It’s official that Todd Palin will refuse to respond to the Legislative Council’s subpoena to appear. And, of course, the other expected event in tandem with that was Attorney Thomas Van Flein sent a letter yesterday to Indy Counsel Steve Branchflower letting him know just that.
For those of you who have kept up on the Trooper’gate saga via my posts, his reasons for Todd Palin’s refusal to appear are already familiar. i.e. no authority, unConstitutionally vague in what they want him to bring in for documentation, a violation of Constitutional due process, etal. You can read the three page letter in the link above for the specifics. But it’s a familiar shopping list already. The new addition to the list? It’s “unduly burdersome” for Palin to appear…. Todd’s a pretty busy “First Dude” at the moment, campaigning with wife Sarah.
But this really isn’t news… just the anticpated steps that would ensue considering the legal stance the AG’s office has adopted. But, I got politely called on the carpet for being not up to date by a disappointed reader on the side… LOL. So Donald? This one’s for you!
As I pointed out in my Sept 15th post on Trooper’gate, Senior Asst. AG Michael Barnhill was promising to fight the Legislative Councils subpoenas unless they agreed to accept his interpretation of the Personnel Board Act.
So all in all.. the only thing that’s new is that, as predicted, there will be many that will refuse to appear before the Legislative Council…. and Todd’s the most prominent on the list to say “no way, Jose” to French and company.
And right now, the AG’s office has their back for ignoring the subpoenas.
This, of course, has Andrew Halcro, the lead Legislative Investigator cheerleader, being driven up the wall. His latest posting is a rant, accusing Senior AG Talis Colberg of being in over his head… alluding to him as incompetent by saying: “Plucked from the relative obscurity of drawing up wills in Palmer to managing one of the biggest legal staffs in the state, Colberg’s latest actions show he is certainly not ready for prime time.
Perhaps Halcro might want to check further… in that the AG representative taking the lead is not Colberg, but Michael Barnhill. Instead, Halcro demonstrates amazing chutzpah, attempting to dictate to the AG’s office the law. He cites the Alaskan statute on subpoenas… never comprehending that these issues, combined with the AG’s vow to fight subpoenas, and combined with two lawsuits questioning the legality of the French/Branchwater witch hunt in Superior Court, can most definitely delay any testimony with plenty of legal authority.
Halcro’s out of his expertise. His bio via his website:
Occupation:
Director of Business Development, Avis Alaska 2007-present
Candidate for Governor 2006
President, Avis/Alaska (Statewide Family business owned and operated since 1955) 2002-2006
Director of Marketing, Avis Alaska, 1990-2002
Fleet Manager, Avis Alaska, 1985-1990
Administrative Assistant, Avis Alaska, 1984-1985
Airport Rental Agent, Avis Alaska, 1982-1984
Car Wash Manager, Avis Alaska, 1980-1982
Hummm…. I’m missing him being a member of the Alaskan Bar in there….
Now.. the news I *am* waiting for?
1: Who French will pick to represent himself, Kim Elton, Branchwater, the Legislative Council, etal in their lawsuit that was filed by the GOP lawmakers in Alaska Superior Court this week.
2: Who will pay for that legal representative for the above… the taxpayers? And does the Legislative Council have the authority to allocate funding for that?
3: Will the Superior Court put a halt to the legislative investigation?
4: Will the Personnel Board choose to throw out both Palin’s and PSEA/John Cyr’s ethics complaints? Or appoint an investigator?
Now *that’s* news….
Print This Post


Trackbacks
25 comments so far
Leave a reply
If you find your posts being held for moderation, sign up at OpenID and login using that. This will avoid moderation.