Horndog Obama Checking Out Skirts at Rome Summit

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/2289162/replies?c=92

Well it’s hard to tell with a snapshot in time. Was his head moving at the time or was it staring? However it looks like on this occasion – looking at this shot – his eyes are closed.

@Mike
Michael Jackson was accused of sexually boys under the age of consent. Quite different from a photo of Obama turning his head and appearing to be looking at a 16yr old butt.

btw – what age is it okay to ‘objectify’ (sounds feminist to me) a person? Or check out their body with a quick glance? Apparently the age of consent in Italy is only 14! The Vatican is apparently 12! A lot lower the States in the US which goes as high as 18.

July 9th, 2009 at 7:39 pm

Mike's America

@GaffaUK: Endorsing pedophilia. Why am I not surprised?

July 9th, 2009 at 8:27 pm

Timothy

How does that rap song go?

….I LIKE BIG BUTTS !!!!!

July 9th, 2009 at 8:37 pm

Mike's America

@Timothy: I linked to that in the post.

July 9th, 2009 at 9:00 pm

Greg

Berlusconi’s pose is hilarious! Thinking to himself…….I cannot look at young stuff………..I will not look at young stuff…………….head down………head down…………..is she gone yet?

July 9th, 2009 at 9:27 pm

slatrat

Not to worry…the best he could be charged with would be Assault with a Dead Weapon. Seems he inherited the white gene below the belt.

July 9th, 2009 at 9:27 pm

yonason

Cipher sez – “Michelle, I’m home. . . . Hey, Michelle, let me tell you about the G8 Summit. . . . It was great, and I got to do some sight seeing, too. . . . I can’t wait to tell you. . . . Michelle? . . . . . . . . Michelle, . . . . where are you . . . ?“

My guess is that this is about as “transparent” as this administration is ever going to get. And, from the look on Sarko’s face, I wonder if he isn’t thinking,…. “Typical American – no subtlety. He’s probably as untrainable as the rest of them. I’ll have to rethink taking him on as an apprentice…”

July 9th, 2009 at 9:50 pm

MataHarley

Lawdy, Mike. Lighten up here. How would the big Zero know she was 16? Even you didn’t mention it in your post since the press only identifies her as a “junior G* delegate”. Which, BTW BrianP, care to provide the link on where you ascertained she was who you say she was?

UPDATED: According to the NY Post, she was 17, and not identified as anyone’s daughter. END UPDATE

But pedophile? Big stretch, Mike.

Frankly, I’m with Aqua and a few others. Who would blame any red blooded male from taking a second look? Stunning from that angle. And it is possibly one of the only behavorioral examples I’ve seen out of the Eunich in Chief that is somewhat humanizing and identifiable with the common man.

I give him a pass… and perhaps an atta boy for having good taste. And Sarkozy really makes me laugh here!

But I tell you… love to be a fly on the wall with Michelle at the moment….

July 9th, 2009 at 10:03 pm

MataHarley

Yon… Sarkozy ain’t thinkin’ sheeeet about what Obama’s reaction is. He’s focused on the goods.

July 9th, 2009 at 10:04 pm

yonason

@MataHarley:

He’s French. He can do both at once. (which was kind of my point)

@Greg:

LOL – strange for an Italian, unless he knows that his wife follows the news, and would see any photos taken at events like this? …as O’Bungler will soon discover, heh heh heh.

Too many other good comments here to acknowledge them all.

July 9th, 2009 at 10:14 pm

Buffalobob

There will be a whole lot of whoop ass in the Michele house hold.

July 9th, 2009 at 10:23 pm

Mike's America

@MataHarley: Daughter of the Brazilian President:

You joining the Obama lovers on this one?

July 9th, 2009 at 10:26 pm

MataHarley

Nope… just callin’ BS when I see it, Mike. As far as I can tell, any red blooded male would have his head swiveled by a pretty girl. Got nothing to do with his Eunuch in Chief and “remaking of American” plans that I detest.

BTW, I see no documentation about her being the daugher and the age of 16 v 17 just via the pic.

July 9th, 2009 at 10:43 pm

Mike's America

@MataHarley: What? You want the child’s birth certificate? We all know how easy it is to fake those documents.

