Obama on his abortion votes:

…I hate to say that people are lying, but here’s a situation where folks are lying. I have said repeatedly that I would have been completely in, fully in support of the federal bill that everybody supported — which was to say — that you should provide assistance to any infant that was born – even if it was as a consequence of an induced abortion. That was not the bill that was presented at the state level. What that bill also was doing was trying to undermine Roe vs. Wade.

But David Freddoso, author of the book “The Case Against Barack Obama: The Unlikely Rise and Unexamined Agenda of the Media’s Favorite Candidate” proves Obama is outright lying once again:

Sen. Obama is currently misleading people about what he voted against, specifically claiming that the bill he voted against in his committee lacked “neutrality” language on Roe v. Wade. The bill did contain this language. He even participated in the unanimous vote to put it in.

Obama’s work against bill to protect premature babies represents one of two times in his political career, along with his speech against the Iraq war, that he really stuck out his neck for something that might hurt him politically. Unlike his Iraq speech, Obama is deeply embarrassed about this one — so embarrassed that he is offering a demonstrable falsehood in explanation for his actions. Fortunately, the documents showing the truth are now available.

At the end of last week, Obama gave an interview to CBN’s David Brody in which he repeated the false claim that the born-alive bills he worked, spoke, and voted against on this topic between 2001 and 2003 would have negatively affected Roe v. Wade. This has always been untrue, but, until last week, it appeared to be a debatable point that depended on one’s interpretation of the bill language. Every single version of the bill was neutral on Roe. Each one affected only babies already born, not ones in the womb.

But in 2003, in the health committee which he chaired, Obama voted against a version of the bill that contained the specific “neutrality” language — redundant language affirming that the bill only applied to infants already born and granted no rights to the unborn. You can visit the Illinois legislature’s website here to see the language of the “Senate Amendment 1,” which was added in a unanimous 10-0 vote in the committee before Obama helped kill it. This is the so-called “neutrality clause” on Roe that everyone is talking about

Of course this is all above his pay grade.

What an embarrassment. During the most important job interview in his whole life he tells the country that the answer to when life begins is above his paygrade…..Not only that, he spins the votes he made in the past and then, the uh’s…..oh the uhs

Obama: Uh, I…, Uhhhhh, ……ah, I…., uh, I, uh………….

McCain: Yes, Yes, No, Yes.

Sigh….

When KOS stories appear like this one you know your guy is going down in flames.

Steller candidate you Dem’s picked out. Just steller.

  • Share/Bookmark
Print This Post Print This Post
This entry was posted on Sunday, August 17th, 2008 at 11:32 am and is filed under Barack Obama. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

Trackbacks

  1. Top 10 reasons Obama voted against the Illinois Born Alive Infant Protection Act : BigMouthFrog
  2. Papa Mike’s Blog » Blog Archive » Obama Spins ( LIES ) On Abortion Votes and Lets Not Forget The Uh’s
  3. It IS in Obama’s “pay grade” to answer the question. SB1082! « The Sadim Touch

3 comments so far

Leave a reply

Name (*)
Mail (will not be published) (*)
URI
Comment

If your comments get caught in spam a lot please log into your registered account before trying to comment again. You can email me if your comment is caught in spam

 

Identity Verification: If you wish to verify your commenter identity, so no one can steal it, click the below button: