheld unless they ban all training materials considered to be biased against race, ethnicity, religion or national origin. In short, these empowered Muslim activists want to dictate how our nation’s law enforcement agencies operate at every level.

The outrageous demands were made this month in a letter to Lisa O. Monaco, the Assistant to the President for Homeland Security and Counterterrorism. Among the signatories is the terrorist front organization Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR), which has repeatedly proven that it wields tremendous power in the Obama administration. Founded in 1994 by three Middle Eastern extremists, CAIR got the FBI to purge anti-terrorism material determined to be offensive to Muslims. Judicial Watch uncovered that scandal last summer and obtained hundreds of pages of FBI documents with details of the arrangement. JW also published a special in-depth report on the subject in December.

The bottom line is that CAIR demands that no Muslims are to be considered suspects in any crime.

Illnois has been kowtowing to Muslims:

CAIR also got several police departments in President Obama’s home state of Illinois to cancel essential counterterrorism courses over accusations that the instructor was anti-Muslim. The course was called “Islamic Awareness as a Counter-Terrorist Strategy” and departments in Lombard, Elmhurst and Highland Park caved into CAIR’s demands. The group responded with a statement commending officials for their “swift action in addressing the Muslim community’s concerns.” CAIR has wielded its power in a number of other cases during the Obama presidency, including blocking an FBI probe involving the radicalization of young Somali men in the U.S. and pressuring the government to file discrimination lawsuits against employers who don’t accommodate Muslims in the workplace.

And so has Obama:

Deputy U.S. Attorney General James Cole confirmed on Wednesday that the Obama administration was pulling back all training materials used for the law enforcement and national security communities, in order to eliminate all references to Islam that some Muslim groups have claimed are offensive.

“I recently directed all components of the Department of Justice to re-evaluate their training efforts in a range of areas, from community outreach to national security,” Cole told a panel at the George Washington University law school.

The move comes after complaints from advocacy organizations including the Council on American Islamic Relations (CAIR) and others identified as Muslim Brotherhood front groups in the 2004 Holy Land Foundation terror fundraising trial.

Remember how they missed the Tsarnaev brothers?

And here’s how Muslims’ indignation is beginning to dominate communities:

sneakers bacon

A Winooski restaurant’s decision to take down a bacon advertisement has become the center of an online backlash.

“It’s blown up beyond all imagination,” City Manager Katherine “Deac” Decarreau said in an interview Monday.

Last week, Sneakers Bistro and Cafe removed a sign reading “Yield for Sneakers Bacon” from a garden at the Winooski Rotary after a woman who described herself as “a vegan and a member of a Muslim household” called the sign offensive in a post on Front Porch Forum.

“Given the large number of Muslim families in Winooski, as well as many others who do not eat pork for a variety of reasons, it seems unnecessary for this insensitive business sign to be at the city’s main crosswalk,” she wrote. The woman also complained that the sign “clutters an already dangerous crosswalk.”

The owner apologized for his offense. Winooski presumably has Jews in its population as well, but they didn’t complain about the sign. Muslims don’t assimilate. They demand that you be assimilated and not offend them.

Muslim Activists Demand Overhaul of All U.S. Law

It’s coming. Stay tuned.

“The future must not belong to those who would slander the prophet of Islam”

Just about everything slanders the prophet of Islam and everything offends the Religion of Perpetual Indignation.

DrJohn has been a health care professional for more than 30 years. In addition to clinical practice he has done extensive research and has published widely with over 70 original articles and abstracts in the peer-reviewed literature. DrJohn is well known in his field and has lectured on every continent except for Antarctica. He has been married to the same wonderful lady for over 30 years and has three kids- two sons, both of whom are attorneys and one daughter on her way into the field of education. DrJohn was brought up with the concept that one can do well if one is prepared to work hard but nothing in life is guaranteed. Except for liberals being foolish.

