Big Sis Parrots Orwell, Makes Big Fool Of Herself [Reader Post]

Loading

Doublethink means the power of holding two contradictory belief’s in one’s mind simultaneously, and accepting both of them.
George Orwell,
Nineteen Eighty Four

The Internet must be monitored while preserving the First Amendment, terrorism doesn’t exist and we are not at war with terrorism; however,  it is necessary to monitor the internet to keep an eye on home grown terrorism.

Our nation’s Chief of Homeland Security, Janet Napolitano, offered these rationales to justify eroding Civil Liberties to fight a threat that doesn’t exist by an enemy that doesn’t exist in a speech on Friday to the American constitution Society for Law ad Policy.

Fighting homegrown terrorism by monitoring Internet communications is a civil liberties trade-off the U.S. government must make to beef up national security.

As terrorists increasingly recruit U.S. citizens, the government needs to constantly balance Americans’ civil rights and privacy with the need to keep people safe.

Apparently, spying on domestic internet communication can be rationalized; but listening to the conversations between Americans at home and Terrorists in the Middle East is a violation of Civil Liberties.  Presumably, Napolitano refers to the recent acts of Jihad carried out by Radical Islamic Fascists at Fort Hood and Times Square: however, these attacks are not mentioned and Americans are left wondering if the DHS wil be used as a political tool to monitor groups like the Tea Party and their gray haired storm Storm Troopers, some of them wearing skirts, who are mounting an effective challenge to the Progressive Agenda of the White House and the status quo of the Republican Leadership.

“The First Amendment protects radical opinions, but we need the legal tools to do things like monitor the recruitment of terrorists via the Internet,”

If we are to judge this administration and its paranoia toward political opposition and the thin skinned nature of Obama, we might be inclined to agree with him if we knew who the enemy actually is; especially, since we have a Hell of a Contingency operation going on against people we are not at war with and who we are now supposed to compromise the First amendment for and who apparently pose no threat.

We the American people are left asking President Obama. “Who the Hell is the enemy, BO?  Is it Us?”

Janet The System Worked, Chief of Homeland Security

0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
19 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

I can’t wait for November to get here. Hopefully, we can get rid of the incumbents. Do they actually think we are stupid…well I guess we are since we elected him.

“Terrorist”:

Returning combat vets
Tea Party activists
Fox News viewers
NRA members
Republicans
Anyone opposed to the free spending, socialist direction this country is taking
Anyone opposed to Obamas agenda. (also counts as racism)

(spit)

Here is a consistent, but telling description of Obama’s lack of engagement when dealing with a Nationally critical challenge:

Describing Obama’s first White House meeting with McChrystal as a photo-op, one aide told Rolling Stone: ‘Obama clearly didn’t know anything about him, who he was. Here’s the guy who’s going to run his fucking war, but he didn’t seem very engaged. The boss (McChrystal) was pretty disappointed.’

How much more than a mountain of evidence does it take for support to drop to 0?

When will you all realize liberalism is a mental illness.

Exposure to “double think” (contradictory evidence) usually leads to “cognitive dissonance,” an uncomfortable, if often unconscious, feeling that something is wrong. The person suffering CD then usually, according to the original formulation of the CD theory, changes their attitude or behaviour in such a way that one of the conflicting sides is tuned out and disregarded. Evidence that this actually happens is somewhat sporadic. 🙂
In a larger sense, double think and CD may go on for a long time together, because of the ambiguity of life. How can anyone know all the details of any story? People will spend a lot of time trying to construct a life narrative where the conflicting elements make sense when they really want conflicting rewards. That is, they just aren’t being realistic and want to have their cake and eat it too. This explains why so many voted for the empty suit and still support him. As they gather evidence that he isn’t what they wanted they fall away, but… BUT they have to gather the evidence. If they can’t, or don’t want to hear about it, the conflicting stories persist.

It’s going to be very interesting to see which gets here 1st… The November elections or the outright insurrection of American patriots!

As Pogo once said: “We have met the enemy and he is us.” 😆

They left one terrorist group out. That be Vietnam vets. We will be a force to be reckoned with should the shit hit the fan. And we’ve had more time to prepare. Please add us to the list.

Janet singing in her deep baritone voice,
“I could while away the hours, conferrin’ with the flowers
Consultin’ with the rain.
And my head I’d be scratchin’ while
my thoughts were busy hatchin’
If I only had a brain”.

What Joseph Goebbels, …I mean Janet Napolitano is talking about is state control of media, in this case the open free speech of the internet. The exact type of censorship that China engages in, and which all Socialist regimes must have to control the minds of the people. Even if they managed to sneak it through, I don’t think it would ever get past the Supreme Court as it is not compatible with the First Amendment

Well I have to say that Big Sis is correct. Those of us who are on the right side of these issues with this admin. are a “very real threat” to them. Damn man, it does not take a professor (think obama) or a mental midget (janet) to figure out the American Patriot is only going to take so much on the issues of our freedoms before we either tar and feather them or send them to their maker with the instructions to ask the question, which part of “thou shall not” did you not understand? Was it the thou shall not have other gods before me ( think progressivism), or thou shall not steal ( redistribution of others wealth), or shou shall not covet thy neighbors ( think GM, housing, student loans etc).
I would have to agree with the previous poster, it’s all about the need to stay informed about the truth, not their lie’s.

Skookum, and now the Times is nothing but a funny paper. Kind of ironic, no? 😯

@Jarhead: In Calgary yesterday, the news reported that Canada is going to subsidize all newspapers that charge for subscriptions because the newspapers are no longer viable. Just one step closer to the government controlling the propaganda or news.

Obama will probably be trying to do the same thing in the US, he has been kicking it around, like a soccor ball for months.

Yes the Times is nothing but a propaganda bureau for Obama and once Obama pays them it will only get worse. Canada and the US often mirror each other. I will be in the Yukon in four hours; hopefully, I can get service and report on Socialism North of the Border

The left will fail miserably to see the conflict of interest in a newspaper being paid by the government to report on that same government.

@John Galt: Twenty years ago, we would have said there was no way the government would own or subsidize private industry and give preferential treatment to unions, but here we are about to jump through the Obama Portal. Canada is saying that all Canadian communities deserve a local voice and therefore the government must step up to the plate and insure their viability. Thus another Leftist institution is guaranteed survival in a supposed free market. Watch for the same approach in the US, as if the government is really worried about a paper in Wichita. Got to catch a plane. Their real concern is NYT and others!

SKOOKUM: hi, IT SEEMS that it ‘s becoing suspicious: you seems to be where EARTQUAKES RUMBLES around your passage; THAT one was in the 5point and some, that was around OTTAWA VALLEY; very suspicious indeed. bye 🙄