Comments on: Democrats Take Bush Position On Russian Invasion

By: yonason

yonason — Wed, 13 Aug 2008 17:39:42 +0000

It’s all about perception with them, not reality.

They have to see themselves as being better than everyone else, especially the ‘little people’ (voters without whom they would be nothing). They also need the general populace to think of them as morally superior, which they attempt by espousing the causes they perceive as being popular, but for which they have no real understanding of or interest in, except to use in furthering their sleazy agenda behind closed doors.

By: Mike's America

Mike's America — Wed, 13 Aug 2008 17:14:56 +0000

That was good Yonason. Funny how the cut and run crowd were all for going into Iraq when it was the popular thing to do.

I recommend the video to anyone who needs proof about how two faced Democrats are on this issue:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6nF02z_9S50&eurl=http://www.sondrak.com/index.php/weblog/todays_wedgie26/

The dynamite comes in the last ten seconds, so hold on.

By: yonason

yonason — Wed, 13 Aug 2008 17:01:06 +0000

THERE ARE LIARS, DAMN LIARS, ...AND THEN THERE ARE DEMOCRATS So, the Dems take the same position as the Reps, do they? Oh, Ree Hee Heeely???!!! Where have I heard THAT Before? BUSTED! They will say anything to get elected, then attempt to ram through their Leftist agenda that no sane person wants, and no one at all needs. (You Tube link for the same video as above) _______________________________________________________ "whadaya want…video proof?" (of Russian aggression) -- F.A. "Who ya gonna believe, me, or your lyin eyes?" -- Stoner, Gnoebles, WD-40, in 3-part disharmony.

By: Stop US Wars » Blog Archive » Democrats Take Bush Position On Russian Invasion

Wed, 13 Aug 2008 16:55:10 +0000

[...] Bill Corcoran wrote an interesting post today onHere’s a quick excerptBecause their opposition to war isn’t to “war” (if that were the case, then they’d protest all wars). Their protests are only against the invasion of Iraq which took place five years ago, and the only reason they protest that is because … [...]

By: Scott

Scott — Wed, 13 Aug 2008 16:16:36 +0000

Many, but not all. Leaders-absolutely. Followers…fewer and fewer in direct correlation to their level of activeness imo.

By: Mike's America

Mike's America — Wed, 13 Aug 2008 16:12:53 +0000

“Put more simply, if the Democratic Party doesn’t protest it, then there’s no reason to protest, and the only reasoning there can be is that protesting war was never sincere-just their way of being tools and pawns for a political party seeking power.”

But don’t forget that many of these “peace” activists owe allegiance to political movements beyond the borders of the United States and only follow the Democrat Party line when it coincides with their world socialist agenda. Of course many Democrats also support world socialism (or communism lite) so they usually are on the same page.