<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Surviving A Obama Presidency</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.floppingaces.net/2008/11/05/surviving-a-obama-presidency/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.floppingaces.net/2008/11/05/surviving-a-obama-presidency/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 02:48:07 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Nom</title>
		<link>http://www.floppingaces.net/2008/11/05/surviving-a-obama-presidency/#comment-129277</link>
		<dc:creator>Nom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Nov 2008 13:00:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.floppingaces.net/?p=12107#comment-129277</guid>
		<description>If you are going to make public statements, try to get the grammar right.  It should be &quot;Surviving An Obama Presidency&quot;, not &quot;Surviving A Obama Presidency&quot;.  We don&#039;t need to provide ammunition for the left wing assertions that all conservatives are ignorant bumpkins.

I hope you will take a moment to correct your headline.

Thanks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you are going to make public statements, try to get the grammar right.  It should be &#8220;Surviving An Obama Presidency&#8221;, not &#8220;Surviving A Obama Presidency&#8221;.  We don&#8217;t need to provide ammunition for the left wing assertions that all conservatives are ignorant bumpkins.</p>
<p>I hope you will take a moment to correct your headline.</p>
<p>Thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The candidate who couldn&#8217;t win did; How Barack Obama won the presidency &#171; Northern Thoughts And Reflections</title>
		<link>http://www.floppingaces.net/2008/11/05/surviving-a-obama-presidency/#comment-128983</link>
		<dc:creator>The candidate who couldn&#8217;t win did; How Barack Obama won the presidency &#171; Northern Thoughts And Reflections</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Nov 2008 19:10:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.floppingaces.net/?p=12107#comment-128983</guid>
		<description>[...] What can we do now that Barack Obama weaseled his way into power? Oppose him. As Kurt over at Flopping Aces said, [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] What can we do now that Barack Obama weaseled his way into power? Oppose him. As Kurt over at Flopping Aces said, [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The candidate who couldn&#8217;t win did; How Barack Obama won the presidency &#171; Northern Thoughts And Reflections</title>
		<link>http://www.floppingaces.net/2008/11/05/surviving-a-obama-presidency/#comment-128984</link>
		<dc:creator>The candidate who couldn&#8217;t win did; How Barack Obama won the presidency &#171; Northern Thoughts And Reflections</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Nov 2008 19:10:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.floppingaces.net/?p=12107#comment-128984</guid>
		<description>[...] What can we do now that Barack Obama weaseled his way into power? Oppose him. As Kurt over at Flopping Aces said, [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] What can we do now that Barack Obama weaseled his way into power? Oppose him. As Kurt over at Flopping Aces said, [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Leaning Straight Up</title>
		<link>http://www.floppingaces.net/2008/11/05/surviving-a-obama-presidency/#comment-128833</link>
		<dc:creator>Leaning Straight Up</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Nov 2008 08:24:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.floppingaces.net/?p=12107#comment-128833</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Here comes the blame game:  It&#8217;s Palin&#8217;s Fault!...&lt;/strong&gt;

......</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Here comes the blame game:  It&#8217;s Palin&#8217;s Fault!&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>&#8230;&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Craig</title>
		<link>http://www.floppingaces.net/2008/11/05/surviving-a-obama-presidency/#comment-128731</link>
		<dc:creator>Craig</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Nov 2008 03:34:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.floppingaces.net/?p=12107#comment-128731</guid>
		<description>&quot;Make sense now on lawsuits and their effect on elections?&quot; (Mata)

It surely does makes sense.   Thanks for all that information.

P.S.:  I just hope that Obama will not appoint some crooked leftist judges.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Make sense now on lawsuits and their effect on elections?&#8221; (Mata)</p>
<p>It surely does makes sense.   Thanks for all that information.</p>
<p>P.S.:  I just hope that Obama will not appoint some crooked leftist judges.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MataHarley</title>
		<link>http://www.floppingaces.net/2008/11/05/surviving-a-obama-presidency/#comment-128727</link>
		<dc:creator>MataHarley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Nov 2008 03:15:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.floppingaces.net/?p=12107#comment-128727</guid>
		<description>Craig, as a follow up, I do appreciate that reading/writing different languages are very different.  That is why when, sometimes you seem harsh,  I just give you the benefit of the doubt.  And I also appreciate that you do so become involved despite your citizenship of our northern neighbor.  But sometimes I just think you need to be called on what you say to clarify your intent.  And I generally believe that your intent is sometimes misunderstood.

Now, let me use an example of how judicial suits affect our election.

Case 1:  The VA military absentee ballots in &quot;preserve&quot; status:

If there are errors found on the judge&#039;s Nov 10th hearing, it is so ruled and the laws will change to accommodate.  If there were 2000 ballots held in preserve status, and the margin of election difference is 1500, those ballots can change the state&#039;s results.

If, however, the margin of difference is 5000 in votes, then counting every ballot for the losing candidate does not change the outcome.  That is why the election will not be &quot;stolen&quot;.  However the wronged voters... in this case, our military.. will still be addressed.

Case 2:  Philip J. Berg&#039;s lawsuit against Obama and his citizenship.

Obama is our President elect.  However Berg&#039;s lawsuit goes forth.  If the SCOTUS determines that Berg has &quot;standing&quot; (his major failure in the lower courts), and that Obama has been proven to be ineligible, it *does* affect the election.

In that case, we have President elect Biden instead of Obama.

But our judicial system and their decisions are not without effect on our elections.  And just because an election happens doesn&#039;t mean any lawsuits go away.

Case 3:  Ted Stevens, Alaska GOP Senator found guilty

He is appealing his charges, and ran on the argument that until his appeal is heard, he is still an eligble Senatorial candidate.

If Stevens wins in his appeal, and he wins the Alaska race (still up in the air), he serves.  If he wins, and his previous conviction is upheld, he cannot serve.  In that case his Senate seat is filled by whomever the Governor of the state dictates... in this case, Sarah Palin.  Were it a Dem Governor, they could replace him with a DNC Senate representative.

So despite Stevens&#039; conviction, we all want him to win since he is likely to be replaced with a GOP Senator by Palin, and therefore retain the balance... and not tossing one more to the DNC in the already overloaded DNC Senate.

Make sense now on lawsuits and their effect on elections?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Craig, as a follow up, I do appreciate that reading/writing different languages are very different.  That is why when, sometimes you seem harsh,  I just give you the benefit of the doubt.  And I also appreciate that you do so become involved despite your citizenship of our northern neighbor.  But sometimes I just think you need to be called on what you say to clarify your intent.  And I generally believe that your intent is sometimes misunderstood.</p>
<p>Now, let me use an example of how judicial suits affect our election.</p>
<p>Case 1:  The VA military absentee ballots in &#8220;preserve&#8221; status:</p>
<p>If there are errors found on the judge&#8217;s Nov 10th hearing, it is so ruled and the laws will change to accommodate.  If there were 2000 ballots held in preserve status, and the margin of election difference is 1500, those ballots can change the state&#8217;s results.</p>
<p>If, however, the margin of difference is 5000 in votes, then counting every ballot for the losing candidate does not change the outcome.  That is why the election will not be &#8220;stolen&#8221;.  However the wronged voters&#8230; in this case, our military.. will still be addressed.</p>
<p>Case 2:  Philip J. Berg&#8217;s lawsuit against Obama and his citizenship.</p>
<p>Obama is our President elect.  However Berg&#8217;s lawsuit goes forth.  If the SCOTUS determines that Berg has &#8220;standing&#8221; (his major failure in the lower courts), and that Obama has been proven to be ineligible, it *does* affect the election.</p>
<p>In that case, we have President elect Biden instead of Obama.</p>
<p>But our judicial system and their decisions are not without effect on our elections.  And just because an election happens doesn&#8217;t mean any lawsuits go away.</p>
<p>Case 3:  Ted Stevens, Alaska GOP Senator found guilty</p>
<p>He is appealing his charges, and ran on the argument that until his appeal is heard, he is still an eligble Senatorial candidate.</p>
<p>If Stevens wins in his appeal, and he wins the Alaska race (still up in the air), he serves.  If he wins, and his previous conviction is upheld, he cannot serve.  In that case his Senate seat is filled by whomever the Governor of the state dictates&#8230; in this case, Sarah Palin.  Were it a Dem Governor, they could replace him with a DNC Senate representative.</p>
<p>So despite Stevens&#8217; conviction, we all want him to win since he is likely to be replaced with a GOP Senator by Palin, and therefore retain the balance&#8230; and not tossing one more to the DNC in the already overloaded DNC Senate.</p>
<p>Make sense now on lawsuits and their effect on elections?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Craig</title>
		<link>http://www.floppingaces.net/2008/11/05/surviving-a-obama-presidency/#comment-128724</link>
		<dc:creator>Craig</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Nov 2008 03:04:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.floppingaces.net/?p=12107#comment-128724</guid>
		<description>Mata,

