12
Nov

Hoffman Didn’t Lose NY-23 Race After All?

Posted by: Mike's America @ 8:45 am in Uncategorized  | 482 views

That headline may be premature, but it was even MORE premature to swear in Owens last Friday before all the votes were counted!

Democrats didn’t waste any time swearing in Bill Owens to take a seat in Congress representing the 23rd Congressional District of New York. While the Conservative candidate Doug Hoffman had conceded the race on election night when it looked like he was down by over 5,000 votes, all the ballots had yet to be counted and a string of reporting errors underreported Hoffman’s totals by thousands of votes.

The official vote count is now so close that the actual winner will be decided by the 10,200 absentee ballots which were distributed. With ACORN and SEIU paid agents working on behalf of Owens that means it’s likely the absentee ballots will favor Owens as fraud with these ballots is a specialty of Democrats.

But what would happen if it were determined that Hoffman actually won? Would Owens be removed from office and the deciding vote he cast in favor of Obama Care on Saturday be overturned? All unlikely, but you can just hear Democrats screaming at even the suggestion.

Meanwhile, Hoffman, who wasn’t a particularly charismatic candidate is considering running again in 2010. Plus, for those interested in a poll taken after the election, here’s some interesting background on the race.

  • Share/Bookmark
Print This Post Print This Post
This entry was posted on Thursday, November 12th, 2009 at 8:45 am and is filed under Uncategorized. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

Trackbacks

8 comments so far

Patvann
 1Reply to this comment  

In light of his conceding the race, would it even be legally possible for him to take the seat?

November 12th, 2009 at 9:56 am
huh
 2Reply to this comment  

Thieves rarely wait around before hocking thier ill-gotten wares.

November 12th, 2009 at 9:57 am
Hard Right
 3Reply to this comment  

OT–obama has rejected all suggestions on Afghanistan and told them to go back to the drawing board.
I’m sure any minute now the left will scream about obama ignoring the advice of his generals.

November 12th, 2009 at 10:00 am
Lorraine
 4Reply to this comment  

But the state of NY has yet to verify the election, so isn’t Owens being sworn in and illegal act

November 12th, 2009 at 11:08 am
Patvann
 5Reply to this comment  

http://www.syracuse.com/news/index.ssf/2009/11/its_not_over_recanvassing_shows_ny23_race.html

The new vote totals mean the race will be decided by absentee ballots, of which about 10,200 were distributed, said John Conklin, communications director for the state Board of Elections.
Under a new law in New York that extended deadlines, military and overseas ballots received by this coming Monday (and postmarked by Nov. 2) will be counted. Standard absentee ballots had to be returned this past Monday.
Conklin said the state sent a letter to the House Clerk last week explaining that no winner had been determined in the 23rd District, and therefore the state had not certified the election. But the letter noted that Owens still led by about 3,000 votes, and that the special election was not contested — two factors that legally allowed House Speaker Nancy Pelosi to swear in Owens on Friday.
“We sent a letter to the clerk laying out the totals,” Conklin said. “The key is that Hoffman conceded, which means the race is not contested. However, all ballots will be counted, and if the result changes, Owens will have to be removed.”

Could get interesting. If Owens is removed, the vote he placed for the healthcare bill is also removed!

November 12th, 2009 at 11:20 am
Missy
 6Reply to this comment  

I’m thinking Sarah Palin just might get a chuckle out of this, and Pelosi might have to be rescued from one of the vats at her vineyard.

November 12th, 2009 at 6:38 pm
Old Ez
 7Reply to this comment  

Maybe the reports I read were wrong, but I believe Nancy covered her large A. by passing the bill by two votes. So even if the election were overturned, she’d then claim that Hoffman was not eligible to vote on that bill since he had not officially been declared the winner of the race before that vote was taken. So one of the worst bills (possibly the worst) in American history would still stand.

There has been precedent of recanting a conceded race because the information available was not accurate. I’m not sure that a race has ever went this long before a recant was successful, but I can’t see why not. The available information was just as inaccurate.(And before anyone asks, I don’t have the exact races and dates in front of me. This is still just a friendly conversation, right?)

It does seem to me to be impossible to be the legal Rep. before the state has officially verified an official winner. But the Dem’s control any power to enforce the rules, I believe. I won’t be holding my breath on any corrective/punitive action being attempted.

November 12th, 2009 at 8:43 pm
Hankster58
 8Reply to this comment  

The vote was a SHAM anyways…. they got the amount they needed, and the Democrats who voted “against” were ALLOWED to, as they were in areas that they could have suffered election problems had they voted FOR it….. dems won AND covered the Asses of those “vulnerable” seats… Cowards and frauds!!!!

November 12th, 2009 at 8:47 pm

Leave a reply

Name (*)
Mail (will not be published) (*)
URI
Comment

If your comments get caught in spam a lot please log into your registered account before trying to comment again. You can email me if your comment is caught in spam

 

Identity Verification: If you wish to verify your commenter identity, so no one can steal it, click the below button: