Democrats Rewriting History Once More

Loading

Funny how these Democrats blame Bush for the Fannie Mae crisis: (h/t Hot Air)

“The turmoil on Wall Street is further evidence that Republican economic policies have failed. During eight years of control in Washington, Republicans put in to practice their belief that markets should be allowed unfettered freedom and drastically weakened oversight,” House Majority Leader Steny Hoyer, D-Md., said in a statement.

“In the midst of a dire economic situation, President Bush this morning characterized recent market developments as an ‘adjustment’ that can be painful for investors and employees of the firms, while Senator McCain said the ‘fundamentals of our economy are strong,'” Pelosi said. “President Bush, Senator McCain, and their Republican Party are out of touch and apparently ill-equipped to get our economy back on track.”

“I certainly don’t fault Senator McCain for these problems, but I do fault the economic philosophy he subscribes to,” Obama said, adding, “It’s a philosophy we’ve had for the last eight years – one that says we should give more and more to those with the most and hope that prosperity trickles down to everyone else.”

But there is one teeny itty bitty bit of information they are all forgetting. From September 11, 2003:

The Bush administration today recommended the most significant regulatory overhaul in the housing finance industry since the savings and loan crisis a decade ago.

Under the plan, disclosed at a Congressional hearing today, a new agency would be created within the Treasury Department to assume supervision of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, the government-sponsored companies that are the two largest players in the mortgage lending industry.

The new agency would have the authority, which now rests with Congress, to set one of the two capital-reserve requirements for the companies. It would exercise authority over any new lines of business. And it would determine whether the two are adequately managing the risks of their ballooning portfolios.

The plan is an acknowledgment by the administration that oversight of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac — which together have issued more than $1.5 trillion in outstanding debt — is broken. A report by outside investigators in July concluded that Freddie Mac manipulated its accounting to mislead investors, and critics have said Fannie Mae does not adequately hedge against rising interest rates.

So Bush understood the crisis was coming and tried to stop it at the pass. Who got in the way? The Democrats:

Among the groups denouncing the proposal today were the National Association of Home Builders and Congressional Democrats who fear that tighter regulation of the companies could sharply reduce their commitment to financing low-income and affordable housing.

”These two entities — Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac — are not facing any kind of financial crisis,” said Representative Barney Frank of Massachusetts, the ranking Democrat on the Financial Services Committee. ”The more people exaggerate these problems, the more pressure there is on these companies, the less we will see in terms of affordable housing.”

Representative Melvin L. Watt, Democrat of North Carolina, agreed.

”I don’t see much other than a shell game going on here, moving something from one agency to another and in the process weakening the bargaining power of poorer families and their ability to get affordable housing,” Mr. Watt said.

But now they want to blame it all on Bush. Just like they will most surely do when Social Security goes belly up. He tried, but they forced it to fail and now they reap the whirlwind.

IBD gives us another history lesson:

But it was the Clinton administration, obsessed with multiculturalism, that dictated where mortgage lenders could lend, and originally helped create the market for the high-risk subprime loans now infecting like a retrovirus the balance sheets of many of Wall Street’s most revered institutions.

Tough new regulations forced lenders into high-risk areas where they had no choice but to lower lending standards to make the loans that sound business practices had previously guarded against making. It was either that or face stiff government penalties.

The untold story in this whole national crisis is that President Clinton put on steroids the Community Redevelopment Act, a well-intended Carter-era law designed to encourage minority homeownership. And in so doing, he helped create the market for the risky subprime loans that he and Democrats now decry as not only greedy but “predatory.”

Yes, the market was fueled by greed and overleveraging in the secondary market for subprimes, vis-a-vis mortgaged-backed securities traded on Wall Street. But the seed was planted in the ’90s by Clinton and his social engineers. They were the political catalyst behind this slow-motion financial train wreck.

And it was the Clinton administration that mismanaged the quasi-governmental agencies that over the decades have come to manage the real estate market in America.

Democrats, trying to rewrite history once again.

0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
24 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

This is a company [Lehman Brothers] which had on its board, or so we are told, the ultimate snake oil salesman, James Hansen, the self-same company having ambitions of becoming “the primary brokerage for emission permits”.

Somehow, it is entirely fitting that a company which was looking to exploit the smoke and mirrors business of carbon trading should crash and burn.

Lehman Brothers .. died because of AGW .. who knew ?

Are government employees allowed to sit on private sector boards ?

Unfortunately the Democrats will get away with blaming Bush and the Republicans because the media won’t tell the true story.

I wish Bush had fought back when the Democrats blocked him on issues like Fred and Fannie as well as medicare, Social Security. Instead he just let these issues drop when the Democrats started screaming.

I can’t fault Bush too much since we had the majority in both houses but the piss poor leadership in the Senate and House just went along to get along. They let the Democrats mug them at every turn and now we have a mess that could take years to clean up.

Chuck

it would be nice if a few, or any of our TV commentators remembered their courses in Am Govt or Finance.Regulatory agencies all are creatures of congress , not the executive branch.The Pres can only suggest or recommend, and appoint Boards subject to Congressional approval.Comments on the Fed srole are also inane. The Fed was created to assure that there is liquidity in the financial system.They have to use the most efficient system of doing this.A bridge loan for example thru the commercial banks is not a bailout, it is the Fed doing the job they were created to do.If all of the participants were not so frightened that they would do something constructive but blasted by the MSM the problem would be solved fairly quickly.

Barack Insane Obama is a repugnant stench.

Down with Obama. Long live America and American values.

http://www.nextgenerationcorp.com/NextGenBlog/?p=32

http://www.nextgenerationcorp.com/NextGenBlog/?p=43

Curt’s excerpt from the 9-11-03 NYTs

The plan is an acknowledgment by the administration that oversight of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac — which together have issued more than $1.5 trillion in outstanding debt — is broken.

There’s quite the irony, since Fannie and Freddie, both GSEs (government sponsored enterprises) were created by none other than Congress themselves.

Fannie was started in 1938, and was privatized by LBJ in 1969 due to the financial pressures of the Vietnam War. It originally operated like a savings & loan, leading to the development of what we call the secondary mortgage market (where banks sell their loan notes to, wholesale)

Freddie was started in 1970, after the privatization of Fannie and to stop their monopoly. Because they are GSEs (altho privately run), they are required to give public notice when they are in financial trouble.

So it’s ironic that the Congressional creations are the ones that apparently lack the oversight…

However there is ample blame to go around. ACORN and other minority rights organization regularly lobbied Congress to stop what was perceived as discrimination in lending practices. Started under Clinton, as Curt points out, and carried on thru to now. Thus the easy money for high risk lenders, which started the snowball rolling down hill.

Add to that, people refi’ing their homes and spending their equity on anything BUT home improvement. Dangerous because it depends upon the value of the home steadily increasing, while depreciating in condition.

So it’s fast easy lending, combined with out of control buyers and sellers, managing their equity poorly.

Now I have a lot of faith in the housing market. It is a basic necessity… everyone needs a place to live. The new construction industry has been hit the worst. However even existing homes sales are experiencing the snafus now. Lending criteria, under constant threat from Congress to be regulated, has tightened up unbelievably. Underwriters are asking for outrageous demands last minute before allowing docs to be drawn for closing.

Unfortunately, while they are doing this in self defense, the tighter they are on money, the worse the problem will get. I suspect a bumpy winter, and hopefully some getting back on track in spring.

And the falling prices? It’s a market correction. The prices were driven up to outrageous levels because the low rates allowed buyers to finance more. So sellers and agents were asking more… doubling and tripling normal annual equity. This couldn’t last or no one would be able to afford a house in a couple of years, as income was not rising in a parallel measure.

Thus the 15-20% devaluing from last year is just bringing the home’s value what what it would have been had the last two years appreciation boom never happened. Run some numbers yourself on your own homes. Take your value pre-boom, say three (make that four) years ago. Add your normal annual appreciation for the next two to three years…(area dependent, but generally ranging from 3-6% in rural areas, and 7-12% in urban areas). Then compare that to what is 15%-20% below the “boom” value.

i.e. avg home in Portland west side was worth $464K in Aug 2004. By Aug 2006, it leaped to $656K… $192K equity increase over two years is not sustainable, nor realistic equity.

Using a top high average of approx 10% annual appreciation on the original $464K pre-boom price, and in 2006 it should have been $561,500 approx. By today that value with 10% annual appreciation should be worth $679,500. And ya know what? The average sales price in the area is $719K in Aug 2008. Even with the “crash”, the place is still worth more than the average annual equity ever supported. The prices could still come down to $650K, and that home would still have ample yearly increase in value that is desireable.

Yep… bring the prices of homes down to reality again. Keep the rates low, and don’t shut out the buyers with too strict of criteria. It may take them a while to figure this out, but they’ll get there.

Mata,

Have you seen the list of people who benefited from political donations from Fannie and Freddie?

Quite telling.

Dodd, Christopher J $165,400
Obama, Barack $126,349
Kerry, John $111,000

Doesn’t surprise me, Aye Chi. When they talk about the big revenue industries, oil is third, following medical/pharmaceuticals and banking/investment. Both those industries tend to send most their cash to the Dems.

However it goes to show how effective media propaganda is. They’ve demonized the oil/GOP relationships, and ignored the pharmaceutical and banking/Dem relationships.

But I’m sure you’ll find several GOPer in that list as well. Congressional corruption is quite bipartisan…

Yes, there are definitely some R’s in the list.

The top three are the ones that I listed.

Ironically (or not) number two is running for President.

I sent this link to foxnews, who knows maybe they will get thier heads out of the clouds and do some reporting

now go shopping people!

316christianstore.biz

The strangest thing about Fannie and Freddie is the presence of politicos with little or no banking experience at the helm… over and over and over. Yet you won’t ever see a 20/20 special report, or see congressional hearings, or any of the rest of it.

Republicans on the Hill really floundered. I still can’t quite figure out what they were doing, if anything. They had a chance to really fight for movement in the right direction, yet they just kind of worried about reelections and smiled a lot. The Dem’s seem to be in similar straits now, although their leadership is heavy-handedly using procedure to stymie everything they don’t want to address.

We need to pump up the freshmen Republicans, the guys behind the #dontgo movement during the last recess, get them into a crusade mindset and with enough support get the federal gov’t back on track.

I think it’s time for another revolution, folks. Let’s roll back to the original Constitution plus ratified amendments. Reverse all stupid court decisions that are demonstrably UNConstitutional and throw ALL the bums out. We start from scratch. Then we put term limits on the Congress…2 for Senators and 6 for Congressmen. We put term limits on the Supreme Court…say 20 years and get the hell out. No one named Bush or Clinton is allowed to run for president. We have Nuremberg-type trials for all the democRATS who committed treason during the war. We find the scumbags in the State Dept. and the CIA who told the NY Slimes about the SWIFT banking program, the NSA wiretapping, etc., and put them on trial for treason. Pelosi, Hussein and others get put on trial for violating the Logan Act…it’s high time SOMEBODY was prosecuted under that law. And, finally, we let all liberals move to Canada or Mexico where they can try to shove Marxism down the throats of more willing subjects. Any liberal who stays behind doesn’t get to vote for 15 years. We take the schools back, teaching real history, real science, real math and real English. If a kid flunks, he stays behind. Employers must not discriminate against job applicants because they don’t have a college degree. I have met a lot of people without a degree who can run circles around today’s college grads.

Finally, George Soros is sent packing to Hungary without his ill-gotten gains to live in a gypsy camp with Barbara Streisand and Rosie O’Donnell. The only music they are allowed to listen to is Lynard Skynard with the amps cranked to 11.

Any other suggestions, gang?

“And, finally, we let all liberals move to CANADA or Mexico where they can try to shove Marxism down the throats of more willing subjects.”

OUCH! Jarhead68. Thanks, but no thanks. Here, in the province of Quebec, we have enough of those, we do not need more. I used to blog with these lefties and sort of got fed-up with them. A bunch of insulting idiots. I am so glad I have found the Flopping Aces blog, what a difference. I just hope that my English writing will get easier for me, as times goes by, and that I will be able to express myself in a much better way.

NEO – #1

NICE CATCH!!!

“Are government employees allowed to sit on private sector boards ?” I didn’t think so, but… see my #9

Democrats Blocked Financial Reforms that McCain and GOP Proposed in 2005!*

You guys are all brainwashed. control by a politburo is always an attempt to consolidate power and control, much like the federal reserve system. Please don’t put people into nonsensical monolithic spheres like liberal or conservative. The fact is, the current financial crisis has been going on since the days of reagan, and we have simply been bandaging it, thus the ballooning surplus. America needs to contract and you guys need some knowledge or real life experience.

Great post, thanks for the info