<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: ABC &#038; Washington Post Reporters Alter Obama Speech To Cover Gaffe [Reader Post]</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.floppingaces.net/2008/06/25/abc-washington-post-reporters-alter-obama-speech-to-cover-gaffe/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.floppingaces.net/2008/06/25/abc-washington-post-reporters-alter-obama-speech-to-cover-gaffe/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2009 01:36:18 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: fester</title>
		<link>http://www.floppingaces.net/2008/06/25/abc-washington-post-reporters-alter-obama-speech-to-cover-gaffe/comment-page-1/#comment-89620</link>
		<dc:creator>fester</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jun 2008 14:46:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.floppingaces.net/?p=5679#comment-89620</guid>
		<description>How can one interpret this any other way but to say Obama doesn't believe in American Ingenuity?  I know thyat this equates to a Rank-and-File democrat response to anything republican, but does anyone else see this statement oozing with an ideological nanny state? 
Scientists believe overwhelmingly that we are on the verge of battery power on the scale of 40 times more powerful than we currently enjoy.  Can you imagine what this would do to our oil dependency? This man of change won't cross the aisle to save this country, ever. Literally.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How can one interpret this any other way but to say Obama doesn&#8217;t believe in American Ingenuity?  I know thyat this equates to a Rank-and-File democrat response to anything republican, but does anyone else see this statement oozing with an ideological nanny state?<br />
Scientists believe overwhelmingly that we are on the verge of battery power on the scale of 40 times more powerful than we currently enjoy.  Can you imagine what this would do to our oil dependency? This man of change won&#8217;t cross the aisle to save this country, ever. Literally.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Formerly known as Skeptic</title>
		<link>http://www.floppingaces.net/2008/06/25/abc-washington-post-reporters-alter-obama-speech-to-cover-gaffe/comment-page-1/#comment-89614</link>
		<dc:creator>Formerly known as Skeptic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jun 2008 14:17:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.floppingaces.net/?p=5679#comment-89614</guid>
		<description>Not that I think it's right, but it is likely that the published reports are based on the speech as written, not as delivered.  I doubt 2 separate news agencies would change the wording (as opposed to just omitting any reference to it at all, THAT I believe they would do).  Never attribute to malice that which can be explained adequately by the laziness and unprofessionalism of our journalistic class.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not that I think it&#8217;s right, but it is likely that the published reports are based on the speech as written, not as delivered.  I doubt 2 separate news agencies would change the wording (as opposed to just omitting any reference to it at all, THAT I believe they would do).  Never attribute to malice that which can be explained adequately by the laziness and unprofessionalism of our journalistic class.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jainphx</title>
		<link>http://www.floppingaces.net/2008/06/25/abc-washington-post-reporters-alter-obama-speech-to-cover-gaffe/comment-page-1/#comment-89442</link>
		<dc:creator>jainphx</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jun 2008 03:17:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.floppingaces.net/?p=5679#comment-89442</guid>
		<description>Long ago when I was young, I remember all the coups that took place in South America. The First thing they did was take over the News Papers and radio Stations. The reason then is the same as now, to control the news. The MSM controls the news in two ways, report the news that is good for them and to suppress the news that wasn't. Does anyone see any difference in most of our MSM today.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Long ago when I was young, I remember all the coups that took place in South America. The First thing they did was take over the News Papers and radio Stations. The reason then is the same as now, to control the news. The MSM controls the news in two ways, report the news that is good for them and to suppress the news that wasn&#8217;t. Does anyone see any difference in most of our MSM today.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike's America</title>
		<link>http://www.floppingaces.net/2008/06/25/abc-washington-post-reporters-alter-obama-speech-to-cover-gaffe/comment-page-1/#comment-89434</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike's America</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jun 2008 02:58:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.floppingaces.net/?p=5679#comment-89434</guid>
		<description>McCain makes a gaffe and it's front page news. Obasma makes one and it gets hushed up... 

Is anyone surprised?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>McCain makes a gaffe and it&#8217;s front page news. Obasma makes one and it gets hushed up&#8230; </p>
<p>Is anyone surprised?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gregory Dittman</title>
		<link>http://www.floppingaces.net/2008/06/25/abc-washington-post-reporters-alter-obama-speech-to-cover-gaffe/comment-page-1/#comment-89433</link>
		<dc:creator>Gregory Dittman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jun 2008 02:56:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.floppingaces.net/?p=5679#comment-89433</guid>
		<description>Gee, How much money was involved in the space program to get a man into space compared to the X-Prize civilian tourism competition?  Even in today's dollars, the X-Prize was far cheaper.  The same goes with the AI competition vs SDI.  SDI cost the U.S. billions of dollars and it still couldn't tell the difference between balloons and real ICBM.  The AI vehicle competion cost the army $10 million and the vehicals can tell you if it's seeing grass or barbed wire and plot a course on their own.   Obama doesn't have a clue and don't expect anything to be produced if he is president.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gee, How much money was involved in the space program to get a man into space compared to the X-Prize civilian tourism competition?  Even in today&#8217;s dollars, the X-Prize was far cheaper.  The same goes with the AI competition vs SDI.  SDI cost the U.S. billions of dollars and it still couldn&#8217;t tell the difference between balloons and real ICBM.  The AI vehicle competion cost the army $10 million and the vehicals can tell you if it&#8217;s seeing grass or barbed wire and plot a course on their own.   Obama doesn&#8217;t have a clue and don&#8217;t expect anything to be produced if he is president.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