You sure Larry W. didn’t slip you some Kool Aid?

July 9th, 2009 at 10:45 pm

yonason

AND WHILE THE MEN ARE ENTERTAINED BY THEIR DISTRACTIONS….
http://www.theopenpress.com/index.php?a=press&id=53672

July 9th, 2009 at 10:45 pm

MataHarley

Try all you want, Mike. But I’m not “lockstep” with anyone… and that includes you. I’ve got plenty to diss the Eunuch in Chief on. But it’s not that he, or Sarzoky, appreciates beauty.

July 9th, 2009 at 10:46 pm

Mike's America

@MataHarley: Ok. Whatever… Just don’t sip too much of Larry’s Kool Aid. That stuff is dangerous.

@yonason: A “topless” first ladies summit? Oh my! You’re going to get me into even more trouble with Mata!

July 9th, 2009 at 10:58 pm

proof

“Yes, we can!” Heh.

July 9th, 2009 at 11:00 pm

@Mike

lol – how on earth do you think I’m endorsing pedophilia? Is that’s what it’s called in Hilton Head if a man looks at a woman’s behind if she is 16 or 17?

July 10th, 2009 at 12:19 am

jeeez

Is the POTUS doing the gangsta lean??

July 10th, 2009 at 12:26 am

yonason

http://www.repubblica.it/2006/05/gallerie/esteri/obama-sguardo-indiscreto/1.html

LOL, anything I can do to help, Mike, not the you need any.

July 10th, 2009 at 3:30 am

sarainitaly

She is a Junior Delegate, and is 17 years old. Each world leader had a Junior Delegate Rep that was photographed with them. I think it is creepy that Obama chose to oogle a young girl who was there to represent the Junior Delegation. She’s only a few years older than his daughter!

L’obiettivo del fotografo ha catturato un’immagine curiosa del G8: lo sguardo del presidente americano sembra incuriosito dal passaggio della delegata brasiliana allo Junior8, Mayara Rodrigues Tavares, 17 anni, di Rio de Janeiro. La foto sta facendo il giro del web ed è stata pubblicata anche da Tmz, Huffingtonpost e dal Drudge Report

Translation: The object of the photo has captured the imagination of the curious at G8. The american president is watching, seeming curious of the passing of the Brazilian Junior delegate, Mayara, 17 years old of Rio. The photo is going around the web, and has been publicized by TMZ….

July 10th, 2009 at 3:41 am

Wordsmith

@sarainitaly:

I think it is creepy that Obama chose to oogle a young girl who was there to represent the Junior Delegation. She’s only a few years older than his daughter!

The photo’s hilarious; but, I don’t believe that’s what he was doing. And if so…..I’ll sip some of what Mata’s having.

@Aye Chihuahua:

Seems that there may be a pattern developing here:

Also a nice “gotcha”. And I certainly don’t want to rain on our parade, but just to “be clear”, his eyes aren’t looking at her posterior but at the name plate she’s putting before him for their group photo.

I think these photos are worth light-hearted humor, and that’s it.

July 10th, 2009 at 4:32 am

http://blogs.abcnews.com/politicalpunch/2009/07/when-in-rome.html

Mike, some years ago I met someone who was a professional dancer (Martha Graham, Joffrey Ballet..) – very physically mature and attractive would be an understatement – who, oddly enough, also found me attractive. So we made a date to go out.

Over dinner, I found out that my date was 16. Mortified and disappointed, I politely ended the date.

Now, I hope you don’t think that my initial physical attraction would qualify me as a pedophile. I looked at it as a lesson that sometimes younger folk can look rather mature for their ages, and that I needed to find out sooner than I did.

So I agree with everything Mata said on this one. No doubt that girl’s dad has his hands full!

July 10th, 2009 at 4:33 am

philly_nj

So what’s this going to cost the American taxpayer on ‘Michelle’s Date Night’ ?
.

July 10th, 2009 at 4:33 am

Prairie

Thank goodness she wasn’t wearing a blue dress.

July 10th, 2009 at 4:43 am

Wordsmith

Caption:

“Hellooooo….Looking for a summer job, as my intern czar?”

July 10th, 2009 at 4:52 am

philly_nj

I aint the least bit surprised that Obama is a bummer
.

July 10th, 2009 at 5:00 am

Aqua

@ Mike
The ettiquette of butt gazing would dictate looking away if you knew it was the 16yo daughter of a friend or colleague. I don’t think this was either. And GaffaUK is prolly right about 100’s of frames being taken and this one being published. Matter’s not, he’s obviously busted. But I’m still giving him a pass. If it were me there, I would have looked and Sarkozy would be holding my hand back from smacking that booty.
Aye’s second photo is even better. Nothing we can say here is anything compared to what Michelle is going to do to him.
We have plenty of ammunition to sling at Obama. This has no place in the arsenol.

July 10th, 2009 at 5:13 am

Aye Chihuahua

What Obie needs is a pair of dark wraparound shades…and a little more tact.

When MeeChelle gets finished with him, he’s gonna need the shades for a different reason.

Heh.

July 10th, 2009 at 5:28 am

Aqua

@ Aye
Exactly! I favor Oakley M-frame Heater Black Iridiums. Unfortunately, I lost mine in the lake last weekend while consuming mass quantities of beer. My new ones should be here tomorrow. I miss them dearly.

July 10th, 2009 at 5:36 am

yonason

@philly_nj:

It’ll be pittance compared to what he keeps throwing away…
http://www3.signonsandiego.com/stories/2009/jul/10/g8-summit-africa-071009/?world&zIndex=129727
(last night that headline read $15 billion – looks like inflation has hit)

July 10th, 2009 at 5:39 am

BarbaraS

GaffaUK

Well it’s hard to tell with a snapshot in time. Was his head moving at the time or was it staring? However it looks like on this occasion – looking at this shot – his eyes are closed

Nice try. He’s walking down the stairs so he has his eyes closed? Now that you mention it that suounds about right.

I wouldn’t care if this POS ogled the entire female population. I just object that he does it while president. There is such a thing as dignity and if a politician can’t control himself he needs to leave politics. What is it about democrats that they have no respect for the position or the oval office itself. Just look at Clinton’s shenagans. Obama is so arrogant that even knowing all cameras are on him he still pulls something like this.

July 10th, 2009 at 5:55 am

Justal

Most heterosexual guys would look first and think about the age second, this does not equate to pedophilia. While I agree this is amusing we should not treat it as anything more than a laughable distraction.

The reasons to scrutinize His “O”lliness are legion and far, far more serious than this. Too often we take cheap shots at his wife who was not blessed with an appearance generally regarded as attractive, we should not give the left an excuse to point out that we can be as trivial as they are.

Eyes on the prize! We have to stop the socialists now or be enslaved forever.

July 10th, 2009 at 7:12 am

TammyL

An interesting update from ABC News. What is most interesting about this post is the extent to which a mainstream network would go to protect the image of President Obama even from such an innocent charge of him checking out a girl’s butt. I don’t ever recall ABC news going to great analysis and lengths to defend former President Bush. See attached link.

In case, this link doesn’t work, you can access it as well on the Drudge Report.

July 10th, 2009 at 7:27 am

yonason

@Aye Chihuahua:

You might enjoy this…
http://astuteblogger.blogspot.com/2009/06/does-michelle-obama-remind-you-of-aunt.html
…and the links he supplies to supplement it.

July 10th, 2009 at 7:35 am

ThunderGod

Looks like he’s letting-out a “Daaaaamn!” and doin’ the gansta, horny-pants dance. Just surprised he’s not throwin’ down gang-sign with one hand and grabbin’ his crotch with the other.

July 10th, 2009 at 7:40 am

Fit fit

Good litmus test for ODS.

July 10th, 2009 at 7:41 am

ThunderGod

@Fit fit,

Don’t you mean “NES”? Naked Emperor Syndrome?

July 10th, 2009 at 7:49 am

yonason

@Fit fit:

The Dems hate Bush, literally. We don’t hate Obama. We just want him and his deceitful and very destructive power hungry thieves as far away from gummint as possible.

July 10th, 2009 at 7:53 am

@TammyL:

haha even in the video it looks like he’s grabbing a glimpse, then “covering” by turning around to help the person behind him… and who among us hasn’t done THAT?!

July 10th, 2009 at 8:15 am

pdill

Mata you simply rock! These butt pics are indeed fun humor, and we all can afford to lighten up from the big stuff when we can. I seriously doubt that they even are as they appear, albeit still quite amusing. Like words, photos can just as easily be taken out of context. I think if we saw the rest of the frames shots before and after, it would ruin the fun.

All said, Sarco is simply priceless. And hey, “beauty” transcends!

July 10th, 2009 at 8:15 am

@TammyL

Thanks for the link to the video. If that was Obama checking out her butt then it’s must be the most subtle check out ever! lol. Instead it seems like the woman is passing by and he stepping down and helping out the other woman. There was no double take of his eyes following the woman’s posterior;) Storm in a tea cup. Don’t you just love single snapshots.

July 10th, 2009 at 8:18 am

Mike's America

@Prairie: I like what you said: “Thank goodness she wasn’t wearing a blue dress. “

July 10th, 2009 at 8:26 am

MataHarley

TammyL, I found that ABC tongue in cheek report to be hilarious. And Sarkozy? “not so clear, not so clear”…. LOL I really like this French President. He’s a breath of fresh air.

I say the day men stop appreciating women and their beauty is the day we begin to die as a species.

July 10th, 2009 at 8:31 am

Aqua

@ Mata
I think I love you Mata. You’re right, he could have been caught checking out Sarkozy’s butt and then we’d know he’s on the down-low.

July 10th, 2009 at 9:04 am

Joe

Yes yes, please, give him a pass, I wouldn’t look PASS that ass either. Sorry father for I have sinned, I just fantasized about a 16 year old. But when in Rome……

July 10th, 2009 at 9:16 am

Hawk

Awww man!
The video to this shows something a bit differently. As much as I thought ABC was covering for him, they may be right.
Video Clears Up Obama Photo – ABC News

Thoughts?

July 10th, 2009 at 9:39 am

http://comics.com/speed_bump/2009-07-10/

@Hawk:

Check out my comment #58. He doesn’t stare or linger, but his eyes pass over. I mean look at that posterior – it would be hard not to notice, don’t you agree?!

July 10th, 2009 at 9:47 am

Larry Sheldon

The evolution of Presidents:

[Thanks Larry, that's worth a courtesy embed - Aye]

July 10th, 2009 at 10:14 am

Buffalobob

Remember the Seinfeld episode where George is caught staring at the NBC exec. 16 yr. old daughter? Cleavage, cleavage.
Cut the man a break.
Check out 47 Aye Cahuahua. Now that is scary. Instead of completing the border fence here in Southern AZ. why not just place 4 ft. high pictures of Michelle every 15 to 20 feet. That’s mean, but not as mean as Mrs. O will be if the rumors that she is prego……… are true.

July 10th, 2009 at 11:36 am

Mike's America

@Hawk: My thoughts? After eight years of the most bitter, vile hatred directed at George W. Bush there is no shame in us poking a little fun at Obama.

July 10th, 2009 at 11:38 am

@Mike’s America

Even without the last eight years, there’s no harm in a little jest. His sense of humor was a large part of why Reagan was so loved.

July 10th, 2009 at 11:55 am

SoCal Chris

@Mike’s America:
So true, Mike. (regarding Pres. Bush).

One thing that seems to be amiss here in this thread is that we are talking about the President of The United States. One who is and should be held to a higher standard, and one who is married. So, no, it’s not “normal” for the POTUS to oggle a teenager, or any other woman other than his wife. Or a man, for that matter. (had to be said).

my two cents: isn’t it a bit (a lot) sexist to say that every man has no control over his sexual inclinations and would do the same thing as in this picture, and that’s o.k.? That’s what I’m hearing here anyway.

July 10th, 2009 at 11:56 am

@SoCal Chris:

we are talking about the President of The United States. One who is and should be held to a higher standard

Higher standard than whom? A doctor? A teacher? A bus driver? An accountant? An actor? (well, I hope so…)

What job lends one to exemption of standards?

As for him being married – this isn’t a Bill Clinton scandal – dude, it was just a look. Sarkozy looked, too – and he even named his plane after his wife!

No, not all men and women “read the menu when they’re full” – that doesn’t mean there’s anything wrong with it, so long as that’s all it is.

July 10th, 2009 at 12:14 pm

pmills89

lol, i see abc a big obama supporter is trying to cover for him, and while its pretty obvious sarcozy was gazing wat too long, obama knows his his and and pulls a “im letting this lady pass me”, or “im waiting for smebody”, “or tring to gaze at the ground”, now idk how women see these phose but smart men know how to look at ass without getting cause

ONE WORD PERITHIALS!!!

July 10th, 2009 at 12:28 pm

I think my last comment is lost in the filter!

July 10th, 2009 at 12:31 pm

SoCal Chris

@Cary:
I guess we’ll have to agree to disagree on this one.

July 10th, 2009 at 12:37 pm

@SoCal Chris:

Fair enough.

July 10th, 2009 at 12:40 pm

pdill

@So Cal Chris, you are really nice guy but I think a bit misguided on this. That’s the kind of prudery that gives Christianity (and sex) a bad name.

This is a fully dressed beautiful woman. Who are any of us to assume what Obama or Sarko aren’t “seeing” (if at all, being as I’m quite sure the pic is out of context), isn’t simply “beauty.” After all, that’s how God intended, i.e., Theology of the Body!

I’ve give the presidents the benefit of the doubt on this one!

Besides, most of here probably know what GK Chesterton said:

Every man who knocks on the door of a brothel is looking for God.

So there you go; a day before the papal visit!

July 10th, 2009 at 1:03 pm

linda

If you watch both the photo and the video at the same time they just do not coincide. Is it possible the video was taken at different times. Regardless, it seems some editing have been done on the video to cover up for Obama. Or is it possible she went pass Obama and up those stairs twice??

The photo clearly shows Obama looking up at the young girl’s butt; the other woman is standing right behind him and does not appear to be stepping down.

The video shows the young girl passing him as he helps out a woman step down the stairs. Not once does he look up. Did ABC edit the part where is looking up the young girl’s butt?

July 10th, 2009 at 1:15 pm

Buffalobob

pdill 77 So Cal Chris, you are really nice guy but I think a bit misguided on this. That’s the kind of prudery that gives Christianity (and sex) a bad name.

Your joking right?

July 10th, 2009 at 1:48 pm

linda

However, to get to the real issues lets talk of what Obama was doing in that meeting. He was spending our hard earned american money on other countries. He agreed to give away 3 billion dollars to other nations including Africa and those countries that hate us. He has already given Hamas 900 million dollars. I have lost count of how much money he has thrown to Kenya’s (his homeland) way.

Spending and throwing away our money is what really gets to me. He can continue to ogle all he wants just don’t spend my hard earned money. Besides this is not the first time this President had stared at a woman’s buttock while out there; it is just the first time the media has paid any mind to it.

July 10th, 2009 at 2:29 pm

@linda:

Linda, Bush gave more money to Africa, to help in the battle against AIDS, than any other American President. I consider that something GOOD that he did. It was our money, then, too.

July 10th, 2009 at 2:37 pm

Mike's America

As much as I love the attention this post has garnered, I can’t see how we have 81+ comments on this and so much less attention to the more pressing issues I and my fellow contributors have posted in the last 24 hours.

Do none of you libs care that Obama is using your tax dollars to fund a political machine? Perhaps not.

Do you not care that Nancy Pelosi lied to the people of the United States when she accused the CIA of misleading Congress?

Is it no concern to you that Dems continue to vote for massive spending bills like the stimulus, cap and tax and soon health care that NONE OF THEM HAVE READ?

O.K. Sorry for the lecture. You may now continue to discuss the issue of Obama the horn dog/sleaze bag.

July 10th, 2009 at 2:50 pm

You make a good point that this is a smaller issue than a lot of what’s going on. As for myself, I did post some thoughts on the open thread. I’m paying attention, but have nothing more to contribute to those discussions until I learn something definitively new.

July 10th, 2009 at 2:58 pm

Larry Sheldon

@Mike’s America….

None of the things you mentioned are news. Seriously.

Note that I did not say they are unimportant–they certainly are important and defineitly more important than yet another demonstration of the racism, sexism, and arrogance we have in tghe person of our Candidate-for-Life.

What is news is that parts of the world outside the blogsphere and the world of us rightwingcranks or what ever we are being called this week is noticing.

The Main Stream Media is now reporting that their messiah is actually of the flesh, a mere mortal, one of us, only not quite so civilized.

July 10th, 2009 at 2:59 pm

Hard Right

1) She is rather unnatractive
2) Most importantly, she is OBVIOUSLY underage

I would not have looked. I have more discipline than that and I like WOMEN. Not “girls”.
There is no excuse for this and I will not give him a pass. Giving dems a pass when they do something wrong yet letting them bash us for for the same is partly what got us to where we are today.

July 10th, 2009 at 5:09 pm

Larry Sheldon

I disagree as to attractivnes.

But she is clearly under age.

And the behavious is clearly inappropriate at best for the circumstances.

At least Cliton did it behind closed doors.

July 10th, 2009 at 5:12 pm

toadpond

Are we sure the other guy is not looking at Obama’s butt?

July 10th, 2009 at 5:24 pm

Larry Sheldon

If Obama’s butt is where his ears are, could be.

July 10th, 2009 at 5:28 pm

When she turned around and showed her face, she was clearly under age. From behind… well I’m not so sure that’s clear. That’s a pretty mature shape.

July 10th, 2009 at 5:33 pm

Larry Sheldon

Cary, the whole group was school children!

July 11th, 2009 at 1:22 am

Tom N

I’m sure it’s Sarah Palin’s fault.

July 11th, 2009 at 8:30 am

@Larry Sheldon:

This was not a day camp swarming with children, it was a summit to which select students were invited. I agree with Mike that it’s time to move on.

July 11th, 2009 at 8:59 am

Mike's America

@Cary: Someone above, I’ve lost track because of the number of comments, suggested we stick to the more substantive criticisms of Obama. To a point I agree. But yet, we post those all the time. Just look down at my post directly below this one where I discuss I post the fact that stimulus money is going to areas that supported Obama. That post got a handful of readers with only 17 comments. I’m not sure if the person suggesting we stick to more substantive issues commented on that post or not, but I would be willing to bet they did not.

People like fun posts like this more than the substantive stuff. So, I give them both.

July 11th, 2009 at 9:20 am

I don’t know about anyone else, Mike, but I don’t always comment on everything I read here, because I don’t always have anything new to add. And just because I’m not bashing Obama with you, doesn’t mean I’m going to jump to his defense on every single issue (I wasn’t a “Bush basher” either) Or sometimes I just don’t have time to sit down and write something.

But you shouldn’t be discouraged by a lack of commenting, you’re still getting your point of view out there, and that’s why I visit in the first place.

July 11th, 2009 at 10:37 am

Mike's America

@Cary: Thanks. I’m not discouraged. I know more people will want to comment on a fun post like this rather than the more serious issues. I would hope that the folks who dropped in on a link to this post at Free Republic (which generated most of the traffic) would also click the link for the main page and read more. Not sure how many do that.

And I don’t expect comments from every reader on every post. I read lots of posts, and comments, where I don’t have anything to add.

Anyway, I’ve milked this one for 94+ comments. Let’s see if we can hit 100.

July 11th, 2009 at 10:48 am

Hawk

@Cary:”it would be hard not to notice, don’t you agree?!”

I’m a living heterosexual male with a very healthy heartbeat.
I WOULD NOTICE

@Mike’s America:”…there is no shame in us poking a little fun at Obama.”

Oh, I totally agree. I’m not saying DON’T. Before actually watching the ABC clip, I thought it was going to be a totally off the mark bit is really what I was getting at. I thought that they would totally *ahem* white wash even this small thing

“Do you not care that Nancy Pelosi lied to the people of the United States when she accused the CIA of misleading Congress?”

Mike, here is the REAL beauty of that. Either Nancy …

A: Lied about the CIA misleading her/congress
B: …is obstructing justice since the ciA would have broken the law.

Libs don’t like either choice and CHOOSE to stick their heads in the sand.

July 11th, 2009 at 12:04 pm

Larry Sheldon

“This was not a day camp swarming with children, it was a summit to which select students were invited. I agree with Mike that it’s time to move on.”

Well, I wouldn’t let my 16-year-old got where that guy might be.

Like it or not, the J8 people were by definition 14-16 years old.

July 11th, 2009 at 9:25 pm

SoCal Chris

Hey ya’ll, I’m just lurkin’…

(In reality, I’m trying to help Mike hit 100 posts on this thread.)

July 12th, 2009 at 12:54 am

@Larry Sheldon:

The J8 was tagging along with the 8.

(no need to keep hashing this out, I’m just help with the 100, too. One more to go!!!)

July 12th, 2009 at 1:36 am

Missy

100

“testing”

Is there a prize? Wink!

July 12th, 2009 at 1:41 am

ditto

101

I’ll pass as well but add that Her hair looked very nice from the back.

July 12th, 2009 at 2:38 am

Mike's America

102

Wow! 101+! Is that a record?

July 12th, 2009 at 9:15 am

103

As they say in Hollywood, “sex sells!”

July 12th, 2009 at 9:18 am

Mike's America

104

@Cary: Is this an example of sleaze, sex or both?

July 12th, 2009 at 5:48 pm

105

http://gatewaypundit.blogspot.com/2009/07/mother-speaks-out-says-she-would-have.html

As much as I liked President Clinton, if you described him as “sleazy” I’d have no argument. This… not so much. An embarrassing, blush inducing moment for the President? Absolutely!

July 12th, 2009 at 5:55 pm

Missy

106

Her mom wants to box Obama’s ears, her dad thinks this has ruined their lives.

I think whoever released this photo into the public realm is the one to be blamed for the angst now being suffered by the young lady and her family. I have issues with gawkers, but this isn’t one of those types of incidents, sloppy photo editing. Lot’s of fun unless you are the young lady and her family.

July 12th, 2009 at 7:19 pm

Mike's America

107

@Missy: I’m glad to know the Mother is outraged. Too many might find the attention flattering.

July 12th, 2009 at 7:32 pm

MataHarley

108

I guess Missy’s NY Post link confirms the fact she isn’t the daughter of the Brazilian President…. unless, of course, this daddy named Patriarch Eduardo Tavares got Chavez to help him with a Brazilian coup in the last couple of days… LOL

July 12th, 2009 at 8:13 pm

http://www.bikinibuys.com/president-george-bush-ogling-olympic-bikini-babe-bent-over/

109

Shock horror!

July 13th, 2009 at 8:27 pm

Larry Sheldon

110

One or two things about the Bush-butt picture as compared to the Obama-butt pickture:

The female in the Bush picture is an adult. The one in the Obama is a child.

The female in the Bush picture, if I remember the accurately reported (don’t remember which blog that was), offered her butt for a “good luck” pat or something. It doesn’t matter what the child in the Obama picture was doing because she is a child.

In the Bush picture, the man (Mr. Bush) is standing there with a drink in his hand looking bemusedly at the camera. In the Obama picture, the man (Mr. Obama) is bent over like he was on his way in for a sniff.

And in other news, did you see what the Russians did in the hand-shake game?

July 13th, 2009 at 8:46 pm

Wordsmith

111

if I remember the accurately reported (don’t remember which blog that was), offered her butt for a “good luck” pat or something.

Yup. And Bush, like a good Christian and astute politician, opted to pat her on the backside, and not the butt.

Gaffa,

I didn’t think anyone would be so moral-equivalence-clumsy as to post that old story.

Guess I was wrong.

July 13th, 2009 at 9:04 pm

Wordsmith

112

@Mike’s America #102:

Wow! 101+! Is that a record?

Not by a longshot, you spammer!

July 13th, 2009 at 9:11 pm

Mike's America

113

@GaffaUK: As usual another of your lame moral equivalency arguments. And it further undermines your credibilty citing a source that opens their post with “Former President Bush may lack a lot of things; a grasp on reality is one of them. ” But I imagine that is where you get most of your “news.”

Is that the same site where you “learned” so much about Sarah Palin?

@Wordsmith: What is the record?

July 13th, 2009 at 10:11 pm