And how Democrats are trying to rewrite history!

As of Sunday evening, the proposed legislation enabling the most massive federal intervention into the financial markets in history has been agreed to by negotiators representing the U.S. House of Representatives, U.S. Senate and the Executive Branch.

The proposed legislation is available online here and will no doubt be studied feverishly in the next few hours as the House of Representatives is likely to vote on the measure Monday.

There is some reason for optimism. As Curt noted the new measure appears to be much less offensive to conservatives than previous proposals. House GOP whip Congressman Roy Blunt (R-MO) prepared this chart showing what progress was made in eliminating many of the offensive Christmas tree ornaments Democrats attempted to hang on this bill prior to the big White House meeting on Thursday.

How we got to this point is rather instructive to all those wish to evaluate the performance of the two presidential candidates in a time of crisis. Once again, conservatives were assured that John McCain is on their side.

Let’s retrace our steps:

Early on Thursday morning it was reported that key members of the House and Senate had reached a deal in advance of the big White House Pow-Wow scheduled for that afternoon. However, House Republicans, whom Democrats counted on to join in a bipartisan effort, were not part of any deal and as they learned of the details in the Frank-Dodd-Paulson plan concern mounted that the agreement in it’s current form was a disaster.

Phone calls protesting the deal had been flooding the House at an unprecedented rate, subjecting even Democrats to a barrage of protest from their constituents.

Writing in Saturday’s Washington Post Jonathon Weisman reports that John McCain made a courtesy call to House Minority Leader John Boehner’s office on Thursday prior to a luncheon with the Senate GOP members. When he arrived he was informed by GOP members who were present of their very strong opposition to the current bill.

McCain went to the Senate luncheon and dropped a bombshell. He informed his colleagues that “I’m not going to sign on to a deal just to sign the deal…”Just like Iraq, I’m not afraid to go it alone if I need to.” According to Senator Lindsey Graham, a McCain confidante, “you could hear a pin drop” then pandemonium broke out as it became obvious that any idea of a deal was shattered.

Attention then shifted to the White House:

Obama bombs at White House meeting

Jonathon Karl, writing at ABC, has the inside story on what happened at the White House meeting Thursday afternoon:

President Bush opens the meeting at 4 p.m., quickly turning it over to Paulson who gives a status report on the markets and says, “We need to get this done quickly.” Paulson turns it over to Pelosi, who defers to Senate Democratic Leader Harry Reid, who defers to Sen. Barack Obama. Obama starts things off for the Democrats by reiterating his principles on what the plan should include. Obama agrees with Paulson on the need to act quickly but says some on the Hill “don’t understand the need for the rush.” Some of the Republicans took this as an attack on them.

When it was McCain’s turn to speak, he deferred instead to House Minority Leader Boehner who listed House GOP objections to the bill and later suggested alternatives such as federal insurance for mortgage securities instead of buying them outright.

At that point Obama chimed in again appealing to Treasury Secretary Paulson, a friend to Democrats, in an effort to undercut House GOP concerns.

McCain spoke again saying that House GOP concerns are: “legitimate concerns that need to be listened to.”

Shortly after that the fireworks began as Rep. Barney Frank (D-MA) (who must have thought he pulled one over on his House GOP colleagues with the earlier drafting of the bill) began shouting and accused Republicans of sandbagging” him.

ABC’s Jonathon Karl describes what happened as the meeting broke up:

Democrats go back into the Roosevelt Room to discuss whether to go out to the cameras waiting on the White House driveway. Paulson comes in and literally begs them not to go out and criticize the meeting. For dramatic effect, Paulson gets down on one knee and says, “Please, I beg you, don’t blow this up.”

Barney Frank, shouting, “Don’t give me that bulls**t.”

Instead of rushing to the driveway to spew their venom, Democrats first coordinated their talking points, all aimed at blaming McCain. Later, Obama was up first:

In interviews after the meeting, Obama pointed a finger at his rival for the faltering talks, saying on CNN that “when you start injecting presidential politics into delicate negotiations, you can actually inject more problems, rather than less.”

Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-NV) used the similar phraseology in his attack:

“The insertion of presidential politics has not been helpful…It’s been harmful. A few days ago, I called on Sen. McCain to take a stand, to let us know where he stands on the issue, on this bailout. But all he has done is stand in front of the cameras.”

Interesting that Reid accused McCain of grandstanding “in front of the cameras” when that is exactly what he, Obama and other Dems were doing despite Secretary Paulson’s plea.

