Obama Supporters Terrorized My Little Girl Today

sick, to say this to a child, an innocent child. what monsters, they should have the crap smacked out of them. terrible.

Ghillie suit. Daisy chained claymore mines. Pungi stakes.

Scott, she’s adorable! Keep up the good fight and keep teaching her well.

“Is the entire world on LSD”

Is the beaver wearing a waistcoat?

Welcome to the coming Obama Thugocracy Scott.

This is what happens when a Messianic candidate ascends what he sees as the throne of power.

From the top down, Obama has given his supporters a license to hate and to punish those who don’t worship at the altar of his power.

After all, if those who dare oppose him are racists intent on stealing this election then his supporters feel entitled to take direct action to combat it.

I guess when you voted for Democrats in Ohio in 2006 you didn’t realize this would be one of the consequences.

Anne,

How many moonbats have been paid by THE ONE to come here today? Just curious…

MataHarley

Comeon now, your comments are every bit as negative as mine and I stand by my remarks.
I live in Arizona and people here do not like or respect McCain because he has a crude mouth and has no respect for women. Do you suppose if McLame was so great he would be having to fight to win his own state.
I just have to say that I would not be willing to put my daughters picture and our lovely home on the internet for all to see, that is why this just doesn’t make sense to me. Just too many nutty people who don’t need to know where adorable children live.
Wow, thats the first time I have ever been called an embarrassment. I have seen many Barck signs in my community torn to shreds and some have even been burned, Do you suppose Democrats did all of that?
You do realize that it is not Democrats who are spreading lies and having the radical right wingers like Rush and Hannity literally freak out and make terribly negative remarks about Barack Obama?
I am not really the monster you make me out to be. I do all kinds of volanteer work in my city, including at hospitals, homeless shelters and an orphaned childrens shelter.I think I am feeling weary of all the ugly attacks on Obama and it finially just boiled over.

That is so sad! I remember when I was in the 5th grade, we had a mock election. I was the only kid that voted for Gerald Ford. Not because my parents brainwashed me to vote for a Republican, but they taught me values and not to believe in BS.

Anne, get back under your bridge, you troll.

AND… let me add…

If you equate sign vandalism with intimidation of 6 year olds, then you may completely regress from the “amoeba” status to less than a weed in the life cycle plant chain.

As Anne should surely see… and had she read anything of Scott before sticking her keyboard into her mouth… Scott regards her with a kindness and courtesy she does not deserve.

Kudos to you, Scott. Anne, you owe him an apology, but I will not hold my breath.

Scott? Guess I should send you some MRE cookies for those that invade your house uninvited, eh? LOL

@Scott Malensek: I have to add, that in ALL posts I’ve seen that you have written, you seem like you are very open minded, and kind to all. I like the way you think, and wish more people were like you. You have a VERY beautiful daughter. I like her courage,and I hope I can instill in my children the same.

“I live in Arizona and people here do not like or respect McCain because he has a crude mouth and has no respect for women.” (Ann the moonbat)

LOL… McCain chose a female V.P. and pays his female employees almost twice as your stupid Obama.

“I’m a registered Democrat” (Scott)
Sorry to hear this.

“Try and look up LIBERAL in the dictionary. It means open-minded.” (Scott)
Maybe in the dictionary, but in the real world it means, crooked leftists.
In French we call them leftists… or “gogauche”. We respect the “gauche” but we do not respect the “gogauche”. Obamatrons are “gogauche” idiots.

Liberals do not exist anymore on this planet, they are way too leftist… too bad. Maybe it would be time to find another word than LIBERAL. Leftists would be the right appellation for liberals nowaday.

What is it with these libs coming in here to spew insults and they can’t even use a spell checker….white trash indeed.

Glad to hear your daughter is ok and not taking it too hard Scott. Some of the most intolerant people I have ever run across are liberal’s.

Open-minded indeed.

so sorry scott. i remember when i was her age we lived in panama. carter was screwing things up there and we lived on the economy, so we didnt have the protection of the military. crazy, crazy things happened on the school bus and in the yard, at the grocery store and at school. yeh a cookie and support helped, but i never forgot. that was panama. this is america, were different here, were safe here right??? i wouldnt feed them either.

I hope you will amend your post to read “This is political America” and not Obama’s America. The hate and prejudice and ignorance is thick on both sides and you and I both know that it is unfair to characterize the actions of a select few as an indictment of a candidate or their party.

Ahhh.. let’s celebrate the success of the Obama/Alinsky “community organizing” rules of radicals on one hand, but give ‘em a pass on the other.

Amend the post? Why, Eric? Were the Obama supporters not told to get “in your face” of the opposition? Are not the Obama campaign organizing roots based on such tactics?

And so it passes… from parents to children. From generation to generation. Oddly enough, not unlike the proliferation of jihad…. but in a morphed American perspective.

@MataHarley:

But, ya know, I had to let this pass thru. You provide a perfect example of anything Obama supporters will do… i.e. muddy the actualities and demean other citiziens… just to give your guy’s supporters a pass. You’re an embarrassment. Not only to your own political camp, but to humanity in general. “white trash”, applied to you, would be a compliment.

Oh, c’mon, Mata….anne is obviously a Republican plant…a fictitious commenter (probably created by Scott) to frame Democrats into looking like complete tools.

See, the logic here, anne?

@voter:

@Scott Malensek: I have to add, that in ALL posts I’ve seen that you have written, you seem like you are very open minded, and kind to all. I like the way you think, and wish more people were like you. You have a VERY beautiful daughter. I like her courage,and I hope I can instill in my children the same.

Scott always conducts himself as a gentleman.

Given how you see him as “very open minded”, you really should take a look at the Iraq/al Qaeda connection category and read his work. It just may change the way you view the rightness/wrongness of the decision to invade Iraq.

That is…if you enter in with “an open mind”, as well.

Sorry Katy experienced this, Scott. Glad she has such a great father to comfort her.

Passions are running very high, this election; and it’s sifted down to the children of parents with deep-seated political feelings.

Living here in Los Angeles, and being constantly around kids and families at my job teaching gymnastics, I can say being “outed” as a McCain supporter can make one the subject of ridicule and mean-spirited derision. I know one young girl in my class today, whose family are McCain supporters. All around us, kids are hollering about Obama. I can deal with that, and the parents; but I worry about her and how other kids might behave toward her. I’ve overheard kids say some pretty ignorant things (must come from parroting the parents).

ROTFLMFAO Bronze! Just brilliant, guy.

Leah,

I honestly don’t think Scott looks at anne’s comments through those kind of lenses. I doubt she “got him down” or that he felt insulted by her. Scott has a way of looking past the ad hominems and emotionalism that drove anne to rail in the manner that she did in her first comment. Scott has a knack for reading between the lines; for seeing another human being out there, typing away, and not merely a faceless entity and stereotypical moonbat.

Of course….I could be wrong.

Good job Scott, make sure the school does something about the mini-thugs.

Despite the admission that you are a Dem, you are obviously a THINKER, which means I will continue to hold you in the highest esteem.

Love on those puppies of yours, they may save your bacon some day. I have three out here in the country, and they are indispensable to the wife and I.

You must live in a very small town, because your six year old has to ride the school bus with older kids or thugs as everyone appear to be calling them. So instead of complaining about what you think is Obama Democracy or thugism, you should be complaining to your school board elected officials about younger kids riding the school bus with older ones. I surprised she hasnt been threatened sooner, consider she so small and innocent. Do you child also attend the same school as these older children, oops I mean thugs? This would be my issue. I’m also assuming the thugs as you called them were black kids, because this is how you people normally characterize people of different race than you, especially blacks.

Nasty thing isn’t it. Mata, my comment is in the filter.

I just explained how our school system has both elementary and middle school kids on the same buses and why, chided him about his racist remark and thug support. Then told him not to make assumptions when he didn’t have facts to back them up. No big deal, you handled it better!

Could have pushed something I shouldn’t have, hubby just brought me home a panizza, a distraction.

To Rocky B why are you so sensistive? The question was not posed to you, but apparently you felt the need to take up the fight. The question I posed was appropiate. What in my post did you assumed I was talking about hate crimes or mocking the innocent of Mr. Scotts daughter. I only stated, Scott should be angry with his school board and not the “thugs” he so eloquent described in his post. I never heard of young children riding school buses with older kids, so I’m ASS_uming he lives in a small rural town. If this is the case, the fight should not be take up with the “thugs” but the schoolboard, who allow younger kids to be subjected to the ranting and ravings of older ones. As far as I’m concern, I really don’t care who you supported or voted for during this election. But apparent from the majority of the post, you and everyone else are McCain supporters and apparently can’t get over the fact the man lost! As you know in any contest there is always going to be a winner and a loser, and just because people are passionate about their canididate ( as you are about yours) does not make them a thug (black or white). I just know from experience (by the way I’m lily white) when the word thug is mentioned in a sentence 9 times out of 10 you’re talking about African American kids. Why get angry? So much has been put in this election, than any other ones in the past years. People really need to look at themselves and (including you) and pose the question, if Barack Obama was a white man, would I have any issue about him winning the election and now is the President. Would you really be wasting your time ranting, posting and raving about him? What is the big deal. Why can’t people like you get over yourselfs and realize there is only one person in this world (and he is not of this world) can fixed any problems in your life and that’s GOD! You really need to take a chill pill and pray and accept the fact that the next four years Obama will be the President. The sad part about it, you people will continue to put his life and his family under a microscope. If he pisses incorrectly you will blog about it. Personally if I was Obama, there is no way in hell I would have wanted to be President of such as racist (hidden racism I might add) as America. The land where the color of your skin does matter. Im also wondering if Scott was an Obama support and thugs were McCain supporters would have felt the need to post this story (which sounds so unreal).

Does it matter;
It is not a matter of me being over-sensitive, it was a matter of you being insensitive and trying to turn it into a matter of racism.

What in my post did you assumed I was talking about hate crimes or mocking the innocent of Mr. Scotts daughter.

Answer:

I surprised she hasnt been threatened sooner, consider she so small and innocent.
———————————————————————————————
I’m also assuming the thugs as you called them were black kids, because this is how you people normally characterize people of different race than you, especially blacks.

The former was mocking of his daughter Katy and in the latter you clearly implied that Scott was being racist by his use of the general word “thug”, which has no racial stereotype connected with it. Had Scott used the “N-word”, I would not have come to his defense for you taking him to task for it, on the contrary others and I would have also come down on Scott for stating it. Therefore, I feel you owe Scott an apology.

As to your defense:

I only stated, Scott should be angry with his school board and not the “thugs” he so eloquent described in his post. I never heard of young children riding school buses with older kids, so I’m ASS_uming he lives in a small rural town. If this is the case, the fight should not be take up with the “thugs” but the schoolboard, who allow younger kids to be subjected to the ranting and ravings of older ones.

Perhaps you missed it in your haste to throw fuel on the embers of injustice and transform it into an attack a personal attack on the submitter, but Scott had already mention in post 4 & 6, he had taken appropriate action:

Local police are on it now
———————————————————————————————–
I’ll be talking to the school tomorrow. Gonna stop by even though it’s a teacher’s day.

We fully accept and concede that Obama has defeated McCain. Yet, people like you feel you have a need to rub our noses in it and continue to degrade us. During the campaign, moonbats like you were constantly doing fly-by posts on FA not to debate the issues, but to charge posters supporting McCain-Palin as being; hicks, rubes,:

so I’m ASS_uming he lives in a small rural town.

bigots, racists:

this is how you people normally characterize people of different race than you, especially blacks.
———————————————————————————————–
People really need to look at themselves and (including you) and pose the question, if Barack Obama was a white man, would I have any issue about him winning the election

rednecks, trailer-trash, inbred, racists, etceteras, ad nausium.

The Democratic party’s insistence on transferring their own feelings of racist guilt upon us is unfounded, unwarranted and unappreciated. After all, it has been the Republican Party for the last 150 years that has been the party for Civil Rights:

http://www.floppingaces.net/2008/10/11/democrat-civil-rights-leader-drops-race-card-bomb-on-mccain-palin/#comment-120281
http://www.floppingaces.net/2008/10/11/democrat-civil-rights-leader-drops-race-card-bomb-on-mccain-palin/#comment-120493
http://www.floppingaces.net/2008/10/11/democrat-civil-rights-leader-drops-race-card-bomb-on-mccain-palin/#comment-120508

If you had been following FA, you would find that we who opposed Obama did not do so because of his race, but for his socialist ideologies and radical ties. When the question was posed would we have supported a Colin Powell-Condoliza Rice ticket, the consensus agreed with me; “YES”. Powell’s subsequent endorsement of Obama two days after that question was posed, was a disappointment to many of us.

Does it matter,

Wow, your last post convinced me that you are black. Why do you hide it? Do you think that it is a flaw? We don’t. We don’t care that your skin color is brown, white, yellow, red, purple or whatever. But we do care though about the stupidities that you write here. Can you see the difference?

I recently joined this blog just to hear what is out there and Scott, this one takes a large cake. I aked if this person actually believes Obama supporters did that or perhaps a small group of idiots with misguided behavior. It almost sounded like it was directed at the Obama supporters in general but that is obviously not the case as we are mature adults here. I can see that in many of the participants.
Look, we are a great nation and shall strive to remains so. Please do not forget that our two party system is what brought us here and too actually prefer a one party rule hence forth may backfire. We should change horses every eight to twelve years keeping our core in place.

Obama was sincere in his mission and that purpose got him elected. People felt it was time to trust once again. Recall this is the only candidate that asserted openeness in administration. He will tell the people the hard truth and not play the game for some one sided approval.

Scott, it is a good first step in asserting you look forward to Obama’s administration. I agree, it will be highly scrutinized for the many apparent reasons and I fully believe he will surprise the nation with a wonderfully positive admin. Yes McCain said transparency a lot but I once was his strongest supporter ten years ago and looked to him to run independently so I could cast my vote for him and not Bush. However the McCain that showed up this time was a different one with too many flip flops on issues that concerned me. He was the real thing that Kerry was accused of. However, Obama caught my eye and I have read extensively about him. I cast my vote for him with hope that the nation will come back around to accepting all who live in this country. It appears we arrived at the point under Bush where we were forced to live by the rules of the right and the influence of the left was looked upon as extreme. I indeed welcome the change and hope you will see change we speak of. At least you have an open ear to him

Killed opposition in Iraq? What the heck are you talking about? Whose opposition? AS far as I know the US continues to be in favor of getting out of there. The opposition to the war continues to be the majority. Success in Iraq has never been difined and could not be difined by either Bushy or McCain. Iraq was indeed overthrown by us, we killed Saddam, we are rebuilding the country and not asking Iraq to help out. Now at what point do you define success. Scott I would really appreciate hearing the answer if by some chance you have heard if defined by someone of authoriy. Please let me know as I would then consider that information into my opinion. That is the issue, every one on the right belives as McCain said: we must leave under the vail of success, What the heck is that, Please tell me so I can support your train of thought. If you have no definition of such try using mine it makes a lot of sense and Obama surely agrees with this.

Success in Iraq has never been difined and could not be difined by either Bushy or McCain.

I have heard success defined numerous times, since those on your side continually say it isn’t.

“Success will be when al Qaeda no longer has safe haven in Iraq and Iraqis can protect themselves. Success will be when Iraq can support itself economically. Success will be when Iraq is a democracy that can govern itself effectively in response to the will of its people. Success will be when Iraq is a strong and capable ally in the war on terror.”
-President Bush, May 22, 2008 Addressing soldiers at Ft. Bragg

Many people ask, how should we define success? Success in Iraq and Afghanistan is the establishment of peaceful, stable, prosperous, democratic states that pose no threat to neighbors and contribute to the defeat of terrorists. It is the triumph of religious tolerance over violent radicalism.
-John McCain

Still too vague for you, without meeting artificial benchmarks? We’ve met how many now? 15 or 16? (More than today’s Congress has accomplished) Takes time, patience, and a show of resolve and commitment. Success is happening, one step at a time….

Do you not think we are currently on the correct path? That we’re trending in the right direction?

National Strategy for Victory in Iraq

Executive Summary

OUR NATIONAL STRATEGY FOR VICTORY IN IRAQ:
Helping the Iraqi People Defeat the Terrorists and Build an Inclusive Democratic State

• Victory in Iraq is Defined in Stages
  • Short term, Iraq is making steady progress in fighting terrorists, meeting political milestones, building democratic institutions, and standing up security forces.
  • Medium term, Iraq is in the lead defeating terrorists and providing its own security, with a fully constitutional government in place, and on its way to achieving its economic potential.
  • Longer term, Iraq is peaceful, united, stable, and secure, well integrated into the international community, and a full partner in the global war on terrorism.

• Victory in Iraq is a Vital U.S. Interest
  • Iraq is the central front in the global war on terror. Failure in Iraq will embolden terrorists and expand their reach; success in Iraq will deal them a decisive and crippling blow.
  • The fate of the greater Middle East — which will have a profound and lasting impact on American security — hangs in the balance.

• Failure is Not an Option
  • Iraq would become a safe haven from which terrorists could plan attacks against America, American interests abroad, and our allies.
  • Middle East reformers would never again fully trust American assurances of support for democracy and human rights in the region — a historic opportunity lost.
  • The resultant tribal and sectarian chaos would have major consequences for American security and interests in the region.

• The Enemy Is Diffuse and Sophisticated
  • The enemy is a combination of rejectionists, Saddamists, and terrorists affiliated with or inspired by Al Qaida. Distinct but integrated strategies are required to defeat each element.
  • Each element shares a common short-term objective — to intimidate, terrorize, and tear down — but has separate and incompatible long-term goals.
  • Exploiting these differences within the enemy is a key element of our strategy.

• Our Strategy for Victory is Clear
  • We will help the Iraqi people build a new Iraq with a constitutional, representative government that respects civil rights and has security forces sufficient to maintain domestic order and keep Iraq from becoming a safe haven for terrorists. To achieve this end, we are pursuing an integrated strategy along three broad tracks, which together incorporate the efforts of the Iraqi government, the Coalition, cooperative countries in the region, the international community, and the United Nations.

• The Political Track involves working to forge a broadly supported national compact for democratic governance by helping the Iraqi government:
  • Isolate enemy elements from those who can be won over to the political process by countering false propaganda and demonstrating to all Iraqis that they have a stake in a democratic Iraq;
  • Engage those outside the political process and invite in those willing to turn away from violence through ever-expanding avenues of participation; and
  • Build stable, pluralistic, and effective national institutions that can protect the interests of all Iraqis, and facilitate Iraq’s full integration into the international community.

• The Security Track involves carrying out a campaign to defeat the terrorists and neutralize the insurgency, developing Iraqi security forces, and helping the Iraqi government:
  • Clear areas of enemy control by remaining on the offensive, killing and capturing enemy fighters and denying them safe-haven;
  • Hold areas freed from enemy influence by ensuring that they remain under the control of the Iraqi government with an adequate Iraqi security force presence; and
  • Build Iraqi Security Forces and the capacity of local institutions to deliver services, advance the rule of law, and nurture civil society.

• The Economic Track involves setting the foundation for a sound and self-sustaining economy by helping the Iraqi government:
  • Restore Iraq’s infrastructure to meet increasing demand and the needs of a growing economy;
  • Reform Iraq’s economy, which in the past has been shaped by war, dictatorship, and sanctions, so that it can be self-sustaining in the future; and
  • Build the capacity of Iraqi institutions to maintain infrastructure, rejoin the international economic community, and improve the general welfare of all Iraqis.

• This Strategy is Integrated and its Elements are Mutually Reinforcing
  • Progress in each of the political, security, and economic tracks reinforces progress in the other tracks.
  • For instance, as the political process has moved forward, terrorists have become more isolated, leading to more intelligence on security threats from Iraqi citizens, which has led to better security in previously violent areas, a more stable infrastructure, the prospect of economic progress, and expanding political participation.

• Victory Will Take Time
  • Our strategy is working: Much has been accomplished in Iraq, including the removal of Saddam’s tyranny, negotiation of an interim constitution, restoration of full sovereignty, holding of free national elections, formation of an elected government, drafting of a permanent constitution, ratification of that constitution, introduction of a sound currency, gradual restoration of neglected infrastructure, the ongoing training and equipping of Iraqi security forces, and the increasing capability of those forces to take on the terrorists and secure their nation.
  • Yet many challenges remain: Iraq is overcoming decades of a vicious tyranny, where governmental authority stemmed solely from fear, terror, and brutality.
    • It is not realistic to expect a fully functioning democracy, able to defeat its enemies and peacefully reconcile generational grievances, to be in place less than three years after Saddam was finally removed from power.
  • Our comprehensive strategy will help Iraqis overcome remaining challenges, but defeating the multi-headed enemy in Iraq — and ensuring that it cannot threaten Iraq’s democratic gains once we leave — requires persistent effort across many fronts.

• Our Victory Strategy Is (and Must Be) Conditions Based
  • With resolve, victory will be achieved, although not by a date certain.
    • No war has ever been won on a timetable and neither will this one.
  • But lack of a timetable does not mean our posture in Iraq (both military and civilian) will remain static over time. As conditions change, our posture will change.
    • We expect, but cannot guarantee, that our force posture will change over the next year, as the political process advances and Iraqi security forces grow and gain experience.
    • While our military presence may become less visible, it will remain lethal and decisive, able to confront the enemy wherever it may organize.
    • Our mission in Iraq is to win the war. Our troops will return home when that mission is complete.

every one on the right belives as McCain said: we must leave under the vail of success, What the heck is that, Please tell me so I can support your train of thought.

The veil- or perception- of success is critical. Just look here:

The leader of a jihadi group in Iraq argued Friday that the election of Barack Obama as president represented a victory for radical Islamic groups that had battled American forces since the invasion of Iraq.

The statement, which experts said was part of the psychological duel with the United States, was included in a 25-minute audiotaped speech by Abu Omar al-Baghdadi, leader of the Islamic State of Iraq, an umbrella organization that claims ties to Al Qaeda.

bin Laden propagandized a Soviet defeat at the Lion’s Den and used it as a recruiting tool for jihadis. The perception or actualization of a hasty American withdrawal on their terms and not ours, would signal that America has once again proved itself a paper tiger with no will to sustain the losses it takes to win wars.

Same thing with Vietnam and Somalia. It’s the perception of defeat that emboldens our enemies.