<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: President Obama Restricted Navy SEALs From Rescuing Ship Captain With Force</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.floppingaces.net/2009/04/17/president-obama-restricted-navy-seals-from-rescuing-ship-captain-with-force/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.floppingaces.net/2009/04/17/president-obama-restricted-navy-seals-from-rescuing-ship-captain-with-force/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 10:29:04 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Somewhere in the Chicago suburbs a wealthy family is missing it&#8217;s - mbecker908&#8217;s blog - RedState web01.prod.theplanet.eaglepub.com 174.120.27.221</title>
		<link>http://www.floppingaces.net/2009/04/17/president-obama-restricted-navy-seals-from-rescuing-ship-captain-with-force/#comment-238531</link>
		<dc:creator>Somewhere in the Chicago suburbs a wealthy family is missing it&#8217;s - mbecker908&#8217;s blog - RedState web01.prod.theplanet.eaglepub.com 174.120.27.221</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Aug 2009 16:07:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.floppingaces.net/?p=20169#comment-238531</guid>
		<description>[...] tip to Flopping Aces first here and then [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] tip to Flopping Aces first here and then [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: President Obama vs. Somali Pirates &#8211; Point to the Pirates &#171; Designated Conservative</title>
		<link>http://www.floppingaces.net/2009/04/17/president-obama-restricted-navy-seals-from-rescuing-ship-captain-with-force/#comment-201298</link>
		<dc:creator>President Obama vs. Somali Pirates &#8211; Point to the Pirates &#171; Designated Conservative</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 May 2009 18:03:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.floppingaces.net/?p=20169#comment-201298</guid>
		<description>[...] following stuff came across this designated conservative&#8217;s RSS feed this morning, courtesy of Atlas Shrugs, floppingaces.net, something called baylorfans, and exlibhollywood. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] following stuff came across this designated conservative&#8217;s RSS feed this morning, courtesy of Atlas Shrugs, <a href="http://floppingaces.net" title="http://floppingaces.net" class="autohyperlink" target="_blank">floppingaces.net&#8230;</a>, something called baylorfans, and exlibhollywood. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Colorado Bob</title>
		<link>http://www.floppingaces.net/2009/04/17/president-obama-restricted-navy-seals-from-rescuing-ship-captain-with-force/#comment-197736</link>
		<dc:creator>Colorado Bob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 May 2009 00:21:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.floppingaces.net/?p=20169#comment-197736</guid>
		<description>First of all before jumping on this bandwagon, don&#039;t you think a SOURCE should be identified other than the opening line, &quot;Talking to some SEALS....&quot;

For all we know this was some schizophrenic on St. Paul Alaska island, talking to real frikkin seals!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>First of all before jumping on this bandwagon, don&#8217;t you think a SOURCE should be identified other than the opening line, &#8220;Talking to some SEALS&#8230;.&#8221;</p>
<p>For all we know this was some schizophrenic on St. Paul Alaska island, talking to real frikkin seals!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GaffaUK</title>
		<link>http://www.floppingaces.net/2009/04/17/president-obama-restricted-navy-seals-from-rescuing-ship-captain-with-force/#comment-196101</link>
		<dc:creator>GaffaUK</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2009 02:43:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.floppingaces.net/?p=20169#comment-196101</guid>
		<description>@MataHarley

Not according to Bill - he claims the Navy made the call &#039;in spite&#039; of the instructions were given. Therefore that brings up the question why didn&#039;t they make that call earlier. I&#039;m not blaming the Navy myself - as I believe they did the right thing within instructions. It was the right call with the right result.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@MataHarley</p>
<p>Not according to Bill &#8211; he claims the Navy made the call &#8216;in spite&#8217; of the instructions were given. Therefore that brings up the question why didn&#8217;t they make that call earlier. I&#8217;m not blaming the Navy myself &#8211; as I believe they did the right thing within instructions. It was the right call with the right result.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MataHarley</title>
		<link>http://www.floppingaces.net/2009/04/17/president-obama-restricted-navy-seals-from-rescuing-ship-captain-with-force/#comment-195858</link>
		<dc:creator>MataHarley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Apr 2009 00:42:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.floppingaces.net/?p=20169#comment-195858</guid>
		<description>Gaffa, did you miss previous conversations/posts about this?  Since this could escalate into a major int&#039;l incident, the US military wanted confirmation from the top on every by-the-book procedure.  The Navy did not &quot;go against instructions&quot; when it acted.  It made sure that when it acted, it fit the absolute parameters of &quot;the instructions&quot;. 

They could have acted sooner were those &quot;instructions&quot; not so binding, and the CIC given them the blessing to follow traditional ROE already in place.  That&#039;s all they were asking in the beginning.  However when the CIC and his underlings started micromanaging with additional caveats, they had to wait until everything fit the Obama bill.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gaffa, did you miss previous conversations/posts about this?  Since this could escalate into a major int&#8217;l incident, the US military wanted confirmation from the top on every by-the-book procedure.  The Navy did not &#8220;go against instructions&#8221; when it acted.  It made sure that when it acted, it fit the absolute parameters of &#8220;the instructions&#8221;. </p>
<p>They could have acted sooner were those &#8220;instructions&#8221; not so binding, and the CIC given them the blessing to follow traditional ROE already in place.  That&#8217;s all they were asking in the beginning.  However when the CIC and his underlings started micromanaging with additional caveats, they had to wait until everything fit the Obama bill.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GaffaUK</title>
		<link>http://www.floppingaces.net/2009/04/17/president-obama-restricted-navy-seals-from-rescuing-ship-captain-with-force/#comment-195854</link>
		<dc:creator>GaffaUK</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Apr 2009 00:32:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.floppingaces.net/?p=20169#comment-195854</guid>
		<description>@Bill

&lt;blockquote&gt;Gaffa, you’re missing the whole point. The Navy made the call IN SPITE OF the ‘instructions’ they were given&lt;/blockquote&gt;

So you are saying it was the Navy that spent 5 days dithering until they decided to go against instructions - when they could of taken out the kidnappers before then?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Bill</p>
<blockquote><p>Gaffa, you’re missing the whole point. The Navy made the call IN SPITE OF the ‘instructions’ they were given</p></blockquote>
<p>So you are saying it was the Navy that spent 5 days dithering until they decided to go against instructions &#8211; when they could of taken out the kidnappers before then?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill</title>
		<link>http://www.floppingaces.net/2009/04/17/president-obama-restricted-navy-seals-from-rescuing-ship-captain-with-force/#comment-195795</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Apr 2009 18:38:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.floppingaces.net/?p=20169#comment-195795</guid>
		<description>The email&#039;s author names himself &quot;Buddy Wellborn, USNA &#039;59&quot;, who (if true) presumably would be Captain Raymond B. &quot;Buddy&quot; Wellborn USN-Ret (who scored three touchdowns against Notre Dame in &#039;58!). More to the point, CAPT Wellborn was a career submariner, which raises at least the strong likelihood of his having been concerned in SEAL ops. It claims to be based on info from a contact at DEVGRU, with a fairly complete timeline of the Team SIX det&#039;s mission from departure Norfolk until the shoot.  The claim of four rounds fired is corroborated independently by the young FN aboard Boxer who says he heard four reports (That email, at least, reads &quot;clean;&quot; in other words it&#039;s exactly what one would expect to read from a junior sailor who only saw the peripherals)
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/2235870/posts?page=1</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The email&#8217;s author names himself &#8220;Buddy Wellborn, USNA &#8216;59&#8243;, who (if true) presumably would be Captain Raymond B. &#8220;Buddy&#8221; Wellborn USN-Ret (who scored three touchdowns against Notre Dame in &#8216;58!). More to the point, CAPT Wellborn was a career submariner, which raises at least the strong likelihood of his having been concerned in SEAL ops. It claims to be based on info from a contact at DEVGRU, with a fairly complete timeline of the Team SIX det&#8217;s mission from departure Norfolk until the shoot.  The claim of four rounds fired is corroborated independently by the young FN aboard Boxer who says he heard four reports (That email, at least, reads &#8220;clean;&#8221; in other words it&#8217;s exactly what one would expect to read from a junior sailor who only saw the peripherals)<br />
<a href="http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/2235870/posts?page=1" rel="nofollow">http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/2235870/posts?page=1</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: reeko</title>
		<link>http://www.floppingaces.net/2009/04/17/president-obama-restricted-navy-seals-from-rescuing-ship-captain-with-force/#comment-195785</link>
		<dc:creator>reeko</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Apr 2009 17:34:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.floppingaces.net/?p=20169#comment-195785</guid>
		<description>Bill, 
i don&#039;t have any inside info on this. i was only assuming. are u saying that email only suspects that another shooter was used or is it from one of the players involved?  it makes sense to me...

i also misunderstood the Bainbridge ship&#039;s company.  i thought it was still the flagship of the task force there.  apparently it isn&#039;t now but it was, and they rotate flagship designations - and crew compliment. usually only a designated flagship would have the Scout Sniper team. my bad.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bill,<br />
i don&#8217;t have any inside info on this. i was only assuming. are u saying that email only suspects that another shooter was used or is it from one of the players involved?  it makes sense to me&#8230;</p>
<p>i also misunderstood the Bainbridge ship&#8217;s company.  i thought it was still the flagship of the task force there.  apparently it isn&#8217;t now but it was, and they rotate flagship designations &#8211; and crew compliment. usually only a designated flagship would have the Scout Sniper team. my bad.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill</title>
		<link>http://www.floppingaces.net/2009/04/17/president-obama-restricted-navy-seals-from-rescuing-ship-captain-with-force/#comment-195745</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Apr 2009 12:59:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.floppingaces.net/?p=20169#comment-195745</guid>
		<description>Reeko:

What you&#039;re saying makes sense; another e-mail circulating which claims to be the &quot;straight poop&quot; indicates that there were four shooters, and the first one punched out the window with a wadcutter round.

But USMC Scout Snipers as part of Bainbridge&#039; ship&#039;s company?  If so, that&#039;s new since I was in the Canoe Club- and putting a pair on every surface combatant would mean well over 200 highly trained elite grads of the Scout Sniper course floating around the world&#039;s oceans.  Surely we don&#039;t have enough of them for that, do we?


(Still no reliable word on the rifles used: Mk 11, M40, M82?)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Reeko:</p>
<p>What you&#8217;re saying makes sense; another e-mail circulating which claims to be the &#8220;straight poop&#8221; indicates that there were four shooters, and the first one punched out the window with a wadcutter round.</p>
<p>But USMC Scout Snipers as part of Bainbridge&#8217; ship&#8217;s company?  If so, that&#8217;s new since I was in the Canoe Club- and putting a pair on every surface combatant would mean well over 200 highly trained elite grads of the Scout Sniper course floating around the world&#8217;s oceans.  Surely we don&#8217;t have enough of them for that, do we?</p>
<p>(Still no reliable word on the rifles used: Mk 11, M40, M82?)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: reeko</title>
		<link>http://www.floppingaces.net/2009/04/17/president-obama-restricted-navy-seals-from-rescuing-ship-captain-with-force/#comment-195618</link>
		<dc:creator>reeko</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2009 23:37:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.floppingaces.net/?p=20169#comment-195618</guid>
		<description>re: Bill at comment number 50:

&quot;An interesting not-quite-an-eyewitness report. Interesting that he claims four shots. If he’s correct, it would mean that there were four snipers sent out, for four pirates (one subtracted only later). I would expect that two would then have been tasked to the target holding the AK on the hostage, just to be sure.&quot;

actually, i believe there were probably five shooters - and they all might not have been SEALS. the Bainbridge&#039;s normal crew compliment would include USMC Scout Snipers also. either way, they already had the fourth pirate onboard the Bainbridge, so they knew exactly how many shooters were needed. two were timed a split-second ahead to take out the plexiglass windows of the covered boat. (easy to do if trained to engage when hearing/feeling the &quot;muzzle break&quot; of the other shooter)  in sniper parlance, these were &quot;trick&quot; shots - although some might say that ALL sniper shots are trick shots.  ;)

the last thing the pirates actually heard or saw was the windows shattering.

PS: snipers usually use a spotter, and that spotter usually gives the final command &quot;send it&quot; instead of &quot;fire&quot; - which means the sniper can then engage on his own rhythm and timing.  this was not one of those shoots. this was a &quot;volley&quot; shoot, on command. EXTREMELY DIFFICULT.

(full disclosure: i helped rewrite the USMC Scout Sniper Instructor course. got to shoot it also. had a perfect score on the 600yd line iteration with the 7.62 M40 scoped sniper rifle and was awarded the coveted USMC Scout Sniper Instructor coin from the NCOIC of the school.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>re: Bill at comment number 50:</p>
<p>&#8220;An interesting not-quite-an-eyewitness report. Interesting that he claims four shots. If he’s correct, it would mean that there were four snipers sent out, for four pirates (one subtracted only later). I would expect that two would then have been tasked to the target holding the AK on the hostage, just to be sure.&#8221;</p>
<p>actually, i believe there were probably five shooters &#8211; and they all might not have been SEALS. the Bainbridge&#8217;s normal crew compliment would include USMC Scout Snipers also. either way, they already had the fourth pirate onboard the Bainbridge, so they knew exactly how many shooters were needed. two were timed a split-second ahead to take out the plexiglass windows of the covered boat. (easy to do if trained to engage when hearing/feeling the &#8220;muzzle break&#8221; of the other shooter)  in sniper parlance, these were &#8220;trick&#8221; shots &#8211; although some might say that ALL sniper shots are trick shots.  <img src='http://www.floppingaces.net/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>the last thing the pirates actually heard or saw was the windows shattering.</p>
<p>PS: snipers usually use a spotter, and that spotter usually gives the final command &#8220;send it&#8221; instead of &#8220;fire&#8221; &#8211; which means the sniper can then engage on his own rhythm and timing.  this was not one of those shoots. this was a &#8220;volley&#8221; shoot, on command. EXTREMELY DIFFICULT.</p>
<p>(full disclosure: i helped rewrite the USMC Scout Sniper Instructor course. got to shoot it also. had a perfect score on the 600yd line iteration with the 7.62 M40 scoped sniper rifle and was awarded the coveted USMC Scout Sniper Instructor coin from the NCOIC of the school.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill</title>
		<link>http://www.floppingaces.net/2009/04/17/president-obama-restricted-navy-seals-from-rescuing-ship-captain-with-force/#comment-194928</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2009 16:59:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.floppingaces.net/?p=20169#comment-194928</guid>
		<description>And you believe the Obama White House....why?  Because of its unimpeachable rcord for telling the truth without spin?  

Of course Obama approved the SEALs- he would have to- but Jones&#039; account PROVES the stupid ROE- and confirms, indirectly, that the OSC acted on his own initiative. Even Jones confirms the &quot;peaceful resolution&quot; item- proof enough of Obama&#039;s dithering gutlessness.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And you believe the Obama White House&#8230;.why?  Because of its unimpeachable rcord for telling the truth without spin?  </p>
<p>Of course Obama approved the SEALs- he would have to- but Jones&#8217; account PROVES the stupid ROE- and confirms, indirectly, that the OSC acted on his own initiative. Even Jones confirms the &#8220;peaceful resolution&#8221; item- proof enough of Obama&#8217;s dithering gutlessness.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: starboardhelm</title>
		<link>http://www.floppingaces.net/2009/04/17/president-obama-restricted-navy-seals-from-rescuing-ship-captain-with-force/#comment-194914</link>
		<dc:creator>starboardhelm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2009 16:11:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.floppingaces.net/?p=20169#comment-194914</guid>
		<description>Too bad -- this has been debunked pretty thoroughly (via HotAir): http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2009/apr/22/obama-okd-2-seal-teams-for-pirates/

Makes me wonder if the story might have been lefty ploy to get the righty-blogosphere into a frenzy which could then be slapped down.  It sounded kinda over-the-top too me anyhow, as if someone with a little knowledge of how the chain of command works was play-acting how they thought it might go.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Too bad &#8212; this has been debunked pretty thoroughly (via HotAir): <a href="http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2009/apr/22/obama-okd-2-seal-teams-for-pirates/" rel="nofollow">http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2009/apr/22/obama-okd-2-seal-teams-for-pirates/</a></p>
<p>Makes me wonder if the story might have been lefty ploy to get the righty-blogosphere into a frenzy which could then be slapped down.  It sounded kinda over-the-top too me anyhow, as if someone with a little knowledge of how the chain of command works was play-acting how they thought it might go.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill</title>
		<link>http://www.floppingaces.net/2009/04/17/president-obama-restricted-navy-seals-from-rescuing-ship-captain-with-force/#comment-194460</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2009 03:16:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.floppingaces.net/?p=20169#comment-194460</guid>
		<description>Gaffa, you&#039;re missing the whole point.  The Navy made the call IN SPITE OF the &#039;instructions&#039; they were given. Obama dithered for five days and told the OSC, twice, that a &quot;peaceful resolution&quot; was &quot;the only acceptable option.&quot; He voted &#039;present,&#039; once again.

The credit goes to CDR Castellano, who made the call knowing the risk to his career. Obama is a lying glory-hound. Follow the link above to waronterrornews. Blackfive also has the straight poop.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gaffa, you&#8217;re missing the whole point.  The Navy made the call IN SPITE OF the &#8216;instructions&#8217; they were given. Obama dithered for five days and told the OSC, twice, that a &#8220;peaceful resolution&#8221; was &#8220;the only acceptable option.&#8221; He voted &#8216;present,&#8217; once again.</p>
<p>The credit goes to CDR Castellano, who made the call knowing the risk to his career. Obama is a lying glory-hound. Follow the link above to waronterrornews. Blackfive also has the straight poop.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GaffaUK</title>
		<link>http://www.floppingaces.net/2009/04/17/president-obama-restricted-navy-seals-from-rescuing-ship-captain-with-force/#comment-194458</link>
		<dc:creator>GaffaUK</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2009 03:10:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.floppingaces.net/?p=20169#comment-194458</guid>
		<description>@Satch
yeah Obama really screwed up there with three pirates dead, one captured and with Capt Phillips rescued alive. Of course the Seals did their job and are the ones to congratulate - but they made the call based on the instructions they were given.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Satch<br />
yeah Obama really screwed up there with three pirates dead, one captured and with Capt Phillips rescued alive. Of course the Seals did their job and are the ones to congratulate &#8211; but they made the call based on the instructions they were given.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Satch</title>
		<link>http://www.floppingaces.net/2009/04/17/president-obama-restricted-navy-seals-from-rescuing-ship-captain-with-force/#comment-194454</link>
		<dc:creator>Satch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2009 03:04:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.floppingaces.net/?p=20169#comment-194454</guid>
		<description>Obummer, 
The Idealistic Fool. How could we expect a &quot;community Organizer&quot; to have the balls or make a decision to take the pirates or anyone else out?  
What a lame administration we have inherited, $800,000,000,000.00  A Billion is one thousand Millions!  Are we up to our necks or what!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Obummer,<br />
The Idealistic Fool. How could we expect a &#8220;community Organizer&#8221; to have the balls or make a decision to take the pirates or anyone else out?<br />
What a lame administration we have inherited, $800,000,000,000.00  A Billion is one thousand Millions!  Are we up to our necks or what!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
