While the blogosphere remains a’fire on the global warming/faulty science debate, and the MSM appears reluctant to step into the debate other than to diss the CRU/NIWA scandals, it appears the media outlet unfraid of throwing a couple of science types together, living at extreme ends of the spectrum, comes from Moscow. Subject at hand? A segment titled “Heating Cheating”, and hosted by Bill Dod out of the RT Moscow studio.

THE FIGHTERS

~~~

On one side of the ring is Aleksey Kokorin, Head of the Climate Change Programme at the World Wildlife Fund in Russia. Per their website:

WWF’s mission is the conservation of nature. Using the best available scientific knowledge and advancing that knowledge where we can, we work to preserve the diversity and abundance of life on Earth and the health of ecological systems by

* protecting natural areas and wild populations of plants and animals, including endangered species;
* promoting sustainable approaches to the use of renewable natural resources; and
* promoting more efficient use of resources and energy and the maximum reduction of pollution.

We are committed to reversing the degradation of our planet’s natural environment and to building a future in which human needs are met in harmony with nature. We recognize the critical relevance of human numbers, poverty and consumption patterns to meeting these goals.

Okie dokie…. the “relevance of human numbers…. and consumption patterns” is part of their solutions for “meeting” their goals. Gotcha…


What Kokorin has to say isn’t anything we aren’t all familiar with already. What was more interesting was watching him make his case… most of which consisted of him holding up a publication from the Russian Federation of Sciences (which appears is not for public consumption as it’s no where to be found on the Russia Academy of Sciences webpage. But the one that truly made his opponent, Piers Corbyn, roar was his statement that Russia has never had malaria before.

Perhaps Mr. Kokorin, focusing more on preserving wildlife instead of human life, isn’t familiar with the spread of malaria from Balkans, Central Europe and into Southern Russia late 19th and early 20th centuries. One of the reasons that malaria, as well as typhus and cholera, were held in check was Lenin’s extensions of medical services in the wake of the tsarist regimes combating the very disease that Kokorin insists was never in Russia to begin with.

This makes you wonder… does Kokorin believe it was global warming in the early 20th century that caused the plague outbreaks?

Then, of course, there’s Kokorin’s belief that global warming played a significant factor in crash of Air France 447.

Oddly enough, there’s no bio I could find on Mr. Kokorin’s educational credentials. Indeed, even on the WWF site, he is not listed under staff, board, executives, expert or scientists for the organization. A search only turns up his name on press releases, which leads me to believe he’s a hired gun mouthpiece. Other than that, he’s an enigma.

~~~

In the other corner is Piers Corbyn. A man introduced as an “independent weather forecaster” by host, Dod, and oft addressed by Kokorin as being a meterologist. In reality, Corbyn is an astrophysicist with a Ph.D, and founder of Weather Action. He is the originator of the Solar Weather Technique of long range weather forecasting, who’s work was independently verified in a peer-reviewed paper by Dr Dennis Wheeler, University of Sunderland, in the Journal of Atmospheric and Solar-Terrestrial Physics, Vol 63 (2001) p29-34.

Weather Action has audited accuracy, for example, the WeatherAction advance forecast of May 5 2009 predicted “Bay of Bengal land hit on May 24-26 2009” the event was verified by Cyclone Alia in the Bay of Bengal May 25 2009. Please see the Short List table below for more details of successful predictions and notable major extreme events.

Download Excel table report

See below for full independently Audited Assessment report of WeatherAction world extreme events forecasts March to Sept 2008 showing a success rate of 85% in forecasting of generally relatively unusual extreme events in narrow time windows.

Download pdf format report

See below the Audited Assessment report of WeatherAction world extreme events forecasts for the period October 2008 to April 2009 and a cover letter from the Auditors re USA & Canada events

Download pdf format formal audit report
Download pdf format report

Skill and forecast scope has been maintained and advanced since then and reports are issued every month.

The success rate is similar in WeatherAction detailed long range forecasts down to time windows of a few days for Britain, Ireland & European countries.

The unique power of the forecasts has also been proven by the profits on Scientific Weather Bets with William Hill at odds and verification organized independently by the UK Met Office.

[more at link above]

Yes, you read that last paragraph correctly. Corbyn was so confident of his track record of measurements that Weather Action made over £20,000 in bets with William Hill – about 40% of over 4,000 weather test bets…. all of which had odds and verification organized independently by the UK Met Office. Corbyn himself was excluded from the bookies.

The Odds were statistically fair and set by the Met Office before being shortened by William Hill by a standard 20%; the results were then provided by the Met Office for William Hill to settle each bet. Piers Corbyn was excluded by the bookies from such account betting in 2000.

Bets and notional bets can be used to estimate Forecasting Power which is the % profit (or negative for losses) on stakes that would come from bets placed at fair odds. For general long range forecasts for the three most extreme recent seasons, namely Summer 2007, Summer 2008 and Winter 2008-09 The Met Office long range forecast Power is minus 100% (ie Met Office long range forecasts failed in all three cases) and WeatherAction (Solar Weather Technique) scores about plus 500%.

Where has this man been, and why haven’t we heard more of him and his solar techniques? While most scientists are busy rewriting the past historic temperatures, and making impossible claims about the ionosphere when man wasn’t around with technology, Corbyn’s the master of predicting the future.

Needless to say, it’s more than amusing watching the debate… with Corbyn basically at odds with both the host with an obvious preconceived notion and the WWF media mouthpiece. And I have to wonder if Kokorin, bent on holding up his little blue book from RFS is getting paid to peddle the publication.

So watch, and enjoy… and don’t forget to wait for that great belly laugh from Corbyn when the malaria comment comes ’round.

As Aye says… roll the tape.

  • Share/Bookmark
Print This Post Print This Post
This entry was posted on Friday, November 27th, 2009 at 7:38 pm and is filed under ClimateGate, Global Warming. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

Trackbacks

  1. Tweets that mention Looking for climate change debate in all the wrong places? Turn to Russia Today TV -- Topsy.com

6 comments so far

Patvann
 1Reply to this comment  

Looking at the reproduction-rates in Russia, they’ll all be gone this century anyway. ;-)

November 27th, 2009 at 10:23 pm
 2Reply to this comment  

The Brit is spot-on!

Complete. Rubbish.

November 27th, 2009 at 11:15 pm
Skookum
 3Reply to this comment  

My friend Knarley Manners in Northern BC told me that last winter was the coldest winter since 81-82, six weeks of temps below 40 below. He asked if I could arrange some Global Warming up there.

I told him to write Al Gore, he has a lot of hot air and might be able to help out this winter.

November 28th, 2009 at 1:32 am
 4Reply to this comment  

This gets even funnier when you consider the host, Bill Dod, and his side comment about not having snow on the ground when you’re supposed to be having snow in Russia.

uh… oops. Isn’t part of “global warming” – so they tell us in condescending terms – supposed to be inordinate amounts of snow, rain, drought, hurricanes, typhoons, floods, tsunamis and extremes? That’s convenient… any change… too much snow, or *no* snow is all the fault of man and global warming. sigh

No one denies climate “changes”. Climate *always* changes. What we skeptics “deny” is that man is a sufficient contributing cause. Nothing to do with cleaning up air… we’re all for that. But oppressive, economic killers like the IPCC and warmists want? No way, Jose. You’re a long way from proving that to me.

But I digress… back to the “no snow on the ground” comment by host Dod. And let’s look at that when it comes to “measuring” Russia’s temps.

Last year, Nov 2008, an article from UK’s Telegraph, title “The World has never seen such freezing heat”.

A surreal scientific blunder last week raised a huge question mark about the temperature records that underpin the worldwide alarm over global warming. On Monday, Nasa’s Goddard Institute for Space Studies (GISS), which is run by Al Gore’s chief scientific ally, Dr James Hansen, and is one of four bodies responsible for monitoring global temperatures, announced that last month was the hottest October on record.

This was startling. Across the world there were reports of unseasonal snow and plummeting temperatures last month, from the American Great Plains to China, and from the Alps to New Zealand. China’s official news agency reported that Tibet had suffered its “worst snowstorm ever”. In the US, the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration registered 63 local snowfall records and 115 lowest-ever temperatures for the month, and ranked it as only the 70th-warmest October in 114 years.

So what explained the anomaly? GISS’s computerised temperature maps seemed to show readings across a large part of Russia had been up to 10 degrees higher than normal. But when expert readers of the two leading warming-sceptic blogs, Watts Up With That and Climate Audit, began detailed analysis of the GISS data they made an astonishing discovery. The reason for the freak figures was that scores of temperature records from Russia and elsewhere were not based on October readings at all. Figures from the previous month had simply been carried over and repeated two months running.

Whoa… like how “inconvenient” is that “truth”? Let’s fill in the missing blanks with previous warmer months measurements as the GISS data. How very “scientific” a “carry over” formula. whooo hoo! I feel so very confident in the “science” now. LOL

Naturally, in light of Watts Up With That and McIntyre (of let’s “debunk the hockey puck” graph fame), GISS… instead of arguing and defending their measurement “adjustments”… began *revising* them. Only to make them credible, they had to “discover” a new “hotspot” in the Arctic.

Whoa Rudolf… has anyone notified Santa???

This only made the confusion worse because, to compensate for the lowered temperatures in Russia, GISS claimed to have discovered a new “hotspot” in the Arctic – in a month when satellite images were showing Arctic sea-ice recovering so fast from its summer melt that three weeks ago it was 30 per cent more extensive than at the same time last year.

A GISS spokesman lamely explained that the reason for the error in the Russian figures was that they were obtained from another body, and that GISS did not have resources to exercise proper quality control over the data it was supplied with. [Mata Musine: naw... say it ain't so, joe! Ain't this what the CRU-NIWA faulty science debate is all about? Faulty databases?]

This is an astonishing admission: the figures published by Dr Hansen’s institute are not only one of the four data sets that the UN’s Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) relies on to promote its case for global warming, but they are the most widely quoted, since they consistently show higher temperatures than the others.

This isn’t the first time NASA’s Hansen has had to scramble to redo his “science”. McIntyre called him out in 2007 when he had to revamp his claims that the 1990s were the hottest on record for US surface temps when it was actually the 1930’s… PRE industrialized/POST WWII America.

DOH!

Concur with “the bronx”. The Brit (Corbyn) was spot on. Pure rubbish is being spouted as “concensus” science.

November 28th, 2009 at 1:07 pm
 5Reply to this comment  

BTW, here’s several photos of Russia’s 2007 “global warming” winter…

So which is it? Too little snow, or too much snow in the span of two years that equals “evil” mankind’s dastardly nature deeds?

November 28th, 2009 at 1:30 pm

Leave a reply

Name (*)
Mail (will not be published) (*)
URI
Comment

If your comments get caught in spam a lot please log into your registered account before trying to comment again. You can email me if your comment is caught in spam

 

Identity Verification: If you wish to verify your commenter identity, so no one can steal it, click the below button: