<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: UPDATED:  Missouri attorney sues McCain/Palin for $6 mil over &#8220;reprehensible campaigning&#8221;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.floppingaces.net/2008/10/18/missouri-attorney-sues-mccainpalin-for-6-mil-over-reprehensible-campaigning/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.floppingaces.net/2008/10/18/missouri-attorney-sues-mccainpalin-for-6-mil-over-reprehensible-campaigning/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 06:40:03 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Hard Right</title>
		<link>http://www.floppingaces.net/2008/10/18/missouri-attorney-sues-mccainpalin-for-6-mil-over-reprehensible-campaigning/#comment-122512</link>
		<dc:creator>Hard Right</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Oct 2008 14:42:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.floppingaces.net/?p=10768#comment-122512</guid>
		<description>Rocky, liberals &lt;strong&gt;never&lt;/strong&gt; grow up. Ms. Green is proof of that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rocky, liberals <strong>never</strong> grow up. Ms. Green is proof of that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rocky_B</title>
		<link>http://www.floppingaces.net/2008/10/18/missouri-attorney-sues-mccainpalin-for-6-mil-over-reprehensible-campaigning/#comment-122448</link>
		<dc:creator>Rocky_B</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Oct 2008 10:20:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.floppingaces.net/?p=10768#comment-122448</guid>
		<description>In one sentence, you got the entire jist of where Mary Kay Green&#039;s bases her case.

&lt;blockquote&gt;
Because Green views Obama as the modern day JFK, she fears for his safety.
&lt;/blockquote&gt; 

Remember the naivity of the people during the JFK presidency. Now please don&#039;t take this as next statement as sexist, because it is not intended as such, but young women voted for JFK in droves, not because of his position on the issues, but because he was so &quot;handsome&quot;. As a child I remember them discussing it over coffee and cards all the time. His administration was glowingly refered to as Camelot even before he took office. They didn&#039;t like Nixon because he looked &quot;Mean and ugly&quot; and they thought he was &quot;picking on&quot; JFK during the debates. I recall them sitting on the couch cussing at Nixon for his abuse of this gallant man, just before we were rushed out of the room to bed. JFK was a romantic symbol to them, nothing else, they gushed over him like a pop music idol. They viewed Jackie as an American princess and John as a princely knight on a white steed. They went out and bought pill-box hats and pink dresses to look like her. No wonder Green feels offended. She has learned nothing in the last 40 years or so. She still votes with her heart and not her head. You are not a silly teen anymore Ms. Green. Grow up.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In one sentence, you got the entire jist of where Mary Kay Green&#8217;s bases her case.</p>
<blockquote><p>
Because Green views Obama as the modern day JFK, she fears for his safety.
</p></blockquote>
<p>Remember the naivity of the people during the JFK presidency. Now please don&#8217;t take this as next statement as sexist, because it is not intended as such, but young women voted for JFK in droves, not because of his position on the issues, but because he was so &#8220;handsome&#8221;. As a child I remember them discussing it over coffee and cards all the time. His administration was glowingly refered to as Camelot even before he took office. They didn&#8217;t like Nixon because he looked &#8220;Mean and ugly&#8221; and they thought he was &#8220;picking on&#8221; JFK during the debates. I recall them sitting on the couch cussing at Nixon for his abuse of this gallant man, just before we were rushed out of the room to bed. JFK was a romantic symbol to them, nothing else, they gushed over him like a pop music idol. They viewed Jackie as an American princess and John as a princely knight on a white steed. They went out and bought pill-box hats and pink dresses to look like her. No wonder Green feels offended. She has learned nothing in the last 40 years or so. She still votes with her heart and not her head. You are not a silly teen anymore Ms. Green. Grow up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lightbringer</title>
		<link>http://www.floppingaces.net/2008/10/18/missouri-attorney-sues-mccainpalin-for-6-mil-over-reprehensible-campaigning/#comment-122321</link>
		<dc:creator>Lightbringer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Oct 2008 00:11:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.floppingaces.net/?p=10768#comment-122321</guid>
		<description>Rereading how I expressed that statement, I can understand your confusion about my meaning. I really should have waited for the coffee to finish brewing. 

 As for defending someone&#039;s right to belief in Socialism, I agree with you. If we start thinking we have the right to dismiss someone based on their political views, then we are the &quot;thugs&quot;. That brings me back to my original point. I am not so much worried about what &quot;they&quot; believe, although I disagree with it completely. What worries me, and what I find &quot;anti American&quot;, is how they behave towards those of us who believe differently. The Democrats seem to be working under a new motto, &quot;The Ends Justify the Means&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rereading how I expressed that statement, I can understand your confusion about my meaning. I really should have waited for the coffee to finish brewing. </p>
<p> As for defending someone&#8217;s right to belief in Socialism, I agree with you. If we start thinking we have the right to dismiss someone based on their political views, then we are the &#8220;thugs&#8221;. That brings me back to my original point. I am not so much worried about what &#8220;they&#8221; believe, although I disagree with it completely. What worries me, and what I find &#8220;anti American&#8221;, is how they behave towards those of us who believe differently. The Democrats seem to be working under a new motto, &#8220;The Ends Justify the Means&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Moonbat sues McCain/Palin for &#8220;hate speech&#8221; &#171; The Daley Gator</title>
		<link>http://www.floppingaces.net/2008/10/18/missouri-attorney-sues-mccainpalin-for-6-mil-over-reprehensible-campaigning/#comment-122306</link>
		<dc:creator>Moonbat sues McCain/Palin for &#8220;hate speech&#8221; &#171; The Daley Gator</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Oct 2008 22:14:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.floppingaces.net/?p=10768#comment-122306</guid>
		<description>[...] sues McCain/Palin for &#8220;hate&#160;speech&#8221;  Expect much more inanity like this in the near future my friends. This is the favorite tactic of the &#8220;free-speech [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] sues McCain/Palin for &#8220;hate&nbsp;speech&#8221;  Expect much more inanity like this in the near future my friends. This is the favorite tactic of the &#8220;free-speech [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MataHarley</title>
		<link>http://www.floppingaces.net/2008/10/18/missouri-attorney-sues-mccainpalin-for-6-mil-over-reprehensible-campaigning/#comment-122302</link>
		<dc:creator>MataHarley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Oct 2008 21:03:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.floppingaces.net/?p=10768#comment-122302</guid>
		<description>Thank heaven, Lightbringer... I was appalled at my communication abilities if someone could walk away and think I&#039;m an Obama socialist!  LOL

Yes, it was the presence of the &quot;your&quot; that threw me off.  And I could see where some could take my defense of Marxism/socialism/communism as being very &quot;American&quot; the wrong way.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank heaven, Lightbringer&#8230; I was appalled at my communication abilities if someone could walk away and think I&#8217;m an Obama socialist!  LOL</p>
<p>Yes, it was the presence of the &#8220;your&#8221; that threw me off.  And I could see where some could take my defense of Marxism/socialism/communism as being very &#8220;American&#8221; the wrong way.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lightbringer</title>
		<link>http://www.floppingaces.net/2008/10/18/missouri-attorney-sues-mccainpalin-for-6-mil-over-reprehensible-campaigning/#comment-122299</link>
		<dc:creator>Lightbringer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Oct 2008 21:00:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.floppingaces.net/?p=10768#comment-122299</guid>
		<description>@ MataHarley

 I could have sworn I put Obama&#039;s name in parenthesis next to &quot;your&quot;. Oh, I did.

 I was not trying to call &quot;you&quot; a socialist. I was trying to say that bringing about socialism through fascist fraud and threats of violence is not American. Whether your name is Obama, or whatever. &quot;YOUR&quot; was meant to include Obama and all his thuggish followers. The Constitutional right to be whatever sort of political flavor you like is fine with me. I would be just as angry and appalled if McCain/Palin had hired ACORN to illegally register thousands of fake names and dead people and such. I don&#039;t particularly give a rat&#039;s ass if Obama decided to wave a red banner and insist on being called &quot;Komrade&quot;, that is his right. Breaking laws and subverting the Constitution is not. 

My apologies if you seriously thought I was under the impression you were a socialist. Perhaps I should wait until after that first cup of coffee before posting next time to be more clear in my wording.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ MataHarley</p>
<p> I could have sworn I put Obama&#8217;s name in parenthesis next to &#8220;your&#8221;. Oh, I did.</p>
<p> I was not trying to call &#8220;you&#8221; a socialist. I was trying to say that bringing about socialism through fascist fraud and threats of violence is not American. Whether your name is Obama, or whatever. &#8220;YOUR&#8221; was meant to include Obama and all his thuggish followers. The Constitutional right to be whatever sort of political flavor you like is fine with me. I would be just as angry and appalled if McCain/Palin had hired ACORN to illegally register thousands of fake names and dead people and such. I don&#8217;t particularly give a rat&#8217;s ass if Obama decided to wave a red banner and insist on being called &#8220;Komrade&#8221;, that is his right. Breaking laws and subverting the Constitution is not. </p>
<p>My apologies if you seriously thought I was under the impression you were a socialist. Perhaps I should wait until after that first cup of coffee before posting next time to be more clear in my wording.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: eaglewingz08</title>
		<link>http://www.floppingaces.net/2008/10/18/missouri-attorney-sues-mccainpalin-for-6-mil-over-reprehensible-campaigning/#comment-122272</link>
		<dc:creator>eaglewingz08</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Oct 2008 19:53:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.floppingaces.net/?p=10768#comment-122272</guid>
		<description>It seems that mental illness runs in that woman&#039;s family. So sad. Perhaps her father died when he had a dream of what a nutcase she would become forty years later, and couldn&#039;t bear the thought that his once prized daughter would become a raving lunatic and laughingstock? Perhaps she should sue her father for dying on her forty years ago? Perhaps she should sue Sirhan Sirhan for killing her father?  Perhaps I should sue her for causing me mental distress and anxiety by her frivolous litigation? Courts allow alot of pro se plaintiffs to come in with cockamamie (and no that is not a racist term) litigation, but this is ridiculous. There is no pure hate speech laws that give this woman a private right of action against anyone in the McCain campaign, just as the SCOTUS recently ruled there&#039;s no private cause of action for the HAVA laws at issue in Hawaii. If McCain&#039;s campaign had called this woman directly the C word, like Obama&#039;s campaign supporters did to Gov Palin, it might have come closer, but it would still likely be deemed opinion and unactionable. This woman should be fined by the Court and sent to Shady Oaks where she will no longer be a danger to herself.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It seems that mental illness runs in that woman&#8217;s family. So sad. Perhaps her father died when he had a dream of what a nutcase she would become forty years later, and couldn&#8217;t bear the thought that his once prized daughter would become a raving lunatic and laughingstock? Perhaps she should sue her father for dying on her forty years ago? Perhaps she should sue Sirhan Sirhan for killing her father?  Perhaps I should sue her for causing me mental distress and anxiety by her frivolous litigation? Courts allow alot of pro se plaintiffs to come in with cockamamie (and no that is not a racist term) litigation, but this is ridiculous. There is no pure hate speech laws that give this woman a private right of action against anyone in the McCain campaign, just as the SCOTUS recently ruled there&#8217;s no private cause of action for the HAVA laws at issue in Hawaii. If McCain&#8217;s campaign had called this woman directly the C word, like Obama&#8217;s campaign supporters did to Gov Palin, it might have come closer, but it would still likely be deemed opinion and unactionable. This woman should be fined by the Court and sent to Shady Oaks where she will no longer be a danger to herself.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MataHarley</title>
		<link>http://www.floppingaces.net/2008/10/18/missouri-attorney-sues-mccainpalin-for-6-mil-over-reprehensible-campaigning/#comment-122257</link>
		<dc:creator>MataHarley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Oct 2008 17:56:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.floppingaces.net/?p=10768#comment-122257</guid>
		<description>Lightbringer, INRE your comment:

&lt;blockquote&gt;Bringing about your (Obama’s) dreams of Socialism through Fascist and criminal methods is anti American in my opinion.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

&quot;My&quot; dreams of socialism?  Oh my... if you believe that, you don&#039;t read much of my work here, Lightbringer.

You might try reading &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.floppingaces.net/2008/10/05/the-obama-ayers-tko-punch-mccain-should-use-linking-radical-ties-to-bhos-failed-educational-economic-leadership/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt; my Oct 5th post about the legitimate TKO punch McCain should be using on the Obama/Ayers relationship&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt; which is Obama&#039;s proven failure in the CAC... blowing lots of money on political purposes, and failing at the educational reform.  Not to mention just what that reform was...

Follow that up with &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.floppingaces.net/2008/10/06/obama-ayers-education-activism-for-social-injustice/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt; with the next day&#039;s post, that Obama activism = social injustice.&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt;  The shared Obama/Ayers quest for a social and economic justice educational system in the US.... the socialist/Marxist plan of Ayers, taken straight from renowned communist, Rosa Luxemberg.

A couple of days later, I saw that &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.floppingaces.net/2008/10/08/media-catching-on-to-the-real-obamaayers-relationship/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt; the media was catching on to the *real* Obama/Ayers relationship, as I had been saying.&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt;  Here&#039;s &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.floppingaces.net/2008/08/21/steve-diamond-lawyerblogger-hot-on-the-obama-ayers-trail-his-annenberg-challenge-story/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt; my first post on the Annenberg connection to socialism.&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt;

Go back into &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.floppingaces.net/author/mataharley/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt; my archives, &lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt;and you&#039;ll find my beef with Obama from day one was that he was a socialist.

You misconstrue my respect for the Constitutional right to be a Communist/socialist/Marxist in America as support of that philosophy.  Nope.  Couldn&#039;t be further from the truth.  

But the day we don&#039;t allow a socialist to speak or function in the US is the day they win.  Because dissent is *very* American.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lightbringer, INRE your comment:</p>
<blockquote><p>Bringing about your (Obama’s) dreams of Socialism through Fascist and criminal methods is anti American in my opinion.</p></blockquote>
<p>&#8220;My&#8221; dreams of socialism?  Oh my&#8230; if you believe that, you don&#8217;t read much of my work here, Lightbringer.</p>
<p>You might try reading <a href="http://www.floppingaces.net/2008/10/05/the-obama-ayers-tko-punch-mccain-should-use-linking-radical-ties-to-bhos-failed-educational-economic-leadership/" rel="nofollow"><b> my Oct 5th post about the legitimate TKO punch McCain should be using on the Obama/Ayers relationship</b></a> which is Obama&#8217;s proven failure in the CAC&#8230; blowing lots of money on political purposes, and failing at the educational reform.  Not to mention just what that reform was&#8230;</p>
<p>Follow that up with <a href="http://www.floppingaces.net/2008/10/06/obama-ayers-education-activism-for-social-injustice/" rel="nofollow"><b> with the next day&#8217;s post, that Obama activism = social injustice.</b></a>  The shared Obama/Ayers quest for a social and economic justice educational system in the US&#8230;. the socialist/Marxist plan of Ayers, taken straight from renowned communist, Rosa Luxemberg.</p>
<p>A couple of days later, I saw that <a href="http://www.floppingaces.net/2008/10/08/media-catching-on-to-the-real-obamaayers-relationship/" rel="nofollow"><b> the media was catching on to the *real* Obama/Ayers relationship, as I had been saying.</b></a>  Here&#8217;s <a href="http://www.floppingaces.net/2008/08/21/steve-diamond-lawyerblogger-hot-on-the-obama-ayers-trail-his-annenberg-challenge-story/" rel="nofollow"><b> my first post on the Annenberg connection to socialism.</b></a></p>
<p>Go back into <a href="http://www.floppingaces.net/author/mataharley/" rel="nofollow"><b> my archives, </b></a>and you&#8217;ll find my beef with Obama from day one was that he was a socialist.</p>
<p>You misconstrue my respect for the Constitutional right to be a Communist/socialist/Marxist in America as support of that philosophy.  Nope.  Couldn&#8217;t be further from the truth.  </p>
<p>But the day we don&#8217;t allow a socialist to speak or function in the US is the day they win.  Because dissent is *very* American.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lightbringer</title>
		<link>http://www.floppingaces.net/2008/10/18/missouri-attorney-sues-mccainpalin-for-6-mil-over-reprehensible-campaigning/#comment-122228</link>
		<dc:creator>Lightbringer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Oct 2008 14:50:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.floppingaces.net/?p=10768#comment-122228</guid>
		<description>@MataHarley

 You are correct, being a Socialist is not anti American.

 Bringing about your (Obama&#039;s) dreams of Socialism through Fascist and criminal methods is anti American in my opinion. His connections to Ayers, ACORN, et al. are simply evidence that he is not unaware of the methods being employed on his behalf.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@MataHarley</p>
<p> You are correct, being a Socialist is not anti American.</p>
<p> Bringing about your (Obama&#8217;s) dreams of Socialism through Fascist and criminal methods is anti American in my opinion. His connections to Ayers, ACORN, et al. are simply evidence that he is not unaware of the methods being employed on his behalf.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hermit</title>
		<link>http://www.floppingaces.net/2008/10/18/missouri-attorney-sues-mccainpalin-for-6-mil-over-reprehensible-campaigning/#comment-122220</link>
		<dc:creator>Hermit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Oct 2008 13:10:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.floppingaces.net/?p=10768#comment-122220</guid>
		<description>@&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-122063&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;MataHarley&lt;/a&gt;: 

Anti-capitalist is essentially correct, but incomplete. It doesn&#039;t address other aspects of socialism that Obama appears to advocate. Obama&#039;s concept of &quot;spreading the wealth around&quot; is just one example. If his tax plan is implemented, it will amount to government-sanctioned robbery (and no, I&#039;m not wealthy at 32k per year - I just don&#039;t believe that my more ambitious and wealthier neighbor should be required to support me). 

The probable federal take-over of public education in this country is another issue - an expensive fast-track to mediocrity and the nurturing of group-think, in my opinion.

Some may see Obama as simply anti-capitalist, but when I look at him, I see an anti-American socialist whose ideas about &quot;change&quot; pose a grave threat to this nation. Obama isn&#039;t offering Americans a safety net (although some believe he is). He&#039;s constructing a cage.

Personally, I&#039;d rather keep my freedom and take my chances outside the cage, regardless of the risks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#comment-122063" rel="nofollow">MataHarley</a>: </p>
<p>Anti-capitalist is essentially correct, but incomplete. It doesn&#8217;t address other aspects of socialism that Obama appears to advocate. Obama&#8217;s concept of &#8220;spreading the wealth around&#8221; is just one example. If his tax plan is implemented, it will amount to government-sanctioned robbery (and no, I&#8217;m not wealthy at 32k per year &#8211; I just don&#8217;t believe that my more ambitious and wealthier neighbor should be required to support me). </p>
<p>The probable federal take-over of public education in this country is another issue &#8211; an expensive fast-track to mediocrity and the nurturing of group-think, in my opinion.</p>
<p>Some may see Obama as simply anti-capitalist, but when I look at him, I see an anti-American socialist whose ideas about &#8220;change&#8221; pose a grave threat to this nation. Obama isn&#8217;t offering Americans a safety net (although some believe he is). He&#8217;s constructing a cage.</p>
<p>Personally, I&#8217;d rather keep my freedom and take my chances outside the cage, regardless of the risks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Leah</title>
		<link>http://www.floppingaces.net/2008/10/18/missouri-attorney-sues-mccainpalin-for-6-mil-over-reprehensible-campaigning/#comment-122145</link>
		<dc:creator>Leah</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Oct 2008 07:02:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.floppingaces.net/?p=10768#comment-122145</guid>
		<description>You know, even looking at this case objectively by putting all partisanship aside, I&#039;d still have to say I&#039;d dismiss this case after reading one half of the page of the brief. Not only is there a matter of free speech involved with what McCain and Palin have said at those rallies, but also her claims are unfounded - there&#039;s no way on Earth she can prove that they &quot;intentionally&quot; tried to provoke the crowd, let alone prove that they actually did what she claims. And claiming that their motive is to win an election is utter bullshit. Any judge with a common sense would just laugh at her face and have her sent to a psychiatric institution.

And yes, I agree. Why the heck is she claiming $6 mil for punitive damages? Hoping to catch a liberal judge and making a quick buck? Or did Obama buy her off secretly too? lol.

It&#039;s the Democrats&#039; full intention to make McCain/Palin look as racist as possible in order to garner votes to have Obama elected - it&#039;s just too bad that that&#039;s not possible. These guys will do anything, even if it means twisting and distorting the truth. It&#039;s unfortunate for them that McCain and/or Palin have never ONCE attacked Obama based on his race, and they never will.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You know, even looking at this case objectively by putting all partisanship aside, I&#8217;d still have to say I&#8217;d dismiss this case after reading one half of the page of the brief. Not only is there a matter of free speech involved with what McCain and Palin have said at those rallies, but also her claims are unfounded &#8211; there&#8217;s no way on Earth she can prove that they &#8220;intentionally&#8221; tried to provoke the crowd, let alone prove that they actually did what she claims. And claiming that their motive is to win an election is utter bullshit. Any judge with a common sense would just laugh at her face and have her sent to a psychiatric institution.</p>
<p>And yes, I agree. Why the heck is she claiming $6 mil for punitive damages? Hoping to catch a liberal judge and making a quick buck? Or did Obama buy her off secretly too? lol.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s the Democrats&#8217; full intention to make McCain/Palin look as racist as possible in order to garner votes to have Obama elected &#8211; it&#8217;s just too bad that that&#8217;s not possible. These guys will do anything, even if it means twisting and distorting the truth. It&#8217;s unfortunate for them that McCain and/or Palin have never ONCE attacked Obama based on his race, and they never will.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Custer</title>
		<link>http://www.floppingaces.net/2008/10/18/missouri-attorney-sues-mccainpalin-for-6-mil-over-reprehensible-campaigning/#comment-122113</link>
		<dc:creator>Custer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Oct 2008 02:31:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.floppingaces.net/?p=10768#comment-122113</guid>
		<description>A Democrat is someone who thinks to broadly to even be on his own side of a quarrel.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A Democrat is someone who thinks to broadly to even be on his own side of a quarrel.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Craig</title>
		<link>http://www.floppingaces.net/2008/10/18/missouri-attorney-sues-mccainpalin-for-6-mil-over-reprehensible-campaigning/#comment-122107</link>
		<dc:creator>Craig</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Oct 2008 02:02:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.floppingaces.net/?p=10768#comment-122107</guid>
		<description>No, Elektra.    As Ann Coulter once said:   &quot;If Democrats had any brains, they would be Republicains&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No, Elektra.    As Ann Coulter once said:   &#8220;If Democrats had any brains, they would be Republicains&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Elektra</title>
		<link>http://www.floppingaces.net/2008/10/18/missouri-attorney-sues-mccainpalin-for-6-mil-over-reprehensible-campaigning/#comment-122106</link>
		<dc:creator>Elektra</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Oct 2008 01:45:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.floppingaces.net/?p=10768#comment-122106</guid>
		<description>Is there not ONE elected or appointed Democrat in office that is not brain damaged and/or abusive of the law and their position!?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is there not ONE elected or appointed Democrat in office that is not brain damaged and/or abusive of the law and their position!?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike's America</title>
		<link>http://www.floppingaces.net/2008/10/18/missouri-attorney-sues-mccainpalin-for-6-mil-over-reprehensible-campaigning/#comment-122104</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike's America</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Oct 2008 01:29:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.floppingaces.net/?p=10768#comment-122104</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;2008: The year freedom died&lt;/strong&gt;

We&#039;re witnessing the next step on the slow progression to socialist fascism.

First it was the character assasination of Sarah Palin and her family. Not to mention the hacking of her email account.

Next it was the &quot;truth squads&quot; of law enforcement and prosecuters in Missouri threatening legal action.

Then it was the Secret Service being sent to the home of a Texas couple who were falsely accused of issuing death threats to Obama when one of his supporters called their home.

Now it&#039;s Joe Wurzelbachers turn to be tarred and feather for questioning &quot;THE ONE.&quot;

And like Josef Goebbel&#039;s the fascists use the power of the media and Hollywood megaphone to make sure only the approved party line gets out.

If Obama is elected, he will have the power of the state behind this thugocracy.

If he loses the election, his thugs have already promised violence in the streets.

Heck, they are doing that already in some places.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>2008: The year freedom died</strong></p>
<p>We&#8217;re witnessing the next step on the slow progression to socialist fascism.</p>
<p>First it was the character assasination of Sarah Palin and her family. Not to mention the hacking of her email account.</p>
<p>Next it was the &#8220;truth squads&#8221; of law enforcement and prosecuters in Missouri threatening legal action.</p>
<p>Then it was the Secret Service being sent to the home of a Texas couple who were falsely accused of issuing death threats to Obama when one of his supporters called their home.</p>
<p>Now it&#8217;s Joe Wurzelbachers turn to be tarred and feather for questioning &#8220;THE ONE.&#8221;</p>
<p>And like Josef Goebbel&#8217;s the fascists use the power of the media and Hollywood megaphone to make sure only the approved party line gets out.</p>
<p>If Obama is elected, he will have the power of the state behind this thugocracy.</p>
<p>If he loses the election, his thugs have already promised violence in the streets.</p>
<p>Heck, they are doing that already in some places.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
