15
Jun

Hope for Iran?

Posted by: Mike's America @ 10:50 am in Uncategorized  | 2 views

Freedom is impossible to repress forever!

Where is President Obama????

Photobucket

Hundreds of thousands of supporters of leading opposition presidential candidate Mir Hossein Mousavi, who claims there was voting fraud in Friday’s election, turn out to protest the result of the election at a mass rally in Azadi (Freedom) square in Tehran, Iran, Monday, June 15, 2009.

Photobucket

Iranian supporters of defeated presidential candidate Mir Hossein Mousavi march in Tehran on June 15, 2009. Opposition supporters defied a ban to stage a mass rally in Tehran in protest at President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad’s landslide election win, as Iran faced a growing international backlash over the validity of the election and the subsequent crackdown on opposition protests.

Photobucket

Photobucket

GO BUCKEYES!
Photobucket

A man lies the back of a truck after being seriously injured by gunfire in an area where militia were firing shots at a rally supporting Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad’s top opponent on Monday, June 15, 2009. Hundreds of thousands gathered in central Tehran to support Mir Hossein Mousavi, who claims there was voting fraud in Friday’s election. The gunfire came from a compound for volunteer militia linked to Iran’s powerful Revolutionary Guard.

This is a rare moment in history where a solid declaration of support for freedom and democracy can make all the difference. WHERE IS OBAMA???

  • Share/Bookmark
Print This Post Print This Post
This entry was posted on Monday, June 15th, 2009 at 10:50 am and is filed under Uncategorized. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

Trackbacks

18 comments so far

Mike_W
 1Reply to this comment  

in reality the pro-Mousavi sentiment is not quite the encouraging sign that so many wish it would be, and assume that it is.
Mousavi was a founder of Hizballah and participated in the creation of Iran’s intelligence service. Some reformer!

- Jihad Watch and Robert Spencer

Iranians seeking an alternative to Ahmadinejad’s truculence have latched onto Mousavi with little concern, it seems, over the fact that in the 1980s, the gray-bearded 67-year-old was at the heart of a regime that executed dissidents, took U.S. hostages and launched a fatwa against author Salman Rushdie.

- Time article: Iran’s Challenger: Mir-Hossein Mousavi

June 15th, 2009 at 11:21 am
Missy
 2Reply to this comment  

If Khomeni thought Mousavi was any different than Ahmadinejad he wouldn’t have been in the election in the first place. Hope for Iran lies in the support of the people by speaking out against this sham of an election and publicly recognizing the Iranian’s right to fair elections. What is Obama waiting for? Khomeni ordering the police and military to stomp down the protesting? Shades of Iraq after Gulf 1, history repeats itself?

Just found this, Iranian students tell CNN reporter without support from Obama they are doomed:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3BcFx380pFA

June 15th, 2009 at 12:49 pm
Michael
 3Reply to this comment  

You’re asking why the President of the United States does not appear in photographs of post-election riots in Iran.

Fascinating.

June 15th, 2009 at 1:03 pm
 4Reply to this comment  

@Michael: What an ass you are!

June 15th, 2009 at 1:18 pm
 5Reply to this comment  

Don’t be a dolt Michael.

We’re asking why President Obama has pulled a disappearing act during such a pivotal moment on the world stage.

For a guy who loves to have his mug in front of a camera, his absence speaks volumes.

Michael, can you explain why Obie has remained silent?

Michael, can you explain why, when Iranian students are being beaten and shot in the streets, Obie has not taken a firm, unequivocal stand in favor of democracy and the citizens’ right to self determination?

Do you think maybe he’s out body surfing again? Just wonderin’ since that’s where he was the last time he chose to dilly dally around and not take a stand.

Maybe Obie doesn’t understand that he can’t just vote “Present” anymore.

Running for President is easy.

Being President….not so much.

June 15th, 2009 at 1:18 pm
G6loq
 6Reply to this comment  

Car chasing dog caught the car … Now whaaaat?

June 15th, 2009 at 2:23 pm
Michael
 7Reply to this comment  

This is a rare moment in history where a solid declaration of support for freedom and democracy can make all the difference.

“All the difference?” Like what, precisely?

June 15th, 2009 at 2:52 pm
Michael
 8Reply to this comment  

Give me a break.

His exact words:

Where is President Obama????

Nope, no confusing that one no matter how much he lies in an attempt to squirm out of this pickle.

June 15th, 2009 at 3:03 pm
 9Reply to this comment  

You’re asking why the President of the United States does not appear in photographs of post-election riots in Iran.

Michael,

The only person who is conflating the pictures from Iran and the unknown whereabouts of Obie is you.

Obie’s silence on the events in Iran, which was Mike’s point, remains both relevant and unaddressed.

June 15th, 2009 at 3:12 pm
Missy
 10Reply to this comment  

@Aye Chihuahua:

He’s got his idols confused, maybe this will help:

http://www.80stees.com/pages/t-shirts/Wheres-Waldo-t-shirts.asp?referer=gog-paid

June 15th, 2009 at 3:46 pm
Missy
 11Reply to this comment  

My post is in the spam filter. P&T.

June 15th, 2009 at 3:48 pm
 13Reply to this comment  

@herman:

Great Herman….that’s a news piece from today…. 36 minutes ago.

How many days ago were the elections in Iran?

How many days ago did the violence start?

Exit question:

How many people have been shot or beaten to death during the time period that Obie was unavailable for comment?

Bonus question:

Why is it that Obie only feels the need to speak up after the public outcry and polling results start to come in?

June 15th, 2009 at 4:47 pm
 14Reply to this comment  

Obama said “It would be wrong for me to be silent on what we’ve seen on the television the last few days.”

I’m sure that was a real relief to the demonstrators. Couldn’t the teleprompter just accidentally load a few of Bush’s speeches on the subject?

June 15th, 2009 at 4:57 pm
eaglewingz08
 15Reply to this comment  

I’m sure Obama’s troubled, he has to make a choice between evil and lesser evil but to him all evils are the same, they are good and lesser good. He actually has to weigh the potential harm from picking the wrong candidate as the winner and deserving of support on the upcoming negotiations without preconditions. All the world’s dictators have looked for where the American President is during a time of civil unrest and possible civil war and find that he has betrayed the trust of the American people and the world. Troubling is a phrase you use when your children engage in mischief. The acts of the iranian regime’s repression and brutalization of its people are beyond the pale. It’s no wonder the students feel they are alone. The man who should be making common cause with them is in fetal position sucking his thumb. He got the three am telephone call and both Hillary and Obama have been asleep at the switch. Tomorrow is a general strike in Iran, and we hope that the oil workers take part in it as well. Cut off the money and the regime will topple. I just wish the blood spilled was for a better candidate than Mousavi. It’s sort of like spilling precious blood for Brezhnev. But when the choice is Kruschev v. Brezhnev you have to go with the lesser of two lessers in the hopes that the country will drag along the leadership no matter how reluctantly.

June 15th, 2009 at 5:17 pm
 16Reply to this comment  

@eaglewingz08: I agree that there isn’t all that much difference between Amadjihad and Mousavi. But knocking down the Mullah’s first choice for President may open the door to further change.

It is possible that the right set of circumstances could even toppling the entire theocratic structure.

That has been the goal of U.S. policy for decades and this is the best opportunity we have to push for progress.

June 15th, 2009 at 6:19 pm
disturber
 17Reply to this comment  

Excuse me folks, but just before the election Obama elated that there was vigorous debate going on in Iran and that there was a “possibility” of change. He referred to his Cairo speech and his “victory” in Lebanon. He was setting himself up to take credit for a “reformist” result. Thus, he took sides and the Mullahs predictably decided that Obama was not going to get credit for anything that went on in Iran and the rest is history. Sadly, Obama failed miserably and shares a great deal of blame for the theft of the election. He doesn’t want to tell other countries how to conduct themselves unless he can get the credit. Hold onto your seats folks, the Middle East is getting ready for an accelerating boil and it ain’t going to be pretty.

June 15th, 2009 at 7:48 pm
Old Trooper
 18Reply to this comment  

Bottom line, demand a re-count in Iran and you will just never be seen or heard from again.
Protesters risk their lives for their beliefs but should run to Iraq for Freedom.

40 Million paper ballots counted in less than 12 hours? Nope, no way.

Not to worry. The IDF will deal with the outcome while Obama votes “present”.

June 16th, 2009 at 3:10 am

Leave a reply

Name (*)
Mail (will not be published) (*)
URI
Comment

If your comments get caught in spam a lot please log into your registered account before trying to comment again. You can email me if your comment is caught in spam

 

Identity Verification: If you wish to verify your commenter identity, so no one can steal it, click the below button: