Two scandalous photos of anti-gay marriage proponent leaked to FA!

Loading

Liberals are giddy over revealing photos of Miss California, Carrie Prejean (good Lord! She’s still in the news cycle?!), surfacing on the ‘net, with the first of six released, thus far:

With partially nude photos of her popping up on Web sites questioning her Christian credentials, Miss California USA Carrie Prejean has fired back, claiming the racy pictures are just modeling shots and vowing to continue her battle against same-sex marriage.

“I am a Christian, and I am a model,” Prejean said in a statement released overnight to the media. “Models pose for pictures, including lingerie and swimwear photos. Recently, photos taken of me as a teenager have been released surreptitiously to a tabloid Web site that openly mocks me for my Christian faith. I am not perfect, and I will never claim to be.”

~~~

The Web site thedirty.com claimed that it had six pictures of Prejean. As of Tuesday morning, it had posted one on its site. The picture shows Prejean wearing nothing but a pair of revealing pink panties and smiling over her shoulder at the camera. Her breasts are covered by her arm.

The picture was deemed too racy to be shown on the TODAY Show.

Too “racy” for the TODAY Show? Give me a break! A year ago, the Today Show had no issue with showing a “racy” photo of influential teen star, Miley Cyrus. Make no mistake: They’re only feigning the photo is too risque for their viewing audience, because they share an agenda with like-minded liberals, out to nail another conservative to a cross.

They’re dragging Prejean through the mud for saying the following:

“I think it’s great that Americans are able to choose one or the other. We live in a land where you can choose same-sex marriage or opposite marriage; and you know what? I think in my country, in my family, I think that I believe that a marriage should be between a man and a woman. No offense to anybody out there, but that’s how I was raised.”

Oh, how outrageous that was! That she expressed a personal opinion! That she exercised the freedom of speech liberal “progressives” so love to champion. Oh, wait…I see the problem: She expressed a conservative opinion and viewpoint. Hence, the indignation and attempt to ridicule and slime her.

Meanwhile, we have a PotUS who also claims to read the Bible and who has stated a similar view. To the Chicago Tribune:

“I’m a Christian. And so, although I try not to have my religious beliefs dominate or determine my political views on this issue, I do believe that tradition, and my religious beliefs say that marriage is something sanctified between a man and a woman.”

Where is the lefty outrage? Oh, I get it: Prejean was contesting for the highly exalted Miss USA distinction. Obama, on the other hand, campaigned to be elected to the lowly office of President of the United States of America. It all makes sense to me, now. He doesn’t really mean it.

Maybe liberals are giving now-President Obama a free pass on his hate-filled, anti-gay, hurtful and insensitive comments because they believe that in his heart, he does sympathize with the plight of gay marriage; that he is merely expressing what is politically necessary and expedient for him to say. Supporting the traditional definition of marriage is the position and belief of the mainstream majority in America.

Of course, if this is the case, then it makes President Obama a weak, moral coward for not standing up for core beliefs and principles; and Prejean a hero for standing up and defending her beliefs amidst a hailstorm of criticism from the liberal elites in the media. Obama saying anything to win the presidency; Prejean saying what she believes, even if it costs her the crown.

And if you truly think it scandalous that Prejean posed for “racy” photos prior to running for Miss USA. May I remind you of the “racy” photos of Obama before he ran for president. These were leaked to us at Flopping Aces, through a simple Google search, and are highly graphic and tastelessly tabloidian.

Flopping Aces had serious reservations over whether or not to republish these well-known topless Obama photos, as they are deemed inappropriate for our younger readers; and deemed “extremely racy” even by FA standards. But after careful deliberation through long hours into the night and much hand-wringing, we feel it important enough that these be published in a responsible manner and not merely to drive-up our readership and FA merchandise sales. Our objective isn’t sensationalism and agenda-driven right-wing propaganda; but an honest desire to expose mainstream media hypocrisy and liberal elitism (Warning!: Graphic photos- may be inappropriate for all ages):

6a00d834fd7f7353ef0105368fa446970b-800wi

8441c750cc9402911aece4e7d6063007

These topless photos of the PotUS before he knew he would become the dignified leader of the free world have been floating around out there for a couple of years now….and the media uproar today is all but silent on them.

Quite revealing….

0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
48 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

I ain’t no queer. I like hot Christian babes with fake funbags! Hoo-boy! Oops. Hoo girl!

Where’s the photo of Wordsmith in the FA thong?

In depth, on the ground reportage has produced this one as well:

Image Source,Photobucket Uploader Firefox Extension

Oh, my eyes! While I appreciate your debate over whether or not to publish such tasteless images, I must say you failed to appropriately warn of the sheer trauma that might be induced in viewing them. 😉

That said, Miss Cali ROCKS and her “nude” photos that have a remarkable lack of nudity do nothing to change my opinion of her as a conservative, a Christian, or an intelligent and well-spoken woman.

Slveryder, you only saw the first of several pics. I suggest you stay tuned.

@Slveryder:

An edited version for you with the naughty bits covered:

Photobucket

h/t – Iowahawk via Ace.

The photo I saw pretty much showed her in underwear with her back to the camera (not much was actually revealed). I’ve seen worse in general magazine publications for some of the ads.

Not that there’s anything wrong with it, but I’m convinced Flopping Aces is a gay website. Maybe a sister (ahem) site ty “Gay Patriot?” How else do we explain equating shirtless photos of a middle aged man with photos of a beauty queen wearing nothing but skimpy panties and showing half a (surgically enhanced) bare tit?

Good luck, and God bless the worthy, things are going to get biblical……..

Thank God you put the pasties up. It was truly indecent that someone calling himself a Christian anti gay marriage proponent would go cavorting on the beach like some wanton hussy in front of the newsmedia.

Looks like your panty-clad heroine’s days are numbered as a beauty queen. The funbag-enhanced, bigoted Christian tartlet lied to the pageant about the existence of her “modeling” pictures. Which were not taken when she was just “a teenager,” to judge by the state of her artificial enhancement. What is it about evangelical Christians that so frequently makes them such cheesy liars, anyway?

@ HL

What is it about evangelical Christians that so frequently makes them such cheesy liars, anyway?

As opposed to pagan liars who do it with more pride?

Why so serious?

barney, the Christian wingnuts are constantly lying. This girl is only the latest example. By the way, she’s not just a liar but a rather stupid liar given that she knows more pictures are coming.

So, why are Christians routinely such blatant liars? Here’s my guess: It’s because your people think that once you’ve declared your Christianity that you’ll get into heaven no matter what the hell you do. Nice trick! Certainly explains all those evangelical limousines and private jets! And the lying.

Magic Dog/HL…. pick a single screen name, or you are out of here with some others that have contributed far more civil and intelligent commentary than yours. This is your one and only warning.

Who is that guy? He needs a breast reduction.

See what I mean?

@ HL

Cheesy liars or blatant liars? It’s important that you look down your nose for the right reasons.

Okay, Mata Harley, I’ll pick HL for your site. Satisfied?

Barney, how about cheesy AND blatant? I mean, come on, you’ve got this enhanced girl telling us that those pics were taken when she was 17. Is that when the pageant paid for her new ones? ‘Cause if you look at the one pic, it’s pretty obvious that it shows an enhanced boob. I’m far from being a prude, but I think that’s a little young. And if the other pics show what I suspect they show, then let’s hope someone has an appointment with a district attorney.

Let’s face it, 2008 and 2009 haven’t been kind to Wingnut America. Bush’s economy collapses. The elections are a rout for your side. The new prez gets inaugurated and Rushbo immediately wishes for failure. That’s followed by the teabaggings — which were labeled as such by YOUR side, rendering yourselves as a punchline to a national obscene joke.

To top it off, the spokesmodel for the anti-gay Mormon wingnuts turns out to be a lying, breast-augmented mess. With material like that, who even needs a Democratic svengali to make you look bad?

@HL:

I’ve stood by and let you thrash and trash this young lady for long enough now.

She says the pictures were made when she was 17, do you have evidence to prove otherwise?

You claim that the one picture shows and “enhanced boob”, can you prove that? Based on the small amount of breast that is showing there, you’d be hard pressed to prove any of your claims regarding her natural or altered state in the photograph.

You’ve gone and got your pretty pink panties in a twisted up mess over some pictures that are no more revealing than the average Sears Roebuck catalog or Hanes Her Way commercial on television.

So basically, you’ve got nothing but your bloviating to work with on this subject.

To top it off, you go on to bash the “anti-gay Mormon wingnuts” when the spokesmodel in question shares the same position on gay marriage that your fearless leader B-Rock Oblama holds.

You might want to educate yourself on that fact prior to running yourself out to the end of your limb being critical of Miss Prejean.

The lying Christian beauty queen says it was a modeling shot. Excuse me, but what modeling shot includes a stray bottle of shampoo in the corner? That pic was pure amateur. We’ll just wait for the next ones. This ongoing saga ought to be a hoot. Carrie P. might be lots of things, but honest or smart ain’t among them.

I got two words for you, Floppin’: FULL FRONTAL! Bwaaaaaaaaaaaahahahahaha!

Of course you don’t want to argue about the photo because you’re talkin’ out yo’ azz again.

You put your credibility on the line and I pinned you to the wall because you lack the facts to support your position.

Aye Chihuahua, that picture was shot in someone’s bathroom. Do you really think that the website in question is going to stop at just one? And you’re really telling me that that half a funbag ain’t enhanced? You people really do crack me up! But hey, you’re the same people who named your rallies “teabaggings!”

You’re the one making the arguments you can’t support there HL.

You can’t prove what you’re saying.

Now, with your latest screed you’ve proven yourself to be a liar.

You have not one shred of credibility left but please stick around. It’s going to be fun mocking you.

When was the last time you saw a “modeling shot” with a half a shampoo bottle tucked in the lower left corner? Oh, and I’ll be interested to know what company had her posing for sexy lingerie at the age of 17, with enhanced funbags. Bwaaaaaaaaaaaaaahahahahahaha!

I’ve seen much more tit in a damned PETA ad and you frigging leftards don’t seem to have ANY qualms about them. Why don’t you jerks get a life, and a job too while you’re at it. Ya, YOU HL.

I’m far from being a prude, but . . .

Not only that, but apparently she’s got a gay father. TheDirty.com… got hold of some divorce records. Oh, but this is delish!

@ HL

Is *not being a prude* all that is required of you to mock this girl and hold her in such contempt? Is the bar set that low? You are free to believe Carrie misrepresented herself, either to the pageant or perhaps now with these photos. But, your schadenfreude is a character flaw, your joy at her [apparent] turn of events is sick. It may be that all who stumble in life disgust you. More likely though, only the Christian “wingnuts.” If you are that concerned with the hypocrites in church, come join us. There’s always room for one more.

Um…who really cares? Hilton’s question was inappropriate, and Prejean shouldn’t be blasted for giving her honest opinion. It was a beauty pageant, for crying out loud – of course contestants at that level (who, in many cases, have been working the pageant circuit for YEARS) are going to have modeling shots floating around, up to and including nude shots. If I give my indifferent shrug any harder, I’ll tear my rotator cuff…[*laugh*]

The only observation I will make is that this rhubarb illustrates, and rather well, the difficulties we face when our personal faith is introduced into political questions. Consider Prejean’s statement, “I am a Christian and I am a model.” Now, the Bible is chock-full of advice/directives concerning appropriate behavior, and it certainly includes, shall we say, “guidance” on proper attire for women; we have everything from Deuteronomy’s prohibition of cross-dressing to 1 Timothy’s “I also want women to dress modestly, with decency and propriety […]”. Each of us is called upon to apply these precepts/guidance to our own lives; as Paul noted, the important question is whether the intent behind our actions is to glorify God. I know people who interpret Scripture such that women should not wear slacks, jeans or shorts; I don’t subscribe to that interpretation, but it doesn’t offend or imperil my personal faith that they sees the issue differently. How is this situation different? How does this differ from any of a LONG list of similar issues, from the consumption of alcohol to the ordination of women?

Questions of faith are God’s, and they are over here.
