It’s always been a laugh for me to see the “peace” demonstrators found their protests in violence - both on person and property.

If you have access to those mailing list “incitement” posts, they’d make a great regular contribution appearing here as well. Nothing like showing “their innards” to give accurate portrayal of those who suck up sidewalk space with regularity.

But after reading LAVA, I have to wonder if Iraq is their only beef. They sniff of a very strong Marxist agenda. Fine if they choose that in their small and willing “collective”. But have they made public intents to thrust this on the nation as a whole? Or are they confining it to their little commune?

The leadership of the CCPM and VFP have been for months writing newsletters to their groupies with statements that easily fit the criteria for ‘inciting violence’. In newsletters and in articles in the Daily Local, Karen Porter has been making blanket statements alluding to our violent and agressive behavior.

This tactic has a way to bring fear and animosity to her groupies and anger to the patriotic members of the Victory Movement. She had hoped our anger would spill over into violence, so she could claim that her statements about us were true.

This tactic horribly backfired on her when two of her members were arrested on March 222, 2008, one being charged with simple and aggravated assault of my person.

So much for the ‘peaceful’ intentions of the peaceful folk.

I doth have to laugh how they freely passed the rumour of expecting “contention” from you guys. Rather like the liberal/progressive media and their Congressional apes promising a Bush war on Iran, while the WH talks only of int’l diplomacy.

But it’s an old, over used tactic… incite apprehension and action by predicting (erroneously) violent misbehavior by the other side. Obviously you all were a major disappointment by not emulating the so many traditional “peaceful” liberal rallies with property destruction and rioting.

I have fixed the link to Phillhy IMC. Thank you for you kind words - it is my pleasure to document the free expression of our First Amendment rights.

Although, it does twist the knickers of those to left of this rally…

That Bones article isn’t important past the headline. It establishes her as one of the CCPM’s partners in the protest and subject to the peac treaty.

The second link establishes that Porter reached out to the IMC types for help Flag Day and indeed several of the Philly IMC types showed up. Mainly other V V A W pukes and one wacko in a “Wobblie” (IWW) shirt.

I kid passing motorists that the other side of the street is a time warp. On our side it’s 2008, on their side it’s ‘68.

But dang, the Wobblies go back to early last century.

To give you a smile, the link to Sarah Bones’ article came up with a internet security warning for my system:

security certificate presented by this website was not issued by a trusted certificate authority

The security certificate presented by this website has expired or is not yet valid.
The security certificate presented by this website was issued for a different website’s address.

Security certificate problems may indicate an attempt to fool you or intercept any data you send to the server

How priceless…. LOL Needless to say, I weighed my desire to read Bones’ bones of contention vs potential security risks, and just moved on instead.