Barney Frank slaving away in the backrooms on next financial power grab

Loading

Just when you think the Obama White House couldn’t find any more power to seize… what with already successful takeovers of banks, Wall Street CEO salaries, auto industries, the energy industry with cap and trade, health care and his proposed Medicare czars, and seizing control from the CIA over terrorist interrogations… Boston.com lets us know what Barney Frank has been tasked with – “…assembling a complex bill to give the federal government unprecedented control over the country’s financial institutions.”

And the ambitious agenda – catering to Obama’s agenda – will be creating the unlikely bedfellows of the Barney Frank liberal/progressive faction and the Ron Paul supporters.

Frank says the legislation is necessary to help fend off future episodes of financial panic. Hedge funds and derivatives traders would have to operate under new limits. A financial products safety commission would regulate the consumer marketplace, down to payday loans and check-cashing stores. Federal officials would gain new powers to unwind failed financial institutions.

In addition, Frank hopes to secure congressional auditing authority over the secretive Federal Reserve, a proposal he describes with phrases – “Ron Paul agrees with that’’ and “secondly, Ron Paul agrees with this’’ – that are jarring coming from a liberal Democrat. He comes close to smiling when describing his narrow alliance with the cranky Texas libertarian and former presidential candidate who is on the committee and whose distrust for the Federal Reserve has led him to propose abolishing the paper money system.


Of course, the omnipotent Treasury Secretary, Tim Geithner, has been complaining that this additional power seize is long overdue, complaining that the federal regulators were “… slowing the bill’s progress with skeptical comments about a proposal to establish a new authority to monitor investment risk.”

Frank, who elsewhere has had kind words for two of George W. Bush’s nominees, Federal Deposit Insurance Commission chairwoman Sheila Bair and Federal Reserve chairman Ben Bernanke, said the administration should not be shocked by the officials’ response.

“They don’t want to lose their control,’’ said Frank. “What a surprise: Regulators don’t want to lose turf.’’

It all sounds so perfectly harmless, most will say. Shouldn’t there be Congressional oversight over the consumer marketplace? And for those who recognize the flaws of the Federal Reserve, this should be right up their alley.

Geithner’s comments and insistence at such increased Congressional oversight is particularly poignant. You all should be reminded that TARP… all that cash for which Geithner is responsible? … *has* “oversight” in the form of SIGTARP (Special Inspector General of TARP). His name is Neil Barofsky, and it was only a few weeks ago that he was complaining that Geithner’s Treasury was ignoring their advice, and refusing valuation data on a monthly basis.

The U.S. Treasury Department ignores advice on how to help the public better understand how banks are using hundreds of billions of dollars of taxpayer funds they were given, the government’s bailout watchdog said Monday.

Neil Barofsky, the Special Inspector General for the $700 billion Troubled Asset Relief Program (TARP), said in a report that Treasury has made only limited steps toward implementing recommendations that his office has made.

“It has repeatedly failed to adopt recommendations that SIGTARP believes are essential to providing basic transparency,” Barofsky said, noting that Treasury won’t even put a value on its TARP portfolio.

“Notwithstanding that Treasury has now retained asset managers and is receiving such valuation data on a monthly basis, Treasury has not committed to providing such information except on the statutorily required annual basis,” he said.

Barofsky also said that in the case of so-called public-private partnership funds, which will buy toxic assets from banks using a substantial portion of taxpayer-provided money, Treasury was not willing to make timely disclosures on trading activity, holdings and value of the assets the partnerships will hold.

“Not only should this disclosure be required as a matter of basic transparency in light of the billions of taxpayer dollars at stake, but such disclosure would also serve well one of Treasury’s stated reasons for the program in the first instance: the promotion of ‘price discovery’ in the illiquid market for MBS (mortgage-backed securities),” Barofsky said.

“Treasury has indicated it will not require such disclosure,” he added.

Apparently, Geithner is one of those “do what I say, not what I do” types….

Then, of course, there’s the irony of picking Barney Frank to lead *any* kind of financial reform. Or as Michelle Malkin put it:

Last time I checked Barney Frank’s financial oversight record was the pits. Only in Beltway Bizarro World does such an epic failure get rewarded with even more expansive powers to screw things up.

Michelle was referring to, in part, Barney’s incestuous relationship with Fannie/Freddie… with yet more being revealed with the FOIA documents obtained by Judicial Watch.

uh yeah…. that fox still has a rigor mortis grip on the hen house door handle.

But it can be said that Barney’s appointed task of Obama financial reform… or increased power over the consumer marketplace… is not a new one. Indeed, most of the Congressional and WH battles is not that it should, or should not be done. They all love these new found power they can pass over the US taxpayer so easily. Instead, they are battling over who *gets* the power to supervise the largest financial firms… the Federal Reserve, or Congress.

The administration wants the Federal Reserve to do this, supported by a council of regulators that keeps a lookout for emerging risks. But lawmakers on both sides worry that the central bank is already too powerful, or that expanding its role would undermine its monetary credentials. Barney Frank, the House financial-services committee’s ebullient chairman, has criticised plans to draw up a list of firms that are “too big to fail”, fearing it will entrench them.

So how much will this notion of “reform”… a word from this admin that should make everyone’s blood run cold in itself… reach into the average citizen’s life? How about mortgages and credit? Obama’s admin wants control over them because they think too much of financial “safety” instead of “treatment of customers”.

ummmm…. why does this start smelling like a wide spread CRA ‘tude?

The loudest opposition has been reserved for a proposed consumer-protection agency, which would write and enforce rules for mortgages, credit cards and so forth. This is needed, the administration argues, because bank regulators are inclined to focus on safety rather than the treatment of customers—even if they have recently become, in Mr Frank’s words, “born-again consumer advocates”, rushing out new curbs on predatory lending as their turf has come under threat.

Lawmakers would like to support the new agency—there are votes in championing the little guy. But banks, including politically powerful community lenders, have stoked fears that the new regulator could become an unwieldy monster and that its mandate to make products simpler could constrain credit. Existing regulators have weighed in too, arguing that separating prudential regulation from consumer protection could make the system less safe. A House vote on the agency, scheduled for July, has been postponed until September because of lukewarm support.

No matter how one views it, it will be yet another bureaucratic government behemoth that will be expensive, inefficient, wields far too much power and will make deplorable decisions. But hey… it’s what Obama wants, so Barney hikes up his baggy pants, and does the deed.

And, as usual, the US economy and the consumer will be paying the price for yet another transfer of power to the inept.

0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
19 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

hmm, a transfer from the inept to the inept… god if they had just let them fail then the non inept would have picked up the pieces and we would be in such better shape right now.

Do these retards not realize that when the power shifts in 2010 that the Republicans will have the majority again and they will be eligible for prosecution under the new Obama Revenge Paln for previous administrations?

Aleric: Do these retards not realize that when the power shifts in 2010 that the Republicans will have the majority again…

You mean after the election, right?

Regulation of the financial sector might be in order unless we want to have this happen again someday. Too big to fail is an unacceptable situation for the taxpayers to have to support, and no handful of financial entities should have the ability to crash the economy because they knowingly used bad judgment or unsound principles to make a profit at the expense or our country and it’s interests.

That should be an issue that everyone can work together on in a constructive way to accomplish.

Barney the Frank in charge of finance………. Fannie Mac…….Freddie Mac…….Sallie May
what could go wrong with that?

side note not meant to hijack the thread:

It really really pains me that I have to support anything that Frank does. Unfortunately, he introduced the bill to legalize internet poker. He also made appearences at the WSOP where he was greated with applause. It really is a shame… I was considering writing a full post on it.

This is comming from someone who found this site by looking for a picture of “aces on the flop” in a search engine and has since became an every day reader.

After reading comments, I clicked on one of the ads–“Obamanutz”—I was shocked…SHOCKED that I got a warning that the site was dangerous to enter, due to viruses and such—just thought you’d like to know.
“To piss off a conservative, tell them a lie….to piss off a Liberal, tell them the truth.”

these same bozos who were “regulating” the financial sector… from Congress and their CRA

::snip::

The idea that the same idiots – those who caused this with their regulation and willful blind eye to Fannie/Freddie

Oh, Mata.

Just wait until you see the post that I am currently working on.

Wait until you see what these idjits are up to now.

It’s gonna make your hair catch fire.

The words slaving and backroom grab should never be used when discussing Bawney Fwank.

Mata: We may be on common ground on this issue, the Republicans should take an active approach with the Democrats to deal with the financial stability issues, if they just lay back and hope for failure on this issue for political reasons, that is to everyone’s detriment and is an abdication of their responsibility.

The Dems have offered their “solutions”, what are the Republicans proposals on this issue?
I haven’t heard about any from them, but it could be because I haven’t dug into it enough to find out…..

@kjc

The words slaving and backroom grab should never be used when discussing Bawney Fwank.

I feel ill. Please don’t ever put that vision in my head again, or I may have to buy a new keyboard.

Someone mentioned visions of Barney Frank?

How about some photos?

Image Source,Photobucket Uploader Firefox Extension,Photobucket Uploader Firefox Extension

Image Source