http://www.reteaparty.com/teaparties/
http://www.teapartypatriots.org/
http://www.teapartyday.com/
http://michellemalkin.com/2009/04/15/massive-tax-day-tea-party-usa/
http://www.surgeusa.org/actions/july4.htm

Preparations are also being made for a major 9/12/09 National Taxpayer Protest in Washington, DC: http://912dc.org/2009/04/sign-up-for-the-protest/

Recognizing the unmet need of American political conservatives, SurgeUSA.org… proposes a new “Specious American Politician” award. For those who are not familiar with the term “specious”, here’s one common definition:

1. apparently true but actually false: appearing to be true but really false
2. deceptively attractive: superficially attractive but actually of no real interest or value
http://www.surgeusa.org/actions/selectout.htm

The Tea Parties are the first awakenings of the public to the realization of the truth.

What happened to these – did the revolution fizzle out? Or was it a storm in a teacup?;)

I think he’s referring to the general populace perceving the cipher “as a moderate,” if I read him correctly.

The Won won because more people voted for him than voted for anybody else.

What were the dominant issues? In order of probable importance:

Bush is evil.

Bush is evil.

Sarah Palin is evil.

Bush is evil.

We want to be part of this historic moment–our first Affirmative Action President.

Probably contributing: Bush is evil.

How y’all enjoying the results? Iran looks like it is going to be a hoot.

NICE SUMMARY!

In the meantime, voters had been fed hateful politically biased reporting about the Bush Administration by the same MSM for eight years, which served to paint in their gullible minds the MSM “Republicans-bad” mantra. (The same MSM neglected to remind us that both George Bushes were moderate Republicans.) Granted, some of the ire against the Bush Administration was fully justified. (Erosion of the 4th Amendment rights, the financial bailout. etc..). The MSM has been painting all Republicans with the same broad brush for years, and the public bought the propaganda.

All this deception foisted on the American public is what nudged them into marginally voting the Democrats into power. As we all know, following the elections, the Democratic party and Obama dropped all pretense of moderation, and is in a drunk-with-power race to radically transform the country before the sheeple catch on to the fact that they have been had.

The mantra by the Democrats now is “We won” which they propagandize as meaning that this is blanket justification for any far-left agenda they want to shove down our throats. Ignoring the fact that some voters thought they were voting for a moderate administration and the “lessor of evils” (MSM; Republican=Darth Vader and the Evil Empire) The Tea Parties are the first awakenings of the public to the realization of the truth.

I’m currently working on four different things at once and ended up fat fingering the comment as a result.

Glad I could provide you with some entertainment.

We take it where we can get it right?

Pssstt….

I had it fixed before you pointed it out.

I fired my proofreader.

Good grief… Harry doesn’t know the difference between the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (aka FISA), and Aye’s somewhat dyslexic. (Added: I see you corrected that, Aye… typo prone today? LOL)

It’s FDIC, guys. FICA is SS payroll taxes.

And Harry, FDIC does not give the government the ability to “take control” of banks. It’s a deposit insurance program that has always been underfunded in the event of a serious crash. And if you had a clue, you’d know that it is not funded by a dime of taxpayer cash via Congressional appropriations, but by insurance premiums paid for by banks and institutions, and earnings on investments in U.S. Treasury securities…. which aren’t “earning” anything with the amount of money Obama and Geithner are printing up in the wee hours at Fed Reserve.

Here’s the link to the FDIC. Remove the cyber foot from your mouth, click on it and read before wandering in like a bozo with a bullseye on your tee shirt.

And you’re whining about Bush deficits, but insist Obama’s more than doubling of that is justified? OMG… what has public education come to. Hang… forget that. Where’s common sense gone? You’re a joke, and thanks… I needed the guffaw.

And oh, BTW, Nancy is not a “dude”.

You are on your game today sir. Your responses are quick and poignant!

Keep it up!

Ron

OK, what’s so special about audacious hope? Be specific – no nebulous unsubtantiated b.s.

and be sure to give some solid rational for why this is a “good” thing…
http://gatewaypundit.blogspot.com/2009/06/change-obama-fires-inspector-general.html
and this
http://therealbarackobama.wordpress.com/2009/06/12/batchelor-czar-zero/

Long on words (no substance) + illogical and emotion driven + Fox news (propaganda/false/inaccurate/wrong) + lack original thought + no-facts based rhetoric + gullible = Conservative Republican

You on the other hand suggest that you and your party:

Takes moral/intellectual high ground + possess the “real” news channels (mostly truth/no propaganda/accurate/correct) + possess original thought + posses the Truth + possess real substance + fact based rhetoric = Liberal Democrat

Correct? More or less?

Lets look at your post:

long on words, short on truth
long on words, short on real substance
long on words, all pablum for the masses that get their “truth” from fox news, the sorriest excuse for journalism there is.

Unless you are stating this as fact, I see a bunch of attacks. If it is truth or a sweeping statement, back up your claims with sources. I don’t get my ‘Truth’ from fox news.

I live in a town full of people who probably frequent this site. If you try to have a debate as the writer of this story starts, all you get is the same right wing, neocon rhetoric. If you ask them for an original thought you’re met by a deer in the headlights look…ask them to think and they are lost. Ask them to truly come up with a criticism they can defend with facts they just storm off quoting Rush, or Cheney or Palin without ever bothering to check the facts…so sad there could be 62 million people in this country that actually think the way this writer does.

Storm off quoting Rush? Cheney? Palin? Man, sounds like you started to make a point (laced with insults and stereo types) and then resorted to a sweeping claim that we all think as the author does. Why is that sad? Is it sad that people believe information contrary to your belief system? Or is it sad that we are the people you associate with conservative republicans? Is what you are saying fact based? I for one don’t storm off quoting rush, palin, or cheney and feel I know my issues. You wouldn’t be taking the low road and stereotyping or generalizing your opposition to justify your /own/ beliefs, would you?

Oh well! There is always hope, that audacity of hope that scares so many of you here. So sad…And so scary that there are 62 commenter’s above my entry who can only pat each other on the back for blinding repeating the same garbage from one comment to the next.

I don’t think you read all the posts, since there were several known liberals posting as well. That wouldn’t mean you just made a broad generalization again would it? How can you take the moral and intellectual high ground “without ever bothering to check the facts”? Without storming off quoting Obama and assuming that we lack the audacity and hope? Maybe you were long on words and short on truth and substance. I for one didn’t get anything productive out of your post.

Sounds to me, like you are that very same person you are raging against.