Subscribe
Notify of
163 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

@ilovebeeswarzone: Thanks for your comment…when I first started watching this circus…I came in at the part were “The Big White Guy” or better known as the prosecutions “Key” witness or “Eye Witness” watched this crime take place…in short order I will say it again and it is nothing against the RE-ACTION of the “Eye Witness…you re-act…or decided to watch-yell out commands-turn away-and call 9-11….A LITTLE ADVICE FOR ALL PEOPLE-WHO HAVE “FEAR” OF BEING HARMED BY “THE LITTLE FAT CRACKER’ OR THE BLACK GUY WITH THE HOODIE….”Geta GUN” learn how to use it safely….Not a gun !!!…next best TASER/Stun gun…$$$29.95 on Amazon…last but not least
PEPPER spray…there is stuff out there that will stop a “LARGE BLACK or BROWN BEAR”…just think if TM had a TASER or Pepper Spray…or decided on option (2)…to run home ??????????????? ( Invest in a TASER manufacture…your going to get RICH !!!!!!)…one last thing….this morning I watched a commerical of a childs back-pack that had a FLASHING ALARM built into it….for every parent that “NOW” has “FEAR” of thier child being profiled or “ASSAULTED” by a ZOMBIE….BUY THE BACK-PACK….

@Greg:

If you watched the trial you would know that the Sanford Police offered Zim an official car and a uniform to patrol. Zim turned them down.

The level of ignorance masquerading as knowledge in this case is astounding.

Was Group Captain Zimmerman also offered a free T-shirt?

Isn’t it sufficient that Mr. Zimmerman was acquitted by a court? Do we also need public commendations, and signed statements from everyone who remains skeptical that they’re now convinced of the 100% accuracy of his story?

I’ll confess that I didn’t remain glued to my television throughout the entire trial.

There have been other significant events in the world, while the Zimmerman trial played out. Some have been mentioned on FA, and have had hardly any views or comments. The apparent Israeli submarine attack that took out Russian missiles in Syria, for example, rumored to have been accomplished with the full cooperation of the United States. That’s certainly interesting.

HOLDER IS GOING TO ENFLAME THE BLACKS AGAIN TO RIOT
AND BURN AND SMASH WINDOW, WHAT AN IGNORANT HE IS NOT TO SEE AHEAD OF HIS NOSE,’HE IS FREE AND SHOULD BE LEFT ALONE AFTER HAVING GONE TO PRISON FOR SO LONG,
HE IS DENYING THE VERACITY OF THE PLAYERS ON THE CASE, HE ARROGANTLY TAKE THEM FOR FOOLS WHEN THE FOOL IS HIMSELF,
GET OUT OF THAT CASE AND GO IN CHICAGO TO RESOLVE THE BLACKS ON BLACKS MURDERS, WHY HAVEN’T YOU DONE ANYTHING YET AND WANT TO HARASS A SPANISH MAN WELL BEHAVE WHO WAS HELPING HIS NEIGHBORHOOD TO PREVENT BREAK IN WHICH WHERE DONE BY BLACKS,
WHO NEVER WHERE ARRESTED, GET OF THIS CASE AND DO YOUR JOB ELSEWHERE IT’S BETTER NEEDED, HOW ABOUT THE OLD VETERAN BEATEN SO BAD BY THOSE YOUNG BLACKS ONE HOLDING HIM SEATED WHILE THE 3 OTHER JUMP KICKING HIM AND THE 17 YEAR OLD YELLING : KILL HIM
FOR TRAYVON, DID YOU SEE IF THAT MAN IS ALIVE 80 YEARS OLD LEFT IN THE WOOD AFTER TO DIE, DID YOU ARREST THE GANG AND PROSECUTE THEM? NO YOU DIDN’T GIVE A SHIT ABOUT HIS WOUNDS,
GEORGE ZIMMERMAN IS AN INNOCENT MAN WHETHER YOU WANT OR NOT,
FIND YOURSELF ANOTHER CASE IN CHICAGO, AND THE ONE WHO KILL A PERSON IN THE CLEVELAND RIOT,
FIX YOUR PROBLEM BEFORE GOING AFTER DECENT PEOPLE WHO WENT TO HELL TO PROVE THEIR INNOCENCE ALL THIS TIME, HE IS DEAD ALSO AND NEED TO BE REVIVE AGAIN.
AND YOU HAVE THE GAL TO PUT HIM THROUGH THAT AGAIN,
HOW BAD IS THAT GOVERNMENT TO EVEN THINK OF IT.
WHILE YOU HAVE YOUR HANDS FULL OF CRIMINALS TO SEND TO HELL PRISON.
YOU WILL BE OUT AND LEAVE IT UNFINISH, THAT’S HOW MUCH THE CRIMES HAVE BEEN DONE AND LEFT UNPUNISH BECAUSE THEY ARE YOUR COLOR

@Greg:

I’ll confess that I didn’t remain glued to my television throughout the entire trial.

Then why don’t you stop opining on a subject on which you are in the main ignorant? Unless your intention was to parade your ignorance. And yes. I would be honored to have Zim as a neighbor. Tray – not so much. Racist? Maybe. Why don’t you ask my Black buddy who is living with me.

Some people around here seem to be overly quick to attribute any differing opinions to ignorance. They seem to have swallowed one side of this particular story hook, line, and sinker, and seem to be suffering from an obsessive need to have this be seen as correct.

That’s not going to happen. I see the inconsistencies. Any genuinely objective viewer will have noticed the inconsistencies. I’m certain the jury did. I also understand and accept how that doesn’t add up to a conviction.

That doesn’t make what’s obvious go away.

@Greg:

Some people around here seem to be overly quick to attribute any differing opinions to ignorance.

But you admitted your ignorance. And your fantasies do not make reality (such as it is) go away.

Now about the four black on black murders in my town in the last 11 days. Got an opinion? You obviously don’t need any evidence to form one. So have at it.

I’ve also noticed a tendency to read things into comments that weren’t actually said at all. A number of posters here share that tendency.

What I said was that I didn’t stay glued to the television throughout the Zimmerman trial as if it were some sort of multi-day, reality TV event.

@Greg:

What I said was that I didn’t stay glued to the television throughout the Zimmerman trial as if it were some sort of multi-day, reality TV event.

No, what you said was:

I’ll confess that I didn’t remain glued to my television throughout the entire trial.

Pathetic, Greggie. You can’t even quote yourself accurately.

@Greg:

I’ll confess that I didn’t remain glued to my television throughout the entire trial.

But you can tell my my errors despite your lack of familiarity with the evidence.

Amazing. Just amazing. But let me clear up one thing that may help you.

Where was GZ when the dispatcher told him he did not need to follow TM any further? In his truck or already out and looking around (i.e. following dispatcher suggestions).

Ya. Know if you don’t know the evidence and the time line you can’t have an informed opinion. You are open to forming opinions based on misinformation.

@retire05, #159:

I think maybe I’ll leave you to discuss that important observation with M. Simon. You can pretend you’re attorneys. Or better yet, one of you can pretend to be an attorney, and the other can pretend to be a psychiatrist. I’ve reached my 24 hour saturation point.

Ah@Greg:

So you can’t judge the evidence unless you are a lawyer? Clever boy.

When you actually know something – which you can actually learn by listening to the NEN calls – come on back. Would love to discuss the case with you once you are actually familiar with the evidence.

GREG
WHY DO YOU THINK EVERYTHING WAS SAID?
we are finding a lot was conceal with intent,
here we tell our opinion our gut’s feeling, our reasoning
on each comment on each words the click can open a page in our mind and we tell it to be weight on,
and add on and each come back with the same progress of mind work,that’s what we do and among all of us,
I find that we figured it pretty close, but don’t expect to hear them say what we say here unless we repeat their own words and follow on it, build on it we come with facts which all of us brought to the consensus,
and we end up with the truth,
even you with your negative thinking and TOM with his rebufell and blame contribute in the thinking process.
that’s my opinion
yes we got to know when to fold
bye