It’s getting harder and harder for libs to defend the “Par-tay” President!

Consider that this was reported by the Boston Globe, owned by the New York Times. When these guys start criticizing Obama it’s something to talk about!

Obamas’ trip to Paris raises some eyebrows
By Joseph Williams
Boston Globe
June 5, 2009

WASHINGTON – So much for the Obama common touch.

After whisking his wife to Manhattan for dinner and a Broadway show last weekend, President Obama is treating his family to a Paris vacation – paid for, in part, by taxpayers.

The White House confirmed yesterday that first lady Michelle Obama, their two daughters, and his mother-in-law will fly today to the City of Lights to join the president, who has scheduled meetings with French officials and will appear at a ceremony tomorrow in Normandy marking the 65th anniversary of D-Day.

Last year on the campaign trail, the Obamas prided themselves on staying close to the people. Much was made of Michelle Obama’s down-to-earth J.Crew wardrobe, candidate Obama’s off-the-rack suits, and the family’s search for a “shelter dog” to satisfy the wishes of 10-year-old Malia and 7-year-old Sasha for a puppy.

Now, the French press is buzzing about whether the first family will dine at a posh restaurant atop the Eiffel Tower, what fashions the first lady will wear, and whether she’ll outshine Carla Bruni-Sarkozy, her glamorous French counterpart.

But the trip has raised eyebrows among government watchdog groups, particularly since it comes so soon after the Obama’s pricey “date night” jaunt to New York – the president called it fulfilling a campaign promise – and in the midst of what Obama himself has called the worst economic crisis since the Great Depression.

One public interest group notes that the White House still hasn’t disclosed expenses from the Manhattan trip – estimated to be about $30,000 – and argues that the public should get a full accounting of a “flashy” European vacation.

Leslie Paige, a spokeswoman for Citizens Against Government Waste, said that because Obama has such a demanding job, few would begrudge him some presidential perks – as long as he doesn’t completely indulge himself on the taxpayer’s dime. The problem, she said, is that Obama has not made his expenses public, and thus is failing to keep his pledge to run an open, transparent government.

“I doubt we’ll see the true cost of the trip to Paris,” Paige said. Not keeping his promise “has been a disappointment, to say the least,” she added.

A White House spokeswoman said Michelle Obama will accompany her husband to the Normandy tribute, but otherwise the family’s schedule while in Paris will be private. Under government rules, the spokeswoman said, Obama will personally pay for any non-official expenses he and his family incur on the trip, but their expense report will not be released. The president plans to return to Washington on Sunday, but his family plans to stay longer in Paris.

Wow! At least one reporter has discovered what elitists the Obama’s really are? Maybe there is hope for the Republic after all.

Meanwhile, millions of Americans have lost their jobs during the months since Obama took office. No five star +++ vacations for them. But they’ll be paying for Obama’s trips!

  • Share/Bookmark
Print This Post Print This Post
This entry was posted on Friday, June 5th, 2009 at 9:23 pm and is filed under Uncategorized. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

Trackbacks

9 comments so far

liam09
 1Reply to this comment  

I personally support his vacations. The more he is away from the country, the more chance people will have at sobering up from his ching-chang-chong-voo-doo-witch-craft-shimminay-shimminay-bippity-boppity-boop that he pulled during the election. There is no way he can keep all his promises (what we have been saying forever), and the ones he is keeping – like closing Gitmo – the majority of the public disagree with. Lovely.

Its like how The Onion reported, “Obama Supporters Realize How Empty their Lives Are” after the election (must watch.. hilarious)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wbObFCadlqQ

[courtesy embed by Mike's America]

June 5th, 2009 at 10:17 pm
 2Reply to this comment  

This is just his way of voting PRESENT ;-)

The more he does wrong like this where it pisses off the independents who voted him in and the left that is more center, the more I want him to do it.

It hasn’t taken long for his approval rating to converge with his disapproval rating.

June 5th, 2009 at 10:38 pm
 3Reply to this comment  

@liam09: Unfortunately, Obama will be back from his pleasure trips in plenty of time to raise our taxes and take even more money away from us to pay for his socialist makeover of America.

If only we could buy him off with a billion a year and free rides on Air Force One whenever he wants it would be worth it to get rid of him.

Oh, and good find at the Onion. Love those Obama zombies.

null

June 5th, 2009 at 10:42 pm
FedUp
 4Reply to this comment  

Ugh!!! Unfortunately, we got what we paid for. Hope we have enough money to vote him out in 4 years, and the dems in 2.

June 6th, 2009 at 4:55 am
pdill
 5Reply to this comment  

Hey, even Rachel Maddow is starting to cave! Never thought I would see the day, but the “prolonged detention” was just too much to take. (Sorry, I don’t know how to embed the video on this blog, but here’s the link).

[courtesy embed by Mike's America:]

June 6th, 2009 at 8:43 am
liam09
 6Reply to this comment  

@Mike’s America: THAT is hilarious!! hahaha

June 6th, 2009 at 8:50 am
drjohn
 7Reply to this comment  

Transparency is for the little people.

June 6th, 2009 at 9:17 am
ICanCopyAndPasteToo
 8Reply to this comment  

Along with Obama’s plan to appoint a “Special Master for Compensation”, or Pay Czar, the GOP should press him to appoint a POTUS Czar to keep his spending of our money in check. Whats good for the goose…

June 6th, 2009 at 2:51 pm
ditto
 9Reply to this comment  

So the question is: When will Obama open the pre-crime preventive detention concentration camps for Tea Bag Protesters, FOX news viewers, Ron Paul supporters, those clinging to their gun rights, and those dangerous returning veterans that his Homeland Security agency deems a security threat?

What do you have to say about that ACLU?

(Chirp, chirp, chirp…)

June 7th, 2009 at 3:36 am

Leave a reply

Name (*)
Mail (will not be published) (*)
URI
Comment

If your comments get caught in spam a lot please log into your registered account before trying to comment again. You can email me if your comment is caught in spam

 

Identity Verification: If you wish to verify your commenter identity, so no one can steal it, click the below button: