Even Libya’s Qaddafi Knows Obama Lies

K’Daffy knows that Hussein O lies and he also knows he’s Muzzie and an Islamist. Smarter than anyone in the democrat party.

Oh my DW 5000,,,,
and I don’t say this lightly…
Are you retarded?????
Seriously.. how could you be that stupid….????

Righties applauding Qaddafi for mouthing Republican talking points? Strange bedfellows indeed.

Yeah, that would be the same Libya that voluntarily dropped their WMD program when our troops entered Baghdad.

However with Hamas, Chavez, Castro, American socialists and communists, black hardcore radicals, home grown US terrorists free as a bird, and other sundry scumbags actively talking up your guy, I wouldn’t be casting aspersions about “contagion”, DW.

Mike, you are using a terrorist as a reference to support a position. My position is that doing so is always, always wrong.

If saying that is spin, then I do not know what is NOT spin.

Aye Chi, I have no idea what you think I am wrong about either, but for furture reference I would typically not call someone a name that makes fun of birth defects. But I guess that somehow makes me wrong around here too.

I do not post comments here very often and for certain they typically run counter to the author of a post here, I admit being the contrarian. But dude, I am not going to call for support for any of my positions by using a murderer like Q as a source.

I am out of this one fellas, make sure and claim that I have a birth defect now. That is never inappropriate.

I predict the use of the word “retarded” or “retard” in 3, 2, 1 ……..

Too late. It was already whipped out upthread by one of your Righty fellow travelers. Proud indeed.

Oh, wait; I’m sure that there will now be some kind of back and fill that shows why it was okay for bigpapa to use it. My bad.

for furture reference I would typically not call someone a name that makes fun of birth defects.

~~~

make sure and claim that I have a birth defect now. That is never inappropriate .

Hmmm….

Really?

Are you sure?

Do I have you confused with someone else?

Or are you lying?

***

Oh, wait; I’m sure that there will now be some kind of back and fill that shows why it was okay for bigpapa to use it. My bad.

DW,

I worded my post the way that I did to intentionally elicit the “Oh! Not me” reaction.

Needless to say, I wasn’t disappointed.

Having been here for awhile I know that he has a difficult time constructing coherent thoughts without using that particular word or its variants.

Aye Chi, tell me why you are calling me a liar? I said that I typically would not call someone a birth defect. Where did I calim that I never did it? Are you claiming that I am a liar because I said that I would typically not use it? Have you deconstructed this discussion to a level of a syntax argument?

Aye Chi, tell me instead why you are in support of using a terrorist to support your position on an issue? Or just goad to illicit a specific response because you can not in good faith, claim that is a very good idea.

That would be great if you could do that instead.

that’s actually a funny reply chi…

but the fact remains that what is typical is not absolute. Therefore, your calling me a liar is the only untruth of either of our posts.

were you to prove that the times I used that word ( 5 times, three times as a reply to someone else using it ) were typical then you would be right. But since I have been coming here and commenting for years those times would clearly be atypical. And the fact remains despite your hours of research to uncover the times I used it uncovered a hand full of times.

That is not typical.

Incedentlly, if the nutroot comment was for me too it would not take you very long to find many, many more comments where I am in support of John McCain. I just never, ever use a known terrorist’s words to support my positions.

What a bunch of sanctimonious crap.

Thus spake Mike’s America. So mought it be.

CentFla,

I really am beginning to wonder what sort of cloud of cluelessness you live under.

Five times you say? Did you even click the links to see? Did you count them or is five just a nice round easy to type number for you?

Your total is far higher than that.

Thus your contention that the pattern is atypical is even more ridiculous.

If your use of that word was not typical of your posts then it never would have caught my attention and I invested less than 15 minutes of research to prove it.

Finally, I am well aware of your support of McCain.

Psst….

We’re talking about the total number of times you used the word that you “would typically not” use.

We’re not talking about the number of links. How is this still cloudy for you?

Do try and keep up.

Please tell me are you capable of counting the words?

Let me help. What you’re looking for is the atypical word “retard” or the atypical word “retarded”.

Hint: You’ll need all of your fingers and some of your toes, assuming of course that you have the normal number of each.

Now, off you go.

Sorry, I almost forgot this:

But the net sleuth will certainly find it if it exists, but I am pretty sure that he will tell you that I have never done that.

You can find out all sorts of interesting things with a simple Google search.

All sorts of things.

Ahh, I see. You are one of those “depends on what the word IS means”.

gottcha.

You obviously got lost somewhere along the way but that’s OK.

I accomplished what I set out to do.