You live in the States and you are an American.   I do not live in the States, I am not an American.   So for me all Americans are not alike.    Your country is divided in half.    You had the proof last night.   I like only one half of Americans.   I like the Americans who have values, who fights, who stands-up for what they believe, like Sarah Palin for instance.   The other half is not any better to me than the leftist Canadians that I cannot stand.   But since we are only 33 millions and you are 350 millions, I guess I prefer Americans to Canadians (at least 175 millions of them)... lol

As for my two languages, French is no problem to me; I use to be a French teacher.   English I can speak quite well and I have no problem reading it either.   But would you believe that it is the first time in my life that I have to write in English... and it is not easy, believe me.   Reading, speaking and writing are very different tasks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mata,</p>
<p>You live in the States and you are an American.   I do not live in the States, I am not an American.   So for me all Americans are not alike.    Your country is divided in half.    You had the proof last night.   I like only one half of Americans.   I like the Americans who have values, who fights, who stands-up for what they believe, like Sarah Palin for instance.   The other half is not any better to me than the leftist Canadians that I cannot stand.   But since we are only 33 millions and you are 350 millions, I guess I prefer Americans to Canadians (at least 175 millions of them)&#8230; lol</p>
<p>As for my two languages, French is no problem to me; I use to be a French teacher.   English I can speak quite well and I have no problem reading it either.   But would you believe that it is the first time in my life that I have to write in English&#8230; and it is not easy, believe me.   Reading, speaking and writing are very different tasks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MataHarley</title>
		<link>http://www.floppingaces.net/2008/11/05/surviving-a-obama-presidency/#comment-128723</link>
		<dc:creator>MataHarley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Nov 2008 02:47:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.floppingaces.net/?p=12107#comment-128723</guid>
		<description>Craig, I know that English is one of your two languages.  I&#039;m not sure which one you are more proficient.  And I do try to allow this when I read your posts.

But when you speak in generalities... such as the comments I repeated multiple times above... they are blanket.  It does my heart no good to hear you say they don&#039;t apply to me, personally.  They apply to us all.  I am an American.  I do not consider myself immune from your comments.

And you must remember that much, if not all, of what you love about the US is our spirit to fight... against the most daunting of odds.

But you cannot speak for &quot;Americans in general&quot; without including us.. here on FA.  We *are* Americans in general.  Does that makes sense?

I&#039;ll leave the &lt;i&gt;&quot;more tolerance with the leftist moonbat American haters that come on this site&quot; comment alone.&lt;/i&gt;  I try to have tolerance for all.  But you can count the times I&#039;ve flown off the hook on an all out assault, and at whom (because of their entry posting) on one hand.  You have not been one of those.  So I&#039;m quite sure that you cannot be associating my &quot;tolerance for moonbats&quot; with you.  This just happens to be one of the first times I&#039;ve flown off the handle at you...  Perhaps one of the &quot;general statements&quot;, but &quot;doesn&#039;t include you?&quot; statements?? .... heh heh

Ya know... it&#039;s sorta getting a little of your own back.  You fly at &quot;everyone, in general&quot;.  I fly &quot;specifically&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Craig, I know that English is one of your two languages.  I&#8217;m not sure which one you are more proficient.  And I do try to allow this when I read your posts.</p>
<p>But when you speak in generalities&#8230; such as the comments I repeated multiple times above&#8230; they are blanket.  It does my heart no good to hear you say they don&#8217;t apply to me, personally.  They apply to us all.  I am an American.  I do not consider myself immune from your comments.</p>
<p>And you must remember that much, if not all, of what you love about the US is our spirit to fight&#8230; against the most daunting of odds.</p>
<p>But you cannot speak for &#8220;Americans in general&#8221; without including us.. here on FA.  We *are* Americans in general.  Does that makes sense?</p>
<p>I&#8217;ll leave the <i>&#8220;more tolerance with the leftist moonbat American haters that come on this site&#8221; comment alone.</i>  I try to have tolerance for all.  But you can count the times I&#8217;ve flown off the hook on an all out assault, and at whom (because of their entry posting) on one hand.  You have not been one of those.  So I&#8217;m quite sure that you cannot be associating my &#8220;tolerance for moonbats&#8221; with you.  This just happens to be one of the first times I&#8217;ve flown off the handle at you&#8230;  Perhaps one of the &#8220;general statements&#8221;, but &#8220;doesn&#8217;t include you?&#8221; statements?? &#8230;. heh heh</p>
<p>Ya know&#8230; it&#8217;s sorta getting a little of your own back.  You fly at &#8220;everyone, in general&#8221;.  I fly &#8220;specifically&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Craig</title>
		<link>http://www.floppingaces.net/2008/11/05/surviving-a-obama-presidency/#comment-128721</link>
		<dc:creator>Craig</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Nov 2008 02:40:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.floppingaces.net/?p=12107#comment-128721</guid>
		<description>Mata,

What is wrong with you?  How can you feel offended and believe that I am talking about you?   I never pointed out to the FA authors in my comments, except for Wordsmith and his &quot;good guy&quot; attitude.   I speak for Americans in general, the ones that voted for Obama and the ones that will continue to support his policies and respect him and for the centrists that have no opinions whatsoever on nothing.   

It is amazing to see that you have more tolerance with the leftist moonbat American haters that come on this side, then for a conservative that loves your country, but sometimes has the guts to question the sanity of the American tolerant mentality.   Maybe you read me wrong… or could it be that I do not pass my message correctly… could be.   It is so frustrating for me to have to say only half of what I really want to say… I never find the right words to express clearly my message.

P.S.:   Glad to know that the voting will be looked at.   I thought since he had the majority, that no one would have investigated it.   And I like you too Mata, can&#039;t believe you doubted it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mata,</p>
<p>What is wrong with you?  How can you feel offended and believe that I am talking about you?   I never pointed out to the FA authors in my comments, except for Wordsmith and his &#8220;good guy&#8221; attitude.   I speak for Americans in general, the ones that voted for Obama and the ones that will continue to support his policies and respect him and for the centrists that have no opinions whatsoever on nothing.   </p>
<p>It is amazing to see that you have more tolerance with the leftist moonbat American haters that come on this side, then for a conservative that loves your country, but sometimes has the guts to question the sanity of the American tolerant mentality.   Maybe you read me wrong… or could it be that I do not pass my message correctly… could be.   It is so frustrating for me to have to say only half of what I really want to say… I never find the right words to express clearly my message.</p>
<p>P.S.:   Glad to know that the voting will be looked at.   I thought since he had the majority, that no one would have investigated it.   And I like you too Mata, can&#8217;t believe you doubted it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Craig</title>
		<link>http://www.floppingaces.net/2008/11/05/surviving-a-obama-presidency/#comment-128709</link>
		<dc:creator>Craig</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Nov 2008 02:20:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.floppingaces.net/?p=12107#comment-128709</guid>
		<description>&quot;Um, he just hired a Zionist as his Chief of Staff.&quot; (Cee Cee)

LOL... terrorists will never forgive him for that.   He will probably be killed before he reaches the White House.

P.S.:  Can somebody tell SKYE that her new thread is wrongly wired in.   We cannot write in the comment box.   The right column of this site is covering it up.

&lt;i&gt;[Mata note:  should be fixed...]&lt;/i&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Um, he just hired a Zionist as his Chief of Staff.&#8221; (Cee Cee)</p>
<p>LOL&#8230; terrorists will never forgive him for that.   He will probably be killed before he reaches the White House.</p>
<p>P.S.:  Can somebody tell SKYE that her new thread is wrongly wired in.   We cannot write in the comment box.   The right column of this site is covering it up.</p>
<p><i>[Mata note:  should be fixed...]</i></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MataHarley</title>
		<link>http://www.floppingaces.net/2008/11/05/surviving-a-obama-presidency/#comment-128708</link>
		<dc:creator>MataHarley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Nov 2008 02:14:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.floppingaces.net/?p=12107#comment-128708</guid>
		<description>Craig, you know I like you.  You are a fire&#039;y number who reacts hot/cold, but doesn&#039;t recognize that lukewarm exists.

But I take issue with one of your particular comments about &quot;Don&#039;t Question the Verdict&quot;...

&lt;blockquote&gt;Sure, just pretend you haven’t been robbed. Why upset the poor innocent robber? Gee, that mentality drives me crazy. &lt;b&gt;I could go on and on but why bother? No one seems to care here.&lt;/b&gt;

&lt;b&gt;So go and hide your head in the sand and pretend that everything is alright.&lt;/b&gt; What a beautiful election, what a fantastic leader. Don’t worry… Be happy! That should do the trick. &lt;/blockquote&gt;

Let me tell you right now, without any mincing of words... something you should be able to appreciate.

&lt;Center&gt;&lt;b&gt;I TAKE YOUR COMMENTS PERSONALLY... JUST AS YOU DELIVERED THEM!&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/center&gt;

All voter fraud charges will be investigated in our usual judicial channels.  And that, under a US system, is not instigated by a winning POTUS but by the wronged public.  

There are many voter ballot/fraud related cases around the nation.  Whether or not the numbers included affect the final outcome is a different story.  But rest assured, we do not turn a blind eye to any charges.. even if they do not affect the outcome.  Such is our way.

&lt;b&gt;&lt;center&gt;&quot;no one seems to care here&quot;???  &quot;..hide your head in the sand and pretend...&quot;??&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/center&gt;

I truly take that personally, Craig.  Not only on my own behalf, but on the others here that form the FA authors.  

There is no one here that I know of hiding their heads. That&#039;s an easy charge for you, sitting in Quebec.  But this is one hurled charge I&#039;ve no patience for.  

You&#039;ve been hanging around here for quite a while now.  I must believe you know the FA authors, and most of the regular posters pretty well by now.  I also know your nature and often chalk up some statements to your &quot;hot/cold but never lukewarm&quot; general emotions.  

But quite frankly, I&#039;m not going be subject to the same emotional standards you apply to yourself... nor take some blanket insult from you.  Period. &lt;i&gt;&lt;b&gt; Hiding my head?  No one cares?&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/i&gt;

Do not cross the political international boundary line with me on this.  You are &quot;out of int&#039;l bounds&quot;.

We will battle our imminent future the way we best see fit in our legal system.  You don&#039;t like our election results?  Okay.  *Take a number!*

You don&#039;t like the strategy we decide to take for 2010 or 2012?  That&#039;s also kewl, but not your business.

But .. as Biden says&quot;... MARK MY WORDS CAREFULLY!  Do *NOT* ever say I... nor  anyone else as an FA author here ... is &quot;hiding their heads&quot; or &quot;doesn&#039;t seem to care&quot;.  I cannot say this more clearly.  &lt;b&gt;I will not accept this from you, or anyone else.&lt;/b&gt;

But if you don&#039;t wish to &quot;step foot&quot; on US soil until Obama is no longer in office, then I suggest you postpone your travel until after Jan 2012.  Because we can&#039;t do anything about that until then.  As much as I like you, I will not sit here silently and accept your insults hurled... despite your well intentioned passion.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Craig, you know I like you.  You are a fire&#8217;y number who reacts hot/cold, but doesn&#8217;t recognize that lukewarm exists.</p>
<p>But I take issue with one of your particular comments about &#8220;Don&#8217;t Question the Verdict&#8221;&#8230;</p>
<blockquote><p>Sure, just pretend you haven’t been robbed. Why upset the poor innocent robber? Gee, that mentality drives me crazy. <b>I could go on and on but why bother? No one seems to care here.</b></p>
<p><b>So go and hide your head in the sand and pretend that everything is alright.</b> What a beautiful election, what a fantastic leader. Don’t worry… Be happy! That should do the trick. </p></blockquote>
<p>Let me tell you right now, without any mincing of words&#8230; something you should be able to appreciate.</p>
<p><center><b>I TAKE YOUR COMMENTS PERSONALLY&#8230; JUST AS YOU DELIVERED THEM!</b></center></p>
<p>All voter fraud charges will be investigated in our usual judicial channels.  And that, under a US system, is not instigated by a winning POTUS but by the wronged public.  </p>
<p>There are many voter ballot/fraud related cases around the nation.  Whether or not the numbers included affect the final outcome is a different story.  But rest assured, we do not turn a blind eye to any charges.. even if they do not affect the outcome.  Such is our way.</p>
<p><b><center>&#8220;no one seems to care here&#8221;???  &#8220;..hide your head in the sand and pretend&#8230;&#8221;??</center></b></p>
<p>I truly take that personally, Craig.  Not only on my own behalf, but on the others here that form the FA authors.  </p>
<p>There is no one here that I know of hiding their heads. That&#8217;s an easy charge for you, sitting in Quebec.  But this is one hurled charge I&#8217;ve no patience for.  </p>
<p>You&#8217;ve been hanging around here for quite a while now.  I must believe you know the FA authors, and most of the regular posters pretty well by now.  I also know your nature and often chalk up some statements to your &#8220;hot/cold but never lukewarm&#8221; general emotions.  </p>
<p>But quite frankly, I&#8217;m not going be subject to the same emotional standards you apply to yourself&#8230; nor take some blanket insult from you.  Period. <i><b> Hiding my head?  No one cares?</b></i></p>
<p>Do not cross the political international boundary line with me on this.  You are &#8220;out of int&#8217;l bounds&#8221;.</p>
<p>We will battle our imminent future the way we best see fit in our legal system.  You don&#8217;t like our election results?  Okay.  *Take a number!*</p>
<p>You don&#8217;t like the strategy we decide to take for 2010 or 2012?  That&#8217;s also kewl, but not your business.</p>
<p>But .. as Biden says&#8221;&#8230; MARK MY WORDS CAREFULLY!  Do *NOT* ever say I&#8230; nor  anyone else as an FA author here &#8230; is &#8220;hiding their heads&#8221; or &#8220;doesn&#8217;t seem to care&#8221;.  I cannot say this more clearly.  <b>I will not accept this from you, or anyone else.</b></p>
<p>But if you don&#8217;t wish to &#8220;step foot&#8221; on US soil until Obama is no longer in office, then I suggest you postpone your travel until after Jan 2012.  Because we can&#8217;t do anything about that until then.  As much as I like you, I will not sit here silently and accept your insults hurled&#8230; despite your well intentioned passion.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CeeCee</title>
		<link>http://www.floppingaces.net/2008/11/05/surviving-a-obama-presidency/#comment-128706</link>
		<dc:creator>CeeCee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Nov 2008 02:10:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.floppingaces.net/?p=12107#comment-128706</guid>
		<description>Um, he just hired a Zionist as his Chief of Staff. Another dual American/Israeli Citizen. How is this different from the Bush admin?

The Pharisees will simply continue their quest to control the world. Nothing to see here gang.

Goyim will continue to be totally clueless about &quot;the plan&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Um, he just hired a Zionist as his Chief of Staff. Another dual American/Israeli Citizen. How is this different from the Bush admin?</p>
<p>The Pharisees will simply continue their quest to control the world. Nothing to see here gang.</p>
<p>Goyim will continue to be totally clueless about &#8220;the plan&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aye Chihuahua</title>
		<link>http://www.floppingaces.net/2008/11/05/surviving-a-obama-presidency/#comment-128704</link>
		<dc:creator>Aye Chihuahua</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Nov 2008 02:08:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.floppingaces.net/?p=12107#comment-128704</guid>
		<description>@&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-128697&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Craig&lt;/a&gt;: 

Craig,

Questioning, moping, screaming, etc will do no good.  The election is over.  The count did not go our way.  Nothing will change that.

Some you win, some you lose.

Does that mean that I like it?  Hell no!  But not liking it won&#039;t change it.

So, I am choosing to redirect and focus my attention on the future.  I will continue to do what I have always done.  I will be involved.  I will be engaged.  I will, as always, watch and observe and listen to everything that is going on.  I will educate.  I will inform.  I will do whatever it takes to preserve what America is all about.

I will not sell out my values.  Nor will I sacrifice my character or my ideals.

I will support Obama because he will occupy the Office of the President of the United States.  I will not support him because of who he is.  I will support him because of the job he holds.

The minute, and I mean the very minute, that he begins to lead this country astray I will begin resisting his efforts just as I have resisted Clinton and Bush when they did things that I disagreed with.

I predict that Obama will have a very short honeymoon period before reality sets in.  

His supporters are bound to be disappointed because Jesus himself is the only person who could do all that Obama has promised.  The media, the complicit partner, the fourth estate is already working to weave the narrative.  The promises have been over promised.  The under-delivery is on the way.

All we have to do now is just sit back and watch the Dems hang themselves with the rope that they got last night.  They&#039;ve wanted control.  Now they have it.  They have, however, lost the ability to blame their failures on the Rep party.  As long as the Rep&#039;s don&#039;t sidle over to them and become &quot;me too&quot; Rep&#039;s like they did when FDR was Pres all will be well.

On the other hand, the Republicans had control for years.  They squandered a great number of opportunities to do great things.  They settled, instead, for a watering-down of their core values.  

Conservatism didn&#039;t lose yesterday.  A milquetoast commitment to what used to be bedrock principles is what lost.

The Conservative movement will survive.  Just as a forest is renewed by flame, Conservatism will grow and flourish once again.

Don&#039;t despair about your southern neighbors Craig.  We&#039;re going to be fine.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#comment-128697" rel="nofollow">Craig</a>: </p>
<p>Craig,</p>
<p>Questioning, moping, screaming, etc will do no good.  The election is over.  The count did not go our way.  Nothing will change that.</p>
<p>Some you win, some you lose.</p>
<p>Does that mean that I like it?  Hell no!  But not liking it won&#8217;t change it.</p>
<p>So, I am choosing to redirect and focus my attention on the future.  I will continue to do what I have always done.  I will be involved.  I will be engaged.  I will, as always, watch and observe and listen to everything that is going on.  I will educate.  I will inform.  I will do whatever it takes to preserve what America is all about.</p>
<p>I will not sell out my values.  Nor will I sacrifice my character or my ideals.</p>
<p>I will support Obama because he will occupy the Office of the President of the United States.  I will not support him because of who he is.  I will support him because of the job he holds.</p>
<p>The minute, and I mean the very minute, that he begins to lead this country astray I will begin resisting his efforts just as I have resisted Clinton and Bush when they did things that I disagreed with.</p>
<p>I predict that Obama will have a very short honeymoon period before reality sets in.  </p>
<p>His supporters are bound to be disappointed because Jesus himself is the only person who could do all that Obama has promised.  The media, the complicit partner, the fourth estate is already working to weave the narrative.  The promises have been over promised.  The under-delivery is on the way.</p>
<p>All we have to do now is just sit back and watch the Dems hang themselves with the rope that they got last night.  They&#8217;ve wanted control.  Now they have it.  They have, however, lost the ability to blame their failures on the Rep party.  As long as the Rep&#8217;s don&#8217;t sidle over to them and become &#8220;me too&#8221; Rep&#8217;s like they did when FDR was Pres all will be well.</p>
<p>On the other hand, the Republicans had control for years.  They squandered a great number of opportunities to do great things.  They settled, instead, for a watering-down of their core values.  </p>
<p>Conservatism didn&#8217;t lose yesterday.  A milquetoast commitment to what used to be bedrock principles is what lost.</p>
<p>The Conservative movement will survive.  Just as a forest is renewed by flame, Conservatism will grow and flourish once again.</p>
<p>Don&#8217;t despair about your southern neighbors Craig.  We&#8217;re going to be fine.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Craig</title>
		<link>http://www.floppingaces.net/2008/11/05/surviving-a-obama-presidency/#comment-128697</link>
		<dc:creator>Craig</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Nov 2008 01:45:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.floppingaces.net/?p=12107#comment-128697</guid>
		<description>I do not agree with advices #3 and 4 in this thread.

#3-   Don&#039;t Question the Verdict:
Sure, just pretend you haven&#039;t been robbed.   Why upset the poor innocent robber?   Gee, that mentality drives me crazy.    I could go on and on but why bother?   No one seems to care here.
So go and hide your head in the sand and pretend that everything is alright.   What a beautiful election, what a fantastic leader.   Don&#039;t worry... Be happy!   That should do the trick.   

#4- Don’t Blame The Voters:
Hell no!   They have nothing to do in this mess.   They are idiots, but don&#039;t tell anyone.   Don&#039;t even try to educated them; they might think you are underestimating them.   Got to protect those idiot&#039;s egos.   Hey, they couldn&#039;t be brainwashed, could they?    No, not them, they are too smarts for that.   
TELL THEM they are idiots, they have the right to know and it is your duty to tell them so.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I do not agree with advices #3 and 4 in this thread.</p>
<p>#3-   Don&#8217;t Question the Verdict:<br />
Sure, just pretend you haven&#8217;t been robbed.   Why upset the poor innocent robber?   Gee, that mentality drives me crazy.    I could go on and on but why bother?   No one seems to care here.<br />
So go and hide your head in the sand and pretend that everything is alright.   What a beautiful election, what a fantastic leader.   Don&#8217;t worry&#8230; Be happy!   That should do the trick.   </p>
<p>#4- Don’t Blame The Voters:<br />
Hell no!   They have nothing to do in this mess.   They are idiots, but don&#8217;t tell anyone.   Don&#8217;t even try to educated them; they might think you are underestimating them.   Got to protect those idiot&#8217;s egos.   Hey, they couldn&#8217;t be brainwashed, could they?    No, not them, they are too smarts for that.<br />
TELL THEM they are idiots, they have the right to know and it is your duty to tell them so.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lets Play for 2010, not 2012 : Stop The ACLU</title>
		<link>http://www.floppingaces.net/2008/11/05/surviving-a-obama-presidency/#comment-128693</link>
		<dc:creator>Lets Play for 2010, not 2012 : Stop The ACLU</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Nov 2008 01:17:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.floppingaces.net/?p=12107#comment-128693</guid>
		<description>[...] Curt at Flopping Ace&#8217;s adds:  We have to get back to our principals…small government. Once we do we then attack the left…not like they attack the right which can be downright dishonorable. No, we attack them as we did in 1994. Because believe me, after two years of this socialist as President people will be looking for a way out. After two years of their hard earned income being confisicated by the state, they will be looking for a change. So keep your nose to the grindstone and keeping fighting. We got Sarah Palin out of McCain’s mess of a campaign, thats a start. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Curt at Flopping Ace&#8217;s adds:  We have to get back to our principals…small government. Once we do we then attack the left…not like they attack the right which can be downright dishonorable. No, we attack them as we did in 1994. Because believe me, after two years of this socialist as President people will be looking for a way out. After two years of their hard earned income being confisicated by the state, they will be looking for a change. So keep your nose to the grindstone and keeping fighting. We got Sarah Palin out of McCain’s mess of a campaign, thats a start. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