16 Responses to “Muslim Activists Demand Overhaul of All U.S. Law”

  1. 1

    Beth just south of Berkeley and just east of San Francisco

    Muslim and vegan? And demanding signs about bacon be removed? Odds on this being an American convert?

  2. 2

    FAITH7

    “Somebody” – Someone – our Government needs to stand up against this. This will not end well.
    This is getting ridiculous.
    Were these people ‘forced’ to come here? Did they come on their own free will?
    Of course they studied our Laws, they are using them against us.
    Are these people American Citizens?
    If so, then THEY are anti-American.
    Our Government better get their shit together and quickly. And NOT give in.
    Tell them anything – LIE to them like you do to us!
    They can leave at any given time.

    This is what the intellectual elitist have brought us with their ‘all inclusive’ multiculturalism…

    I don’t think we have a right to not be ‘offended’ in this country.

  3. 4

    Pete

    So bacon adverts are offensive, as is training LEOs to be aware of the history of islamic terrorism…but when a Christian complains about a photo of a crucifix in a jar of urine, we are told to suck it up because freedom of speech.

    It is cultural suicide to give in to these outrageous muslim demands.

  4. 6

    Smorgasbord

    I have an image from a news story that I can’t find. The image says, “Little Pigs Bar-B-Q Sandwiches.” On the marques it says, “Safest restaurant on earth. No muslims inside.” I would support a business like that.

  5. 10

    Smorgasbord

    @Petercat: #7
    If you have them printed, I will buy one. If you don’t, I hope someone else does. Send it to the conservative sites that sell stuff like that, and they would probably have one made.

  6. 12

    Budvarakbar

    @Petercat: Well – then go ahead and be a slave to them — surely you do not think they will pay you for your time and effort. My time is far more valuable to me than to using it being a slave to a muslim psycho.

  7. 13

    Smorgasbord

    @Budvarakbar: #8

    Why bother

    There is a saying I wish I could remember, that says something about a bad thing happening around an individual, but they didn’t care, because it didn’t affect them. Some other bad thing happened, but they didn’t care, because it didn’t affect them. This happened different times, with different events, but the individual didn’t care, because it didn’t affect them. Then, something happened that affected them, but nobody else cared, because it didn’t affect them.

    This is how countries were taken over. The ones in charge now had learned from the experts, and diverted attention from what they were REALLY DOING, so they could slowly take over the country. As I have mentioned different times, what has happened to other countries before they were taken over is happening now.

    One reason to “bother” is that now there are at least 36 muslim terrorist training camps in the USA.

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CN3R054Eurg

    How many other countries allow the ones who want to destroy the country, and set up their own ruling system, to train in THAT country? Has ANY republican complained about this? Why not?

    How hard would it be to write a law that states that no terrorist organization will be allowed to train in the USA, or it’s territories, and any other country that allows ANY training by them shall not receive ANY aid of any kind? Since the muslim religion teaches that a muslim must convert the world, and they must kill whoever will not be converted, this makes them a terrorist organization. How much plainer do the muslim believers have to be that their ultimate goal is world domination? WHEN ARE WE GOING TO STOP HELPING THEM DESTROY US.

  8. 14

    FAITH7

    @Scott#11 – I am with you on that one! We have our own Government chipping away at our Laws we don’t need invaders doing that too. Besides, if I cannot live in what little freedom we have left…well…

  9. 15

    Petercat

    @Budvarakbar: #12
    Volunteering is not slavery. As far as payment goes, I would consider it an act of love (for my nation), for which I expect no compensation.
    I guess you don’t believe in doing good unless someone pays you, eh? How sad a philosophy that is.

  10. 16

    Smorgasbord

    @Petercat: #15

    I guess you don’t believe in doing good unless someone pays you, eh?

    I get paid in SATISFACTION. One way I judge myself is if I do something for someone without them knowing it, and I still feel good about it, even though nobody complimented me for doing it, I figure I’m doing OK. I suggest people try paying for a cop’s meal without them knowing it was you, and see how you feel, or do some other good deed anonymously.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *