<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Tabloid Paper &#8220;McClatchy&#8221; Going Down, Down, Down&#8230;..</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.floppingaces.net/2008/07/01/tabloid-paper-mcclatchy-going-down-down-down/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.floppingaces.net/2008/07/01/tabloid-paper-mcclatchy-going-down-down-down/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 22 Mar 2010 15:25:27 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: stix1972</title>
		<link>http://www.floppingaces.net/2008/07/01/tabloid-paper-mcclatchy-going-down-down-down/#comment-92944</link>
		<dc:creator>stix1972</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jul 2008 22:51:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.floppingaces.net/?p=5754#comment-92944</guid>
		<description>It is a rag that bought out our local newspaper and I have not read it since</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is a rag that bought out our local newspaper and I have not read it since</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Harry Bergeron</title>
		<link>http://www.floppingaces.net/2008/07/01/tabloid-paper-mcclatchy-going-down-down-down/#comment-92801</link>
		<dc:creator>Harry Bergeron</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jul 2008 17:13:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.floppingaces.net/?p=5754#comment-92801</guid>
		<description>&quot;Tabloid&quot; is a strong word for their flagship, the Sacramento Bee, a very influential paper in CA.

All the pols read it, all the other CA rags quote it. They take it quite seriously.

I reckon the management is not nearly as Left as the editorial staff, but is paying the price, which shows the danger of letting the inmates run the asylum.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Tabloid&#8221; is a strong word for their flagship, the Sacramento Bee, a very influential paper in CA.</p>
<p>All the pols read it, all the other CA rags quote it. They take it quite seriously.</p>
<p>I reckon the management is not nearly as Left as the editorial staff, but is paying the price, which shows the danger of letting the inmates run the asylum.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bbartlog</title>
		<link>http://www.floppingaces.net/2008/07/01/tabloid-paper-mcclatchy-going-down-down-down/#comment-92249</link>
		<dc:creator>bbartlog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Jul 2008 13:11:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.floppingaces.net/?p=5754#comment-92249</guid>
		<description>I like the 5-year graph of the stock&#039;s performance even better.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like the 5-year graph of the stock&#8217;s performance even better.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott Malensek</title>
		<link>http://www.floppingaces.net/2008/07/01/tabloid-paper-mcclatchy-going-down-down-down/#comment-92217</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott Malensek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Jul 2008 11:20:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.floppingaces.net/?p=5754#comment-92217</guid>
		<description>NYT, LAT, WP, AP, Reuters, NBC/MSNBC, none of them have compared to the outright lies about the war in Iraq that the McLatchy line has latched on to.  At MSNBC, the decision was deliberately made to appeal to a demographic that though small, was fervent, active, and not swooned to; ie the far left political demographic.  It seems McLatchy tried the same tact, but lost.  MSNBC is floundering and now with Tim Russert passed they had to resurrect Tom Brokaw just to try and give the appearance of actual reporting instead of propagandizing via Special Comments and propagand punditry.  Newspaper revenue is collapsing as well, and there&#039;s been continuing talk of selling the NYT.  

Americans want to see and hear about heroes, and about good things.  There&#039;s no shortage of bad, and we want/need to see it reported as well, but not dwelled on.  Not when the country is so filled with good stories that deserve to be told.  They say a house that doesn&#039;t burn doesn&#039;t get reported, but I say, when a house burns it should be reported, and the firefighters tales of heroism should lead the report.  Some outlets just don&#039;t get that.

...and so they fade away.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>NYT, LAT, WP, AP, Reuters, NBC/MSNBC, none of them have compared to the outright lies about the war in Iraq that the McLatchy line has latched on to.  At MSNBC, the decision was deliberately made to appeal to a demographic that though small, was fervent, active, and not swooned to; ie the far left political demographic.  It seems McLatchy tried the same tact, but lost.  MSNBC is floundering and now with Tim Russert passed they had to resurrect Tom Brokaw just to try and give the appearance of actual reporting instead of propagandizing via Special Comments and propagand punditry.  Newspaper revenue is collapsing as well, and there&#8217;s been continuing talk of selling the NYT.  </p>
<p>Americans want to see and hear about heroes, and about good things.  There&#8217;s no shortage of bad, and we want/need to see it reported as well, but not dwelled on.  Not when the country is so filled with good stories that deserve to be told.  They say a house that doesn&#8217;t burn doesn&#8217;t get reported, but I say, when a house burns it should be reported, and the firefighters tales of heroism should lead the report.  Some outlets just don&#8217;t get that.</p>
<p>&#8230;and so they fade away.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