Questions of politics are man’s, and they are over there.

barney and Aye, what’sa mattter? Don’t you like getting firsthand instructions on how to be tolerant and accepting from HL? Between all HL’s gay commentary and bashing of those who are Christian, I think he is a stellar representative of his political party. It’s obvious that compassion and tolerance for gays and/or those of faith is only trotted out when they are a class to be used for a political football.

Does give one a laugh about how sensitive HL is about “liars”…. guess looking in the mirror at one filled with such bigoted hatred distorts one’s perspective of reality.

I do believe he wandered over here originally from the Firedogpond swamp. But of course that blog was insinuating that only conservatives seemed to flock to porn or semi-porn with such gusto. But it does seem the HL is quite well versed in that himself, being as he professes enough expertise to prounounce certain poses and locations as amateur, and seems to have viewed each and every Miss California photo available for free.

Again, the dichotomy is delicious… Naturally his bigotry is unappealing and offensive, if not predictable. But sometimes it’s just good to give them rein and let them show their true colors. This kind of attitude comes back to haunt in the future when someone like HL tries to claim the moral high ground.

@MataHarley:

As I said above I truly hope that HL/M. Dog Squeeze will stick around.

It’s going to be fun mocking him. I look forward to it.

@ MataHarley

It’s obvious that compassion and tolerance for gays and/or those of faith is only trotted out when they are a class to be used for a political football.

It’s for this reason you’d think the gay community would be more a little more sensitive about some of the non-gays who selectively rush to their defense. HL can only think that Carrie Prejean’s father [possibly] being gay is a liability for her *if HE believes there’s something wrong with him being gay.*

But it does seem the HL is quite well versed in that himself, being as he professes enough expertise to prounounce certain poses and locations as amateur, and seems to have viewed each and every Miss California photo available for free.

We agree then that, if nothing else, HL is not a prude? 🙂

The problem wasn’t with the plug-ins. It was with the computer trying hard to regurgitate the photos to the null bucket.

HL: “The new prez gets inaugurated and Rushbo immediately wishes for failure.”

And this compares to the left wanting bush to fail from the word go 8 years ago how???
The right still has a lot of greif to heap onto BHO to even get a start on the hate the left heaped upon Bush.

HL: “The lying Christian beauty queen…”

And a lying Christian beauty queen compares to a LYING SPEAKER of the house … HOW in a political forum? She may speak out about something but is she actually in office making policy? Ummm NO!

Its kind of like the Dixie Twits. I don’t rely on them to make policy. I rely on them to get on stage and sing like they are paid to do. Not soapbox on their politics. If I wanted to hear about their politics, I would pay them and invite them to a function that is not a concert.

So, let me ask HL, do you also wait to beat the drums on all things about Christians who somehow fail in their life? And then somehow tie this into politics …. pretty sad attempt if you ask me.

Even if tomorrow this girl is shown to flat out lie and do a full “spread” I don’t care. Who is she in the light of things? OOOOOOO right … someone beauty queen who spoke out against homosexuality. What next, the pedicure person who also spoke out against it?

I don’t see you making a stink about the other beauty queen who was recently disgraced after pics of her drinking and licking another girls breasts were publicized.

Surely you (and the rest of the left) can come up with something more substantial.
BIG WHOOP!

I smell desperation on the left’s part for even trying to make an issue on this.

Does give one a laugh about how sensitive HL is about “liars”…. guess looking in the mirror at one filled with such bigoted hatred distorts one’s perspective of reality.

I do hope you’re not trying to suggest that I’m a liar, because then I’d have to ask you to prove it. As for being a “bigot,” I think it’s fallin’ down funny that lying Christians and their admirers cast any criticism as bigotry.

And this compares to the left wanting bush to fail from the word go 8 years ago how?

Show me the prominent Democratic commentator who, in January or February 2001, told nationwide audiences that he or she wanted President Bush to fail. Really, prove it. Or are you just one more Christian liar? Come on, cough it up.