Dick Durbin (D-IL) the #2 Democrat in the Senate added:

McCain’s decision to return would would bring the “charged political atmosphere” of presidential politics to Washington. “I’m not sure that will help create a positive, bipartisan or nonpartisan atmosphere to solve the problem,” said Durbin, who added, “I think we need to do this in a thoughtful, quiet and sensible way.”

Pelosi: House GOP “Unpatriotic”

And speaking of that “bipartisan or nonpartisan atmosphere” necessary to solve the problem in a “thoughtful, quiet and sensible way” House Speaker Pelosi accused Republicans of being “unpatriotic” for skipping a meeting on the bailout that they were not even invited to.

McCain is the Man who Got Action

Weisman’s article sums up the objectives of both McCain and Obama:

“McCain has been trying to help the House guys, trying to get their ideas into the broader bill,” said a senior Republican Senate aide. “If McCain can do that, he can bring 50 to 100 House Republicans to the bill. That would be a big damn deal.”

One Republican in the room said it was clear that the Democrats came into the meeting with a “game plan” aimed at forcing McCain to choose between the administration and House Republicans.

If Democrats did succeed in forcing McCain to choose between House Republicans and President Bush McCain choose wisely. President Bush is effectively a lame duck and without the support of House Republicans John McCain cannot be elected President.

But more to the point, without McCain’s action to stop the runaway freight train that the Obama-Dodd-Frank-Paulson bill had become, the bill might very well have failed to gain passage in the House causing further panic in world financial markets.

In an orchestrated attempt to showcase Obama’s leadership ability,it’s clear that instead, Obama only served to foster division by stoking the unease House GOP leaders felt over being pressured to sign off on what they knew was a bad bill. Weisman described Obama’s participation at the White House meeting as a “hectoring performance” certainly not one designed to win over converts to the Democrat plan.

McCain’s performance was much more presidential. Instead of doing all the talking, he LISTENED to what House GOP leaders were saying instead of trying to browbeat them into a bad agreement.

And in the end, McCain is motivated by lifelong principles dedicated to protecting the taxpayer from big government boondoggles which is exactly what the Democrat plan pushed at the White House had become.

If the current compromise passes, as many insist it must to avoid financial disaster, there will be only one man to thank: John McCain!

  • Share/Bookmark
Print This Post Print This Post
This entry was posted on Sunday, September 28th, 2008 at 9:38 pm and is filed under Uncategorized. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

Trackbacks

  1. The bailout: McCain is the Man who Got Action : Stop The ACLU
  2. John McCain Doesn’t Take the Bait “The Democrats came into the meeting with a “game plan” aimed at forcing McCain to choose between the administration and House Republicans.” « Rosettasister’s Weblog
  3. Why Aren’t Americans Buying the Bailout? (3) | Jack’s Newswatch

18 comments so far

 1Reply to this comment  

John McCain is a great man. What kind of man is Obama?
http://thenewconservatives.blogspot.com/

September 28th, 2008 at 11:49 pm
Kitty
 2Reply to this comment  

And then I read this (via L.com):
http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/washington/2008/09/bailout-plan.html
‘You won’t believe where that $700-billion bailout figure came from
“It’s not based on any particular data point,” a Treasury spokeswoman told Forbes.com… Tuesday. “We just wanted to choose a really large number.”
They made it up to be sufficiently ginormous to frighten everyone into rapid action.
And it worked.’

September 29th, 2008 at 3:52 am
Missy
 3Reply to this comment  

Kitty, the name for it is the “Cloward-Piven Strategy.”

“The strategy of forcing political change through orchestrated crisis. The “Cloward-Piven Strategy” seeks to hasten the fall of capitalism by overloading the government bureaucracy with a flood of impossible demands, thus pushing society into crisis and economic collapse.”

http://www.americanthinker.com/2008/09/barack_obama_and_the_strategy.html

For years they knew this was coming and fought any attempt to reform it. It’s a democrat self-made crisis they hoped to use the tax payers money to further their goal/dream, socialism.

Bush was going to cave, Paulson was on their side, they had pretty much lined everything up in their favor until Big Bad John threw a monkey wrench into it. I’m not liking this deal, but think we can be thankful this happened now and not if and when the dems control Congress with Obama in the Oval Office. It would have been worse.

September 29th, 2008 at 4:32 am
Missy
 4Reply to this comment  

Shoot, my post got lost in the spam filter.

Thanks for this really informative post Mike’s America. I hope it gets posted all over the net!!!

September 29th, 2008 at 4:34 am
ThomNJ
 5Reply to this comment  

SEC. 109. FORECLOSURE MITIGATION EFFORTS – I think that section should be replaced with a statement to the effect that people should pay their bills……or mortgages or whatever. Just in perusing the document quickly at this point, it is so full of loose language that the bill probably means whatever someone wants it to mean. Lots of verbiage that can surely be stretched to cover a myriad of items….the deal is supposed to minimize the impact on the national debt. If we already cannot quantify the potential damage other than saying it would be really, really bad, then how can one say to minimize it – there is no basis for reference of many issues. I would rather have seen a bill that would address short term credit markets and the like to ensure that businesses in this country can operate and then let the financial markets sort themselves out without our tax dollars. Shift the debt side over to some market driven solution where sound institutions or individuals could pick up the debt for whatever pennies on the dollar that they can. I don’t see the bill as much more than a Wall Street save, and I see small individual investors still getting hammered in the long run with damage to IRAs and 401ks no matter what. Secretary Paulsen is a smart guy, but I believe that he has a tremendous amount of allegiance to Wall Street as opposed to Ma and Pa Kettle.

As an aside, there are an awful lot of people on Wall Street who believe it is their right to do whatever they want with investors’ money, and the investor shouldn’t complain in their view, because “the investor makes some money too” (emphasis on some). You’ll notice though that whenever an investment loses money due to their advice or shenanigans – they still get their ususal sum. And as a matter of fact, if the investment just barely makes money, it will still be a loser for you – since their fee will drive it into the negatve return category – but you never get that kind of accounting as an investor in mutual funds or the like. Sorry to go off toppic, but it just makes me leery of trusting ANY of these guys, and most especially the lawyer filled Congress.

September 29th, 2008 at 5:28 am
Missy
 6Reply to this comment  

They already passed a bail out in July. What kind of nerve to come back for more?

James Terry, Chief Public Advocate for the Consumer Rights League was interviewed on FOX this morning. He said we are already on the hook for billions from the earlier bill. I googled and found that Terry has testified before Congress regarding the housing mess and ACORN’s illegal behavior.

This was posted at the CRL site, from an editorial published by Congressman Ed Royce right after it passed:

“Perhaps less obvious than the $300 billion bailout, but in many respects more egregious, is an affordable housing fund which would funnel as much as $600 million every year to activist organizations under the guise of promoting affordable housing. This plan takes a percentage the GSEs’ total new business and redistributes it to groups like ACORN and La Raza with lengthy histories of both voter fraud and anti-free market advocacy at the local, state, and national levels. So while the chance of a government bailout of these two struggling institutions remains a real threat, we will begin levying a tax dedicated to fund these groups. And what would be the penalty should one of these organizations be found to have misused the taxpayer funds? Today’s legislation would simply require repayment of the misused funds and anything left from the initial grant. Additionally, there is nothing to prevent these groups from going back the very next year to receive additional money from this slush fund. Regardless of where the taxpayer money actually goes, because it is fungible, the government is subsidizing all of these groups’ activities whether we intend to or not. ”

http://www.consumersrightsleague.org/news/DocumentSingle.aspx?DocumentID=23103

September 29th, 2008 at 6:41 am
Missy
 7Reply to this comment  

My post is in the filter again.

September 29th, 2008 at 6:42 am
 8Reply to this comment  

And Dems attempted to scew the taxpayers and send even MORE money to ACORN in this current bill. Too bad we didn’t also use this occasion to void that provision in the July bill.

I totally agree with what Missy says here so will repeat it:

Bush was going to cave, Paulson was on their side, they had pretty much lined everything up in their favor until Big Bad John threw a monkey wrench into it. I’m not liking this deal, but think we can be thankful this happened now and not if and when the dems control Congress with Obama in the Oval Office. It would have been worse.

September 29th, 2008 at 6:51 am
Scrapiron
 9Reply to this comment  

If McCain had not returned to D.C. and fired up the republicans to clean up the $700 dollar give away bill the democrats add on’s (payoff’s with tax dollars to those who bribe the democrats for votes) would have expanded to a trillion dollars and more.

Hussein O ($126,000 in bribes in 3 years above the table and millions under the table), Peeeloshi, Reid, Dodd, Chuckie, Murtha, Waters, and Frank along with dozens of others should be facing the same federal judge that the theives at Fannie and Freddie are soon to face.

September 29th, 2008 at 8:19 am
suek
 10Reply to this comment  

>>Hussein O ($126,000 in bribes in 3 years above the table and millions under the table), Peeeloshi, Reid, Dodd, Chuckie, Murtha, Waters, and Frank along with dozens of others should be facing the same federal judge that the theives at Fannie and Freddie are soon to face.>>

You wish. Right up there with Jamie Gorelick????

I wish too, but somehow, I don’t think it’s going to happen.

And if HO wins the election, he’ll be immune and they’ll be putting everyone else in jail.

September 29th, 2008 at 9:25 am
Dan Wroblewski
 11Reply to this comment  

I would like to know why taxpayer’s money has to be spent to solve the problem?

The government could temporarily suspend the capital gains tax and call for money coming from the market to shore up the economy. They could insure the mortgage debt instead of writing a check to protect homeowners and not have to socialize our financial economy.

This would be similar to what was done in Sweden, which seemed to work.

I would also like to know why the same democrats who blocked oversight (Barney Frank, Chuck Shumer, and Chris Dodd to mention the main ones) should be in charge of, and so in favor of this so-called rescue plan. I think they should be excluded from participating in the program since they where particularly instrumental in the problem. I would also like to make sure that special interest groups like Acorn do not get any of these funds.

People need to hear the truth and the names of both senators and congressmen who created this with their votes need to be exposed. Maybe we can get a real election with people who will start looking out for us.

September 29th, 2008 at 11:48 am
bbartlog
 12Reply to this comment  

The government could temporarily suspend the capital gains tax

Temporarily suspending the gains tax will cause the stock market to go down. Basically everyone will want to sell now (while the tax is suspended) but not want to buy now and sell later (when the tax is reinstated). If you want to juice the market, you have to credibly cut the capital gains tax for at least the medium term and preferably indefinitely.

They could insure the mortgage debt instead of writing a check to protect homeowners

If this were first and foremost just some sort of crisis of confidence, then having the government step up as an insurer would be a good measure. But the losses we are dealing with are mostly real, and you can’t just make them vanish by having the government act to insure the mortgage debt; that just leaves the government on the hook in a slightly different way.
And by the way, ‘writing a check to protect homeowners’ is not really the plan. The bailout is not constructed to pay the obligations of those currently defaulting on their mortgages. Of course, if the government buys up all these worthless mortgages I suppose it could handle the defaults and foreclosures in a number of different ways, but as I understand it Paulson would be buying entire enterprises and not just bundles of bad debt.

September 29th, 2008 at 12:03 pm
BevAnn
 13Reply to this comment  

I smell Rats in Congress. Red Flags are going up everywhere.
Time to rip the lid off of this can of worms!
Why are they trying to pass this bill so fast?

The only ultimate ‘crisis’ I see is the closure of the subprime credit market.
That would be a GOOD thing, considering that is what caused this mess, but I doubt the sub prime market is what is shoring up our economy, and if it is, then that has to end anyway as shaky credit is NOT an investment, it is a risky gamble, NOT a foundation for a stable & strong economy!

We need to demand mandatory prison sentences for any elected government representative who betrays the public’s trust or acts outside her best interests.
With no painful penalties, these abuses will continue to occur undeterred.

Obama connected to Fannie Mae CEOs
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RbyVvcDmLhQ

Who sent money to Obama’s Campaign who are connected to the recent (and future?) Bail Outs and why?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fb1SGOs3jfM

Why is most of Congress being shut out of the Bail Out negotiations & not provided any details, yet asked to vote on behalf of us?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S27yitK32ds

Am I the only one who smells a skunk?

September 29th, 2008 at 12:19 pm
KCG
 14Reply to this comment  

How is that tasty humble pie?

You wrote “If the current compromise passes, as many insist it must to avoid financial disaster, there will be only one man to thank: John McCain!”

Let me guess, you’re planning a new post on how we need to blame McCain for failing to drum up enough republican support right?

Oh wait, I forgot that logic and rational thinking doesn’t work in your small little world.

September 29th, 2008 at 1:27 pm
 15Reply to this comment  

Watching from afar I have no personal stake in this shouting match but I linked this entry today because there is a lot of good information in it.

As we all know the bill didn’t pass — the world had a collective heart attack — and tonight there is to be another vote.

We’ll see how that goes but there is a video on my site that all Americans may be interested in watching. Things are not as they appear.

October 1st, 2008 at 1:21 pm

Leave a reply

Name (*)
Mail (will not be published) (*)
URI
Comment

If your comments get caught in spam a lot please log into your registered account before trying to comment again. You can email me if your comment is caught in spam

 

Identity Verification: If you wish to verify your commenter identity, so no one can steal it, click the below button: