The Conspiracy Of The Centuries [Reader Post]

Loading

How companies, universities, and governments are planning our future
under the guise of so-called Anthropogenic Global Warming.

Since the release of the e-mails and documents from the Hadley Center Climate Research Unit (aka CRU) in England, there has been an outpouring of rage, disbelief, and excuse making. They revealed that a small group of scientists, acting as a “clearinghouse”, have been leading many of the world’s researchers, climate-modelers, and data-gatherers toward a result that had been planned since the beginning of the Clinton administration, then feeding their “science-based projections” to the United Nations to make long-term policies that will have an effect on all the world’s population. These scientists have been given a goal, and other than a few setbacks, they have been carrying it out successfully… until now.

While this may sound like a conspiracy that might be found only on obscure websites, and midnight talk-radio, the evidence is clear. The names, e-mail addresses, organizations, and government agencies that have been involved in this are clearly put on display within the leaked documents and e-mails. The data-manipulation is made bare, and the methods of how it has been presented to the public is clear, along with how they have squashed anyone who might question their “science”. The stakes are too high for them to be sidetracked by actual facts, or realistic solutions.

The specific acts of data manipulation, and falsified results are now being disseminated across the Internet by regular citizens, known skeptics, and by intrepid reporters. Over the past week, and in the coming weeks, many people, and even the press, will publish these findings. Climate scientists who have found themselves ostracized will have been vindicated, skeptics will find new and curious supporters, and politicians will find themselves on the street, and possibly in a witness stand.

In this essay, I will not delve into the actual data that was manipulated, except to provide context. These particular disclosures are being done by thousands of people while I compose this, and will be seen by millions more. Those with a higher visibility have already surpassed the small samplings I’ve given here on Flopping Aces, and the most egregious of them made public by those more qualified than I am in analyzing the actual science behind it. More will undoubtedly be released as the thousand some-odd e-mails and documents are gone through by the “Army of Davids”, as Glenn Reynolds of Instapundit has termed us (in a book by the same title).

My research has been focused on getting “inside” the process itself, and to make the connections. To do this, I have read over 1000 individual e-mails, and every document released by the still unknown “hacker”. They were first converted from a difficult-to-read Notepad format with associated10-digit identifier date-codes, to a M.S. Word document titled by actual dates that were within each e-mail header. During this time, many were deemed “not useful” to the larger goal or redundant, were put aside. The others were separated by relevance and impact. The e-mails cover a time period from 1996 through 2009. I now know how “sausage” is made.

The “Documents” section of the release consisted of PDF’s, Word-docs, and included files that contain software code in Fortran and C++, and gathered raw data from the field. I did not have the means to re-assemble the codes, but there again, people more knowledgeable than I certainly will in the near future and disclose their findings, as some already have. My hope is that through this data, we can gain from a better understanding of the world’s actual climate history and possible future. Real and harmful pollution should be decreased, and no one on either side of the political spectrum wants to drink bad water or breathe smoggy air.

The Beginning of the End Game

The seeds to this scandal were planted early in the Clinton administration, when emerging abilities to measure and track temperatures on a global scale, revealing what scientists saw as a rise in temperature, corresponding with a rise in CO2. The long-established proof of the ability of initial amounts of CO2 concentrations to hold heat, and to also let heat pass into space has not been questioned, nor is it questioned now in light of the hacker’s release.

The sole focus should be if human-added CO2 is the main driver for the increase in reported temperatures, and if so, what to do about it.

In all reality, those questions remain, and might have even been resolved by now had the scientists with the most visibility not been given a different mandate in those early days, and other scientists not been crowded out, or their views discounted simply because they were not part of the self-named “Community”. The released e-mails have shown this “us verses them” mentality over and over (1256765544), and the reasons have little to do with large egos or territorial aspirations as can sometimes be seen in every scientific discipline. Science is more competitive than many realize.

The editors of numerous environmental publications (1237496573) worked closely with the scientists of this “Community”. There was a symbiotic relationship between them, the reviewers, and the scientists in-question. They conspired to reject or delay submissions from outside scientists, or accepted them if they were seen as being on the same page. Some were accepted only after jumping over hurdles that members of this Community never had to, and skeptical editors like James Saiers from the University of Virginia fired (1106322460). The level of disparagement and vitriol within the e-mails that the Community scientists espoused toward the “outsiders” is akin to what one might hear on a 2nd grade schoolyard (1255100876). They actually expressed relief, bordering on joy, when a skeptic had died (1075403821), and expressed the same sort of emotion when a high-level scientist had left the Community “hive”( 1256765544). In many instances, un-reviewed data and conclusions were released to their self created public outlet known as realclimate.com without any outside input whatsoever (1102687002).

The high-level software modelers were also part of this scheme. They knew what inputs, curves, smoothings, and adjustments were needed to keep the temperature-level increases where the managers “needed” them to be (1254108338) in order to keep the Project moving forward, and the money flowing in from taxpayers and foundations from all over the world.

Bishop Hill has a collection of the most incriminating evidence, and is where the above links are from.

The hundreds of lower-level scientists, programmers, and especially the thousands of folks including college students, who do the hard work of gathering data from all corners of the globe, are as much victims of this charade as any of the rest of us. Most have dedicated their lives to furthering the knowledge of our planetary home, and I feel very badly that they might end up being put into the same corner of shame that the conspirators might find themselves in if justice is ever done. They deserve more than this, and should be commended for their dedication.

A New Enemy, and New Opportunities

We now return to the beginning of the 90’s: the Wall had fallen, Germany was united, and the former Soviet Union countries were in political, economic and environmental shambles. The Middle East was smoldering from the first Iraq war, and looked like it might be ripe for long-term peace. The paradigms of the previous 40 years had been forever turned upside down, and for the first time, those who came of age in the 60’s had attained the power of the Presidency, and Congress. The threats of the previous generations were suddenly gone.

There was much to do, for they had dreams. But they needed a new “cause”.

Corporations that had carried on in a more or less predictable manner suddenly had very different market out-looks all over the world, along with different commodity sources. Russia had oil, diamonds, and an educated population, China and the newly free Soviet states had potential customers, and a cheap labor pool, Military spending was seen as drying up, and the now-recovering economies of America Asia, and Western Europe was seen as stable for as far as forecasts could be made.

There was much to do, for they needed new plans. But they needed a new “stability”.

Both of these entities may seem very different on the surface. At first blush, 60’s dreamers and international corporate leaders look and act diametrically opposed. But they do have one thing in common: They both seek the power, planning and predictability over others.

Enter global warming: the new enemy, the new market, all wrapped up in one.

The first iteration was “Agenda 21”. A program proposed to alleviate all things bad happening to the world’s poor. It never really got off the ground, primarily because we already had lots of programs to help the poor, and it was seen by most as redundant. Meanwhile following the Europeans, some environmentalists had turned up the volume on CO2 concerns, aided by Jim Hansen of NASA, who added credence to this clarion call. At the time this was not seen as pressing, because the science itself seemed sketchy. Sure CO2 can have an effect, but a runaway effect? This needed more research, and the environment-loving Clinton admin was right there to help, with Al Gore as their inside man. Many others now work within the Obama admin.

The first thing the international oil corporations smelled of course was their butts on a spit. They all knew that they would be the logical target of any CO2 reductions. They had to act fast, and along with the corporate-friendly Republicans now controlling the Senate, they also had an inside man within the Clinton admin: The heir to the Occidental Petroleum Corporation, Albert Gore Jr.

According to the released e-mails and documents, one large international company brought forth a grand vision in early 90’s. That company was a new division of Royal Dutch Shell International of Holland and England. It took only a few more years to solidify their hold on the agenda, and begin to steer it.

E-mail # 0894639050
(Dozen’s of CC’s and e-mail addresses of large companies, schools, think-tanks, government officials, environ groups, and UN members, all removed by PV)

From: Ged.R.Davis
Subject: RE: IPCC SRES Scenario Guidelines for Authors
Date: 08 May 1998 10:50:50 +0100

Find below guidelines on how to present the IS99 storylines and scenarios. Could you the nominated authors send me your first drafts as soon as possible?
In writing up your contribution could you cover the following areas, ideally structured as follows:

1. Scenario family narrative to discuss main themes, dynamics and a diagram showing ‘grand logic’

2. Key Scenario Family Drivers and their Relationships
Topics you should cover include the following:
* population
* technology developments
* governance and geopolitics
* economic development
* equity
* communication and settlement patterns
* environmental concerns/ecological resilience

3. Scenarios, include reasons for branches: this section should state clearly the reasons behind selection of scenarios and review the key highlights of the scenario quantification
* energy resources/technology, include resource availability
* land use and agriculture
* scenario quantification, include snowflake
* CO2 emissions

There may be other factors you wish to add to the paper.

Regards,
Ged Davis
Shell International Limited, London
Scenario Processes and Applications Div.

The Long Term Agenda

So what did Shell and their dozens of “friends” have in mind?

Easy: Long-term stability of markets based on a cause. And not just the oil market.

They even have a nice website that sounds so nice, but reveals little:

Notice the name of the school it’s run through.

This particular e-mail does not look like much, and says even less, but does anyone think, (especially you environmentalist’s) that Shell Oil, or any other multinational cares about CO2 or global warming?

So what might be the long term “plans” and “scenarios” you ask?

E-mail # 0889554019 from Anne Johnson of the IIAS coordinated this “gathering of the minds” for the Shell division, and they came up with 4 scenarios, one of which (A1) is the preferred one. The E-mail is very long, so I will only quote-out the one they most want to see happen by the year 2100:

That section is titled:

Golden Economic Age (A1): a century of expanded economic prosperity with the emergence of global governance.

This is what they envision happening if they can use your CO2 taxes and fees to pay for it:

3.Golden Economic Age (A1)

This scenario family entitled “Golden Economic Age”, describes rapid and
successful economic development. The primary drivers for economic growth and development “catch up” are the strong human desire for prosperity, high human capital (education), innovation, technology diffusion, and free trade.

The logic of successful development assumes smooth growth with no major political discontinuities or catastrophic events. The scenario family’s development model is based on the most successful historical examples of economic growth, i.e., on the development path of the now affluent OECD economies. Historical analogies of successful economic “catching up” can be found in the Scandinavian countries, Austria, Japan, and South Korea.

“Intangible” assets (human capital, stable political climate) take
precedence over “tangible” assets (capital, resource, and technology
availability) in providing the conditions for a take-off into accelerated
rates of development. Once these conditions are met, free trade enables each region to access knowledge, technology, and capital to best deploy its respective comparative economic and human resource advantages. Institutional frameworks are able to successfully sustain economic growth and also to handle the inevitable volatility that rapid economic growth entails.

The “intangible” prerequisites for accelerated rates of economic growth
also offer long-term development perspectives for regions that are poorly endowed with resources or where current economic prospects are not auspicious, such as Sub-Saharan Africa. There, for instance, fostered regional trade and capital availability enhance the pull-effects of a strong South African economy. In other regions, growth may be fuelled by domestic know-how and high human capital valued at the international market. An example of this is the thriving software industry of the Indian subcontinent. In yet other regions, growth could be stimulated by the expansion of regional economic partnerships and free trade arrangements (e.g., extensions of NAFTA and the European Union).

The main difference with the historical OECD experience is a certain
acceleration in time and space, (i.e., “leapfrogging”) made possible by
better access to knowledge and technology, a consequence of the high-tech and free trade characteristics of development. Successful catching up becomes pervasive; all parts of the “developing world” participate, though with differences in timing. The final outcome is that practically all parts of the world achieve high levels of affluence by the end of the 21st century, even if disparities will not have disappeared entirely. The current distinction between “developed” and “developing” countries will in any case no longer be appropriate.

As in the past, high growth (a “growing cake”) eases distributional
conflicts. Everyone reaps the benefits of rapid growth, rising incomes,
improved access to services, and rising standards of living. The economic imperatives of markets, free trade, and technology diffusion (i.e., competition) that underlie the high growth rates provide for efficient allocation of resources. Efficiency and high productivity are the positive by-products of the highly competitive nature of the economy. They also provide the economic resources for distributive and social measures required for a stable social and political climate, vital for sustaining high growth rates in human capital, productivity, innovation, and hence economic growth.

The economic development focus explains its central metric: the degree of economic development as reflected in per capita income levels (GDP at market exchange rates as well as at purchasing power parity rates). The principal driver is the desire for prosperity, all major driving forces are closely linked to prosperity levels, with actual causality links going in both directions. For example, demographic variables co-evolve with prosperity: mortality declines (i.e. life expectancy increases) as a function of higher incomes (better diets and affordable medical treatment).

In turn, changes in the social values underlying the fertility transition
also pave the way for greater access to education, modernisation of
economic structures, and market orientation. These are key for innovating and diffusing the best practice technologies underlying the high productivity, and hence economic growth, of the scenario.

It goes on into more detail, but you get the point… “Nirvana” as only the left could define it, all paid for by benevolent corporations. It shall all come to pass when we give them control, or they take it.

Scenarios B1, A2, and B2 are further down the “nirvana-scale”, but all are “better” than today.

The Surge the Left Supports

As a side-note, I could not get over this sentence: As in the past, high growth (a “growing cake”) eases distributional conflicts.

-Shades of the man the left still hates, Ronald Reagan, and his “A rising tide lifts all boats.”

Do any of you still wonder why the Left went nuts when Gore didn’t get elected?
-It slowed down the “Plan”.

Do any of you still wonder why Obama had to be elected?
-To make up for lost time.

Look back and remember the only Bill that Obama ever submitted while he was a Senator.

“Global Poverty Act” (S.2433) The legislation would commit the U.S. to spending 0.7 percent of gross national product on foreign aid, which amounts to a 13-year total of $845 billion over and above what the U.S. already spends.

For a crime to take place motive, means, and opportunity come into play. But is there more evidence within the hacked release? Glad you asked. A certain PDF document is there.

In June of 2004, a draft of a document titled: Adaptation And Mitigation strategies: Supporting European climate policy. (ADAM 2nd order draft) There is a red-lined entry within it, obviously to be added by the coordinator Mike Hulme of the Tyndall Centre, on line 676 through line 682. It reads, in his words exactly how I present it here:

We believe that one worked example should certainly relate to the design and implementation of a post-2012 global climate regime. Here, we would develop a portfolio of global design principles (e.g. burden-sharing, blah, blah…) and EU policy options (e.g. compensation measures, blah, blah…) which could deliver a 2100 global climate consistent with Article 2 of the UNFCCC and consistent with other international goals, treaties, and conventions (e.g. Millennium Development Goals, WTO Biodiversity and Desertification Conventions). These options would be such to nan options appraisal using the ADAM PAF.

To those who have been paying attention all these years, we see familiar phrases within this open-ended bureau-speak, such as; “Global design principals”, “Compensation measures”, “Burden sharing”, “Millennium Goals”, “WTO”, etc.

All the proposals to supposedly lower the earth’s temperature, inevitably end up being a multi-tentacled redistribution scheme from those who have earned what they have under a sovereign Constitution, and handing it over to those who do not share our values nor our laws, all under the auspices and management of the “benevolent” United Nations, and time is of the essence.

Very little is mentioned within these documents about the use of solar, nuclear, or any other non-CO2-emitting technologies to fix the “problem” of AGW.

Within the PDF, one notes that the very first name listed is the list of participating organizations to implement the ADAM/UN goals, is the University of East Anglia UK and the Tyndall Centre.

The Climate Research Unit of the University of East Anglia is where these documents and e-mails came from, and who supply the climate numbers to the UN. The Tyndall Centre is a huge advertising and market research company based in England.

The “settled science” is but a tool, and the Commission on Intervention and State Sovereignty (UN/CISS), the IIAS, the Commission on Global Governance, and anyone else we have no means to elect, should be kept as far away as possible to our great country, no matter the issue.

~~~

Being the son of a programmer/astronomer, I have always loved the sciences, and have kept abreast of this AGW topic since the beginning. I have always been eager to continue adding to my own knowledge of how and why “things” work, regardless of the “what”. I’ve worked many years alongside chemists and engineers in the semiconductor industry, and I am very familiar with vacuum, pressure, gas phasing, radio frequency induced plasma, and many other physical sciences. I can appreciate the tasks involved with science, especially because it was I who in many occasions did the hands-on part of experimentation, and data collection, and in other cases wrote up the drafts for submissions to journals, and patents. I have also been a political junky since Watergate, and a nut for history for as long as I can remember. This life-experience is why this revelation has intrigued me the way it has, and is why I think I can shed some light on it, in a way that may not be apparent to the average person trying to follow all of this.

That, and I have 3 children whom I love dearly, who will have to pay for all this.

0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
64 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

Pat, it’s finally here and I’m tired, had one of those rare big days, going to read this more thoroughly in the morning. Just want to say right now, thank you and your family!!!! for the effort you all put into this.

Being a mom, grandmother and great grandmother, just have to believe some in here know what this idiotic group, Congress, the UN and this president are doing is frightening and threatening to the whole world.

As you said, your children will be left to pay for all this hokum as will mine plus the grandkids and my greats. It has to be stopped, information about this fraud has to be spread far and wide. Knowledge is power and you and others here strengthen us. We might not be able to put it altogether like you guys do, but we can e-mail it all over everywhere.

So much of your career to thank you for, you still are on watch just like Old Trooper, my husband and are greatful.

I also want to thank Mata, Curt, Mike, Skye, Word and the rest in here that have been working so hard on this, outstanding,! Sheesh, I’m almost feeling like someone just handed me a gold statue and I need to babble about something. Just kidding, you guys are great!

One minor correction if I may…anAL GOREtentive isn’t exactly the ‘heir to Occidental Petroleum’….he began his political career as political bitch boy to Armand Hammer…the founder and straw boss of Occidental….just like his daddy had been while he was in office…..the only
‘crop’ that is produced on his ‘farm’ just outside Carthage,TN is zinc…mined by a subsidiary of Occidental and it has been a polluter of nearby waterways for years…..he calls this anti ‘global warming’ crusade a ‘spiritual’ matter…..well,the last thing I or anybody else needs is a lecture on ‘spiritual’ matters from someone who bows down to a stone statue of Buddha for $50k in illegal Chinese communist campaign cash and who flunked out of Vanderbilt University Divinity School.

Great work, Patvann. Head over to wattsupwiththat.com I have shared your work in the comments on Anthony’s latest work about Google hits.

Climategate now shows 57 million hits on Bing and 10 million on Google. I guess that is what happens when your CEO is on Obama’s advisory board.

Nice piece, but it ain’t the Hadley Centre — that was early misreportage by the legacy media (which reveals how seriously they’re taking this story). It’s the Climate Research Unit (CRU) at East Anglia University.

Patvann –

Great work from you and your family.

If it’s okay with you and the Flopping Aces posse I’d like to cross-post this on my site?

I’ll wait for a yes or no to that effect, however.

Maggie

Go ahead and cross post, Maggie. 🙂

If you don’t mind, please add the correction that Mr. Dunn noted, (even though they are closely connected), and be sure to get a Trackback to here cuz technically Curt now owns it.

Patvann –

Thanks.

I’ll wait roughly 24 hours before posting it (with the noted correction) and absolutely link it to FA site.

This gives Curt enough time to say “Oh, hell no!” before I do.

Ya did good!

Great post, PV!

One (very) minor point though, it’s Anthropogenic Global Warming, not Anthropological.

@Thebronze

Oh jeez…stoopid spellchecker. (Curt? Can you help a tired guy out?)

My foster daughter just read me something…

“There is no such thing as AWG…Chuck Norris was cold, so he turned the sun up.”

Remember, their Btu tax was part of the Clinton agenda in 1993. This was prior to AGW. They have correctly identified that energy is a root of freedom.

Well worth the callous on my big toe from tapping, Patvann. Kudos to you and family.

No worries PV, just helping a friend out…

You must go here now

Really. You must. It’s from a file I couldn’t open. You want smoke from a gun, here it is.

This is the best article I have read that gives the full scope of the ambitions of the Warmers and their allies. Wouldn’t it be nice if we saw at least a handful of “news” stories report on all these big government/ big business connections and how that will squeeze the little guy?

But it seems that the “news” media is more interseted in covering the story about the White House gate crashers than they are in covering a story that will deeply and forever impact the lives of all Americans and others throughout the world.

Good work Patvann.

Now, how long will it before one of the Warmers shows up to tell us all it ain’t so?

Where’s Larry W.? Did he go on vacation and ask Turdbutt to substitute for him?

Here’s this documentary with some of the same themes in case anyone is interested:

Raging hyper-inflation, Depression-era unemployment, stifling regulatory and tax burdens designed explicitly to sabotage entrepreneurial free markets– these combined with a looming geopolitical catastrophe involving at least Iran are BHO’s classic Cloward-Piven Strategy for demolishing post-Enlightenment industrial civilization for the benefit of a global totalitarian kakistocracy orchestrated by parasitic thugmeisters.

Following a century-long rebound from a 500-year Little Ice Age, as of 2010 Earth faces a 70-year “dead sun” Maunder Minimum through about 2080 that may well end our current Holocene Interglacial Epoch in favor of a resurgent 102,000-year Pleistocene glaciation. Having blighted global energy economies, purposefully sabotaged every effort to enhance coal, oil, nuclear resources, death-eating Luddite sociopaths at CRU and elsewhere have committed crimes against humanity worthy of 1930s Gauleiters and Commissars. “Seething maggots” is Science Czar (sic) John Holdren’s view of humankind– he of Paul Ehrlich’s “Population Bomb” (1969) who reviles Borlaug’s seminal Green Revolution in terms so viciously homicidal they take one’s breath away.

Since the mid-1960s a virulent strain of psychopaths, atavistic and regressive to their craven core, has fastened on global polities, draining sustenance like societal tapeworms, blasting and perverting everything they touch. No wonder worldwide populations face demographic cataclysm, depleting generations on a level not seen since the Great Plagues. And all the while murderous, extraordinarily violent sects of Muslump nihilists drive forward their medieval theocracies in contravention of every civilizing tenet known to man.

There will be blood, an end of innocence. The generation born in AD 2000 will have good cause to curse Climate Cultists and such others’ very name.

First of all, thank you Curt. I owe you a donut.
*ducks and runs* 🙂

..and thank you Mike. It means a lot.

AND A BIG THANK YOU TO MATA!!!!! For the great feedback and suggestions. *hug*

Tour de Force!, great job.

These environmental movements stated so long ago with some WASP who at the beginning really care and did help us create some awareness…remember “save the Whales?” However, some radical lefties in the 60’s and 70’s saw the opportunities to make money and most of all to get “power”. At the end of the day, that’s what these people really want is power! sick power at any cost, where truth is a casualty.
I am very impress with everyone’s strong background and amazing intellect. Let’s keep those liers opportunists radicals out of America’s future by unvailing their lies and deceipts. We need to confront them and fight their stupit mentality!

I’d like to add that I also agree with Mike’sA and others that this is a stellar analysis of the database, Patvann.

@Alvin: I’m sure Patvann’s happy with the hotlink on Anthony’s site, Alvin. But dang… that Google thread??? Never seen so many people fooled by Google, and boolean challenged as that group. Rather like Turbo, who used Google hits as proof positive of FOIA/FOI/FOA etal. yeeeash.. Hope that Patvann’s work doesn’t get lost in all their “google tests” and “research”…. LOL

Haven’t people heard of mega search engines? BTW, OT for a sec with a bit of trivia, and using a mega search engine, I simply typed climategate and immediately came up with a prescient commenter on climate-skeptics dot com calling himself Skydiver. The guy was obviously ahead of his time. Check out the date of his prediction….

Skydiver48:
Look, IPCC is political. Enough said. Except someday the whole concept of man-made global warming will be properly called ClimateGate! Possibly, ScienceGotGored! Peer reviews? LOL. Arthur Anderson, the largest CPA firm in the world had peer reviews done regularly – but truth and ultimately bankruptcy got them anyway. It ain’t rocket science folks.

August 8, 2008, 6:00 am

Now back to our regularly scheduled topic…. :0)

Pat, very complete analysis of the fraud we all felt was being forced on us. Watching you tear through the data dump and working to understand the timeline of the data was key to understanding the roots of the fraud.

Kudos to you for a job well done. (Now, get some sleep…)

Time will tell if the nut has truely been cracked apart or just banged up. Until people are incarcerated, and humanity gets a refund on the trillons of dollars bilked out of all of us, justice has not been done. The amount of money taken from us under the guise of safeguarding our little blue mudball in space is staggering. How to calculate the amount owed to us all is beyond me, but we are certainly owed something.

“Golden Economic Age (A1): a century of expanded economic prosperity with the emergence of global governance.”

Hitler talked about a “Thousand Year Reich.” These guys are looking for only a hundred year reich, so they’re only a tenth as Looney Tunes as Adolf. I’d say that’s enough to lock ’em up, based on the Precautionary Principle. Right?

Put them at the controls of the entire world, they say, and all will be peace and wonderfulness. I wouldn’t let these bozos near the flush handle of my 1957 toilet, the one that actually works. They’ve all got proctocraniosis.

Wow… another “vann” here… and one of the Monster drinkers, no doubt. We all had visions of the Patvann family, furiously ripping thru data and tapping on keboards 24/7, multiple screens flickering thru the night, and lots of morning bloodshot and glazed eyes. LOL

Nope… no sleep for the soon to be infamous, ya know.

Yup, Patvann did a bang up job. Nice you (Patvann) say thanks, guy but the work was all yours and family. And I enjoyed the overview perspective, history of the players, and watching the timeline of an agenda being pulled together… all in the name of science.

To comment on Mikevann’s statement about “Time will tell if the nut has truely been cracked apart or just banged up.”…. one casualty has been shaken faith in the “science”. The ‘splaining away stuff just isn’t flying, and the stories just keep coming.

But I suspect if you want an answer pretty quick to the nut’s status, we can watch both Britain and France, as they are the ones lobbying to build a “… $22bn (£13.3bn) global fund to respond to the world’s “climate emergency” by fast-tracking funds to poorer countries from next year.”

Then combine that with the admission that CRU did indeed destroy the original raw data upon which their merged data set is founded back in the 80s (pre Phil Jones era). Apparently they didn’t feel the need to transfer the data to a current medium and “needed more data storage” since it wasn’t such a “hot” (pun intended) issue then.

Gotta admit, that’s a lot of chutzpah on Brown and Sarkozy’s part – announcing beaucoup pounds and francs from a couple of nations in little better economic shape than the US for a “climate emergency” in the very shadow of this CRU double faux pas. Since both nations are comprised of a lot of die hard AGW prozac types, we’ll have to see whether there’s a public backlash for this money request on the heels of corruption and scandal. If there is, the nut is severely cracked in multiple places, and not merely a starter crack.

@Maggie: Come on Missy…you know I don’t do that. Crosspost away and give a link is all I ask.

@Patvann: No donuts for me :)…Ill take a healthy salad instead. Gotta keep up with all the youngsters and stay in shape.

PV, my goodness, your work will be a major instrument in bringing down this Marxist Fool in the White House and freeing us from the Left’s imposition of the shackles and chains of Marxist slavery. Your family has made history and probably saved the United States from economic ruin. You and your unit, (family) are heroes of the first order; free people of integrity and honor, who are not apart of the fraud will be forever indebted to you. You are now a part of history!

It is undeniable that we will need to take to the streets of the cyber world to throw the Molotov Cocktails of cyber journalism into the very houses of those who believe, because the vested interests of the political/MSM symbiotic relationship coupled with the sycophantic lemmings will be reluctant to relinquish their humanitarian dream of saving the world through Scientific Marxism, not to mention the goal of gaining economic and virtual control of the world.

Outstanding! In the remote possibility that you ever need my help in the future, just ask!

Hand Salute!

Whew! All for a one world government, this country already does so well at the UN, right? Our country’s progressive, leftist cabal could very well see the power they have accumulated to date amount to nothing on the world stage should this come to pass. What a bunch of fools, we need to stop, pronto!

The hacker or whistleblower, whatever, who cares what they are calling him today, took a courageous first step, you took step two as did our other authors that have been contributing to the exposure of this fraud, now on to step three. I have my pitchfork ready aka telephone/e-mail!

BTW, Part of your opening paragraph:

a small group of scientists, acting as a “clearinghouse”, have been leading many of the world’s researchers, climate-modelers, and data-gatherers toward a result that had been planned since the beginning of the Clinton administration,

Reminds me of how al Qaeda operates, same goal, different reason and methods.

Thanks again Pat and family, lot to take in in just this post, and this amounts to a second in a day in comparison to what you have studied to put all this together.

Mike, outstanding, frightening video.

I am a mathematician, and I teach statistics. Allow me to choose from a set of data the values that prove my point, and I can prove anything. Statistics has no validity if there is any tampering with the raw data. Statistics, as a mathematical skill, has as a basis the presumption that the purpose of computation is to infer information from the raw data.
A poll is taken. 60% of the respondents belong to one political party, where that political party represents 45% of the population. This is called a skewed poll, and is of no value.
Any textbook on statistics will tell you this; the text will even tell you the various means of assuring that the sample is truly random and includes no bias.
What I am saying about statistical computations is established fact; even non-mathematicians can verify that sampling and computation must be based on unbiased samples.
I am also a scientist. True science investigates phenomena without pre-ordained results. Government-funded science is by definition an oxymoron; to obtain a grant one must specify in advance the results one will obtain using the grant money. Fulfilling a government grant means making the committee which makes the grants happy, by checking that the conclusion matches the specified goal of the research. This method of investigation will discover nothing.
None of the great scientific discoveries of the past were pre-ordained. All of them were gotten by the acute observer seeing something unexpected and following that unexpected event to a new conclusion. Penicillin. Teflon. Carbon rings. Pasteurization. Relativity. I could go on for pages.
What is so sickening about AGW is the systematic effort to bias the data. To cherry-pick certain trees out of a larger sample, then claim that the trees (selected for their bias) are representative, is fraud.
To discard data because it is not reflective of the desired conclusion is fraud.
To use a high-pass filter to discard low temperatures and include high temperatures is fraud.
To systematically report the disappearing ice around the North Pole (when, in fact, said ice cyclically expands and contracts in its extent) is fraud.
To introduce one’s movie by using a fabricated view of a collapsing ice sheet from a commercial move, presented as real, is fraud.
To publish one’s new book and include as the flyleaf an illustration of the Earth with many hurricanes (airbrushed in, including on the equator) is fraud.

The truly sick part of the story is that the fraud is justified by the nobility of its purpose: one New World Order, the grand dream of Karl Marx imposed upon all, so that all can enjoy living under tyranny.

AGW is not science. AGW is a hoax, a fraud, a vast chicanery foisted off on unsuspecting people, for the intended purpose of world domination.

And that is wrong.

I hope you don’t mind, mathman, but I cross posted your comment above on another thread for it’s relevancy there INRE a discussion.

@mathman said: ” Fulfilling a government grant means making the committee which makes the grants happy, by checking that the conclusion matches the specified goal of the research. “

I can personally attest to the veracity of that statement. At EPA I worked in the Grants Administration Division overseeing ALL the agencies grants. EPA just doesn’t give money to people who disagree with their overall position on these issues.

P.S. If anyone thought Patvann’s statement on the real anti-capitalist agenda of the warmers needed a firmer foundation Al Gore today provided it:

http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/1b1067b2-dacd-11de-933d-00144feabdc0.html

I found it amusing that Al also said: “Disclosure and transparency are critical to the optimal allocation of capital. “ Something tells me Al doesn’t apply that same standard to the Warmers and their “research.”

Global warming is from the same people who will state on National TV that the Defense budget (10-12% of the budget) is the major part of U.S. spending which is bankrupting the nation. Isn’t there a book out titled ‘arguing with idiot’? Democrats are so stupid they won’t admit they’re wrong when they know they’re wrong, or is that their pre-school mentality>

At least one researcher saw the problems with the use of IPCC SRES [Special Report on Emissions data] results:

http://www.eastangliaemails.com/emails.php?eid=186&filename=968705882.txt

The key graph:

“First let me say that in general, as my own opinion, I feel rather unconfortable [sic] about using not only unpublished but also un reviewed [sic] material as the backbone of our conclusions (or any conclusions).”

“I realize that chapter 9 is including SRES stuff, and thus we can and need to do that too, but the fact is that in doing so the rules of IPCC have been softened to the point that in this way the IPCC is not any more an assessment of published science (which is its proclaimed goal) but production of results.”

Scrapiron — I think the book you are referring to is “Arguing with Idiots” by Glenn Beck

Outstanding, Patvann! Simply outstanding work! To echo other commenters, my thanks to you and your family, as well.

To quote/paraphrase the Goracle,

“The debate’s over”.

Hopefully all my lefty friends and global warming affirmers on my Facebook. 😉

Near 50 million hits on bing, about 14 million on google, who is scamming whom now.

@Patvann: Curt’s been pimping you good. You got almost double the hits I do.

Cross-Posting complete. You look good in stilettos, Patvann. ;^ )

From the UK Daily Mail:The BBC has become tangled in the row over the alleged manipulation of scientific data on global warming.

One of its reporters has revealed he was sent some of the leaked emails from the Climatic Research Unit at the University of East Anglia more than a month ago – but did nothing about them.

Despite the explosive nature of some of the messages – which revealed apparent attempts by the CRU’s head, Professor Phil Jones, to destroy global temperature data rather than give it to scientists with opposing views – Paul Hudson failed to report the story.

This has led to suspicions that the scandal was ignored because it ran counter to what critics say is the BBC’s unquestioning acceptance in many of its programmes that man-made climate change is destroying the planet.

Skookum –

Hmmm … recall how the NYTimes sat on the ACORN story just before the 2008 POTUS election.

Just something about that aiding and abetting media these days.

Very nice post Patvann! Now we just need to make sure these people are held accountable for the fraud they perpetrated. I watched all the Sunday shows today, including Fox News Sunday and not a peep about this from any of them.

PV and crew, 1300 hits is nice, but I was hoping for FA to be overwhelmed and in the shop for a serious overhaul. That article was historical and the mathman’s comment was serious sauce for such an article. I have emailed the article to Canada and hopefully it will be controversial, for their MSM is as much a Marxist propaganda bureau as our own. I am not letting down and if Curt could consider keeping MA’s & PV’s article on the front burner for a while longer, these articles deserve 1.3 mill hits not 1300.

To me this is betrayal, theft and fraud that is the equivalent of 9/11 and Pearl Harbor; and our moron in chief is sailing into the maelstrom of betraying and bankrupting this country as if nothing is wrong. The word is not reaching the public, because the outrage isn’t there. There should be such a cry that this country comes to a standstill and the Marxist in the White House is forced to resign.

That is my opinion!

PV wear tights with the hot pants.

Great work PatVann, thanks! Did anyone email this to Glenn Beck?

Good think you didn’t mention the Catholic Church Patvann!

Here is a little more background on this Hoax – mainly in quotes. First from the Club of Rome a clear declaration of intent.

“The common enemy of humanity is man.
In searching for a new enemy to unite us, we came up
with the idea that pollution, the threat of global warming,
water shortages, famine and the like would fit the bill. All these
dangers are caused by human intervention, and it is only through
changed attitudes and behavior that they can be overcome.
The real enemy then, is humanity itself.”

– Richard Haass, Club of Rome Document, 1991, “The First Global Revolution” p. 71,75 1993

The person used to implement it was Club of Rome member Maurice Strong: CEO of Canadian oil companies, Senior Advisor to the UN and World Bank, trustee of the Rockefeller foundation, member of the UN funded Commission on Global Governance (CCG). He is also guilty of at least three frauds, one with the help of Al Gore the Molten Metal scam, then there was The U.N.’s corrupt Oil-for-Food Scandal and AZL Resources where, as the largest shareholder and chairman, he was sued for hyping the stock ahead of a merger that failed.

Compare the Club of Rome agenda to what Elaine Dewar wrote in Toronto’s Saturday Night magazine:

“…It is instructive to read Strong’s 1972 Stockholm speech and compare it with the issues of Earth Summit 1992. Strong warned urgently about global warming, the devastation of forests, the loss of biodiversity, polluted oceans, the population time bomb. Then as now, he invited to the conference the brand-new environmental NGOs [non-governmental organizations]: he gave them money to come; they were invited to raise hell at home. After Stockholm, environment issues became part of the administrative framework in Canada, the U.S., Britain, and Europe….”
http://www.mail-archive.com/ctrl@listserv.aol.com/msg106963.html

So now you know where the Global Warming hoax originated. The following quote tells what Strong’s real agenda is:

“…Strong prefers power extracted from democracies, and kept from unenlightened voters. Most power-crazed men would stop at calling for a one world Earth Charter to replace the U.S. Constitution, or the UN Charter.

But in an interview with his own Earth Charter Commission, Strong said “the real goal of the Earth Charter is it will in fact become like the Ten Commandments. It will become a symbol of the aspirations and commitments of people everywhere”….” http://www.taxtyranny.ca/images/HTML/Maurice-Strong/article1.html

Strong is not working alone of course. An influential document in the global warming “debate” is the Stern Review. Lord Stern, a former World Bank Chief Economist, became head of the UK Government Economic Service. Stern published a set of proposals for a global deal on climate change at the London School of Economics and Political Science, called Key Elements of a Global Deal. http://www.lse.ac.uk/collections/granthamInstitute/publications/KeyElementsOfAGlobalDeal_30Apr08.pdf

The comment DennisA (04:30:53) : at

Telegraph's Booker on the "climategate" scandal

Has a lot more info about the UK side of the story including a list of the banks and corporations poised to make money off Carbon credits.

Also do not forget about the Rockefellers. Heartland and the climate “deniers” are accused of taking money from Exxon (owned by the Rockefellers) yet Greenpeace, Sierra Club, and WWF are funded through Rockefeller foundations. I am sure funding through the oil company instead of one of the many Rockefeller foundations was done so the research could be discounted and then ALL “deniers” tarred with the same brush. – The oil companies are behind the “deniers”!!!

The really interesting bit is how rank and file Political Activists are controlled.

The ‘Innocents’ Clubs’: http://www.heretical.com/miscella/munzen.html
“…During the 1920’s and most of the 1930’s Münzenberg played a leading role in the Comintern, Lenin’s front for world-wide co-ordination of the left under Russian control. Under Münzenberg’s direction, hundreds of groups, committees and publications cynically used and manipulated the devout radicals of the West….Most of this army of workers in what Münzenberg called ‘Innocents’ Clubs’ had no idea they were working for Stalin. They were led to believe that they were advancing the cause of a sort of socialist humanism. The descendents of the ‘Innocents’ Clubs’ are still hard at work in our universities and colleges. Every year a new cohort of impressionable students join groups like the Anti-Nazi League believing them to be benign opponents of oppression…”

Maurice Strong added a new twist to the ‘Innocents’ Clubs’. Strong’s early work with YMCA international “…may have been the genesis of Strong’s realization that NGOs (non-government organizations) provide an excellent way to use NGOs to couple the money from philanthropists and business with the objectives of government.” http://sovereignty.net/p/sd/strong.html

Very few of even the larger international NGOs are operationally democratic, in the sense that members elect officers or direct policy on particular issues,” notes Peter Spiro. “Arguably it is more often money than membership that determines influence, and money more often represents the support of centralized elites, such as major foundations, than of the grass roots.” The CGG has benefited substantially from the largesse of the MacArthur, Carnegie, and Ford Foundations. http://www.afn.org/~govern/strong.html

President Clinton took the NGOs even further. By Presidential Executive Order the USA was divided into ten regions. These regions are governed by an unholy mix of unelected government bureaucrats and NGOs. The regions were set up by President Nixon but implementing “regional governance concept began in earnest with the Clinton-Gore administration. “On the heels of the President’s Council on Sustainable Development , came the President’s Community Empowerment Board, chaired by Vice President Al Gore,” http://www.rense.com/general63/ree.htm These quasi-governmental regional authorities are slowly transforming the US from representative government to government by United Nations sponsored and directed NGOs and appointed bureaucrats.

The history of the take over of our food supply is detailed in this superb and well documented article. http://www.opednews.com/articles/History-HACCP-and-the-Foo-by-Nicole-Johnson-090906-229.html

Sorry for rambling but it is all interconnected like a spiderweb with the Central bankers in the middle controlling our money supply and now making a grab for complete control of energy and food — Worldwide.