We patrol the border so that we can… What? Throw some back!
Why do we have a pretense of Border Security and National Sovereignty? President Obama’s Administration does not want illegal felons deported, they vote Democratic.
We could save a lot of money and actually have diversity instead of automatic promotion for Blacks by putting the Border Patrol to work as crossing guards, an occupation that is more logical than “Catch an Release” Border Guards, then our borders would be open to citizens of the world as Obama has envisioned. This will promote diversity and America can be a huge Dsytopia for welfare recipients and a whole slew of international felons.
Let’s be serious, is this a matter of rewarding those who are lucky or the most stealthy and taking the ones who get caught back across the border so that they can try again. That is one Hell of a Border Security our Socialist President has proscribed.
Now making the illegal alien eligible for citizenship has been a thorny issue with nearly the whole country voicing opposition, excluding the 20 to 40 million illegals who desperately need access to welfare and other benefits of course; however, Barack has a plan and it deviates slightly from normal United States protocol, in fact it resembles the method of the Soviet Union or China.
Actually, he intends to bypass the normal legislative process and just declare all illegal aliens as legal citizens and Democrats; otherwise, reelection in 2012 is a Forlorn Hope.
According to an internal U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services memo going the rounds of Capitol Hill and obtained by National Review, the agency is considering ways in which it could enact “meaningful immigration reform absent legislative action” — that is, without the consent of the American people through a vote in Congress.
“This memorandum offers administrative relief options to . . . reduce the threat of removal for certain individuals present in the United States without authorization,” it reads.
Also: “In the absence of Comprehensive Immigration Reform, USCIS can extend benefits and/or protections to many individuals and groups by issuing new guidance and regulations, exercising discretion with regard to parole-in-place, deferred action and the issuance of Notices to Appear (NTA), and adopting significant process improvements.”
In recent weeks, Sen. Chuck Grassley and others in Congress have been pressing the administration to disavow rumors that a de facto amnesty is in the works, including in a letter to Department of Homeland Security head Janet Napolitano. “Since the senators first wrote to the president more than a month ago, we have not been reassured that the plans are just rumors, and we have every reason to believe that the memo is legitimate,” a Grassley spokesman tells NR. (NR contacted DHS, but a spokesman did not have a comment on the record.)
Many of the memo’s proposals are technical and fine-grained; for example, it suggests clarifying the immigration laws for “unaccompanied minors, and for victims of human trafficking, domestic violence, and other criminal activities.” It also proposes extending the “grace period” H-1B visa holders have between the expiration of their visa and the date they’re expected to leave the country.
With other ideas, however, USCIS is aiming big. Perhaps the most egregious suggestion is to “Increase the Use of Deferred Action.” “Deferred action,” as the memo defines it, “is an exercise of prosecutorial discretion not to pursue removal from the U.S. of a particular individual for a specific period of time.” For example, after Hurricane Katrina, the government decided not to remove illegal immigrants who’d been affected by the disaster.
The memo claims that there are no limits to USCIS’s ability to use deferred action, but warns that using this power indiscriminately would be “controversial, not to mention expensive.” The memo suggests using deferred action to exempt “particular groups” from removal — such as the illegal-immigrant high-school graduates who would fall under the DREAM Act (a measure that has been shot down repeatedly in Congress). The memo claims that the DREAM Act would cover “an estimated 50,000” individuals, though as many as 65,000 illegal immigrants graduate high school every year in the U.S.
In the immediate wake of the court decision blocking the Arizona immigration law yesterday, the memo is sure to create controversy — and the sense that the administration is bent on preserving and extending the nation’s de facto amnesty.
Our Republic is destined to become a mirrored image of the regimes of Mao and Stalin unless we rise to the occasion to fight this Socialist Buffoon occupying the White House.