Three SEIU Chapters Granted ObamaCare Waivers…Freshmen Republicans Want To Know Why

Loading

Is there any better example of do as we say, not as we do, than ObamaCare? (h/t Gateway Pundit)

Three local chapters of the Service Employees International Union (SEIU)–whose political action committee spent $27 million supporting Barack Obama in the 2008 presidential election–have received temporary waivers from a provision in the Obamacare law.

The three SEIU chapters include the Local 25 in Obama’s hometown of Chicago.

The waivers allow health insurance plans to limit how much they will spend on a policy holder’s medical coverage for a given year. Under the new health care law, however, such annual limits are phased out by the year 2014. (Under HHS regulations, annual limits can be no less than $750,000 for 2011, no less than $1.25 million in 2012 and no less than $2 million in 2013.)

The SEIU, with more than 2 million members nationally, includes health care workers, janitors, security guards, and state and local government workers.

The three SEIU locals, covering a total of 36,064 enrollees, are covered by the federal waivers, according to the Department of Health and Human Services.

But there is a new Sheriff in town after November and this kind of behavior will no longer be allowed to be sweeped under the rug. The new Republicans on the Congressional Oversight subcommittee on health want answers on who and why certain organizations are getting waivers to the ObamaCare requirements: (h/t Michelle Malkin)

“If there are exemptions,” Rep. Trey Gowdy (R-S.C.) told The Hill, “what was the process by which those exemptions were sought and given?”

“I think those are fair questions to ask,” he said, “and I expect we will.”

Gowdy, a freshman and former prosecutor, got the chairmanship on Tuesday. The health subcommittee has jurisdiction over federal health policy and food and drug safety, in addition to the District of Columbia and federal records.

Gowdy said he met with Oversight Committee staff Wednesday and immediately began planning future hearings.

The below video is from November when the number of organizations who were getting waivers was at 111. It’s now over 200:

Obama’s Secretary of the Department of Health and Human Services dismissed all these complaints:

However, HHS Kathleen Sebelius, in a sit-down interview with The Hill on Friday, called both assertions “pretty ludicrous.”

“The provisions in the law always gave some flexibility to me as secretary,” she said.

Sebelius said the waivers were necessary to help individuals keep their health insurance – even if it isn’t the best coverage – until new insurance exchanges opening in 2014 allow individuals and small businesses to pool their purchasing power.

But why are Obama’s pals and big donors the ones getting these waivers?

We’re gonna find out:

Also Tuesday, the powerful Energy and Commerce Committee wrote to the Department of Health and Human Services requesting that it provide a list of every individual, organization, business, state or other entity that requested a waiver, obtained a waiver, or has been denied a waiver for any part of the reform law.

HHS had as of Dec. 3 granted annual waivers to 222 health plans covering 1.5 million workers, exempting them from the requirement that they cover up to $750,000 in patients’ healthcare costs in 2011. The waivers were given to low-value “mini-med” plans that likely would have dropped coverage if they hadn’t been exempted. Republicans have suggested the waivers are used to reward political allies or are hard evidence that the law doesn’t work.

The committee’s vice-chairman, Rep. Paul Gosar (R-Ariz.), is also a freshman. Gosar, a dentist, said the fact that conservative outsiders got the top two spots is indicative of a new tone in Washington following the mid-term elections.

Remember this?

Some transparency.

0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
12 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

Weird that 222 Obama supporting unions and businesses could so easily get waivers while 26 plus states want a complete waiver out of the whole thing but Obama is digging his heels in over that.
If it were such a great thing you’d think Congress, the Obama-backing unions and his business cronies would be happy to take it.
What’s the deal?
Some of the unions:
the Bricklayers Local 1 of MD, VA and DC,
the United Food and Commercial Workers Union in Mount Laurel, New Jersey,
the Indiana Teamsters Health Benefits Fund,
Service Employees International Union Local 1 Cleveland Welfare Fund.

All 222 are listed here.

Can I have a waiver?

cml in Maine…

Did you donate big bucks to the O’s election fund?
Start an ACORN group in your neighborhood to cook up “votes”?
Grow up on the crooked side of Chicago politics?
Date Valerie Jarrett?
Send union thugs to any rally that dare opposes O’s agenda?

If not, no waiver for you!!

horrible administration. either they don’t know what they are doing or they know exactly what they are doing. vote these fools out.

Isnt this what the Pretender in Chief stated would not happen?? Political favors and back room deals would not be allowed. The Republicans need to call him on that in PUBLIC.

@Bobachek:We find it difficult to get waivers for our small community here in Colorado. We have a Big O company, but when the administration found out it was a tire store, no waiver. Our alternative energy store applied, too. No waiver because they sell vitamins! We do have an opportunity to get a waiver for the windies at the capital building!

Were these SENIOR Republicans, their response would be predictable–they would claim to be “troubled” when told to shove it and mind their own business!! But freshmen Republicans??? They might just have a spinal cord!!!

Of the 222 waivers that have been granted, omly about 45 have gone to labor unions. Most have gone to businesses that provide healthcare benefits to low-wage employees.

http://www.seattlepi.com/politico/433960_politico48003.html

Randy,

Any chance a majority of the employees at these companies are undocumented Democrats? If so you may want to indicate that on your waiver application…
Hope this helps..

Maybe the House should have approached the repeal from the Waiver perspective. Give everyone a waiver and it will all go away.

It’s like being in charge to help those who elect you, and the rest of the people has to pay for the
protection racket. they thought about that from the beginning of that law with those pages too numerous to read before they put it into law