Yup, We DO Want Obama’s Socialist Agenda To Fail

This is really great stuff. I was hooked after the firs segment, explaining who conservatives are, and what we want!

I see a difference between those who wanted Bush to fail, and those who talk about “fail” as it relates to President Obama. I wish our president well, and want him to do a good job; I want him to have a successful presidency, for the sake of our country. But to clarify, Ann Coulter phrased it best: “I want him to succeed….but in order for him to do that, he’d have to govern as a conservative.” (Paraphrased from memory).

Nothing at all unpatriotic in that.

I still think Newt stole the show. I got tingly over his Bush/Obama failures speech. Here’s an excerpt:
“The great irony of where we are today is that we have a Bush- Obama big spending program that was bipartisan in its nature. Last year the Bush-Obama plan had a $180 billion stimulus package in the spring which failed. It came back with a $345 billion housing package in the summer which failed. It then had a $700 billion Wall Street spending package in October which failed. It had a $4 trillion Federal Reserve guarantee which failed… We got big spending under Bush, now we got big spending under Obama. And so we have 2 new failures.”
2012 couldn’t get here fast enough. We are one party again!!!!!!

Those who voted for Obama do not know history, and are allowing a bit of dark history to be repeated:

In his book Das Kapital, Karl Marx wrote ominously in 1867:

“Owners of capital will stimulate the working class to buy more and more of expensive goods, houses and technology, pushing them to take more and more expensive credits, until their debt becomes unbearable. The unpaid debt will lead to bankruptcy of banks, which will have to be nationalized and the State will have to take the road which will eventually lead to Communism.”

It helps to have willing accomplices in the White House and in Congress. Sadly, Marx’s prediction is eerily wending its way through the American system.

Yes this conservative wants those policies to FAIL

And why do you think I included Cantor in the non-conservative fold of Snowe, Collins and Spector, Larry? (in my latest post, A 2012 Strategy)

The folly is not making Limbaugh “the de factor face of the GOP”. The folly is allowing people like you to twist what conservatism is… and that is best exampled by you and your ilk’s continuation of demonizing Limbaugh.

There may be hope for Cantor as Gingrich is playing “David Axelrod” to him. Then again, it’s taken Gingrich a while to figure out that Obama is “not governing from the center”.

But if Cantor’s idea is to be the GOP great hope, abandoning the principles laid out by Rush (by slamming Rush publicly) is unlikely to win him genuine support. He might get, like McCain did, the “noBama” votes. But that is a far cry from genuine enthusiasm.

As usual, you tend to uncork the champagne bottle early as you dash in with the latest Obama cyber campaign.