And a lying Christian beauty queen compares to a LYING SPEAKER of the house

For purposes of argument only, let’s concede that the Speaker of the House — say, Newt Gingrich or Denny Hastert — was a liar. How would that justify your Christian beauty queen being a liar? Could you point me to the Bible verse that justifies one person’s lies on the basis of another’s? Two wrongs make a right in your religion, do they? New one to me, but I must admit that evangelical America never fails to surprise me.

Even if tomorrow this girl is shown to flat out lie and do a full “spread” I don’t care

You and me both! I’m all for full frontal Christrian lyin’ beauty queens, myself.

I don’t see you making a stink about the other beauty queen who was recently disgraced after pics of her drinking and licking another girls breasts were publicized.

Well, you know the old saying: “Whatever two girls do in the privacy of their own home is okay, as long as they make movies.” Ha ha ha! I’m waitin’ for the pics of Miz California in some girl-on-girl!

@HL:

I do hope you’re not trying to suggest that I’m a liar, because then I’d have to ask you to prove it.

Why yes, as a matter of fact, I am calling you a liar.

I called you a liar in post #23 too.

Here’s why (from your post # 22):

But hey, you’re the same people who named your rallies “teabaggings!”

That statement is not, in any way, based in fact so, yeah, you’re a LIAR.

You’re telling me the wingnuts didn’t call them teabaggings? Then what’s this? Bwaaaaaaaaaaaaaahahahaha!

Your pic proves what, exactly?

That’s right, nothing.

You’re still a LIAR.

Care to try again?

Here’s the question for you again: Where did anyone other than the Leftists call them “teabaggings”?

A little more about who first used the word “teabag” as a verb with respect to your wingnuttery. Sorry, little dog, it’s yours. All yours!

Better face it wingnuts, you’re the teabaggers! Bwahahahahahahahaha!!

You’ve gone and gotten all distracted now haven’t you?

Focus man!

Here’s what you said:

But hey, you’re the same people who named your rallies “teabaggings!”

Now, show me where the people who organized, or participated, called the rallies “teabaggings”?

It shouldn’t be difficult for you….if it’s true.

The cutesy little clip of Rachel Maddow using the term doesn’t count because she’s not one of ours.

LIAR, LIAR….PANTS ON FIRE!

Care to try again?

“Teabagging” is just another form of the word. You guys were the first to use “teabag” as a verb for your rallies. It’s all yours, wingnuts! How does it feel to be the punch line to a national obscene joke?

So, where’s your proof bucko?

Where is it?

That’s right….there’s not any.

Now all the world can see that HL is a L-I-A-R.

What a surprise.

Not.

GOD Bless Miss Prejean for the courage of her conviction and the Grace she has shown in the face of her adversity. GOD Forgive those ignorant morally relativistic anti-GOD elitists who became haters just because she shared her opinion, and finally, GOD, please help people like me who would like to act just as irresponsibly and maybe even more so, to rid this wonderful country of the blight of leftists ideologies. Jesus is not the author of hate, so I cannot be a party to it. Those who are filled with it, no matter what side they choose are casualties already.

Four pictures of Obama with his shirt off and not a single one of Carrie Prejean?

THAT”S DISGUSTING!!!

Seems a big fuss over nothing. How the hell did a nobody like Perez Hilton become famous? He has no talent – he only feeds off people who do have talent. I don’t agree with Prejean’s views – but she should never been asked such a dumb loaded question in a beauty contest. The photo of Prejean is harmless and no big deal in this day and age – unless you are a member of the Taliban. The only thing Prejean has done wrong is that she seemingly broke her contract – but it wouldn’t surprise if half the women in the contest may have done similar things. Again it’s only become a big deal because of the answer she gave.

well of course it was just a matter of time before the other shoe dropped and the rightwing would have to look stupid again In this case it was 6 months before the CARRIE PREJEAN SEX TAPE surfaced, and my my my, at what an awkward time . In a lawyers meeting with Carrie’s mom there. Word is that Carrie dropped her suit 15 seconds after the lawyer hit the play button. And all of that in front of poor carrie’s mother. Shame Shame Shame She will be thrown under the bus for this and she probably now regrets not accepting that 1 million dollar offer to do a hardcore porn film