<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: UN embarks on new attempt to criminalize expressions of &#8220;defamation of religion&#8221;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.floppingaces.net/2008/11/27/un-embarks-on-new-attempt-to-criminalize-expressions-of-defamation-of-religion/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.floppingaces.net/2008/11/27/un-embarks-on-new-attempt-to-criminalize-expressions-of-defamation-of-religion/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 06:40:03 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Rocky_B</title>
		<link>http://www.floppingaces.net/2008/11/27/un-embarks-on-new-attempt-to-criminalize-expressions-of-defamation-of-religion/#comment-134540</link>
		<dc:creator>Rocky_B</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Nov 2008 02:49:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.floppingaces.net/?p=13021#comment-134540</guid>
		<description>Conservatives have been begging our government since at least the Carter years to give the U.N. a full boot in the butt out of our country. But the only way it&#039;s going to happen is to unceremoniously reform our government by booting out of office legislators who fail to follow the will of the people. We found out quickly with the League of Nations that such worldwide power was a stupid idea. Yet FDR, along with other socialists just had to go there again and offer them a home here.

The biggest problem with it since it&#039;s inception is that each nation-state was given an identically equal voice as all others. Though technically America is an alliance of separate states, each with their own individual Constitution, sovereignty, and the ability to raise military forces. Each of our states do not have an equal voice. Our National Guard troops assigned to each state have been tasked and have participated in U.N. actions, So they&#039;ve paid for their own voice by virtue of shedding their own blood. 

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_Nations
&lt;blockquote&gt;
Conceivably, the one state, one vote power structure could enable states comprising just eight percent of the world population to pass a resolution by a two-thirds vote.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
With the addition of Montenegro on 28 June 2006, there are currently 192 United Nations member states, including all fully recognized independent states[17] apart from Vatican City, which has observer status.[18]

The United Nations Charter outlines the rules for membership:

1. Membership in the United Nations is open to all other peace-loving states which accept the obligations contained in the present Charter and, in the judgment of the Organization, are able and willing to carry out these obligations.
2. The admission of any such state to membership in the United Nations will be effected by a decision of the General Assembly upon the recommendation of the Security Council.

—United Nations Charter, Chapter 2, Article 4, http://www.un.org/aboutun/charter/
&lt;/blockquote&gt;
As noted the biggest problem with the U.N. is Third World Nation voting block. I see no reason why we shouldn&#039;t at least set an ultimatum and demand the U.N. award each sovereign states on this continent and protectorate territory an equal voice or move their offices the hell out of our country. That might at least help resolve the Third World 2/3 majority.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Conservatives have been begging our government since at least the Carter years to give the U.N. a full boot in the butt out of our country. But the only way it&#8217;s going to happen is to unceremoniously reform our government by booting out of office legislators who fail to follow the will of the people. We found out quickly with the League of Nations that such worldwide power was a stupid idea. Yet FDR, along with other socialists just had to go there again and offer them a home here.</p>
<p>The biggest problem with it since it&#8217;s inception is that each nation-state was given an identically equal voice as all others. Though technically America is an alliance of separate states, each with their own individual Constitution, sovereignty, and the ability to raise military forces. Each of our states do not have an equal voice. Our National Guard troops assigned to each state have been tasked and have participated in U.N. actions, So they&#8217;ve paid for their own voice by virtue of shedding their own blood. </p>
<p><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_Nations" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_Nations</a></p>
<blockquote><p>
Conceivably, the one state, one vote power structure could enable states comprising just eight percent of the world population to pass a resolution by a two-thirds vote.<br />
&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;-<br />
With the addition of Montenegro on 28 June 2006, there are currently 192 United Nations member states, including all fully recognized independent states[17] apart from Vatican City, which has observer status.[18]</p>
<p>The United Nations Charter outlines the rules for membership:</p>
<p>1. Membership in the United Nations is open to all other peace-loving states which accept the obligations contained in the present Charter and, in the judgment of the Organization, are able and willing to carry out these obligations.<br />
2. The admission of any such state to membership in the United Nations will be effected by a decision of the General Assembly upon the recommendation of the Security Council.</p>
<p>—United Nations Charter, Chapter 2, Article 4, <a href="http://www.un.org/aboutun/charter/" rel="nofollow">http://www.un.org/aboutun/charter/</a>
</p></blockquote>
<p>As noted the biggest problem with the U.N. is Third World Nation voting block. I see no reason why we shouldn&#8217;t at least set an ultimatum and demand the U.N. award each sovereign states on this continent and protectorate territory an equal voice or move their offices the hell out of our country. That might at least help resolve the Third World 2/3 majority.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AdrianS</title>
		<link>http://www.floppingaces.net/2008/11/27/un-embarks-on-new-attempt-to-criminalize-expressions-of-defamation-of-religion/#comment-134465</link>
		<dc:creator>AdrianS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Nov 2008 17:59:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.floppingaces.net/?p=13021#comment-134465</guid>
		<description>FYI:

Wikipedia reports - “The total reporting non-Christian religions in 2007 was 4.7%, up from 3.3% in 1990.[137] The leading non-Christian faiths were Judaism (1.7%), Buddhism (0.7%), Islam (0.6%), Hinduism (0.4%), and Unitarian Universalism (0.3%).”

NOTE: Islam .6%!

And, “According to a 2007 survey, 78.4% of adults identified themselves as Christian,[136] down from 86.4% in 1990.” The number of Christians may be going up in 2008 due to the radicalism projected by (violent) Muslims.

NOTE: 78.4% or more Christians in America.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>FYI:</p>
<p>Wikipedia reports &#8211; “The total reporting non-Christian religions in 2007 was 4.7%, up from 3.3% in 1990.[137] The leading non-Christian faiths were Judaism (1.7%), Buddhism (0.7%), Islam (0.6%), Hinduism (0.4%), and Unitarian Universalism (0.3%).”</p>
<p>NOTE: Islam .6%!</p>
<p>And, “According to a 2007 survey, 78.4% of adults identified themselves as Christian,[136] down from 86.4% in 1990.” The number of Christians may be going up in 2008 due to the radicalism projected by (violent) Muslims.</p>
<p>NOTE: 78.4% or more Christians in America.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hard Right</title>
		<link>http://www.floppingaces.net/2008/11/27/un-embarks-on-new-attempt-to-criminalize-expressions-of-defamation-of-religion/#comment-134403</link>
		<dc:creator>Hard Right</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Nov 2008 07:23:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.floppingaces.net/?p=13021#comment-134403</guid>
		<description>Well to be accurate the obamination said if things turned ugly he&#039;d stand with the muslims. I took that to be him pandering to muslims by invoking the whole round up of Japanese-American civilians in WWII thing. It seems he was saying if it happened here again but with muslims, that&#039;s who he would support. He did say that the call to prayer was the most beautiful sound he&#039;d ever heard. Me? I think it sounds like a guy who got his junk caught in his pants zipper.

My concern is that obama is waaaaay too sympathetic to CAIR types and muslim tyrants. God help us if he sucks up to the U.N. like we think he will. 

We need to kick the U.N. out of the U.S. and then tell them to piss off. It&#039;s utterly corrupt and little more than a place to bash Israel and America.

FYI, the U.N. made a failed grab for control of the internet earlier this year. You see, they wanted to take it over and tax it. The revenue it would have generated would have freed them from needing member dues.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well to be accurate the obamination said if things turned ugly he&#8217;d stand with the muslims. I took that to be him pandering to muslims by invoking the whole round up of Japanese-American civilians in WWII thing. It seems he was saying if it happened here again but with muslims, that&#8217;s who he would support. He did say that the call to prayer was the most beautiful sound he&#8217;d ever heard. Me? I think it sounds like a guy who got his junk caught in his pants zipper.</p>
<p>My concern is that obama is waaaaay too sympathetic to CAIR types and muslim tyrants. God help us if he sucks up to the U.N. like we think he will. </p>
<p>We need to kick the U.N. out of the U.S. and then tell them to piss off. It&#8217;s utterly corrupt and little more than a place to bash Israel and America.</p>
<p>FYI, the U.N. made a failed grab for control of the internet earlier this year. You see, they wanted to take it over and tax it. The revenue it would have generated would have freed them from needing member dues.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Craig</title>
		<link>http://www.floppingaces.net/2008/11/27/un-embarks-on-new-attempt-to-criminalize-expressions-of-defamation-of-religion/#comment-134400</link>
		<dc:creator>Craig</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Nov 2008 06:43:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.floppingaces.net/?p=13021#comment-134400</guid>
		<description>The UN has nothing to do anymore with what it was at the time of it&#039;s creation.    The numbers of seats have been multiplied by 5 and the quasi-totality of the new countries are dictatures.    UN, no longer takes respectable decisions anymore.   We have to get rid of UN.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The UN has nothing to do anymore with what it was at the time of it&#8217;s creation.    The numbers of seats have been multiplied by 5 and the quasi-totality of the new countries are dictatures.    UN, no longer takes respectable decisions anymore.   We have to get rid of UN.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Craig</title>
		<link>http://www.floppingaces.net/2008/11/27/un-embarks-on-new-attempt-to-criminalize-expressions-of-defamation-of-religion/#comment-134330</link>
		<dc:creator>Craig</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Nov 2008 00:30:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.floppingaces.net/?p=13021#comment-134330</guid>
		<description>OMG... what&#039;s next!   And imagine if Obama is sworn in.   He said he will always stand with Muslims.    At least Canada boycotted the meeting.   I agree with Oldpuppymax, I can not understand that the U.S. allows these radicals to meet in your country.

You have to do something about it; those idiots are looking for a Caliphate.   Be aware, after all, it has been said that America will be destroyed from within. No other country will be able to come to your rescue. You are all you have.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OMG&#8230; what&#8217;s next!   And imagine if Obama is sworn in.   He said he will always stand with Muslims.    At least Canada boycotted the meeting.   I agree with Oldpuppymax, I can not understand that the U.S. allows these radicals to meet in your country.</p>
<p>You have to do something about it; those idiots are looking for a Caliphate.   Be aware, after all, it has been said that America will be destroyed from within. No other country will be able to come to your rescue. You are all you have.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jainphx</title>
		<link>http://www.floppingaces.net/2008/11/27/un-embarks-on-new-attempt-to-criminalize-expressions-of-defamation-of-religion/#comment-134318</link>
		<dc:creator>jainphx</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Nov 2008 23:10:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.floppingaces.net/?p=13021#comment-134318</guid>
		<description>By religious defamation they mean against Islam, and only Islam. Christians need to be aware that the U.N. (funded by our tax dollars) cares little if any about you, just watch what you say about Islam. Spit.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>By religious defamation they mean against Islam, and only Islam. Christians need to be aware that the U.N. (funded by our tax dollars) cares little if any about you, just watch what you say about Islam. Spit.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: OLDPUPPYMAX</title>
		<link>http://www.floppingaces.net/2008/11/27/un-embarks-on-new-attempt-to-criminalize-expressions-of-defamation-of-religion/#comment-134308</link>
		<dc:creator>OLDPUPPYMAX</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Nov 2008 21:37:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.floppingaces.net/?p=13021#comment-134308</guid>
		<description>And our politicians allow these thugs to meet in the United States! Incredible.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And our politicians allow these thugs to meet in the United States! Incredible.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Skye</title>
		<link>http://www.floppingaces.net/2008/11/27/un-embarks-on-new-attempt-to-criminalize-expressions-of-defamation-of-religion/#comment-134287</link>
		<dc:creator>Skye</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Nov 2008 18:59:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.floppingaces.net/?p=13021#comment-134287</guid>
		<description>Watch the Lightwalker hurdle tall NYC buildings to be the first to roll over in obedience to this UN ruling.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Watch the Lightwalker hurdle tall NYC buildings to be the first to roll over in obedience to this UN ruling.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Signs in the sky : [H] Hegemonic Pundit</title>
		<link>http://www.floppingaces.net/2008/11/27/un-embarks-on-new-attempt-to-criminalize-expressions-of-defamation-of-religion/#comment-134275</link>
		<dc:creator>Signs in the sky : [H] Hegemonic Pundit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Nov 2008 17:24:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.floppingaces.net/?p=13021#comment-134275</guid>
		<description>[...] Via Flopping Aces: The United Nations saw another shred of its tattered dignity stripped away November 24, when a committee of the General Assembly approved what amounts to a direct assault on Western liberal democracy. In an 85-50 vote, with 42 abstaining, the so-called Third Committee adopted a resolution, submitted by a caucus of Islamic nations, to criminalize expressions deemed to be “defamation of religion,” with special concern for Islam. All U.N. member states would be called on to amend their criminal codes accordingly. The measure’s next stop is the General Assembly, where it is expected to win handily, probably in December. ~forward.com [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Via Flopping Aces: The United Nations saw another shred of its tattered dignity stripped away November 24, when a committee of the General Assembly approved what amounts to a direct assault on Western liberal democracy. In an 85-50 vote, with 42 abstaining, the so-called Third Committee adopted a resolution, submitted by a caucus of Islamic nations, to criminalize expressions deemed to be “defamation of religion,” with special concern for Islam. All U.N. member states would be called on to amend their criminal codes accordingly. The measure’s next stop is the General Assembly, where it is expected to win handily, probably in December. ~forward.com [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
