Q: Why Does the Left Hate Glenn Beck?

For a sign of how seriously the White House does or doesn’t take this opposition, one adviser told me those bloggers need to take off the pajamas, get dressed, and realize that governing a closely divided country is complicated and difficult.

Democrats are socialist/communist/facist/marxist in training. Half of the democrat politicians already work for and are funded by the enemies of freedom, Soros, the CPUSA, anyone. Billions of dollars stolen from others is being spent to destroy the U.S., by those living within the walls. Too bad they’re power will be taken away, and most will be executed, by the same government they try so hard to force on the rest of us. Even a Facist knows who they’re enemies are and they are the traitors that pushed them into power.

Neo, I think they were paraphrasing Mark Levin, who often tells his Liberal callers to put on some clothes get out of the basement, stop mooching off their mothers and get a job. Of course getting a job now, is nearly impossible.

A lack of originality and creative thinking will plague this administration, if the Socialist haven’t tried it and failed, as they invariably do with all their programs, they aren’t interested in trying the program. Creative ideas that work, not from this bunch of dullards.

Maybe Timmy will get a good scoop from his daily long conversations with the harpies of Wall St., you say, they probably play him like a sap to know how to play the market with the latest Socialist scheme to ruin the country.

Scraprion, They don’t see themselves as Facist, Communist or even Socialists. They see themselves as “Free Thinkers”. In fact they are so free and openminded that if they stand right in the wind you can hear the wind whistle through their heads.

‘I happen to think that Glen Beck is a genius, not on Rush Limbaugh’s level but he’s getting there.’

Why do so many of you guys worship these guys that were former drug addicts??? Doesn’t it ever raise a red flag that individuals that can’t manage their own lives probably shouldn’t reign over others lives?

…drug addicts, not users.

Topps, I though liberals were tolerant, no? I judge people by who they are today, not who they were in the past. Calling Limbaugh a drug addict is insane. He didn’t smoke crack or shoot heroine or snort cocaine to the point of being non-functional. He was addicted to prescription pain-killers. He still functioned quite effectively and did his job better than any other radio host. Beck admits to having been an alcoholic. I don’t think alcoholics are lumped in with drug addicts as a general rule by people without a political agenda.

Just as I judge Obumble as the socialist/marxist/totalitarian narcissist that he is today, not the drug-using do-nothing poser he was yesterday.

@Jarhead68:

topps is nothing more than a sock puppet for herman who is a sock puppet for john, etc. etc. etc.

Who knows who the puppet master really is?

No need to respond to him any further, since we don’t allow the use of marionettes here.

Chihuahua: I suspect it’s David Axelrod’s consulting company who has hired the sock puppets using their ill-gotten prophets from the tax payers. They’re worse than Halliburton. LOL.

Make that PROFITS, not prophets…duh!!!

I’d say Mike’s got it covered. The liberals always idolize the individual who came back from extreme adversity to recover and make it big…. at least if they are liberals or progressives, anyway. If they are conservative, they are lesser individuals – unworthy of accolades.

Nice goin’, topps. Managed to portray yourself as the intolerant partisan mole that you are. Congrats. What can we add to your performance? Nothing. You have done the damage to yourself and your party all by your lonesome. With spokesmen like you, we can merely stand back and watch you do the forked tongue dance all by yourself. For you see, unlike Beck, you are surrounded only by either extreme leftists… or those you manage to convince of Beck’s evil with your misrepresentations.

But then… be careful. They may actually listen and find you’ve got it all wrong.

On the subject of the thread – Glenn Beck. Been listening and watching him for years – long before he was on the radar like he is today. Like Lou Dobbs, Beck’s been confident enough to take his own path on his analyses. And voices that do not cowtow to ratings always interest me.

Not long before he moved to FOX, I turned quite a few others (both parties) on to him. Not one is sorry.

I’ve heard some of his informational errors, but they are small potatoes with the overall presentation that focuses on the escalated corruption and seizure of governmental power. Frankly, he’s on a roll that would never have happened until he and CNN parted company.

However what the liberal leadership and talking points masters fail to understand (which is what makes them attack some goofy, unsophisticated nerd from Utah) is that those that are finding themselves nodding in agreement with Beck cross party and racial lines. Beck’s arguments aren’t about party or race. They are about Congressional spending, family control, and individual responsibility and choice. That is an American message… not a party message.

During the primaries and election campaign, many of us saw what Obama believed, and with whom he chose to surround himself. Others felt it was just pandering to get the vote, and excused it. Now that we have some history under our belts of Obama’s “leadership”, many are awakening. His massive czar selection of those with questionable backgrounds and beliefs echos the truth to Obama’s own words…. “if you want to know what I believe…” look at those with whom he associates.

Always did… nice to know others are finally looking. Thank you for that personal invite of scrutiny, Obama.

Obama is a man who does not like America as it was founded, nor as it is today. His message has consistantly been only he – and his adoring O’faithful army – are capable of changing it to the utopian dream.

Beck’s message isn’t racist. However Obama’s message is. The nuances have always been there with the quiet affirmative action, anti-capitalism approach. However it was as black and white as it could get when Obama immediately chose to side with a black professor prior having details and facts. He saw what he chose to see, as was indoctrinated from his childhood…. the professional victim because of race, despite his privileges and opportunities. To Obama, the black man had to have been abused by the white cop. There was no other possibility.

Obama’s racism is also evident when he backs away from American support for our long standing allies (Jewish or white European in Israel, Poland etal) in order to make nice with despots and terrorists. His bitterness towards capitalism and the white western European race is on display with his constant invocation of financial class warfare.

Yet so many choose to avert their eyes. That they could have misjudged one they thought would truly elevate the nation is something they can’t accept. Pity.

You can also add Obama’s method of mob-style governing. Tell me why a White House needs to personally assail and discredit an independent study of the fiscal repercussions of the Baucus bill? This is a Congressional offering. The White House is out of line playing Chicago defense on a study of a Congressional bill… no matter who was conducting the audit.

This Executive Branch assault on conservative media, individuals and or businesses, when they disagree with policy, is Alinsky Community Organizing 101 and contemptuous coming from our elected officials (or at least the few in Obama’s admin we did elect, or were confirmed). This admin speaks of harmony while they sow the seeds of class envy discontent. It is something we have not seen from the WH before in my lifetime.

I’ve since ceased to be angry. Just in shock and stun that the individuals in the nation cling to visions and dreams of what they perceive rather than clearly seeing what is before their very eyes. I shudder to think what the blow will be that will awakens them from their dreams.

I’ve said before what bothers me second about Obama… the first being his Euro-socialist visions for America… is the fact he thinks of himself as a black man first, and an American second. His policies, behavior and responses to events reflect my opinion. And I assure you, I take no pleasure in being correct.

If the truth hurts, hurl the “racist” crap all you want, oh resident and visiting progressives. You may sleep well, thinking you won some victory with your insults and misconceptions. But it does not alter the truth. My life, my friends, my working compadres, and my acquaintances all belie these false charges. Those around me in my lifetime have been equal in my eyes… regardless of heritage and race. And that included the opportunity to excel, or prove themselves to be bitter victims, blaming others for their own shortcomings as humans.

What Obama and his community that he organized will find is the sheer volume of citizens to which they attach the “racist” label – in order to further their agenda – will result in a backlash that will difficult to surmount. Yes, Obama will be a one termer. The damage he will incur to race relations, class warfare, economic destruction, and international relations with our allies will be hard to reverse.

And unless the nation has been raised to be suckling-at-the-tit socialists, we will again revert to who we were as an infant nation. We will find new energy to honor our individual Consitutional freedoms (which do not include having single payer health insurance) while battling down the power mongrels – both parties – that inhabit the halls of Congress. For far too many of them have decided to sell out our souls for individual wealth and power.

@Missy:

I think what you are referring to is Beck’s research into, and subsequent debunking of, the Interwebz rumors of FEMA internment camps.

The Left cannot be honest about things. They have to twist, lie, spin, and just plain make things up in order to gain/hold ground.

The current controversy regarding Limbaugh is a perfect example.

Another stellar example of why Wiki can never be trusted as a source for anything, even sky color.

Glenn is one of the few who doesn’t sugarcoat it, or get mealy- mouthed in calling these marxists out.
Glenn, unlike some others, calls it like he sees it- he doesn’t “give others the benefit of the doubt” when they have proven that they do not deserve that doubt, indeed they have removed all doubt about their agenda.
There are those who would stick their head in the sand, these people I call Denialists- they are good people, some of whom voted for Obama, who just think if they can hunker down, they will be OK.
Glenn exposes these administration hacks for what they are, and unfortunately, the Denialists are going to get caught in the crossfire of policies, and because they have chosen to be blind, are going to end up far worse than many who have kept their eyes open.
There are at least four Amendments to our Constitution that are under attack by this administration- the First, the Second, the Fourth, and the Tenth Amendments all are intrinsic to individual freedoms, and this administration wants to squash any ideas of individuality.
Oct, 19- 26 this admin is flooding the airwaves with ads and subliminal programming insertions designed to urge citizens to serve Obama and the government.
If this isn’t Marxist to the core, I do not know what is.