Remember it was a bill that was too important not to pass immediately without reading!

The following is from Congressman Dave Camp (R-MI), the Ranking Member on the House Ways and Means Committee:

7 Months After Stimulus 49 of 50 States Have Lost Jobs

America Now Over 6 Million Jobs Shy of Administration’s Projections
Wednesday, October 21, 2009

The table below compares the White House’s February 2009 projection of the number of jobs that would be created by the 2009 stimulus law (through the end of 2010) with the actual change in state payroll employment through September 2009 (the latest figures available). According to the data, 49 States and the District of Columbia have lost jobs since stimulus was enacted. Only North Dakota has seen net job creation following the February 2009 stimulus. While President Obama claimed the result of his stimulus bill would be the creation of 3.5 million jobs, the Nation has already lost a total of 2.7 million – a difference of 6.2 million jobs. To see how stimulus has failed your state, see the table below.

With such a poor record of performance on jobs, what makes people think Democrats can deliver on their promises for health care?

  • Share/Bookmark
Print This Post Print This Post
This entry was posted on Wednesday, October 21st, 2009 at 9:42 pm and is filed under Uncategorized. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

Trackbacks

  1. Tweets that mention Obama’s Stimulus Promises Result in Loss of 2.7 Million Jobs -- Topsy.com

6 comments so far

AFSarge
 1Reply to this comment  

But you forgot the “un-measurable” saved” jobs. I’m sure it will be flouted that there would have been 4 million jobs lost if it weren’t for the stimulus package! LOL I know allot of strategists questioned how you can measure “saved jobs”. You can’t and that was the brilliance of the term. Just as you can’t prove “saved jobs”, you can’t disprove it either. But be honest, with the exception of the military (God Bless ‘em), would you want the government in charge of anything?

Sarge

October 21st, 2009 at 10:52 pm
 2Reply to this comment  

@AFSarge: These Obamatons have shown such utter disregard for any quantifiable truth that it’s breathtaking to behold. If anyone believes what they say about jobs or health care they should have their head examined.

October 21st, 2009 at 11:06 pm
CaptSteve
 3Reply to this comment  

As one of the 11,700 jobs lost in Nebraska this past year, my job as a Project Manager at an Engineering Design firm was eliminated in April. Seems the construction of Ethanol plants came to a screeching halt when developers could no longer get any funding from the banks. Obama & Co gave the big banks lots of bucks to bail them out but they did not pass it along to anyone who could CREATE JOBS. We’re living in the twilight zone now days. The banks are using the bail out cash to fund bonuses for ruining their business. Where I come from, those folks should have been fired, not given bonuses.

As I am over 62 and have a military retirement check coming in, I opted for Social Security and not Unemployment. I’m not even counted as unemployed though I would love to work if I could find a comparable job without moving (again)……

October 22nd, 2009 at 7:07 am
 4Reply to this comment  

Capt Steve, I am part of that 131,900 in Georgia. Out sourcing and the economy played a major role as more and more people I know get laid off in the IT industry.

8 months and I can’t find an IT job that is a fit. Job have been combined to cut back on people which makes it harder for candidates to get a “good fit”

Jobs eliminated, funding not approved, eliminated or otherwise re-allocated.

At this rate you will soon see me working for wally world. SHEESH! Talk about over qualified!

October 22nd, 2009 at 1:51 pm
Liam
 5Reply to this comment  

Maybe this is a good place to discuss this: As an employer in the IT field (programmer), I find that in this tight economy, it is better to outsource some/a lot of my work to russia. I have a team there that works for 10-14/dollars an hour, and deliver much higher quality code then most of the sources I have available in the states. Most of those ‘other’ sources are good, but not as good as my russians. And they try to charge over 75/hour. To me, it is a good thing as it adds a level of reality to our world in the U.S. Even network admins anymore think they can charge late 90’s prices (comparably) when computer solutions have dropped significantly across the board. Moores Law couldn’t stay consistent forever unless we shot through to quantum computing. With that said, I believe in employing Americans, but I don’t believe in employing Americans just because they are American. If they do a poor job, charge more, and complain more, I will be next to join the ranks of the unemployed. My russians work cheaper, write in better english than many of my u.s. programmers, don’t complain at all, and an almost always write better code for the price. Where is my motivation to go elsewhere?

October 22nd, 2009 at 3:40 pm

Leave a reply

Name (*)
Mail (will not be published) (*)
URI
Comment

If your comments get caught in spam a lot please log into your registered account before trying to comment again. You can email me if your comment is caught in spam

 

Identity Verification: If you wish to verify your commenter identity, so no one can steal it, click the below button: