<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A Few New Political Ads - McCain &#038; Energy, Obama &#038; Abortion</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.floppingaces.net/2008/06/27/a-few-new-political-ads-mccain-energy-obama-abortion/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.floppingaces.net/2008/06/27/a-few-new-political-ads-mccain-energy-obama-abortion/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2008 12:28:54 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: MataHarley</title>
		<link>http://www.floppingaces.net/2008/06/27/a-few-new-political-ads-mccain-energy-obama-abortion/#comment-90983</link>
		<dc:creator>MataHarley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Jun 2008 01:02:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.floppingaces.net/?p=5703#comment-90983</guid>
		<description>Arthurstone, evidently you don't have a clue as to how much of the national debt is coming from military defense, do ya?

Can you say drop in the bucket?  Probably not...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Arthurstone, evidently you don&#8217;t have a clue as to how much of the national debt is coming from military defense, do ya?</p>
<p>Can you say drop in the bucket?  Probably not&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Skye</title>
		<link>http://www.floppingaces.net/2008/06/27/a-few-new-political-ads-mccain-energy-obama-abortion/#comment-90972</link>
		<dc:creator>Skye</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Jun 2008 00:24:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.floppingaces.net/?p=5703#comment-90972</guid>
		<description>I see stoner has bloviated:

We can well afford our successful peace missions - we cannot pursue the economics of illegal resident slave labor and the moral wrongness of breaking laws. 

We can invest in our own energy resources - Oil, Coal, Nuclear - instead of outsourcing them. Building on our robust economy and making us energy independent. 

Them conservatives have you terrified, Stoner?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I see stoner has bloviated:</p>
<p>We can well afford our successful peace missions - we cannot pursue the economics of illegal resident slave labor and the moral wrongness of breaking laws. </p>
<p>We can invest in our own energy resources - Oil, Coal, Nuclear - instead of outsourcing them. Building on our robust economy and making us energy independent. </p>
<p>Them conservatives have you terrified, Stoner?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Arthurstone</title>
		<link>http://www.floppingaces.net/2008/06/27/a-few-new-political-ads-mccain-energy-obama-abortion/#comment-90954</link>
		<dc:creator>Arthurstone</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Jun 2008 22:39:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.floppingaces.net/?p=5703#comment-90954</guid>
		<description>Skye complained:

How about building ‘The Fence’ first!!!




Them Mexcans really got you worried haven't they?

Be brave.

It could be so much worse. 

We could be dealing with a couple of wars overseas costing us tens of billions of dollars adding to a burgeoning nat'l debt. We could be dealing with a huge spike in energy costs. We could be dealing with a tanking economy.

Wait a minute...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Skye complained:</p>
<p>How about building ‘The Fence’ first!!!</p>
<p>Them Mexcans really got you worried haven&#8217;t they?</p>
<p>Be brave.</p>
<p>It could be so much worse. </p>
<p>We could be dealing with a couple of wars overseas costing us tens of billions of dollars adding to a burgeoning nat&#8217;l debt. We could be dealing with a huge spike in energy costs. We could be dealing with a tanking economy.</p>
<p>Wait a minute&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Skye</title>
		<link>http://www.floppingaces.net/2008/06/27/a-few-new-political-ads-mccain-energy-obama-abortion/#comment-90941</link>
		<dc:creator>Skye</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Jun 2008 22:24:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.floppingaces.net/?p=5703#comment-90941</guid>
		<description>Putting the Country first?

How about building 'The Fence' first!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Putting the Country first?</p>
<p>How about building &#8216;The Fence&#8217; first!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: D=S VIDEO DUMP</title>
		<link>http://www.floppingaces.net/2008/06/27/a-few-new-political-ads-mccain-energy-obama-abortion/#comment-90800</link>
		<dc:creator>D=S VIDEO DUMP</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Jun 2008 13:44:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.floppingaces.net/?p=5703#comment-90800</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Tony Perkins Asks Barack Obama: When Does Life Begin?...&lt;/strong&gt;

FRCAction President, Tony Perkins Asks Barack Obama: When Does Life Begin?
Curt at Flopping Aces made the remark that Obama had better get a teleprompter in front of him before he tries to answer that one, I mean, he says he&#8217;s a Harvard Law Profe...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Tony Perkins Asks Barack Obama: When Does Life Begin?&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>FRCAction President, Tony Perkins Asks Barack Obama: When Does Life Begin?<br />
Curt at Flopping Aces made the remark that Obama had better get a teleprompter in front of him before he tries to answer that one, I mean, he says he&#8217;s a Harvard Law Profe&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike's America</title>
		<link>http://www.floppingaces.net/2008/06/27/a-few-new-political-ads-mccain-energy-obama-abortion/#comment-90552</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike's America</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Jun 2008 01:27:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.floppingaces.net/?p=5703#comment-90552</guid>
		<description>If McCain is planning a bipartisan energy bill, it won't be comprehensive. Dems will just say NO, NO, NO and NOOOOO to everything we need to get  meaningful energy legislation.

When's McCain going to learn that Dems aren't interested in compromise or bipartisanship?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If McCain is planning a bipartisan energy bill, it won&#8217;t be comprehensive. Dems will just say NO, NO, NO and NOOOOO to everything we need to get  meaningful energy legislation.</p>
<p>When&#8217;s McCain going to learn that Dems aren&#8217;t interested in compromise or bipartisanship?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
