<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: SC Gov. Mark Sanford Admits Affair</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.floppingaces.net/2009/06/24/sc-gov-mark-sanford-admits-affair/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.floppingaces.net/2009/06/24/sc-gov-mark-sanford-admits-affair/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 21 Mar 2010 09:32:01 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: herman</title>
		<link>http://www.floppingaces.net/2009/06/24/sc-gov-mark-sanford-admits-affair/#comment-216137</link>
		<dc:creator>herman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Jun 2009 13:51:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.floppingaces.net/?p=23793#comment-216137</guid>
		<description>i think my post just went in the junk file; it has your links mike.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i think my post just went in the junk file; it has your links mike.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike's America</title>
		<link>http://www.floppingaces.net/2009/06/24/sc-gov-mark-sanford-admits-affair/#comment-216066</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike's America</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Jun 2009 05:41:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.floppingaces.net/?p=23793#comment-216066</guid>
		<description>@&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-216060&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;herman&lt;/a&gt;: You did NOT post a link to the source of your quote. Every comment here is copied to the post author and I have that information. Why would I have asked you for that if you had posted it?

If you want to repost WITH the link to your source please do so.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#comment-216060" rel="nofollow">herman</a>: You did NOT post a link to the source of your quote. Every comment here is copied to the post author and I have that information. Why would I have asked you for that if you had posted it?</p>
<p>If you want to repost WITH the link to your source please do so.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: herman</title>
		<link>http://www.floppingaces.net/2009/06/24/sc-gov-mark-sanford-admits-affair/#comment-216060</link>
		<dc:creator>herman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Jun 2009 05:08:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.floppingaces.net/?p=23793#comment-216060</guid>
		<description>Mike, i posted the link with the post and so they are both gone. 

Talking Points Memo provided the audio of Rush making the statements.

-In any case, I think it&#039;s unfair to remove someone&#039;s post when all he does post what that person said ...and then make a snarky remark about it. Someone is really sensitive.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mike, i posted the link with the post and so they are both gone. </p>
<p>Talking Points Memo provided the audio of Rush making the statements.</p>
<p>-In any case, I think it&#8217;s unfair to remove someone&#8217;s post when all he does post what that person said &#8230;and then make a snarky remark about it. Someone is really sensitive.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: wesmorgan1</title>
		<link>http://www.floppingaces.net/2009/06/24/sc-gov-mark-sanford-admits-affair/#comment-216056</link>
		<dc:creator>wesmorgan1</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Jun 2009 04:48:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.floppingaces.net/?p=23793#comment-216056</guid>
		<description>Where Sanford screwed up was simply disappearing.  He lied to his staff, disappeared for days, turned off his cell phone, and left the executive authority of his State vacant.  THAT is nothing less than dereliction of duty, plain and simple.  It is for those actions that he should seriously consider resignation.  We don&#039;t even have to reach the question of whether adultery/infidelity is sufficient cause; I think that reasonable people can disagree on that question.

Of course, his comments during the Clinton and Livingston scandals are coming back to haunt him, as well...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Where Sanford screwed up was simply disappearing.  He lied to his staff, disappeared for days, turned off his cell phone, and left the executive authority of his State vacant.  THAT is nothing less than dereliction of duty, plain and simple.  It is for those actions that he should seriously consider resignation.  We don&#8217;t even have to reach the question of whether adultery/infidelity is sufficient cause; I think that reasonable people can disagree on that question.</p>
<p>Of course, his comments during the Clinton and Livingston scandals are coming back to haunt him, as well&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MataHarley</title>
		<link>http://www.floppingaces.net/2009/06/24/sc-gov-mark-sanford-admits-affair/#comment-216045</link>
		<dc:creator>MataHarley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Jun 2009 03:58:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.floppingaces.net/?p=23793#comment-216045</guid>
		<description>Not me either... in fact, I have no clue what Herman said...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not me either&#8230; in fact, I have no clue what Herman said&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike's America</title>
		<link>http://www.floppingaces.net/2009/06/24/sc-gov-mark-sanford-admits-affair/#comment-216044</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike's America</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Jun 2009 03:55:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.floppingaces.net/?p=23793#comment-216044</guid>
		<description>@&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-216038&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;herman&lt;/a&gt;: I didn&#039;t do it. But I notice you still haven&#039;t provided a link to that text.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#comment-216038" rel="nofollow">herman</a>: I didn&#8217;t do it. But I notice you still haven&#8217;t provided a link to that text.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: herman</title>
		<link>http://www.floppingaces.net/2009/06/24/sc-gov-mark-sanford-admits-affair/#comment-216038</link>
		<dc:creator>herman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Jun 2009 03:12:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.floppingaces.net/?p=23793#comment-216038</guid>
		<description>So what&#039;s the deal with removing my post?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So what&#8217;s the deal with removing my post?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike's America</title>
		<link>http://www.floppingaces.net/2009/06/24/sc-gov-mark-sanford-admits-affair/#comment-215966</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike's America</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Jun 2009 21:37:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.floppingaces.net/?p=23793#comment-215966</guid>
		<description>@&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-215961&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;herman&lt;/a&gt;: Where&#039;s your link to that text?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#comment-215961" rel="nofollow">herman</a>: Where&#8217;s your link to that text?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TammyL</title>
		<link>http://www.floppingaces.net/2009/06/24/sc-gov-mark-sanford-admits-affair/#comment-215965</link>
		<dc:creator>TammyL</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Jun 2009 21:35:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.floppingaces.net/?p=23793#comment-215965</guid>
		<description>An update: The hope that he went to Argentina for noble reasons is quickly dashed.  The scoundrel was seen in many forms of PDA with the lady in question at various bars and at her apartment complex. Doesn&#039;t sound like a good bye trip to me.  His wife after 20 years of marriage and toil should take him to the cleaners.

As for Rush Limbaugh, I think that was satire but in very, very poor taste.  It is so sad for the Republican party.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>An update: The hope that he went to Argentina for noble reasons is quickly dashed.  The scoundrel was seen in many forms of PDA with the lady in question at various bars and at her apartment complex. Doesn&#8217;t sound like a good bye trip to me.  His wife after 20 years of marriage and toil should take him to the cleaners.</p>
<p>As for Rush Limbaugh, I think that was satire but in very, very poor taste.  It is so sad for the Republican party.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hard Right</title>
		<link>http://www.floppingaces.net/2009/06/24/sc-gov-mark-sanford-admits-affair/#comment-215933</link>
		<dc:creator>Hard Right</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Jun 2009 19:20:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.floppingaces.net/?p=23793#comment-215933</guid>
		<description>There was a study that came out recently claiming that politicians had the same peronality traits as sociopaths.
The more I see from politicians, the more I believe it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There was a study that came out recently claiming that politicians had the same peronality traits as sociopaths.<br />
The more I see from politicians, the more I believe it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TammyL</title>
		<link>http://www.floppingaces.net/2009/06/24/sc-gov-mark-sanford-admits-affair/#comment-215911</link>
		<dc:creator>TammyL</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Jun 2009 18:49:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.floppingaces.net/?p=23793#comment-215911</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t know if this makes any diffrence in the equation or not, but I read that his wife had asked him to leave the governors mansion two weeks before he went AWOL, and not to come around the family for awhile, and this was after she found out about the affair and tried to work it out.  

I don&#039;t think that there is a difference between a persons public life and a persons private life.  You are the same person doing the acts.  Marriage is the most sacred vow a person can make and if he can break his vows on that, he can break his oath and vows to anyone.  If you can look into the eyes of your spouse and screw them over, you can screw anyone over and you shouldn&#039;t be trusted with taxpayer money and be responsible for thousands of peoples lives.  You shouldn&#039;t be trusted with vital information either.   You are untrustworthy.  I do hope he does resign.

Also, on the private front for the sake of those poor little boys of his, I am hoping that his trip to Argentina was made for a noble cause--to call it quits with the lady in question.  I sincerely hope that is the case so that he is free  to fight for his marriage which is what he really needs to do for the sake of those kids.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t know if this makes any diffrence in the equation or not, but I read that his wife had asked him to leave the governors mansion two weeks before he went AWOL, and not to come around the family for awhile, and this was after she found out about the affair and tried to work it out.  </p>
<p>I don&#8217;t think that there is a difference between a persons public life and a persons private life.  You are the same person doing the acts.  Marriage is the most sacred vow a person can make and if he can break his vows on that, he can break his oath and vows to anyone.  If you can look into the eyes of your spouse and screw them over, you can screw anyone over and you shouldn&#8217;t be trusted with taxpayer money and be responsible for thousands of peoples lives.  You shouldn&#8217;t be trusted with vital information either.   You are untrustworthy.  I do hope he does resign.</p>
<p>Also, on the private front for the sake of those poor little boys of his, I am hoping that his trip to Argentina was made for a noble cause&#8211;to call it quits with the lady in question.  I sincerely hope that is the case so that he is free  to fight for his marriage which is what he really needs to do for the sake of those kids.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: USMCdaughter1</title>
		<link>http://www.floppingaces.net/2009/06/24/sc-gov-mark-sanford-admits-affair/#comment-215905</link>
		<dc:creator>USMCdaughter1</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Jun 2009 18:35:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.floppingaces.net/?p=23793#comment-215905</guid>
		<description>Sanford needs to step down from the Governorship as well, he&#039;s an embarrassment to the state and to his constituents.  If he used state funds for his escapades, that needs to be investigated. Unfortunately for his wife and children, he&#039;s opened himself up to enormous consequences because he couldn&#039;t keep it under control.

ANY politician of ANY stripe has to be out of their minds to try to pull off something like this in this technology age.  And on Father&#039;s Day weekend its beyond disgraceful.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sanford needs to step down from the Governorship as well, he&#8217;s an embarrassment to the state and to his constituents.  If he used state funds for his escapades, that needs to be investigated. Unfortunately for his wife and children, he&#8217;s opened himself up to enormous consequences because he couldn&#8217;t keep it under control.</p>
<p>ANY politician of ANY stripe has to be out of their minds to try to pull off something like this in this technology age.  And on Father&#8217;s Day weekend its beyond disgraceful.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GaffaUK</title>
		<link>http://www.floppingaces.net/2009/06/24/sc-gov-mark-sanford-admits-affair/#comment-215817</link>
		<dc:creator>GaffaUK</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Jun 2009 15:23:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.floppingaces.net/?p=23793#comment-215817</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t see the problem of any official having marital affair. It&#039;s not against the law. If you removed every person from office who ever cheated on a spouse, drank too much, ever smoked dope etc etc then there wouldn&#039;t be many left. 

In terms of marital affair - you wouldn&#039;t have Jefferson, Garfield, Harding, FDR, Eisenhower, JFK, Johnson, Reagan and of course Clinton among others. Other politicians, commentators and evanglists Giuliani, Limbaugh, Gingrich, McCain, Thurmond, Dole, Bakker &amp; Swaggart.

http://www.geocities.com/jacksonthor/knowrsex.html

Private matters should be kept seperate from politics unless the person is doing something illegal in the present, they are blatantly being hypocritical, they are inappropriate during their working hours or using tax dollars inappropriately. 

Where Sanford went wrong is him going AWOL. 

In the early 90s we were lectured by the grey and dull conservative John Major who was PM at the time about the need to go back to basics etc. Only later did it transpire he was having an affair.

@Old Trooper

&lt;blockquote&gt;In my case as a career Military Officer you are 24/7, 365 held to standards and held accountable for words and deeds. To Lead Soldiers you must earn their trust and respect otherwise Soldiers won’t follow you and your Command Structure won’t do so either&lt;/blockquote&gt;

So should Eisenhower been removed from his job during WWII when he was having an affair with his driver - Kay Summersby? Or have FDR impeached for his affair with Lucy Mercer? If all the US soldiers during war were sent home for having affairs then I&#039;m sure it would be more than 14%.

That&#039; not to condone extramarital affairs - but let&#039;s put this in perspective please.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t see the problem of any official having marital affair. It&#8217;s not against the law. If you removed every person from office who ever cheated on a spouse, drank too much, ever smoked dope etc etc then there wouldn&#8217;t be many left. </p>
<p>In terms of marital affair &#8211; you wouldn&#8217;t have Jefferson, Garfield, Harding, FDR, Eisenhower, JFK, Johnson, Reagan and of course Clinton among others. Other politicians, commentators and evanglists Giuliani, Limbaugh, Gingrich, McCain, Thurmond, Dole, Bakker &amp; Swaggart.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.geocities.com/jacksonthor/knowrsex.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.geocities.com/jacksonthor/knowrsex.html</a></p>
<p>Private matters should be kept seperate from politics unless the person is doing something illegal in the present, they are blatantly being hypocritical, they are inappropriate during their working hours or using tax dollars inappropriately. </p>
<p>Where Sanford went wrong is him going AWOL. </p>
<p>In the early 90s we were lectured by the grey and dull conservative John Major who was PM at the time about the need to go back to basics etc. Only later did it transpire he was having an affair.</p>
<p>@Old Trooper</p>
<blockquote><p>In my case as a career Military Officer you are 24/7, 365 held to standards and held accountable for words and deeds. To Lead Soldiers you must earn their trust and respect otherwise Soldiers won’t follow you and your Command Structure won’t do so either</p></blockquote>
<p>So should Eisenhower been removed from his job during WWII when he was having an affair with his driver &#8211; Kay Summersby? Or have FDR impeached for his affair with Lucy Mercer? If all the US soldiers during war were sent home for having affairs then I&#8217;m sure it would be more than 14%.</p>
<p>That&#8217; not to condone extramarital affairs &#8211; but let&#8217;s put this in perspective please.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aye Chihuahua</title>
		<link>http://www.floppingaces.net/2009/06/24/sc-gov-mark-sanford-admits-affair/#comment-215805</link>
		<dc:creator>Aye Chihuahua</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Jun 2009 14:22:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.floppingaces.net/?p=23793#comment-215805</guid>
		<description>@&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-215794&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Fit fit&lt;/a&gt;: 

That is one of the more reasoned, well thought out responses you have posted here in a long time and I couldn&#039;t agree with you more.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#comment-215794" rel="nofollow">Fit fit</a>: </p>
<p>That is one of the more reasoned, well thought out responses you have posted here in a long time and I couldn&#8217;t agree with you more.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark</title>
		<link>http://www.floppingaces.net/2009/06/24/sc-gov-mark-sanford-admits-affair/#comment-215800</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Jun 2009 13:49:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.floppingaces.net/?p=23793#comment-215800</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s not because the Republican party is hypocritical or corrupt that the Republican Governor of South Carolina, Mark Sanford made a stupid, hypocritical, colossal blunder in having an affair. Because overall, it isn&#039;t (as far as I know).

But, that won&#039;t stop the Democrats from making that presumptuous charge.

Wait. Watch. And see. Democrats will make this connection:

&quot;Mark Sanford is hypocritical and corrupt, therefore, The entire Republican party is hypocritical and corrupt.&quot; 

It follows as night follows day.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s not because the Republican party is hypocritical or corrupt that the Republican Governor of South Carolina, Mark Sanford made a stupid, hypocritical, colossal blunder in having an affair. Because overall, it isn&#8217;t (as far as I know).</p>
<p>But, that won&#8217;t stop the Democrats from making that presumptuous charge.</p>
<p>Wait. Watch. And see. Democrats will make this connection:</p>
<p>&#8220;Mark Sanford is hypocritical and corrupt, therefore, The entire Republican party is hypocritical and corrupt.&#8221; </p>
<p>It follows as night follows day.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
