Really- how can there still be anyone stupid enough to believe anything Obama says?

By 12 Comments 1,866 views

liar liar

How is it even possible?

Some time ago I wrote this:

There is a story underneath all of these reports and that story is the persistent pattern of deceit and dishonesty on the part of Barack Obama. He apparently lied to Congressional leaders as well as the entire country right from the beginning of this operation. And the lies keep coming. It is entirely reasonable to assert that whatever Barack Obama says, it will be false. It is entirely reasonable to assert that one can count on the exact opposite occurring.

You are an idiot if you take him at his word.

Obama never lets me down.

Watch this (Free Beacon via Right Scoop)

Obama has just embarked on another lengthy vacation in Martha’s Vineyard, dominated by golf.

Here is Obama promising he would take no vacations:

Remember Obama saying he would not visit the border because he wasn’t interested in photo ops?

Here’s one of those photo ops he has no interest in, showing him intently listening to Susan Rice advising him that ISIS was spawned from a video:

obama rice photo op

Remember when Obama said bad intel was behind the underestimation of ISIS?

Saturday from the White House South Lawn, President Barack Obama blamed “intelligence estimates” for not anticipating the speed in which ISIS would capture large sections of Iraq.

The president,who has been under harsh media criticism for likening ISIS to an Al-Qaeda JV basketball team in January said, “There is no doubt that their advance their movement over the last several of months has been more rapid than the intelligence estimates and I think the the expectation of policy makers both in and outside of Iraq.”

Well, that’s another Obama whopper.

The U.S. intelligence community Monday pushed back at reports that the White House was not warned about the growing strength of the Islamic State in Iraq and Syria (ISIS) ahead of the group’s recent offensive.

“The job of the Intelligence Community is to warn. We did that,” said a U.S. intelligence official. “In short, this was not U.S. intelligence failure. It was an Iraqi military failure.”

Reports suggested that the White House was caught off-guard last week by the Islamic State’s rapid advance on Erbil, a city in northern Iraq where the U.S. has a consulate and joint operations center
After Kurdish Peshmerga forces found themselves outgunned, President Obama ordered U.S. airstrikes there and humanitarian drops to stranded Iraqi refugees.

Obama said on Saturday that ISIS’s “movement over the last several months has been more rapid than the intelligence estimates.”

This is just from the last few days!

Really- how can there still be anyone so stupid as to believe anything this liar says? What does it take?

DrJohn has been a health care professional for more than 30 years. In addition to clinical practice he has done extensive research and has published widely with over 70 original articles and abstracts in the peer-reviewed literature. DrJohn is well known in his field and has lectured on every continent except for Antarctica. He has been married to the same wonderful lady for over 30 years and has three kids- two sons, both of whom are attorneys and one daughter on her way into the field of education. DrJohn was brought up with the concept that one can do well if one is prepared to work hard but nothing in life is guaranteed. Except for liberals being foolish.

12 Responses to “Really- how can there still be anyone stupid enough to believe anything Obama says?”

  1. 1

    Scott in Oklahoma

    I’ll answer your last question… it’s going to take a large loss of life attack within our borders, maybe multiple suicide bombers at a major sporting event… even then, I don’t see any action coming from the executive branch.

  2. 2


    I can think of three groups of people who will go along with whatever obama says ( I didn’t say that they believe him).

    (1) Black racists.
    (2) Those who want his free stuff no matter what it costs others.
    (3) muslim terrorists.

    The new democratic slogan is working:

    We don’t have to fool all of the people all of the time. We only have to fool enough of them long enough to get elected.

  3. 3


    @Scott in Oklahoma: #1

    I’ll answer your last question… it’s going to take a large loss of life attack within our borders, maybe multiple suicide bombers at a major sporting event… even then, I don’t see any action coming from the executive branch.

    He will have two reactions to such an event:

    (1) Pardons for all who committed violence.
    (2) Welfare to them because the super rich are getting more money than they should have, and obama has said many times that he thinks spreading the wealth is a good thing. obama is trying to convince the world that if the rich are taxed enough so that the money can be GIVEN to the less fortunate, everybody will be happy. Don’t worry. Be happy.

  4. 4


    I was reading an article this morning and someone found another article or video when obama was campaigning in 2008. He promised NEVER to take a vacation. It it wasn’t so serious, I would laugh.

  5. 7


    Even more amazing is that Obama doesn’t realize that, while he blames “intelligence failures” for being so ignorant of what ISIS was up to and capable of, HE is in charge of the intelligence community.

    Bill Clinton decimated the intelligence community because he believed electronic surveillance could replace boots on the ground. Thus, we had to rely on foreign intelligence sources (some with their own agenda) rather than finding the intelligence on their own. After 9/11, the intelligence community was built back up, adding Arabic speaking operatives and cultivating sources. Since Obama took over, this structure has been being dismantled once again. The terror attacks that have failed under Obama have been more often due to the incompetence of the terrorists (for instance, just cooking their nuts rather than blowing up an airliner full of innocent people) than intelligence coups. Obama is still letting the real hero of the bin Laden op rot in a Pakistani jail for helping us… really encourages others to help us. Though the White House outs high-level operatives, but even with the advice of experts he ignores the facts and invites disaster.

  6. 8


    Go for it Obama! Put your grimy fingerprints all over your attempt to destroy America.
    An open letter to the Dear leader and blame thrower extraordinaire.

    So far you’ve shown yourself to be utterly incompetent in everything you touch, but you’ve always had ready made excuses: It was President Bush’s fault OR Racism OR Global Warming OR obstructionism or whatever was the excuse de jour.

    But now it seems you’re going to make a move so inept and so vast it boggles the mind.

    A move that will be ALL YOU.

    Seems like you want to capitalize on the border invasion crisis YOU created and initiate a virtual coup d’état.

    This would be the granting of amnesty for some newly minted citizens that will vote Democratic National Communist Party in perpetuity…. That is until the moola runs out.

    The predicament here is that you will become the face of the destroyer, your signature achievement will be the death of liberty and the United Steezy of America.

    Oh sure, that was your goal all along but do you really want to be so overt about it?

    Cloward-Piven is a dicey proposition – who’s to say that the people will fall for the scam of Communistic intent causing a crisis and keeping the same slugs in power to solve said crisis?

    But hey, who ever said you thought these things through anyway. You and your ilk have developed a theory and darned if you’re not going to test it on Billions of people.

    You’ve gone and created a crisis flooding illegal invaders into the country and your ‘solution’ it to is to just make it worse – far worse. You want to do something not unlike fixing a leaky dam by blowing it up – no dam, no problem! But instead it’ll be no border, no border crisis.

    Perhaps in your mind this all makes sense – mores the pity.

    But know this comrade, this is going to be all YOU and no one else, say Buh bye to your dog-eared excuses.
    • You will be the responsible for resulting illegal invasion tsunami.
    • You will be the responsible for the deaths of thousands and or perhaps millions from terrorists flooding over the border you threw open at the stroke of a pen.
    The blood of the people killed in terrorist attacks borne of your policies will be all over your hands, this is going to make it difficult to grasp your golf club by the way – just so you know.
    • You will be the responsible for destroying the country you and your comrades hate with a deep seated passion.

    That’ll be fine with you, but do you really want it to be known that YOU DID THIS?

  7. 9


    @Stringy: #8
    There is more than getting more democratic votes as the reason obama wants to open up our southern border. There have been known terrorists caught walking into the USA from Mexico. How many have not been caught? obama knows the terrorists are entering the USA this way. North Korea even said they are going to send agents into the USA this way.

    Why doesn’t obama want to stop the terrorist from entering the USA from Mexico? THINK ABOUT THAT!

  8. 10


    @Smorgasbord: But to be a fly on the wall as the ‘one’ coordinates his ever increasing fortune growing in one or many of the income hiding destinations of choice.

    hildabeast whining that she was broke for an insignificant moment in time. What we don’t know about is where the Clinton mafia have their ill-gotten millions (billions?) squirrelled away.

    Tom Cruise’s movie role is the one defining constant of all democrap life, “Follow the Money”. So gift homes from donors – such as CHAPPAQUA, N.Y and Kailua, HI are the “ones” norm versus small ranch in backwater Crawford, TX.

  9. 11


    @Marine72: #10
    Civilians being broke and politicians being broke are two completely different things. A civilian being broke means they don’t have any money, and can’t pay their bills. A politician being broke means they aren’t getting nearly as much money from the civilians and donors as they were.

    It is like the time many years ago when the democrats were saying that the republicans wanted to CUT Social Security benefits. Fox News explained that the debate was how much to INCREASE the payments, and the democrats wanted to increase them more than the republicans. Since the republicans didn’t want to INCREASE the amount as much as the democrats did, then the democrats consider it a CUT. Typical liberal logic.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *