The “You might be an a-hole” test

By 93 Comments 3,195 views

obama finger

We’re going to have a little test that will determine if you are an a-hole. But first, let’s have a look at the real Barack Obama. Let us review what kind of person he is. Obama is supposed to be the President of all of the United States and not just the President of his party. He is supposed to watch out for the general welfare of all of us. The Presidential Oath reads:

“I, name, do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will faithfully execute the office of President of the United States, and I will to the best of my ability, preserve, protect, and defend the Constitution of the United States.”

Nowhere in the oath does it allow for punishing Americans for doing nothing wrong.

Barack Obama has issued orders to close National Parks and make life miserable for Americans.

“We’ve been told to make life as difficult for people as we can. It’s disgusting.”

Obama has stranded tourists in Yellowstone.

Obama has evicted elderly people from their homes.

Ordering National Parks closed is not enough for Obama. He had them barricaded and wired shut. Those structures have come to be known as “Barrycades.”

1. barrycade

1. A barrier (usually temporary) that exists for no reason. 2. A barrier erected for political reasons.

“Dude, Obama barrycaded the park.”

“Hey, let’s put up some barrycades to keep those World War II veterans away from the open-air World War II Memorial in Washington, D.C., in order to try and score some cheap political points.”

Obama is blocking the road that allows for viewing of Mount Rushmore.

Obama is ordering hundreds of private-owned and privately funded parks closed and has ordered visitors kept out of privately run businesses.

Obama is even trying to shut down the ocean:

Just before the weekend, the National Park Service informed charter boat captains in Florida that the Florida Bay was “closed” due to the shutdown. Until government funding is restored, the fishing boats are prohibited from taking anglers into 1,100 square-miles of open ocean. Fishing is also prohibited at Biscayne National Park during the shutdown.

The Park Service will also have rangers on duty to police the ban… of access to an ocean. The government will probably use more personnel and spend more resources to attempt to close the ocean, than it would in its normal course of business.

This is governing by temper-tantrum. It is on par with the government’s ham-fisted attempts to close the DC WWII Memorial, an open-air public monument that is normally accessible 24 hours a day. By accessible I mean, you walk up to it. When you have finished reflecting, you then walk away from it.

At least that Memorial is an actual structure, with some kind of perimeter that can be fenced off. Florida Bay is the ocean. How, pray tell, do you “close” 1,100 square miles of ocean? Why would one even need to do so?

Obama shut down and barricaded the Vietnam Memorial:

Via William Jacobson, NBC’s affiliate in Washington, D.C. reports that police ordered tourists and Vietnam war veterans who were visiting the Vietnam Veterans Memorial Wall to leave the memorial at one point on Friday.

After one group of veterans went around the barricade, “the park ranger told them the wall was closed,” NBC’s Mark Seagraves reported. “Later another group of vets showed up and moved the barricades. At that point, the memorial filled with vets and tourists. That’s when police came and moved everyone out.”

The Vietnam Veterans Memorial Wall is a black granite outdoor wall on which the names of the 58,272 service members who died or were unaccounted for during the Vietnam war are inscribed.

This is the Vietnam Vets’ Memorial:

vietnam mem

It’s a wall. It’s a goddam wall. What is there to close?

John Ondrasik of Five for Fighting was literally pushed out of the Jefferson Memorial and he asked why he was being pushed:

I asked him “why do you have to put your hands on me and push me out when I’m leaving anyways”…he replied “it’s quicker this way”…

Obama has shut down the Amber Alert website but Michelle Obama’s “Let’s Move” website remains up. There’s no money for the safety of missing children but there is money to infuse the ego of Michelle Obama.

National Parks remained open during the last “shutdown.”

But the good news?

Obama’s golf course remains open!

entitleist

Obama has no interest in alleviating or preventing suffering. He wants Americans to suffer maximally. Mr T might describe Mr. Obama’s Neighborhood this way:

Hello, boys and girls. The new word for today.. is “pain”.

Pain. As much as possible on as many Americans as possible. For unnecessary and cheap political points. Obama is spending far more money on personnel and materials to keep people out of unstaffed memorials than he would leaving them alone. This is the measure of the man. Never let a crisis go to waste. It doesn’t matter who and how many you hurt to get your own way.

What’s next? Does Obama kidnap the children of Republicans and threaten them with death?

So, now for the test- and it’s a simple one. Did you vote for Barack Obama?

If you did, you are an a-hole.

And that goes double for the Obama lapdog media.

UPDATE

Vets no, illegals si

A planned immigration reform rally will take place on the National Mall on Tuesday even though the site is closed due to the government shutdown.

Organizers for the “Camino Americano: March for Immigration Reform” were spotted Monday setting up a stage and equipment on the National Mall for the rally which will take place on Tuesday.

A few scattered barriers around the park have signs informing visitors that the area is closed as a result of the government shutdown.

Susana Flores, a spokesperson for the rally, confirmed for the Washington Examiner that the Park Service will allow the event to take place under the group’s rights granted by the First Amendment.

Weasel Zippers

UPDATE

Obama will punish Vermont to the tune of $90 million:

Northern New England is in its glory; now and for the next week or so. The leaves are nearing peak color and until yesterday, there has been a big high pressure zone parked over the area so the weather has been what would once have been described as “heavenly.” It has been raining now but in a few days, the sun will shine again and the leaves will still be there, in full. And for that, Washington can take no credit.

However … it has done something that will cause some small business people, who depend on this season, to suffer. According to the Caledonian Record, the U.S. Forest Service has closed 21 campgrounds and many more camp sites in the White Mountain National Forest and part of the government “shutdown.”

What is called “leaf-peeping season” generally brings more than half a million visitors to New Hampshire, “pumping nearly $90 million into the economy.”

DrJohn has been a health care professional for more than 30 years. In addition to clinical practice he has done extensive research and has published widely with over 70 original articles and abstracts in the peer-reviewed literature. DrJohn is well known in his field and has lectured on every continent except for Antarctica. He has been married to the same wonderful lady for over 30 years and has three kids- two sons, both of whom are attorneys and one daughter on her way into the field of education. DrJohn was brought up with the concept that one can do well if one is prepared to work hard but nothing in life is guaranteed. Except for liberals being foolish.

93 Responses to “The “You might be an a-hole” test”

  1. 52

    Pete

    @Greg:

    Bernie Sanders is a SOCIALIST, and no amount of obfuscation will cover that up, except to gullible, uninformed voters. He calls himself an independent because he knows most Americans detest socialists. He always caucuses with the dems, and affiliates himself with the progressives in Washington. Blather on all you want – he is not an independent because of principle. He is self-labelled as an independent to try to hide his extreme leftist positions. That is completely dishonest. The fact that you cannot understand it – or that you are playing along with it – shows your low level of understanding or your own dishonesty, Greg. But don’t take my word for it:

    http://billmoyers.com/2012/09/07/is-obama-a-socialist-we-asked-one/

    The word “socialist” has been tossed around by right-wing pundits and politicians unhappy with President Obama’s healthcare and economic policies, but does the charge stick? In this Moyers Moment from a 2012 episode of Moyers & Company, Bill asks Senator Bernie Sanders, a self-described democratic socialist, to explain what it means to be a socialist and assess if Obama is one.

    http://www.democracynow.org/2006/11/8/vermonts_bernie_sanders_becomes_first_socialist

    In Vermont, voters have elected Bernie Sanders to become the country’s first self-described socialist to be elected to the U.S. Senate

    And Sen Sanders describing himself – http://www.huffingtonpost.com/rep-bernie-sanders/socialist-successes_b_189963.html

    I bet I’m the only socialist he knows.

    http://www.theguardian.com/world/2011/oct/21/bernie-sanders-socialist-vermont-interview

    As the only self-proclaimed socialist to sit in the US Congress, Sanders is long used to surviving in the political wilderness.

    So in leftist-friendly publications, Sanders admits to being a socialist. But in non-leftist scenarios he wants to be called “Independent”. No…nothing dishonest about that at all…when you have the amoral perspective of a leftist.

  2. 54

    Greg

    @Pete, #52:

    Bernie Sanders is a SOCIALIST, and no amount of obfuscation will cover that up, except to gullible, uninformed voters.

    A SOCIALIST!? OMG!

    Does this come as big news to you? Bernie Sanders has represented Vermont in Congress for over 20 years. He has never misrepresented himself or his politics to his constituents or to anyone else. He’s openly been a member of the Liberty Union Party for over 40 years, though he has run for and holds office as an independent. This has been a secret from no one.

    The U.S. Pledge of Allegiance was written by Francis Bellamy, a Christian Socialist. I guess you’ve been repeating a socialist pledge to the flag and republic all these years. Deal with it.

  3. 55

    Greg

    None of which changes the facts he presented, or what the story in the New York Times has revealed. The current shutdown was planned by conservative special interest groups months ago. It’s being used as a means of overriding the normal working of the people’s government to destroy a program that they disapprove of.

    In other words, republicans are entirely to blame for shutdown. They planned it as a means to an end that they could not achieve through legitimate means. They have brought it about to achieve that end.

    The evidence is there for anyone to see.

  4. 57

    Nathan Blue

    @Greg: I think you’re a paid advocate for the Dems, like that 20-something that lied about signing up for Obamacare (Chad something?).

    I can’t explain how or why anyone would willfully lack objective thought and analytical skills.

    I think the Reps should just go ahead and take the title of “blame” and stand up for what many Americans are putting forth: ACA is a poorly-planned nightmare that isn’t serving the community, and is still unconstitutional regardless of what one Judge decided.

    The gov serves the people, Greg, not the other way around. I reject your naivety and know that there are enough people of conscience and integrity left in this nation to oppose the pestilence that has become the Obama legacy.

    Many of them are the so-call “Ultra-Right” congresspeople defending we citizens from the well-intentioned, but completely bankrupt actions of the lucky few radicals (Obama the primary) who rode into the WH on a wave of propaganda and special interest, not to mention money supplied by corporations and outsiders (all the things the Dems accuses the Reps of — like pointing out a theft in process while your stealing something yourself. Unconscionable).

    The Reps in congress are the harbor in the storm, and like it or not, we’re going to drag deluded people like you back into a free Republic, one free of discrimination and hate generated by crowd-control techniques. You reap what you sow, and Obama sowed these seeds a long time ago. The only fruit that would ever come from his campaign of hate, division, secrecy, war, and rhetoric is eventual insurrection. The House Reps are heroes.

  5. 58

    Greg

    Analysis: What default? Republicans downplay impact of U.S. debt limit

    October 8, 2013 (Reuters) – The Obama administration says a U.S. default would be “catastrophic.” Economists say it could plunge the country into recession and prompt a global financial meltdown.

    To many Republicans, however, the prospect of the world’s lone superpower juggling its bills doesn’t seem so bad. The government could muddle through without a debt-ceiling increase as long as it kept up with interest payments and a few other priorities, they argue.

    “We are not going to default on the public debt. That doesn’t mean that we have to pay every bill the day it comes in,” Republican Representative Joe Barton of Texas said on CNBC on Monday.

    Barton’s position could reflect a genuine disagreement with warnings by Wall Street and Washington analysts or he could be downplaying the default to gain tactical advantage in negotiations with President Barack Obama. But Barton isn’t an outlier.

    Nearly every Republican in the House of Representatives voted for a bill in May that would direct the Treasury Department to prioritize bond payments and Social Security retiree benefits over other obligations if Congress failed to extend its borrowing authority. In the Senate, 29 of the chamber’s 44 Republicans have signed on to the idea.

    You have elected idiots.

  6. 59

    ilovebeeswarzone

    Greg
    you should know why they do it, it’s because the idiots are on the side of DEMOCRATS ALLOWING OBAMA TO SPEND ABROAD TO HIS FRIENDS WITHOUT LIMITS,.
    YOU DIDN’T GET IT YET? THE PEOPLE GO FIRST IN PRIORITYS,
    WELL YOU ARE ONE OF THEM,
    DON’T ACCUSE ANY ONE ELSE,

  7. 60

    Nathan Blue

    @Greg:

    Barton’s position could reflect a genuine disagreement with warnings by Wall Street and Washington analysts

    Or rather the analysts being cited because they a) work for a liberal advocacy group, or b) said the right thing when, taken out of context, would help with headlines meant to mislead the public by blaming Republicans rather than the second term President and the Dem lead Senate.

    You are a propagandist.

  8. 61

    Greg

    @Nathan Blue, #60:

    “We are not going to default on the public debt. That doesn’t mean that we have to pay every bill the day it comes in,” Republican Representative Joe Barton of Texas said on CNBC on Monday.

    What the hell does Barton think not paying what the government owes on time represents, if not a default? Does he imagine government obligations are like household bills, displaying a “please pay by” date a week or two in the future? That we can pick those that need to be paid immediately, play catch-up with a few others later, and not suffer any permanent consequences?

    The simple-mindedness of such arguments is astonishing.

    I’m curious exactly who it is that Barton thinks we don’t really need to pay on time. Which bills does he suggest we set aside? Would he care to make up a helpful list?

    Like I said, you’ve elected idiots.

  9. 62

    Nathan Blue

    @Greg: At this point, I have no idea what you’re spouting. You took a few choice headlines/quotes and are pointing at the Sun, saying “look!” What? What are we looking at? Sure — you’re a Obamaton/employee. Everything is about “blame” and not adult problem-solving.

    Does that actually work on anybody?

    As I said, you’re a propagandist. You’re offering nothing except blind loyalty and blind defense of the WH. At least you’re not linking the usual lib media talking heads: we all understand that Obama could shoot someone and NBC would blame Boehner.

    Who do you work for, again?

  10. 63

    Greg

    @Nathan Blue, #62:

    If the U.S. government were to default on its debt payments, the interest rates that we’re obliged to pay on our outstanding debt balance would immediately rise. We would find ourselves paying higher and higher percentages of our total federal revenue to service that debt, with less and less to apply to other government costs. Not to mention the possibility that the stock market would crash and the economy would respond by plunge into another deep recession.

    This sort of avoidable disaster is what these people are flirting with.

    I don’t work for anybody. It’s in my own interest as an American to comment on this sort of lunacy. I’m beginning to think that a significant number of republicans have totally lost their minds.

  11. 64

    ilovebeeswarzone

    Greg
    the REPUBLICANS HAVE A GOOD MIND ENOUGH TO PUT UP WITH INSANITY OF THE OTHER SIDE,
    that’s telling how strong and patient they have been with the big spender in chief,
    but now that the citizens have notice, they became more assertive and demand OBAMA TO PAY HIS DEBTS
    NOT PASS IT TO THE CITIZENS, HE WILL BE LEAVING soon but the CONGRESS will stay there,
    and will find many bad secrets, him, so they start now to organize for when he is gone, so to see the next
    PRESIDENT COMING WITH A GOVERNMENT BANKRUP TO THE BONE, BUT ABLE TO FONCTION,
    UNTIL HE GET ON THE BOTTOM OF IT ALL, AND LEARN WHO HE CAN TRUST OR NOT,
    THIS PRESIDENT AND LOYALS WILL RIP EVERY THING GOOD IN THERE TO PUNISH HIM FOR TAKING HIS PLACE RIGHTFULLY, BUT HE OBAMA IS A BAD LOOSER,
    SARAH PALIN COULD PUT HIM IN HIS PLACE VERY WELL IF SHE RUNN FOR PRESIDENT,
    WE NEED A PERSON WHO IS NOT INTIMIDATED BY ANY BULLIES, A PERSON WHO LOVE AMERICA MORE THAN ANYTHING, AND SHE DOES. AND SHE IS ALSO AN IRON LADY,
    SOME ONE YOU DON’T FIND EASY, YOU BETTER GRAB HER WHEN THE TIME COME OR YOU WILL MISS THE TRAIN.

  12. 65

    Nathan Blue

    @Greg: I think you’re just posing for damage control, should something economically disastrous happen.

    Obama shares so much of the blame here, and why you wouldn’t acknowledge that means you’re a) stupid, or b) pretty biased and not open to thinking objectively.

    If the U.S. government were to default on its debt payments, the interest rates that we’re obliged to pay on our outstanding debt balance would immediately rise. We would find ourselves paying higher and higher percentages of our total federal revenue to service that debt, with less and less to apply to other government costs. Not to mention the possibility that the stock market would crash and the economy would respond by plunge into another deep recession.

    No sh*t. That’s the issue. The government can’t run itself on our current spending items, so the Reps are finally saying “enough”. This was why I voted for Romney and his genius pick for Veep: Paul Ryan. While government programs are important, the Obama admin has proven time and time again it can’t face what it wants with how much money it has.

    If the economy fails, it’s largely due to the Dems and their overreach in providing things that we can’t afford. It’s on record that the Reps have opposed the spending, and always said that Obamacare couldn’t work because it costs too much.

    Now due to media spin and loyalists like you, I’m supposed to blame the Reps and say they “lost their minds?” No. Obama has broken every unspoken line of trust in Washington, and this is the expected result.

    The idea of “blaming” is a BS tactic coming from our pop-star president in order to roast his enemies with the ignorance and hate of people like you, should that be necessary.

    You’re bringing the country down, man. Re-boot your brain and stop supporting this lunacy.

  13. 66

    Nathan Blue

    @Greg: Concerning the “who do you work for” question:
    I’m just trying to find out why you, or anyone, would come to a blog like this and echo media talking points and rail against points you don’t agree with.

    That’s not the action of a concerned citizen, it’s just trolling. No one that I’ve seen here is positively affected by your “insights”. You’re just arguing, and galvanizing the view that libs don’t know what they are supporting or talking about. You’re not adding to any conversation; you’re just squawking and actually doing damage to your point of view.

    So you either work for some lib group, paid or unpaid, or you have an axe to grind and are here just to piss people off. Which is it?

  14. 67

    Greg

    @Nathan Blue, #65:

    Republicans aren’t focused on negotiations about spending reductions. The central demand has been about the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, aka Obamacare. They’re attempting to nullify a law that they previously opposed unsuccessfully, by using non-legislative means. This, despite the fact that the President who promoted it was reelected subsequent to its passage by a substantial majority, with the law itself being a central issue in his opponent’s campaign.

    Success would set a totally unacceptable precedent: A minority party that happens to control the House could target any law or program on the books that they strongly disapprove of. The entire legislative process, the Executive Branch, and decisions of the Supreme Court could be overridden by a process that was designed simply to establish the government’s annual budget.

    If Obamacare is going to prove to be so unworkable, the 2 years leading up to the 2016 election should prove the republican case. Meantime, they could be making very reasonable arguments regarding spending reductions and negotiating in those areas. That actually is a legitimate budget topic.

    I just don’t see the logic of what they’re doing. They seem willing to risk economic disaster, which for them would become a political disaster, when the likelihood of removing Obamacare in this manner is virtually non-existent. What do they think Obama will do? Surrender, wave a magic wand, and make the entire law disappear? That would take legislative action, which they obviously can’t pull off at present. I just can’t see what outcome they’re hoping for.

  15. 68

    Greg

    @Nathan Blue, #66:

    I’m just trying to find out why you, or anyone, would come to a blog like this and echo media talking points and rail against points you don’t agree with.

    I think the political questions of the day actually have to do with me. Other people here probably feel the same way. I don’t know what to think about talking points. I say what’s on my own mind, but people who share philosophical views probably tend to see the same events in a similar way. That doesn’t mean they’re all reading from the same prepared script.

  16. 71

    ilovebeeswarzone

    Greg
    you are in a CONSERVATIVE BLOG,
    there is many PEOPLE thinking, AND ANY THOUGHTS IS WORTHY OF TELLING,
    OTHER WISE IT FAIL TO REACH THE TARGET,

  17. 72

    Smorgasbord

    @Greg: #63

    I’m beginning to think that a significant number of republicans have totally lost their minds.

    I agree partly with you, but I don’t think they have lost their minds. I think the party has been infiltrated just like the democratic party has been. Think about this: Why would the richest nation in the world have to borrow money? How can other countries that don’t bring in as much revenue as the USA does, have money left over to loan to us? What are they doing right that we are doing wrong?

    How is the USA getting another credit card (raise the debt limit) going to solve any problems? If you have a bunch of bills coming due, and all of your credit cards are maxed out, do you apply for another card and rack up more debt, or do you cut expenses wherever you can? Anyone who votes for almost any incumbent, republican or democrat, is voting for an idiot, or someone who likes getting more power over more people, and controlling more of YOUR money, or someone who wants to bring the USA down.

  18. 73

    ilovebeeswarzone

    Smorgasbord
    you bring the REPUBLICANS on the same level as THE DEMOCRATS,
    they have shown that they care for what the people think,
    they are better and would not have shut down the GOVERNMENT, if they had the presidency,
    they try to respect the PRESIDENT as much as they can by respecting his position,
    but they cannot hide him anymore,
    the secret is out and the people know a lot especialy now, what he is responsible to have done,
    it’s unforgetteble UNFORGIVEBLE NOW, even for a tolerant people to the the max, like AMERICANS,
    he has push them too many times, and the limit has arrive, and THE REPUBLICANS took the side of the PEOPLE , who where right all along, since the first day he try to demonize the CONGRESS, which was un- AMERICAN way to do, he did it on and on,
    he got away with it also, now he is inflated to do whatever he decide, remember how sure he was of EGYPT, HIS FRIEND MORSI, HE HELP TO RISE IN POWER,
    he feel his power is unlimited,
    but now it’s changing and rightfully so,
    and the REPUBLICANS are working on it ,

  19. 74

    Smorgasbord

    @ilovebeeswarzone: #73

    you bring the REPUBLICANS on the same level as THE DEMOCRATS

    The republicans have had the house, the senate, and the white house different times. Have they:

    (1) Fixed Social Security so that only the ones who pay into it get money out of it, instead of children and adults who claim medical problems, and illegals? Some of the illegals are getting a higher Social Security check each month than I am, and I paid into it ALL OF MY WORKING LIFE.

    (2) Reduced our national debt? Who was the last president who had a lower national debt AFTER they left office than when they got elected? I understand that congress sets the spending level, but a president can veto it.

    (3) Stopped the borrowing? We are the richest country in the world. Why are we borrowing money?

    (4) Reduced the amount of welfare given out? Each president has figured out that the more people on welfare, and the more money the president can give them, the more votes the president will get from the welfare recipients.

    (5) Stopped the flow of illegals into the USA? Just lately Fox News reported that more known terrorist crossed the border into the USA from Mexico. The republicans originally allowed the illegals in because the businesses who donate heavily to the republican party want the cheap labor. The republicans also found out that the democrats wanted the extra votes, so the republicans want them for that reason too.

    (6) Reduced foreign aid? Did you know that we are still giving foreign aid to CHINA? We are also giving it to other unfriendly countries. Years ago, 60 Minutes or 20/20 did a story about a factory we built for a country. I don’t remember which one. The work had to be done by a certain American company, but the dictator agreed to it because he got a cut of the money, the politicians got a cut of the money through donations from the contractor, and the people of the country got jobs, so everybody was happy. The country had a very large brick factory they could be proud of. One MINOR problem was that the factory was built in an area where there is no electricity. Since big corporations have bought up most of the news media, you don’t hear very many of these types of stories any more, but they are still going on.

    (7) Stopped the earmarks. Remember the bridge to nowhere, and the railroad to nowhere. One time Iowa was earmarked to receive $500,000,000 to build an INDORE FAIN FOREST. I grew up in Iowa, and one winter there were over 20 days in a row where the temperature never got over ZERO, and the state wanted a rain forest. Can you imagine how much it would cost to heat it if it had been built? Earmarks are hardly ever used for what the stated purpose is. If an earmarked project is cancelled, the state still gets to keep the money. The bridge, railroad, and indoor rain forest were never built, but the states still got the money.

    (8) Checked into obama’s fake birth certificate and Selective Service registration application, and his using someone Else’s Social security number? Not even obama has denied using the Social Security number. I have asked all three of my REPUBLICAN federal politicians if they have even LOOKED at obama’s birth certificate and didn’t get an answer. I asked a second time, asking only for a “Yes” or “No” answer, and am still waiting for an answer. They have replied every other time I have asked them to reply to. Most of the time I don’t need a reply.

    Why would I want to belong to, or defend a party that keeps giving MY Social Security money to those who don’t deserve it, keeps increasing the national debt, keeps borrowing more money, keeps increasing the welfare roll, wants more illegals allowed into the country, won’t reduce foreign aid, keeps voting themselves earmarks and other funds, and let an illegal be elected president TWICE?

    I’m tired of voting AGAINST a candidate. I want politicians I can vote FOR.

  20. 75

    ilovebeeswarzone

    Smorgasbord
    you got me speechless, except you have very good arguments
    and that would be interesting to hear the reply,,
    and even with all you mentioned, they still are better than who has that power now
    that is a mindset to destroy AMERICA FOREVER, IT SCALE WAY HIGHER THAN WHAT YOU ARE EXPOSING,ALTHOW VERY IMPORTANT, IT DOESN MAKE THE DESTRUCTION HE IS WORKING AT,
    but there is a new younger group forming within the Republicans who will fix it
    in no time at all when they get the seat of power to change things,
    they are now at hard work on it, keep writing, AND THEY WON’T SIT ON THEIR ASS
    WASTING THE RHETORIC, BUT ACTIVLY WORK AT CORRECTING THE SO MANY DANGEROUS ISSUES
    SNEAKED IN BY THE OTHER ONE, WHY DO I KEEP THINKING OF SARAH PALIN, AS THE EXPERT AT IT,
    BYE

  21. 77

    Smorgasbord

    @ilovebeeswarzone: #75

    and even with all you mentioned, they still are better than who has that power now

    I agree, but being better doesn’t mean they are any good. I can be lousy at something, but better at it than some others.

    but there is a new younger group forming within the Republicans who will fix it

    They will still need someone else’s money to run for office, and whoever will donate the most to them will own them. Many GOOD politicians have been elected, only to find that the ones who donated enough to get them elected the first time, aren’t donating like they did before. The candidate now has to get the money from some other place. Those donations ALWAYS come with strings attached, where the politician has to promise the donor certain things, or the money isn’t donated.

    in no time at all when they get the seat of power to change things,
    they are now at hard work on it

    I’m too old, and been through too many elections to believe that any more. As I have mentioned, the money always wins. As long as we have a campaign system where candidates need other people’s money, the ones with the money always win.

  22. 78

    ilovebeeswarzone

    Smorgasbord
    yes money is needed but it won’t corrupt a good smart leader who know he can do the job,
    it will for sure corrupt an envious arrogant angry and fooreign influence UN AMERICAN WITH THE MINDSET THAT THESES AMERICANS MUST BE PUNISH FOR HIS COLOR,
    and donors are good people with a mind to have their wish activated, but this is not a corrupt person,
    it’s a person who know he will not have the job and who don’t want it, but like to choose one they connect with as trusting him or her,
    we may all benefit from the donor’s request to get what he think is right,
    right now any one here at FLOPPING ACES AMONG ALL THE CONSERVATIVES INCLUDING YOU.
    can do a good job, and this one job will be very big after the other leave, it will take many skills,and strength,
    and we have them here bright as the stars,
    beside it’s not the time to keep a grudge, it’s time to start thinking ahead to the next election and get involve,
    to sell the best one we choose,among the CONSERVATIVES and TEA PARTY and REPUBLICANS, WHICH THE DEMOCRATS ARE SO AFRAID OF THEY KEEP ATTACKING THEM AND MAKE THEM LOOK LIKE DEMON, ARSENIST, TERRORIST ECETERA,
    THEY ARE THE BEST PEOPLE TO GOVERN AND THE SMARTEST NEEDED, DON’T WE KNOW NOW, WE SURE DO,

  23. 79

    Smorgasbord

    @ilovebeeswarzone: #78

    we may all benefit from the donor’s request to get what he think is right,

    Do you mean like the corporations who donate to both parties so they can make billions in profit, but not only pay no taxes, but get a huge refund from the IRS? Or the fact that corporate executives can’t be charged with a crime if their company does something they know is wrong, even if people die from it? Corporations have gotten congress to pass laws to keep people from starting their own small business, and to make it hard for those business to keep going once they start.

  24. 80

    ilovebeeswarzone

    Smorgasbord
    you read the negatives, and I read the positive where they will help a business
    which show a potential of success, or a person who has an idea to create something new,
    they invest in those, of course they will make money also, but it’s not you or me who can do it,
    they play a big role in the economy, and if they feel demonize they can go anywhere else,
    we need them more than the leader who demoralize the small businesses,
    you use to hear one create this new thing AND BE EXALTED WITH PURSUING HIS PROJECT, here and there,
    BUT NOW, the creativity seems to evade us,
    YOU NEED THE RIGHT INCENTIVE TO CREATE AND IT WAS AN EVERY DAY AFFAIR BEFORE, AN OBLIGATION
    FOR FAMILY TO THINK OF A PROJECT, THAT WAS THE AMERICAN SPIRIT HIGH WHO COULD ENDURE TO FINISH THEIR PROJECTS
    it sink into stress and the urge to start something bold is no more or few,
    because they are shaping the people to fanienty, meaning, do nothing AND THINK OF WHAT I TELL YOU ONLY ,
    OBAMA will pay you with the worker’s money, NOW HE SUCCEEDED TO HAVE THE JOBS
    TIME CUTS BY 2/3RD, SO THE PEOPLE SUFFER, FOR OBAMA

  25. 81

    Smorgasbord

    @ilovebeeswarzone: #80
    All that I am saying is that congress isn’t working FOR THE PEOPLE any more. They work for whoever pays them the most, or they don’t get enough money to be able to afford much of a campaign to run for office again. This is why the ones with the money get what they want from the politicians.

  26. 82

    ilovebeeswarzone

    Smorgasbord
    you’r good in arithmetic,
    and yes OBAMA GOT MONEY FROM THE FOREIGNERS TO WIN,
    I didn’t think it was allowed, surely not, he hide a lot of it,
    by right he should have been disqualified just there, but the MEDIAS WHERE PROMOTING HIM THEY WHERE IN THE SCAM TOO,
    ALREADY WE KNEW THE CORRUPTION WAS GOING TO BE RAMPANT,
    that’s why the CONSERVATIVES TURNED ON HIM, FROM THE START,
    IMAGINE THE PALESTINE WHO SUPPOSE TO BE POOR ,SEND THOUSANDS OF MONEY BESIDE THE OTHER COUNTRIES, IT WAS A FREE FOR ALL, AND AFTER HE WAS IN YOU SAW MANY MUSLIMS COME IN , MANY MOSQUES WHERE BUILT, IT WAS A FREE FOR ALL,
    NOW THEY ATTACK THE CHRISTIANS ON THE WAR ZONE AND IN THIS USA,
    THEY WALK SLOW IN SMALL STEP BUT GET WHAT THEY WANT,

  27. 83

    ilovebeeswarzone

    CONSERVATIVES ARE GATHERING IN DC
    FOR THE VALUES VOTERS SUBMIT,
    GO CONSERVATIVES, THE GOOD PEOPLE DEPEND ON YOU,
    YOU ARE THE BEST THINKERS AND DOERS,

  28. 84

    ilovebeeswarzone

    Smorgasbord
    29 MILITARY WHERE KILLED THIS TIME,
    IS THAT A FUCKING WAR AGAINST THE TALIBANS?
    OR AGAINST THE AMERICANS MILITARY?
    TWENTY NINE JUST LATELY?
    AND YOU CANNOT PULVERIZE THE TALIBANS?
    THE BEST MILITARY OF THE WORLD CANNOT PULVERIZE THE TALIBANS?
    WHAT IS THIS? AND THE UN SAID THEY ARE EXTENDING THE TIME FOR THE MILITARY IN AFGHANISTAN UNTIL THE END OF 2014 JUST SHOWN ON FOX NEWS,
    YOU MEAN TO SAY THE UN OWN THE AMERICAN ‘S ARMY?
    is that why THE PENTAGONE WHERE NOT TO PAY THE FAMILIES
    FOR THEIR SONS DEATH?
    IS THE PENTAGONE STILL AMERICAN LOOKING AFTER AMERICAN’S INTEREST? OR THE UN INTEREST?

  29. 85

    Smorgasbord

    @ilovebeeswarzone: #82
    When obama has the second in command of a Muslim terrorist organization that the leader is banned from entering the USA visit him in the white house, and some leaders of free countries have a hard time seeing him, you know he sides with the Muslims.

  30. 86

    Smorgasbord

    @ilovebeeswarzone: #84

    IS THE PENTAGONE STILL AMERICAN LOOKING AFTER AMERICAN’S INTEREST? OR THE UN INTEREST?

    obama had John Kerry sign the UN gun regulating treaty. obama wants to sign the Kyoto Protocol treaty with the UN that tuns over tremendous authority for the UN to decide what goes on within the USA. Who’s side do you think he is on?

    Since the Afghanistan and the Iraqi presidents are Muslim, the USA is still the Great Satan, and both countries want us out NOW. They will restart their quest to bring down the USA, and we might have to go in again.

  31. 87

    ilovebeeswarzone

    Smorgasbord
    yes there are no more doubt if there was any, before,TED CRUX IS COMING JUST AT THE RIGHT MOON,
    I’m sure he has a role to play to help AMERICA IN GREAT PERIL,
    AND THE WARRIORS OF ANY WARS ARE TUNING IN, BIG CHANGES WILL COME, IT START BY ONE WHO BELIEVE IN A GOOD CAUSE ENOUGH TO OPEN THE WARNING FOR THE PEOPLE TO HEAR,
    AND OTHER JOIN IN SOONER AND THE BEST OF THE BEST,
    NO TIME WASTED,
    I LIKE THEIR SKILLS AND UNWAVING DETERMINATION,
    AND NUMBER ONE IS THEIR DEDICATION
    AND LOVE FOR AMERICA, THE TRUE AMERICANS ALONG WITH
    RAND PAUL, MIKE LEE, Marco RUBIO, AND OTHER CONSERVATIVES,
    BYE

  32. 88

    Smorgasbord

    @ilovebeeswarzone: #87

    THE TRUE AMERICANS ALONG WITH
    RAND PAUL, MIKE LEE, MICHAEL RUBIO, AND OTHER CONSERVATIVES

    I liked Rubio until he said he wants to give illegals crossing into America illegally free satellite phones so they can call 911, and he wants to give them amnesty once they get here.

  33. 89

    ilovebeeswarzone

    Smorgasbord
    I suddenly thought of my error calling MICHAEL INSTEAD OF MARCO RUBIO,
    Iwas trying to find the post and you came in to show me the way,
    thank you for it,

  34. 90

    ilovebeeswarzone

    Smorgasbord
    on 86
    you just have to before leaving tell them that if anything bad happen to the USA,
    THEY WILL BE ERASE FROM THE MAP, AND GET THERE IF SO BY PLANE AND DROP THE CONTENT FROM THE AIR, AND COME BACK,
    THE USA DO NOT ANSWER TO THE UN OR ANY ONE ELSE, AND NEVER WILL,
    BYE

  35. 91

    Smorgasbord

    @ilovebeeswarzone: #90
    THE USA DO NOT ANSWER TO THE UN OR ANY ONE ELSE, AND NEVER WILL,

    Sorry to disappoint you, but we already answer to the UN in some areas. Yellowstone National Park is jointly run by us AND the United Nations. There is a small sign stating this at the entrance. There are also other things that we run jointly with the UN, but I don’t remember what they are. obama wants to sign an agreement with the UN called Agenda 21 that will move all of the people of the USA into cities so the land can be preserved.

  36. 92

    ilovebeeswarzone

    Smorgasbord
    yes but they will never own it, we’ll throw them out as soon as they try to build in there,
    and i have read with horrors agenda 21, and it could happen by the way some voters do vote
    like a bunch of ignorant,
    have you heard of the truckers coming to talk to the WHITE HOUSE?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *