Joe Scarborough Breaks Through and Proves Liberal Media Slants

Americans need to open their eyes, and see which side is selling the worst used cars.

Americans need to stop looking at everything as “sides”. It’s the us versus them mentality that’s the real problem.

The slant from The Daily Show is obvious and I don’t believe they’ve ever even tried to hide it. But Scarborough is completely wrong about them “never speaking truth to power” when it come to Democrats. Anyone who believes that doesn’t watch the show very often. Balanced? No. 100% one sided? No to that too.

Check out this NY Times piece:

July 15, 2008
Want Obama in a Punch Line? First, Find a Joke
By BILL CARTER
What’s so funny about Barack Obama? Apparently not very much, at least not yet.

On Monday, The New Yorker magazine tried dipping its toe into broad satire involving Senator Obama with a cover image depicting the presumptive Democratic presidential nominee and his wife, Michelle, as fist-bumping, flag-burning, bin Laden-loving terrorists in the Oval Office. The response from both Democrats and Republicans was explosive.

Comedy has been no easier for the phalanx of late-night television hosts who depend on skewering political leaders for a healthy quotient of their nightly monologues. Jay Leno, David Letterman, Conan O’Brien and others have delivered a nightly stream of jokes about the Republican running for president — each one a variant on the same theme: John McCain is old.

But there has been little humor about Mr. Obama: about his age, his speaking ability, his intelligence, his family, his physique. And within a late-night landscape dominated by white hosts, white writers, and overwhelmingly white audiences, there has been almost none about his race.

“We’re doing jokes about people in his orbit, not really about him,” said Mike Sweeney, the head writer for Mr. O’Brien on “Late Night.” The jokes will come, representatives of the late-night shows said, when Mr. Obama does or says something that defines him — in comedy terms.

“We’re carrion birds,” said Jon Stewart, host of “The Daily Show” on the Comedy Central channel. “We’re sitting up there saying ‘Does he seem weak? Is he dehydrated yet? Let’s attack.’ ”

But so far, no true punch lines have landed.

Why? The reason cited by most of those involved in the shows is that a fundamental factor is so far missing in Mr. Obama: There is no comedic “take” on him, nothing easy to turn to for an easy laugh, like allegations of Bill Clinton’s womanizing, or President Bush’s goofy bumbling or Al Gore’s robotic persona.

“The thing is, he’s not buffoonish in any way,” said Mike Barry, who started writing political jokes for Johnny Carson’s monologues in the waning days of the Johnson administration and has lambasted every presidential candidate since, most recently for Mr. Letterman. “He’s not a comical figure,” Mr. Barry said.

Jokes have been made about what Senator Hillary Rodham Clinton really thought about Mr. Obama during the primaries, and about the vulgar comments the Rev. Jesse Jackson made about him last week. But anything approaching a joke about Mr. Obama himself has fallen flat.

When Mr. Stewart on “The Daily Show” recently tried to joke about Mr. Obama changing his position on campaign financing, for instance, he met with such obvious resistance from the audience, he said, “You know, you’re allowed to laugh at him.” Mr. Stewart said in a telephone interview on Monday, “People have a tendency to react as far as their ideology allows them.”

Despite audience resistance, Mr. Stewart contended, his show had been able to develop a distinctive angle on Mr. Obama.

Noting that the senator seems to emphasize the historic nature of his quest, Mr. Stewart said, “So far, our take is that he’s positioning himself to be on a coin.”

There is no doubt, several representatives of the late-night shows said, that so far their audiences (and at least some of the shows’ writers) seem to be favorably disposed toward Mr. Obama, to a degree that perhaps leaves them more resistant to jokes about him than those about most previous candidates.

“A lot of people are excited about his candidacy,” Mr. Sweeney said. “It’s almost like: ‘Hey, don’t go after this guy. He’s a fresh face; cut him some slack.’ ”

Justin Stangel, who is a head writer for “Late Show With David Letterman,” disputed that, saying, “We always have to make jokes about everybody. We’re not trying to lay off the new guy.”

But Mr. Barry said, “I think some of us were maybe too quick to caricature Al Gore and John Kerry and there’s maybe some reluctance to do the same thing to him.”

Of course, the question of race is also mentioned as one reason Mr. Obama has proved to be so elusive a target for satire.

“Anything that has even a whiff of being racist, no one is going to laugh,” said Rob Burnett, an executive producer for Mr. Letterman. “The audience is not going to allow anyone to do that.”

The New Yorker faced a different kind of hostility with its cover this week, which the Obama campaign criticized harshly. A campaign spokesman, Bill Burton, said in a statement that “most readers will see it as tasteless and offensive — and we agree.”

Asked about the cover at a news conference Monday, Mr. McCain said he thought it was “totally inappropriate, and frankly I understand if Senator Obama and his supporters would find it offensive.”

The cover was drawn by Barry Blitt, who also contributes illustrations to The New York Times’s Op-Ed page. David Remnick, the editor of The New Yorker, said in an e-mail message, “The cover takes a lot of distortions, lies, and misconceptions about the Obamas and puts a mirror up to them to show them for what they are.

“It’s a lot like the spirit of what Stephen Colbert does — by exaggerating and mocking something, he shows its absurdity, and that is what satire is all about,” Mr. Remnick continued.

Mr. Colbert said in a telephone interview that a running joke on his show has been that Mr. Obama is a “secret Muslim”; the New Yorker cover, he said, was consistent with that. “It’s a completely valid satirical point to make — and it’s perfectly valid for Obama not to like it,” he said.

Mr. Colbert said he had been freer to poke fun at Mr. Obama than other late-night hosts because “my character on the show doesn’t like him. I’m expected to be hostile to him.”

Mr. Stewart, who is also an executive producer of “The Colbert Report,” said the Obama campaign’s reaction to the New Yorker cover seemed part of what is now almost a pro forma cycle in political campaigns. “Nothing can occur without the candidate responding,” he said.

Bill Maher, who is host of a politically oriented late-night show on HBO, said, “If you can’t do irony on the cover of The New Yorker, where can you do it?”

One issue that clearly has some impact on writing jokes about Mr. Obama is a consistency among the big late-night shows. Not only are all the hosts white, the vast majority of their audiences are white. “I think white audiences get a little self-conscious if race comes up,” Mr. Sweeney of Mr. O’Brien’s show said.

Things might be somewhat different if even one late-night host was black. Black comics are not having any trouble joking about Mr. Obama, said David Alan Grier, a comedian who, starting in October, will have a satirical news magazine show on Comedy Central, “Chocolate News.”

“I tell jokes on stage about him,” Mr. Grier said, reciting a few that would not ever get onto a network late-night show (nor into this newspaper).

But he said of the late-night hosts, “Those guys really can’t go there. It’s just like the gay comic can do gay material. It comes with the territory.” Still, he said, he has no sympathy for the hosts. “No way. They’ve had 200 years of presidential jokes. It’s our time.”

Jimmy Kimmel, the host of the ABC late-night talk show “Jimmy Kimmel Live,” said of Mr. Obama, “There’s a weird reverse racism going on. You can’t joke about him because he’s half-white. It’s silly. I think it’s more a problem because he’s so polished, he doesn’t seem to have any flaws.”

Mr. Maher said that being sensitive to Mr. Obama was in no way interfering with his commentary, though on HBO he has more freedom about content than other comedians. “There’s been this question about whether he’s black enough,” Mr. Maher said. “I have this joke: What does he have to do? Dunk? He bowled a 37 — to me, that’s black enough.”

Mr. Kimmel said, “His ears should be the focus of the jokes.”

Mostly the late-night shows seem to be in a similar position.

Mr. Burnett of the Letterman show said, “We can’t manufacture a perception. If the perception isn’t true, no one will laugh at it.”

Mr. Sweeney said, “We’re hoping he picks an idiot as vice president.”

What bias? Where? Obama’s a seriously dignified, cerebral candidate with nothing to poke fun at. He never makes gaffs. That’s all. No bias.

These guys reveal the same lack of self-knowledge that jounalists have, when they claim they are non-partisan and non-biased in their reporting.

Harwood and the NYT (which endorsed McCain, but is a grossly left-leaning source).

Wasn’t that merely a primary election endorsement, with them also endorsing Hillary for the Dems?

Joe Scarborough, whom BTW I like, tried to make a joke about Obama and it was hopelessly sophomoric. For at least two days running, he would run the video of BHO rollling gutter balls over and over again and accompany it with a high-pitched girlish “Whe-e-e.” Give the Daily Show a chance; they’ll get to Obama.

BTW, what happened to that conservative answer to the Daily Show Fox was working on? Guess they decided their comedy roster was already full with O’Reilly and Hannity.

Krauthammer thinks Obama is narcissistic. That’s rich coming from one of the world’s most pompous men.

Somebody should tell Krauthammer it’s already been announced he’s giving his Berlin speech in a different location…

Ya know, Fit… I thought it was odd you said that as I read the Krauthammer piece last night, if I remember rightly. Today was kinda a blur… But what I read was in the Investment Business Daily. That was titled “Obama hasn’t earned a place at Berlin Gate”. He mentioned in that one that the Germans were diplomatically steering him elsewhere.

Lo… behold. The Townhall piece Wordsmith linked isn’t the same. But has today’s date on it. The IBD piece seems to be more up to date, despite the previous dateline. You may enjoy that read more. He’s really in fine form on that one.

In the 7th paragraph of the IBD article

Does Obama not see the incongruity? It’s as if a German pol took a campaign trip to America and demanded the Statue of Liberty as a venue for a campaign speech. (The Germans have now gently nudged Obama into looking at other venues.)

Add me to those that agree with you on the quit-with-the-sides bit. Then again, that’s why BHO and his different classes of constituents gets on my nerves.

ROFLMAO…calling Fox News right wing slanted is a joke in itself. People who see it as a biased network are coming at it from the left so, naturally, they think it’s right wing. It’s the same perspective as Stalin calling Hitler and Mussolini right wing when, actually, they were both socialists. Fox IS balanced. No other network has as many opposing points of view on their talk shows. ALL of the FOX news analysis talk shows have more liberals as guests than any of the other networks have conservatives as guests. I watch them all and it’s frustrating to watch the MSM try to stack the deck against conservatives. The reason they do it is because liberals can’t win in the battle of ideas, as Rush likes to say. And have any of you libs seen the report that said that the Fox News employees contribute more to the democRats than to Republicans? Guess you missed that one, huh?

BTW, libs, how’s the “War on Poverty” working out for America? What’s the timetable for withdrawal? How many benchmarks have been met? How many billions, or is it trillions, are we spending on that never-ending war?